The Ubiquitin Code in the Ubiquitin-Proteasome System and Autophagy

Trends in Biochemical Sciences

Volumn 42, Issue 11, 2017, Pages 873-886

  Kwon, Yong Tae ^a   Ciechanover, Aaron ^a,b  

^a Seoul National University   (South Korea)

^b TECHNION ISRAEL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Israel)

Author keywords

autophagy lysosome system; protein quality control; proteolysis; ubiquitin linkages; ubiquitination

Indexed keywords

ADENOSINE TRIPHOSPHATASE; BRCA1 PROTEIN; CYCLIN B1; HISTONE DEACETYLASE 6; I KAPPA B KINASE GAMMA; IMMUNOGLOBULIN ENHANCER BINDING PROTEIN; MITOCHONDRIAL PROTEIN; OPTINEURIN; PARKIN; POLYUBIQUITIN; PROTEASOME; PROTEIN DEGLYCASE DJ-1; SEQUESTOSOME 1; SERINE; SUMO PROTEIN; THREONINE; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR PAX3; UBIQUITIN; UBIQUITIN PROTEIN LIGASE E3; UBIQUITIN TRANSFERRING ENZYME 2; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ADENOSINE DIPHOSPHATE RIBOSYLATION; AGGRESOME; AUTOPHAGY; CARBOXY TERMINAL SEQUENCE; CONJUGATION; ENDOCYTOSIS; ENDOPLASMIC RETICULUM ASSOCIATED DEGRADATION; HUMAN; LIPOPHAGOCYTOSIS; LYSOSOME; MITOPHAGY; PEROXISOME; PEXOPHAGY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROLINE RICH PROTEIN DOMAIN; PROTEIN ACETYLATION; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN DEGRADATION; PROTEIN DOMAIN; PROTEIN FUNCTION; PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEIN LOCALIZATION; PROTEIN MISFOLDING; PROTEIN MOTIF; PROTEIN PHOSPHORYLATION; PROTEIN PROCESSING; PROTEIN QUALITY; REVIEW; RIBOPHAGY; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; SUMOYLATION; UBIQUITINATION; XENOPHAGY; METABOLISM; PHYSIOLOGY;

AUTOPHAGY; HUMANS; PROTEASOME ENDOPEPTIDASE COMPLEX; UBIQUITIN;

EID: 85029755786     PISSN: 09680004     EISSN: 13624326     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tibs.2017.09.002     Document Type: Review

References (110)

