Facilitating reflexivity in preservice science teacher education using video analysis and cogenerative dialogue in field-based methods courses

Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education

Volumn 10, Issue 5, 2014, Pages 481-508

  Siry, Christina ^a   Martin, Sonya N ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LUXEMBOURG   (Luxembourg)

^b Seoul National University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Cogenerative dialogues; Field based methods courses; Preservice teachers; Reflexivity; Science teacher education; Video analysis

Indexed keywords

EID: 84935441968     PISSN: 13058215     EISSN: 13058223     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.12973/eurasia.2014.1201a     Document Type: Article

References (87)

1. Abell, S., & Cennamo, S. (2004). Videocases in elementary science teacher preparation. In J. Brophy (Ed), Advances in Research on Teaching, Vol. 10, Using video in teacher education (pp103-129). Oxford: Elsevier, Ltd. DOI: 10.1016/s1479-3687(03)10005-3
2. Anderson, E. (1999). Code of the street: Decency, violence and the moral life of the Inner City. New York, NY: W.W. Norton & Company DOI: 10.5860/choice.37-2223
3. Barton, A.C. (2001). Science education in urban settings: Seeking new ways of praxis through critical ethnography. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. Vol. 38(8), pp. 899-917. DOI: 10.1002/tea.1038
4. Beardsley, L., Cogan-Drew, D., & Olivero, F. (2006). VideoPaper: Bridging research and practice for preservice and experienced teachers. In R. Goldman, R. Pea, B. Barron, & S. Derry (Eds.), Video research in the learning sciences (pp. 479-493). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
5. Bell, R.L., Maeng, J.L., & Binns, I.C. (2013). Learning in context: Technology integration in a teacher preparation program informed by situated learning theory. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 50(3), 348-379. DOI: 10.1002/tea.21075
6. Bleakley, A. (1999). From reflective practice to holistic reflexivity. Studies in Higher Education, 24 (3), 315-330. DOI: 10.1080/03075079912331379925
7. Brophy, J. (2004). Using video in teacher education. San Diego, CA: Elsevier, Inc. DOI: l01016/S1479-3687(03)10001-6
8. Brown, A. (1992). Design experiments: Theoretical and methodological challenges in creating complex interventions in classroom settings. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2, 141-178. DOI: 10.1080/10508406.2013.873673
9. Carambo, C. (2009). Evolution of an urban research program: The Philadelphia project. In K. Tobin & W.-M. Roth [Eds.], World of Science Education: North America (pp. 473-490). The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
10. Carspecken, P. (1996). Critical ethnography in educational research: A theoretical and practical guide. New York: Routledge. DOI: 10.1525/aeq.1996.27.4.05x1155k
11. Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. (2009). Inquiry as a stance: Practitioner research in the next generation. New York: Teachers College Press.
12. Creswell, J.W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. DOI: 10.1177/0011000006287390
13. Darling-Hammond, L. (2006). Constructing 21st-century teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 57, 300-314. doi:10.1177/0022487105285962
14. Donovan, M. S., & Bransford, J. D. (Eds.). (2005). How students learn: Science in the classroom. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. DOI: 10.2307/30036810
15. Duschl, R. A., Schweingruber, H. A., & Shouse, A. W. (Eds.). (2007). Taking science to school: Learning and teaching science in grades K-8. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. DOI: 10.1007/s11191-011-9353-4
16. Elliott, J. (1993). Reconstructing teacher education. London: Falmer.
17. Emdin, C. (2007). Exploring the contexts of urban science classrooms. Part 1: Investigating corporate and communal practices. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 2(2), 319-341. DOI 10.1007/s11422-007-9055-z
18. Friedrichsen, P.J., Abell, S.K., Pareja, E.M., Brown, P.L., Lankford, D.M., & Volkmann, M.J. (2009). Does teacher experience matter? Examining biology teachers' prior knowledge for teaching in an alternative certification program. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46, 357-383. DOI: 10.1002/tea.20283
19. Grossman, P., Hammerness, K., McDonald, M. (2009). Redefining teacher: Re-imagining teacher education. Teachers and teaching: Theory and practice, 15(2), 273-290. DOI 10.1080/13540600902875340
20. Guba, E., & Lincoln, Y. (1989). Fourth generation evaluation. Beverley Hills, CA: Sage.
