Toward an energy function for the contact map representation of proteins

Proteins: Structure, Function and Genetics

Volumn 40, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 237-248

  Park, Kibeom ^a   Vendruscolo, Michele ^a,b   Domany, Eytan ^a  

^a WEIZMANN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE   (Israel)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Contact maps; Hydrophobicity; Pairwise contact potential; Protein folding

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; HYDROPHOBICITY; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN STABILITY; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; STRUCTURE ANALYSIS;

EID: 0034257223     PISSN: 08873585     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0134(20000801)40:2<237::AID-PROT60>3.0.CO;2-P     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Creighton TE. Protein folding. New York: WH Freeman; 1992.
2. Fersht AR. Structure and mechanism in protein science. New York: WH Freeman; 1992.
3. Bairoch A, Apweiler R. The SWISS-PROT protein sequence data bank and its supplement TrEMBL in 1999. Nucleic Acids Res 1999;27:49-54.
4. Anfinsen C. Principles that govern the folding of protein chains. Science 1973;181:223-230.
5. Lattman EE. Third meeting on the critical assessment of techniques for protein structure prediction. Proteins 1999;37:1.
6. Vendruscolo M, Domany E. Protein folding using contact maps. Vitam Horm (in press).
7. Scheraga HA. Calculation of stable conformations of polypeptides, proteins, and protein complexes. Chem Scr 1989;29A:3.
8. Mirny L, Domany E. Protein fold recognition and dynamics in the space of contact maps. Proteins 1996;26:391-410.
9. Vasquez G, Nemethy M, Sheraga HA. Conformational energy calculations on polypeptides and proteins. Chem Rev 1994;94:2183-2239.
10. Brooks CL, Karplus M, Pettitt BM. Proteins: a theoretical perspective of dynamics, structure and thermodynamics. Adv Chem Phys 1988;71:1-259.
11. Duan Y, Kollman PA. Pathways to a protein folding intermediate observed in a 1-microsecond simulation in aqueous solution. Science 1998;282:740-744.
12. Lazaridis T, Karplus M. "New view" of protein folding reconciled with the old through multiple unfolding simulations. Science 1997;278:1928-1931.
13. Levitt M. A simplified representation of protein conformations for rapid simulation of protein folding. J Mol Biol 1976;104:59-107.
14. Skolnick J, Kolinski A. Monte Carlo approaches to the protein folding problem. Adv Chem Phys 1999;105:203-242.
15. De Witte RS, Shakhnovich EI. Pseudodihedrals: simplified protein backbone representation with knowledge-based energy. Protein Sci 1994;3:1570-1581.
16. Zhou YQ, Karplus M. Interpreting the folding kinetics of helical proteins. Nature 1999;401:400-403.
17. Hao MH, Scheraga HA. How optimization of potential function affects protein folding. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1996;93:4984-4989.
18. Mirny L, Shakhnovich EI. How to derive a protein folding potential? A new approach to an old problem. J Mol Biol 1996;264: 1164-1179.
19. Jernigan RL, Bahar I. Structure-derived potentials and protein simulations. Curr Opin Struct Biol 1996;6:195-209.
20. Park BH, Huang ES, Levitt M. Factors affecting the ability of energy functions to discriminate correct from incorrect folds. J Mol Biol 1997;266:831-846.
21. Seno F, Maritan A, Banavar JR. Interaction potentials for protein folding. Proteins 1998;30:244-248.
22. Thomas PD, Dill KA. An iterative method for extracting energy-like quantities from protein structures. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1996;93:11628-11633.
23. Koretke KK, Luthey-Schulten Z, Wolynes PG. Self-consistently optimized energy functions for protein structure prediction by molecular dynamics. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1998;95:2932-2937.
24. Skolnick J, Jaroszewski L, Kolinski A, Godzik A. Derivation and testing of pair potentials for protein folding. When is the quasichemical approximation correct? Protein Sci 1997;6:676-688.
25. Vendruscolo M, Domany E. Efficient dynamics in the space of contact maps. Fold Des 1998;3:329-336.