1. Ciechanover, A., The unravelling of the ubiquitin system. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 16 (2015), 322–324.
2. Ciechanover, A., Kwon, Y.T., Degradation of misfolded proteins in neurodegenerative diseases: therapeutic targets and strategies. Exp. Mol. Med., 47, 2015, e147.
3. Ciechanover, A., Kwon, Y.T., Protein quality control by molecular chaperones in neurodegeneration. Front. Neurosci., 11, 2017, 185.
4. Cha-Molstad, H., et al. Amino-terminal arginylation targets endoplasmic reticulum chaperone bip for autophagy through p62 binding. Nat. Cell Biol. 17 (2015), 917–929.
5. Hershko, A., Ciechanover, A., The ubiquitin system. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 67 (1998), 425–479.
6. Rock, K.L., et al. Inhibitors of the proteasome block the degradation of most cell proteins and the generation of peptides presented on MHC class I molecules. Cell 78 (1994), 761–771.
7. Grice, G.L., Nathan, J.A., The recognition of ubiquitinated proteins by the proteasome. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 73 (2016), 3497–3506.
8. Scott, D., et al. Ubiquitin-binding domains: mechanisms of ubiquitin recognition and use as tools to investigate ubiquitin-modified proteomes. Proteomics 15 (2015), 844–861.
9. Deng, Z., et al. Autophagy receptors and neurodegenerative diseases. Trends Cell. Biol. 27 (2017), 491–504.
10. Ciechanover, A., Intracellular protein degradation: from a vague idea through the lysosome and the ubiquitin-proteasome system and onto human diseases and drug targeting. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 21 (2013), 3400–3410.
11. Wang, X., et al. Ubiquitination of substrates by esterification. Traffic 13 (2012), 19–24.
12. Bhogaraju, S., et al. Phosphoribosylation of ubiquitin promotes serine ubiquitination and impairs conventional ubiquitination. Cell 167 (2016), 1636–1649.
13. Nordgren, M., et al. Export-deficient monoubiquitinated pex5 triggers peroxisome removal in SV40 large T antigen-transformed mouse embryonic fibroblasts. Autophagy 11 (2015), 1326–1340.
14. Ohtake, F., Tsuchiya, H., The emerging complexity of ubiquitin architecture. J. Biochem. 161 (2017), 125–133.
15. Swatek, K.N., Komander, D., Ubiquitin modifications. Cell Res. 26 (2016), 399–422.
16. Yau, R., Rape, M., The increasing complexity of the ubiquitin code. Nat. Cell Biol. 18 (2016), 579–586.
17. Kim, W., et al. Systematic and quantitative assessment of the ubiquitin-modified proteome. Mol. Cell 44 (2011), 325–340.
18. Livneh, I., et al. Monoubiquitination joins polyubiquitination as an esteemed proteasomal targeting signal. Bioessays, 39, 2017, 10.1002/bies.201700027 Published online May 11, 2017.
19. Braten, O., et al. Numerous proteins with unique characteristics are degraded by the 26S proteasome following monoubiquitination. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 113 (2016), E4639–E4647.
20. Dwane, L., et al. The emerging role of non-traditional ubiquitination in oncogenic pathways. J. Biol. Chem. 292 (2017), 3543–3551.
21. Akutsu, M., et al. Ubiquitin chain diversity at a glance. J. Cell Sci. 129 (2016), 875–880.
22. Pickart, C.M., Fushman, D., Polyubiquitin chains: polymeric protein signals. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 8 (2004), 610–616.
23. Yang, W.L., et al. The E3 ligase traf6 regulates akt ubiquitination and activation. Science 325 (2009), 1134–1138.
24. Lim, J., Yue, Z., Neuronal aggregates: formation, clearance, and spreading. Dev. Cell 32 (2015), 491–501.
25. Leznicki, P., Kulathu, Y., Mechanisms of regulation and diversification of deubiquitylating enzyme function. J. Cell Sci. 130 (2017), 1997–2006.
26. Lam, Y.A., et al. Editing of ubiquitin conjugates by an isopeptidase in the 26s proteasome. Nature 385 (1997), 737–740.
27. Finley, D., et al. Gates, channels, and switches: elements of the proteasome machine. Trends Biochem. Sci. 41 (2016), 77–93.
28. Livneh, I., et al. The life cycle of the 26S proteasome: from birth, through regulation and function, and onto its death. Cell Res. 26 (2016), 869–885.