21. Hammerness, K., Darling-Hammond, L., Bransford, J., with Berliner, D., Cochran-Smith, M., McDonald, M., & Zeichner, K. (2005). How teachers develop. In L. Darling-Hammond & J. Bransford (Eds) in collaboration with P. LePage, K. Hammerness, & H. Duffy, Preparing teachers for a changing world: What teachers should learn and be able to do, (p. 358-389). Hoboken, NJ: Jossey-Bass. DOI: 10.5860/CHOICE.43-1083
22. Hatch, T., & Grossman, P. (2009). Learning to look beyond the boundaries of representation: using technology to examine teaching. Journal of Teacher Education, 60(1), 70-85. doi:10.1177/0022487108328533
23. Lampert, M. (2010). Learning teaching in, from, and for Practice: What do we mean? Journal of Teacher Education, 61, 21-34. doi:10.1177/0022487109347321
24. LaVan, S.K., & Beers, J. (2005). The Role of Cogenerative Dialogue in Learning to Teach and Transforming Learning Environments. In K. Tobin, R. Elmesky, and G. Seiler (Eds), Improving Urban Science Education: New Roles for Teachers, Students, and Researchers (p. 167-185). New York: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.
25. Lehner, E. (2007). Describing students of the African diaspora: Understanding micro and meso level science learning as gateways to standards based discourse. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 2(2), 441-460. DOI: 10.1007/s11422-007-9062-0
26. Loughran, J.J. (2002). Effective reflective practice: In search of meaning in learning about teaching. Journal of Teacher Education, 53(1), 33-54. DOI: 10.1177/0022487102053001004
27. Martin, S. (2005). The social and cultural dimensions of successful teaching and learning in an urban science classroom. Doctoral dissertation, Science and Mathematics Education Centre, Curtin University, Perth, Australia.
28. Martin, S. (2006a). Teachers as researchers. In K. Tobin [Ed.] Teaching and learning science: A handbook (pp. 227-233). New York: Praeger Publishing.
29. Martin, S. (2006b). Where practice and theory intersect in the chemistry classroom: Using cogenerative dialogue to identify the critical point in science education. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 1(4), pp. 693-720. DOI: 10.1007/s11422-006-9031-z
30. Martin, S. (2009). Learning to teach science. In K. Tobin & W.-M. Roth [Eds.], World of Science Education: North America (pp. 567-586). The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
31. Martin, S., & Scantlebury, K. (2009). More than a conversation: Using cogenerative dialogues in the professional development of high school chemistry teachers. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 21(2), pp. 119-1136. DOI: 10.1007/s11092-008-9062-y
32. Martin, S. & Siry, C. (2012). Using video in science teacher education: An analysis of the utilization of video-based media by teacher educators and researchers. In B. Fraser, K. Tobin, & C. Campbell [eds.] Second International handbook of science teaching and learning (417-433). The Netherlands: Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4020-9041-7_29
33. Masats, D., & Dooly, M. (2011). Rethinking the use of video in teacher education: A holistic approach. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27, 1151-1162. DOI:10.1016/j.tate.2011.04.004
34. McCullagh, J.F. (2012). How can video supported reflection enhance teachers' professional development? Cultural Studies of Science Education, 7, 137-152. DOI: 10.1007/s11422-011-9375-x
35. Munby, H., & Russell, T. (1994). The authority of experience in learning to teach: Messages from a Physics methods class. Journal of Teacher Education, 45(2), 86-95. DOI: 10.1177/0022487194045002002
36. National Research Council. (2000). Inquiry and the national science education standards: A guide for teaching and learning. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
37. National Research Council. (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
38. Osborne, J., Erduran, S., & Simon, S. (2004). Enhancing the quality of argumentation in school science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(10), 994-1020. DOI: 10.1002/tea.20035
39. Rich, P., & Hannafin, M. (2009b). Scaffolded video self-analysis: discrepancies between preservice teachers' perceived and actual instructional decisions. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 21, 128-145. DOI: 10.1007/s12528-009-9018-3
40. Ritchie, S.M., Tobin, K., Hudson, P., Roth, W.-M., & Mergard, V. (2011). Reproducing successful rituals in bad times: Exploring emotional interactions of a new science teacher. Science Education, 95(4), 745-765. DOI: 10.1002/sce.20440
41. Rosaen, C., & Florio-Ruane, S. (2008). The metaphors by which we teach: Experience, metaphor, and culture in teacher education. In M. Cochran-Smith, S. Feiman-Nemser, J. McIntyre, & K. Demers (Eds.), Handbook of research on teacher education: Enduring questions in changing contexts (3rd edition) (pp. 706-731). New York: Routledge, Taylor & Francis.