26. Vendruscolo M, Najmanovich R, Domany E. Protein folding in contact map space. Phys Rev Lett 1999;82:656-659.
27. Vendruscolo M, Domany E. Pairwise contact potentials are unsuitable for protein folding. J Chem Phys 1998;109:11101-11108.
28. Bowie D, Luthy JU, Eisenberg D. A method to identify protein sequences that fold into a known 3-dimensional structure. Science 1991;253:164-170.
29. Jones DT, Taylor WR, Thornton JM. A new approach to protein fold recognition. Nature 1992;358:86-89.
30. Fisher D, Rice D, Bowie JU, Eisenberg D. Assigning amino acid sequences to 3-dimensional protein folds. FASEB J 1996;10:126-136.
31. Vendruscolo M, Najmanovich R, Domany E. Can a pairwise contact potential stabilize native protein folds against decoys obtained by threading? Proteins 2000;38:134-148.
32. Vendruscolo M, Kussell E, Domany E. Recovery of protein structure from contact maps. Fold Des 1997;2:295-306.
33. Maiorov VN, Crippen GM. Contact potential that recognizes the correct folding of globular proteins. J Mol Biol 1992;227:876-888.
34. Settanni G, Micheletti C, Banavar JR, Maritan A. Determination of optimal effective interactions between amino acids in globular proteins. http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/condmat/9902364 1999.
35. Dill KA, Bromberg S, Yue KZ, Fiebig KM, Yee DP, Thomas PD, Chan HS. Principles of protein folding: a perspective from simple exact models. Protein Sci 1995;4:561-602.
36. Hao MH, Scheraga HA. On foldable protein-like models; a statistical-mechanical study with Monte Carlo simulations. Physica A 1997;244:124-146.
37. Silverstein KAT, Haymet ADJ, Dill KA. Molecular model of hydrophobic solvation. J Chem Phys 1999;111:8000-8009.
38. Lum K, Chandler D, Weeks JD. Hydrophobicity at small and large length scales. J Phys Chem B 1999;103:4570-4577.
39. Crippen GM. Prediction of protein folding from ammo-acid-sequence over discrete conformation space. Biochemistry 1991;30: 4232-4237.
40. Hertz J, Krogh A, Palmer RG. Introduction to the Theory of Neural Computation. Santa Fe Institute Studies in the Science of Complexity. Lecture Notes v.1 (Computation and Neural Systems Series). Addison-Wesley Publishing Company; New York, 1991.
41. Watkin TLH, Rau A, Biehl M. The statistical mechanics of learning a rule. Rev Mod Phys 1993;65:499-556.
42. Nabutovsky D, Domany E. Learning the unlearnable. Neural Comput 1991;3:604-616.
43. Jurs PC. Computer software applications in chemistry. New York: John Wiley; 1986.
44. Karmarkar N. A new polynomial time algorithm for linear programming. Combinatorica 1984;4:373-395.
45. Press WH, Teukolsky SA, Wtterling WT, Flannery BP. Numerical recipes in Fortran: the art of scientific computing. New York: Cambridge University Press; 1992.
46. Hooft RW, Sander C, Vriend G. Verification of protein structures: side-chain planarity. J Appl Cryst 1996;29:714-716.
47. Casari G, Sippl MJ. Structure-derived hydrophobic potential - Hydrophobic potential derived from X-ray structures of globular proteins is able to identify native folds. J Mol Biol 1992;224:725-732.
48. Kyte J, Doolittle RF. A simple method for displaying the hydrophatic character of a protein. J Mol Biol 1982;157:105-132.
49. Sweet RM, Eisenberg D. Correlation of sequence hydrophobicities measures similarity in 3-dimensional protein structure. J Mol Biol 1983;171:479-488.
50. Engelman DM, Steitz TA, Goldman A. Identifying nonpolar transbilayer helices in amino-acid-sequences of membrane-proteins. Ann Rev Biophys Biomol Struct 1986;15:321-353.
51. Finkelstein AV. Protein structure: what is it possible to predict now? Curr Opin Struct Biol 1997;7:60-71.
52. Kocher JPA, Rooman MJ, Wodak SJ. Factors influencing the ability of knowledge-based potentials to identify native sequence-structure matches. J Mol Biol 1994;235:1598-1613.
53. Bahar I, Jernigan RL. Inter-residue potentials in globular proteins and the dominance of highly specific hydrophilic interactions at close separation. J Mol Biol 1997;266:195-214.
54. Betancourt MR, Thirumalai D. Pair potentials for protein folding: choice of reference states and sensitivity of predicted native states to variations in the interaction schemes. Protein Sci 1999;8:361-369.