29. Morris, J.R., Garvin, A.J., SUMO in the DNA double-stranded break response: similarities, differences, and cooperation with ubiquitin. J. Mol. Biol., 2017, 10.1016/j.jmb.2017.05.012 Published online May 17, 2017.
30. Seeler, J.S., Dejean, A., Sumo and the robustness of cancer. Nat. Rev. Cancer 17 (2017), 184–197.
31. Wang, Z., et al. Ubiquitin-like modifications in the DNA damage response. Mutat. Res., 2017.
32. Hendriks, I.A., et al. Uncovering global sumoylation signaling networks in a site-specific manner. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 21 (2014), 927–936.
33. Sriramachandran, A.M., Dohmen, R.J., Sumo-targeted ubiquitin ligases. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1843 (2014), 75–85.
34. Hendriks, I.A., Vertegaal, A.C., A comprehensive compilation of sumo proteomics. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 17 (2016), 581–595.
35. Pichler, A., et al. Sumo conjugation – a mechanistic view. Biomol. Concepts 8 (2017), 13–36.
36. Yamano, K., et al. The ubiquitin signal and autophagy: an orchestrated dance leading to mitochondrial degradation. EMBO Rep. 17 (2016), 300–316.
37. Ordureau, A., et al. Quantitative proteomics reveal a feedforward mechanism for mitochondrial parkin translocation and ubiquitin chain synthesis. Mol. Cell 56 (2014), 360–375.
38. Swaney, D.L., et al. Phosphorylation of ubiquitin at Ser65 affects its polymerization, targets, and proteome-wide turnover. EMBO Rep. 16 (2015), 1131–1144.
39. Koyano, F., et al. Ubiquitin is phosphorylated by pink1 to activate parkin. Nature 510 (2014), 162–166.
40. Lazarou, M., et al. The ubiquitin kinase pink1 recruits autophagy receptors to induce mitophagy. Nature 524 (2015), 309–314.
41. Ordureau, A., et al. Defining roles of parkin and ubiquitin phosphorylation by pink1 in mitochondrial quality control using a ubiquitin replacement strategy. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 112 (2015), 6637–6642.
42. Heo, J.M., et al. The pink1–parkin mitochondrial ubiquitylation pathway drives a program of optn/ndp52 recruitment and tbk1 activation to promote mitophagy. Mol. Cell 60 (2015), 7–20.
43. Ohtake, F., et al. Ubiquitin acetylation inhibits polyubiquitin chain elongation. EMBO Rep. 16 (2015), 192–201.
44. Yang, C.S., et al. Ubiquitin modification by the E3 ligase/ADP-ribosyltransferase dtx3l/parp9. Mol. Cell 66 (2017), 503–516.
45. Nguyen, A.T., et al. Ube2o remodels the proteome during terminal erythroid differentiation. Science, 357, 2017, eaan0218.
46. Zhang, J., et al. Atm functions at the peroxisome to induce pexophagy in response to ros. Nat. Cell Biol. 17 (2015), 1259–1269.
47. Collins, G.A., Goldberg, A.L., The logic of the 26S proteasome. Cell 169 (2017), 792–806.
48. Xu, P., et al. Quantitative proteomics reveals the function of unconventional ubiquitin chains in proteasomal degradation. Cell 137 (2009), 133–145.
49. Ziv, I., et al. A perturbed ubiquitin landscape distinguishes between ubiquitin in trafficking and in proteolysis. Mol. Cell. Proteomics, 10, 2011 M111 009753.
50. Tsuchiya, H., et al. In vivo ubiquitin linkage-type analysis reveals that the cdc48–rad23/dsk2 axis contributes to K48-linked chain specificity of the proteasome. Mol. Cell 66 (2017), 488–502.
51. Brown, N.G., et al. Dual ring E3 architectures regulate multiubiquitination and ubiquitin chain elongation by apc/c. Cell 165 (2016), 1440–1453.
52. Lu, Y., et al. Specificity of the anaphase-promoting complex: a single-molecule study. Science, 348, 2015 1248737.
53. Meyer, H.J., Rape, M., Enhanced protein degradation by branched ubiquitin chains. Cell 157 (2014), 910–921.
54. Mevissen, T.E., et al. Otu deubiquitinases reveal mechanisms of linkage specificity and enable ubiquitin chain restriction analysis. Cell 154 (2013), 169–184.
55. French, M.E., et al. Mechanism of ubiquitin chain synthesis employed by a hect ubiquitin ligase. J. Biol. Chem. 292 (2017), 10398–10413.
56. Locke, M., et al. Lys11- and lys48-linked ubiquitin chains interact with p97 during endoplasmic-reticulum-associated degradation. Biochem. J. 459 (2014), 205–216.
57. Bremm, A., et al. Cezanne (otud7b) regulates HIF-1alpha homeostasis in a proteasome-independent manner. EMBO Rep. 15 (2014), 1268–1277.