42. Roth, K., Garnier, H., Chen, C., Lemmens, M., Schwille, K., Wickler, N. (2011). Videobased lesson analysis: Effective science PD for teacher and student learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48 (2), 117-148. DOI: 10.1002/tea.20408
43. Roth, W-M. (2005). Talking science: Language and learning in Science Classrooms. Rowman and Littlefield Publishers.
44. Roth, W.-M. (2003). Video as tool for reflecting on practice: theoretical perspectives. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Philadelphia, March 23-26, 2003.
45. Roth, W.-M. (Ed.) (2005). Auto/biography and auto/ethnography: Finding the generalized other in the self. In Auto/biography and auto/ethnography: Praxis of research method (pp. 3-21). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
46. Roth, W.-M., & Tobin, K. (2001). The implications of coteaching/cogenerative dialogue for teacher evaluation: Learning from multiple perspectives of everyday practice. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 15 (1), 7-29. DOI: 10.1023/A:1011100117706
47. Roth, W.-M., & Tobin, K. (2010). Solidarity and conflict: aligned and misaligned prosody as a transactional resource in intra- and intercultural communication involving power differences. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 5(4), 807-847. DOI: 10.1007/s11422-010-9272-8
48. Roth, W.-M., Tobin, K., & Ritchie, S. (2008). Time and temporality as mediators of science learning. Science Education, 92, 115-140. DOI: 10.1002/sce.20238
49. Russell, T., & Munby, H. (1991). Reframing: The role of experience in developing teachers' professional knowledge. In D.A. Schön (Ed), The reflective turn: Case studies in and on educational practice (164-187). New York: Teachers College Press.
50. Ruth-Sahd, L. (2003). Reflective practice: A critical analysis of data-based studies and implications for nursing education. Journal of Nursing Education, 42 (11), 488-497.
51. Santagata, R., & Yeh, C. (2013). Learning to teach mathematics and to analyze teaching effectiveness: evidence from a video- and practice-based approach. Journal of Math Teacher Education, 1-24. DOI: 10.1007/s10857-013-9263-2
52. Scantlebury, K., & LaVan, S-K. (2006, March). Re-visioning cogenerative dialogues as feminist pedagogy [32 paragraphs]. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research [On-line Journal], 7(2). Retrieved March 5 2007 from http://www.qualitativeresearch.net/fqs-texte/2-06/06-2-41-e.htm
53. Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books, Inc.
54. Schön, D. A. (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner: Toward a new design for teaching and learning in the professions. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
55. Schulman, L. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1-22.
56. Schwandt, T. (2001). Dictionary of qualitative inquiry (2nd Ed). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
57. Seidel, T., Stürmer, K., Blomberg, G., Kobarg, M., & Schwindt, K. (2011). Teacher learning from analysis of videotaped classroom situations: Does it make a difference whether teachers observe their own teaching or that or others? Teaching and Teacher Education, 27, 259-267. DOI: 10.1016/j.tate.2011.04.004
58. Sewell, W. H. (1992). A theory of structure: Duality, agency, and transformation. American Journal of Sociology, 98, 1-29. DOI: 10.1086/229967
59. Sewell, W. H. (1999). The concept(s) of culture. In V. E. Bonnell & L. Hunt (Eds.), Beyond the cultural turn (pp. 35-61). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
60. Sherin, M. G. (2004). New perspectives on the role of video in teacher education. In J. Brophy (Ed), Using video in teacher education (Advances in Research on Teaching, Vol. 10, pp. 1-27). Oxford: Elsevier, Ltd.
61. Sherin, M. G. (2007). The development of teachers' professional vision in video clubs. In R. Goldman, R. Pea, B. Barron, & S. Derry (Eds.), Video research in the learning sciences (pp. 383-395). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
62. Sherin, M.G., & Hans, S. (2004). Teacher learning in the context of a video club. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20, 163-183. DOI: 10.1016/j.tate.2003.08.001
63. Sherin, M. G., Linsenmeier, K.A., & van Es, E. (2009). Selecting video clips to promote mathematics teachers' discussion of student thinking. Journal of Teacher Education, 60, 213-230. doi:10.1177/0022487109336967
64. Sherin, M.G., & van Es, E. (2005). Using video to support teachers' ability to notice classroom interactions. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 13(3), 475-491.
