-
29
-
-
34547529693
-
-
M. R. Jackson R. Beahm S. Duvvuru C. Narasimhan J. Wu H. N. Wang V. M. Philip R. J. Hinde E. E. Howell J. Phys. Chem. B 2007 111 8242 8249
-
(2007)
J. Phys. Chem. B
, vol.111
, pp. 8242-8249
-
-
Jackson, M.R.1
Beahm, R.2
Duvvuru, S.3
Narasimhan, C.4
Wu, J.5
Wang, H.N.6
Philip, V.M.7
Hinde, R.J.8
Howell, E.E.9
-
40
-
-
0029011701
-
-
W. D. Cornell P. Cieplak C. I. Bayly I. R. Gould K. M. Merz Jr. D. M. Ferguson D. C. Spellmeyer T. Fox J. W. Caldwell P. A. Kollmann J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995 117 5179 5197
-
(1995)
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
, vol.117
, pp. 5179-5197
-
-
Cornell, W.D.1
Cieplak, P.2
Bayly, C.I.3
Gould, I.R.4
Merz, Jr.K.M.5
Ferguson, D.M.6
Spellmeyer, D.C.7
Fox, T.8
Caldwell, J.W.9
Kollmann, P.A.10
-
41
-
-
0041784950
-
-
A. D. MacKerell Jr. D. Bashford M. Bellot R. L. Dunbrack Jr. J. D. Evanseck M. J. Field S. Fischer J. Gao H. Guo S. Ha D. Joseph-McCarthy L. Kuchnir K. Kuczera F. T. K. Lau C. Mattos S. Michnick T. Ngo D. T. Nguyen B. Prodhom W. E. R. III.B. Roux M. Schlenkrich J. C. Smith R. Stote J. Straub W. Watanabe J. Wiorkiewicz-Kunczera D. Yin M. Karplus J. Phys. Chem. B 1998 102 3586 3616
-
(1998)
J. Phys. Chem. B
, vol.102
, pp. 3586-3616
-
-
MacKerell Jr., A.D.1
Bashford, D.2
Bellot, M.3
Dunbrack Jr., R.L.4
Evanseck, J.D.5
Field, M.J.6
Fischer, S.7
Gao, J.8
Guo, H.9
Ha, S.10
Joseph-Mccarthy, D.11
Kuchnir, L.12
Kuczera, K.13
Lau, F.T.K.14
Mattos, C.15
Michnick, S.16
Ngo, T.17
Nguyen, D.T.18
Prodhom, B.19
Roux, B.20
Schlenkrich, M.21
Smith, J.C.22
Stote, R.23
Straub, J.24
Watanabe, W.25
Wiorkiewicz-Kunczera, J.26
Yin, D.27
Karplus, M.28
more..
-
42
-
-
30444448249
-
-
H. Christen M. D. Bakowies R. Baron R. Burgi D. P. Geerke T. N. Heinz M. A. Kastenholz V. Krautler C. Oostenbrink C. Peter D. Trzesniak W. F. van Gunsteren J. Comput. Chem. 2005 16 1719 1751
-
(2005)
J. Comput. Chem.
, vol.16
, pp. 1719-1751
-
-
Christen, H.1
Bakowies, M.D.2
Baron, R.3
Burgi, R.4
Geerke, D.P.5
Heinz, T.N.6
Kastenholz, M.A.7
Krautler, V.8
Oostenbrink, C.9
Peter, C.10
Trzesniak, D.11
Van Gunsteren, W.F.12
-
48
-
-
76449093096
-
-
The highly cited paper of Hunter and Sanders 18 ruled out the hydrophobic effects in π-π interactions by stating: "Even in water, enthalpic effects can be the important driving force favoring T-T interactions. [...] In addition, solvophobic effects favor the geometry of maximum overlap, a situation which is rarely observed [in polar media]". In their work they attributed the affinity between planar systems to the details of the electron density, specifially to an attraction between σ and π electrons overcoming π-π repulsion
-
T. Kolev M. Spiteller B. Koleva Amnoacids 2010 38 45 50
-
(2010)
Amnoacids
, vol.38
, pp. 45-50
-
-
Kolev, T.1
Spiteller, M.2
Koleva, B.3
-
58
-
-
0029785147
-
-
Fold classification based on Structure-Structure alignment of Proteins (FSSP)., 2002
-
L. Holm C. Sander Science 1996 273 595 602
-
(1996)
Science
, vol.273
, pp. 595-602
-
-
Holm, L.1
Sander, C.2
-
76
-
-
0028247378
-
-
E and are the number of exposed members and the total number of members (exposed or not) in the class C, respectively The outlier referring to the FF (PHE-PHE) stacked complexes was discarded in the linear regression calculation According to Table 1 of Marsili et al., 8 the exposure probability (see definition in ref. 81) of the Arg-Arg stacked pair is 0.97 while that of the monomer Arg is 0.81
-
(1994)
J. Mol. Biol.
, vol.239
, pp. 227-248
-
-
Karlin, S.1
Zuker, M.2
Brocchieri, L.3
|