58. Qin, Y., et al. Rnf26 temporally regulates virus-triggered type I interferon induction by two distinct mechanisms. PLoS Pathog., 10, 2014, e1004358.
59. Grice, G.L., et al. The proteasome distinguishes between heterotypic and homotypic lysine-11-linked polyubiquitin chains. Cell Rep. 12 (2015), 545–553.
60. Martinez-Fonts, K., Matouschek, A., A rapid and versatile method for generating proteins with defined ubiquitin chains. Biochemistry 55 (2016), 1898–1908.
61. Kristariyanto, Y.A., et al. Assembly and structure of lys33-linked polyubiquitin reveals distinct conformations. Biochem. J. 467 (2015), 345–352.
62. Michel, M.A., et al. Assembly and specific recognition of K29- and K33-linked polyubiquitin. Mol. Cell 58 (2015), 95–109.
63. Yu, Z., et al. Lys29-linkage of ask1 by skp1–cullin 1–fbxo21 ubiquitin ligase complex is required for antiviral innate response. Elife, 5, 2016, e14087.
64. Johnson, E.S., et al. A proteolytic pathway that recognizes ubiquitin as a degradation signal. J. Biol. Chem. 270 (1995), 17442–17456.
65. Koegl, M., et al. A novel ubiquitination factor, E4, is involved in multiubiquitin chain assembly. Cell 96 (1999), 635–644.
66. Liu, C., et al. Ufd2p synthesizes branched ubiquitin chains to promote the degradation of substrates modified with atypical chains. Nat. Commun., 8, 2017, 14274.
67. Richly, H., et al. A series of ubiquitin binding factors connects cdc48/p97 to substrate multiubiquitylation and proteasomal targeting. Cell 120 (2005), 73–84.
68. Hwang, C.S., et al. The N-end rule pathway is mediated by a complex of the ring-type ubr1 and hect-type ufd4 ubiquitin ligases. Nat. Cell Biol. 12 (2010), 1177–1185.
69. Thrower, J.S., et al. Recognition of the polyubiquitin proteolytic signal. EMBO J. 19 (2000), 94–102.
70. Lander, G.C., et al. Complete subunit architecture of the proteasome regulatory particle. Nature 482 (2012), 186–191.
71. Sakata, E., et al. Localization of the proteasomal ubiquitin receptors rpn10 and rpn13 by electron cryomicroscopy. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 109 (2012), 1479–1484.
72. Lasker, K., et al. Molecular architecture of the 26S proteasome holocomplex determined by an integrative approach. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 109 (2012), 1380–1387.
73. Dimova, N.V., et al. Apc/c-mediated multiple monoubiquitylation provides an alternative degradation signal for cyclin b1. Nat. Cell Biol. 14 (2012), 168–176.
74. Lu, Y., et al. Substrate degradation by the proteasome: a single-molecule kinetic analysis. Science, 348, 2015 1250834.
75. Kim, S.T., et al. The N-end rule proteolytic system in autophagy. Autophagy 9 (2013), 1100–1103.
76. Ouyang, H., et al. Protein aggregates are recruited to aggresome by histone deacetylase 6 via unanchored ubiquitin C termini. J. Biol. Chem. 287 (2012), 2317–2327.
77. Olzmann, J.A., et al. Parkin-mediated K63-linked polyubiquitination targets misfolded dj-1 to aggresomes via binding to hdac6. J. Cell Biol. 178 (2007), 1025–1038.
78. Wenzel, D.M., et al. Ubch7 reactivity profile reveals parkin and hhari to be ring/hect hybrids. Nature 474 (2011), 105–108.
79. Matsumoto, G., et al. Serine 403 phosphorylation of p62/sqstm1 regulates selective autophagic clearance of ubiquitinated proteins. Mol. Cell 44 (2011), 279–289.
80. Lim, K.L., et al. Parkin mediates nonclassical, proteasomal-independent ubiquitination of synphilin-1: implications for lewy body formation. J. Neurosci. 25 (2005), 2002–2009.
81. Papadopoulos, C., et al. Vcp/p97 cooperates with yod1, ubxd1 and plaa to drive clearance of ruptured lysosomes by autophagy. EMBO J. 36 (2017), 135–150.
82. Nathan, J.A., et al. Why do cellular proteins linked to K63-polyubiquitin chains not associate with proteasomes?. EMBO J. 32 (2013), 552–565.
83. Lu, K., et al. Receptor oligomerization guides pathway choice between proteasomal and autophagic degradation. Nat. Cell Biol. 19 (2017), 732–739.
84. Sriram, S.M., et al. The N-end rule pathway: emerging functions and molecular principles of substrate recognition. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 12 (2011), 735–747.