65. Sherin, M. G., & van Es, E. (2009). Effects of video club participation on teachers' professional vision. Journal of Teacher Education, 66(1), 20-37. doi:10.1177/0022487108328155
66. Siry, C. (2009). Fostering solidarity and transforming identities: a collaborative approach to elementary science teacher education. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The Graduate Center, City University of New York, New York.
67. Siry, C. (2011). Emphasizing collaborative practices in learning to teach: coteaching and cogenerative dialogues in a field-based methods course. Teaching Education, 22(1), 91-101. DOI:10.1080/10476210.2010.520699
68. Siry, C. & Lang, D. (2010). Creating participatory discourse for teaching and research in early childhood science. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 21, 149-160. DOI: 10.1007/s10972-009-9162-7
69. Siry, C. & Martin, S. (2010). Coteaching in science education courses: Transforming science teacher preparation through shared responsibility. In C. Murphy & K. Scantlebury [eds.] Coteaching in international contexts: Research and practice (pp. 57-78). The Netherlands: Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-90-481-3707-7_4
70. Swidler, A. (1986). Culture in action: Symbols and strategies. American Sociological Review, 51, 273-286. DOI: 10.2307/2095521
71. Talanquer, V., Tomanek, D., Novodvorsky, I. (2013). Assessing students' understanding of inquiry: What do prospective science teachers notice? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 50 (2), 189-208. DOI: 10.1002/tea.21074
72. Tobin, K. (2006). Learning to teach through coteaching and cogenerative dialogue. Teaching Education, 17(2), 133-142. DOI:10.1080/10476210600680358
73. Tobin, K., & Roth, W-M. (2006). Teaching to learn: A view from the field. The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
74. van Es, E. (2009). Participant's roles in the context of video club. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 18(1), 100-137. DOI: 10.1080/10508400802581668
75. van Es, E., & Sherin, M. G. (2002). Learning to notice: Scaffolding new teachers' interpretations of classroom interactions. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 10(4), 571-596.
76. van Es, E., & Sherin, M.G. (2008). Mathematics teachers' "learning to notice" in the context of a video club. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24, 244-276. DOI: 10.1016/j.tate.2006.11.005
77. van Es, E., and Sherin, M.G. (2010). The influence of video clubs on teachers' thinking and practice. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 13(2), 155-176. DOI: 10.1007/s10857-009-9130-3
78. Warin, J., Maddock, M., Pell, A., & Hargreaves, L. (2006). Resolving identity dissonance through reflective and reflexive practice in teaching. Reflective Practice, 7(2): 231-243. DOI: 10.1080/14623940600688670
79. Wassell, B. (2004). On Becoming an Urban Teacher: Exploring Agency Through the Journey From Student to First Year Practitioner. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
80. Watters, J.J., & Diezmann, C.M. (2007). Multimedia resources to bridge the praxis gap: Modeling practice in elementary science education. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 18, 349-375. DOI: 10.1007/s10972-007-9051-x
81. West, R.E., Rich, P.J., Shepherd, C.E., Recesso, A. & Hannafin, M.J. (2009). Supporting Induction Teachers' Development Using Performance-Based Video Evidence. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 17(3), 369-391.
82. Wilson, E. (2009). School-based research: a guide for education students. London: Sage.
83. Yerrick, R., Ross, D., & Molebash, P. (2005). Too close for comfort: Real-time science teaching reflections via digital video editing. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 16, 351-375. DOI: 10.1007/s10972-005-1105-3
84. Yin, R.K. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods (3rd Ed). Thousands Oaks, CA: Sage.
85. Zeichner, K. (2010). Rethinking the connections between campus courses and field experiences in college- and university-based teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 61, 89-99. DOI 10.1007/s10857-013-9263-2
86. Zembal-Saul, C., Krajcik, J., & Blumenfeld, P. (2002). Elementary student teachers' science content representations. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39, 443-463. DOI: 10.1002/tea.10032
87. Zhang, M., Lundeberg, M., Koehler, M., Eberhardt, J. (2011). Understanding affordances and challenges of three types of video for teacher professional development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27, 454-462. DOI: 10.1016/j.tate.2010.09.015