85. Tasaki, T., et al. The N-end rule pathway. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 81 (2012), 261–289.
86. Cha-Molstad, H., et al. P62/sqstm1/sequestosome-1 is an N-recognin of the N-end rule pathway which modulates autophagosome biogenesis. Nat. Commun., 8, 2017, 102.
87. Cha-Molstad, H., et al. Modulation of sqstm1/p62 activity by N-terminal arginylation of the endoplasmic reticulum chaperone hspa5/grp78/bip. Autophagy 12 (2016), 426–428.
88. Durcan, T.M., et al. Usp8 regulates mitophagy by removing K6-linked ubiquitin conjugates from parkin. EMBO J. 33 (2014), 2473–2491.
89. Cunningham, C.N., et al. Usp30 and parkin homeostatically regulate atypical ubiquitin chains on mitochondria. Nat. Cell Biol. 17 (2015), 160–169.
90. Kane, L.A., et al. Pink1 phosphorylates ubiquitin to activate parkin E3 ubiquitin ligase activity. J. Cell Biol. 205 (2014), 143–153.
91. Kazlauskaite, A., et al. Parkin is activated by pink1-dependent phosphorylation of ubiquitin at ser65. Biochem. J. 460 (2014), 127–139.
92. Richter, B., et al. Phosphorylation of optn by tbk1 enhances its binding to ub chains and promotes selective autophagy of damaged mitochondria. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 113 (2016), 4039–4044.
93. Randow, F., Youle, R.J., Self and nonself: how autophagy targets mitochondria and bacteria. Cell Host Microbe 15 (2014), 403–411.
94. Bingol, B., et al. The mitochondrial deubiquitinase usp30 opposes parkin-mediated mitophagy. Nature 510 (2014), 370–375.
95. Liang, J.R., et al. Usp30 deubiquitylates mitochondrial parkin substrates and restricts apoptotic cell death. EMBO Rep. 16 (2015), 618–627.
96. Komander, D., Rape, M., The ubiquitin code. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 81 (2012), 203–229.
97. Kulathu, Y., Komander, D., Atypical ubiquitylation – the unexplored world of polyubiquitin beyond lys48 and lys63 linkages. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 13 (2012), 508–523.
98. Gatti, M., et al. Rnf168 promotes noncanonical K27 ubiquitination to signal DNA damage. Cell Rep. 10 (2015), 226–238.
99. Iwai, K., Diverse ubiquitin signaling in NF-kappaB activation. Trends Cell Biol. 22 (2012), 355–364.
100. Liu, Z., et al. Ubiquitylation of autophagy receptor optineurin by hace1 activates selective autophagy for tumor suppression. Cancer Cell 26 (2014), 106–120.
101. Wang, Q., et al. The e3 ubiquitin ligase amfr and insig1 bridge the activation of tbk1 kinase by modifying the adaptor sting. Immunity 41 (2014), 919–933.
102. Besche, H.C., et al. Autoubiquitination of the 26S proteasome on rpn13 regulates breakdown of ubiquitin conjugates. EMBO J. 33 (2014), 1159–1176.
103. Jin, J., et al. Epigenetic regulation of the expression of IL12 and IL23 and autoimmune inflammation by the deubiquitinase trabid. Nat. Immunol. 17 (2016), 259–268.
104. Fei, C., et al. Smurf1-mediated lys29-linked nonproteolytic polyubiquitination of axin negatively regulates wnt/beta-catenin signaling. Mol. Cell. Biol. 33 (2013), 4095–4105.
105. Kim, J.B., et al. Identification of a novel anti-apoptotic E3 ubiquitin ligase that ubiquitinates antagonists of inhibitor of apoptosis proteins smac, htra2, and arts. J. Biol. Chem. 288 (2013), 12014–12021.
106. Yuan, W.C., et al. K33-linked polyubiquitination of coronin 7 by cul3-klhl20 ubiquitin E3 ligase regulates protein trafficking. Mol. Cell 54 (2014), 586–600.
107. Huang, H., et al. K33-linked polyubiquitination of T cell receptor-zeta regulates proteolysis-independent T cell signaling. Immunity 33 (2010), 60–70.
108. Sasaki, K., Iwai, K., Roles of linear ubiquitinylation, a crucial regulator of NF-kappaB and cell death, in the immune system. Immunol. Rev. 266 (2015), 175–189.
109. Iwai, K., et al. Linear ubiquitin chains: NF-kappaB signalling, cell death and beyond. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 15 (2014), 503–508.
110. Emmerich, C.H., et al. Activation of the canonical ikk complex by K63/M1-linked hybrid ubiquitin chains. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 110 (2013), 15247–15252.