Teacher learning from analysis of videotaped classroom situations: Does it make a difference whether teachers observe their own teaching or that of others?

Teaching and Teacher Education

Volumn 27, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 259-267

  Seidel, Tina ^a   Stürmer, Kathleen ^a   Blomberg, Geraldine ^a   Kobarg, Mareike ^b   Schwindt, Katharina ^c  

^a TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

^b LEIBNIZ INSTITUTE FOR SCIENCE AND MATHEMATICS EDUCATION   (Germany)

^c GERMAN AEROSPACE CENTER DLR   (Germany)

Author keywords

Learning sciences; Observation; Professional learning.; Teacher education; Teacher learning; Video technology

Indexed keywords

EID: 78651374531     PISSN: 0742051X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tate.2010.08.009     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Atkins S. Best practice: preservice teachers' perceptions of videodisc vs. videotape of classroom practices in a methods course. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education 1998, 6:51-59.
2. Baum B.E., Gray J.J. Expert modeling, self-observation using videotape, and acquisition of basic therapy skills. Professional Psychology-Research and Practice 1992, 23(3):220-225.
3. Baumert J., Kunter M., Blum W., Brunner M., Voss T., Jordan A., et al. Teachers' mathematical knowledge, cognitive activation in the classroom, and student progress. American Educational Research Journal 2010, 47(1):133-180.
4. Berliner D.C. In pursuit of the expert pedagogue. Educational Researcher 1986, 15(7):5-13.
5. Bliss T., Reynolds A. Quality visions and focused imagination. Using video in teacher education 2004, 29-52. Elsevier, Oxford, UK. J. Brophy (Ed.).
6. Borko H. Professional development and teacher learning: mapping the terrain. Educational Researcher 2004, 33(8):3-15.
7. Borko H., Jacobs J.K., Eiteljorg E., Pittman M.E. Video as a tool for fostering productive discussions in mathematics professional development. Teaching and Teacher Education 2008, 24(2):417-436.
8. Brophy J. Using video in teacher education 2004, Elsevier, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
9. Clarke D.J., Mesiti C., O'Keefe C., Xu L.H., Jablonka E., Mok I.A.C., et al. Addressing the challenge of legitimate international comparisons of classroom practice. International Journal of Educational Research 2008, 46(5):280-293.
10. Deci E.L., Ryan R.M. Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior 1985, Plenum, New York.
11. Desimone L.M. Improving impact studies of teachers' professional development: toward better conceptualizations and measures. Educational Researcher 2009, 38(3):181-199.
12. Eraut M. Non-formal learning and tacit knowledge in professional work. British Journal of Educational Psychology 2000, 70(1):113-136.
13. Evertson C.M., Green J.L. Observation as inquiry and method. Handbook of research on teaching 1986, Vol. 3:162-213. Macmillan, New York, NY. M.C. Wittrock (Ed.).
14. Fiske S.T. Social cognition. Advanced social psychology 1995, 149-193. McGraw Hill, Boston, MA. A. Tesser (Ed.).
15. Frederiksen J.R., Sipusic M., Sherin M.G., Wolfe E. Video portfolio assessment: creating a framework for viewing the functions of teaching. Educational Assessment 1998, 5(4):225-297.
16. Friel S., Carboni L. Using video-based pedagogy in an elementary mathematics methods course. School Science and Mathematics 2000, 100:118-127.
17. Furtak E.M. The problem with answers: an exploration of guided scientific inquiry teaching. Science Education 2006, 90(3):453-467.
18. Goldman R. Video representations and the perspectivity framework: epistemology, ethnography, evaluation, and ethics. Video research in the learning sciences 2007, 3-38. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ. R. Goldman, R. Pea, B. Barron, S.J. Derry (Eds.).
19. Goldman R., Pea R., Barron B., Denny S.J. Video research in the learning sciences 2007, Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ.
20. Goodwin C. Professional vision. American Anthropologist 1994, 96:606-633.
21. Hiebert J., Gallimore R., Stigler J.W. A knowledge base for the teaching profession: what would it look like and how can we get one?. Educational Researcher 2002, 31(5):3-15.
22. Jacobs J.K., Kawanaka T., Stigler J.W. Integrating qualitative and quantitative approaches to the analysis of video data on classroom teaching. International Journal of Educational Research 1999, 31:717-724.
23. Jacobs J.K., Morita E. Japanese and American teachers' evaluations of videotaped mathematics lessons. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 2002, 33(3):154-175.
24. Kersting N. Using video clips of mathematics classroom instruction as item prompts to measure teachers' knowledge of teaching mathematics. Educational and Psychological Measurement 2008, 68(5):845-861.
25. Kobarg M. Unterstützung unterrichtlicher Lernprozesse aus zwei Perspektiven. Eine Gegenüberstellung 2009, Waxmann, Münster, Germany.
26. Krajcik J., Soloway E., Blumenfeld P., Marx R.W., Ladewski B.L., Bos N.D., et al. The casebook of project practices: an example of an interactive multimedia system for professional development. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching 1996, 15:119-135.
27. Krammer K., Ratzka N., Klieme E., Lipowsky F., Pauli C., Reusser K. Learning with classroom videos: conception and first results of an online teacher-training program. Zeitschrift für Didaktik der Mathematik 2006, 38(5):422-432.
28. Krone A., Hamborg K.C., Gediga G. About error-related emotional reactions in human-computer interaction. Zeitschrift für Arbeits- und Organisationspsychologie 2002, 46(4):185-200.
29. Lampert M., Ball D. Teaching, multimedia, and mathematics: Investigations of real practice 1998, Teachers College Press, New York, NY.
30. Lemke J. Video epistemology in- and outside the box: traversing attentional spaces. Video research in the learning sciences 2007, 39-51. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ. R. Goldman, R. Pea, B. Barron, S.J. Derry (Eds.).
31. Miller K., Zhou X. Learning from classroom video: what makes it compelling and what makes it hard. Video research in the learning sciences 2007, 321-334. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ. R. Goldmann, R. Pea, B. Barron, S.J. Derry (Eds.).
32. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development Education at a glance 2006, OECD, Paris, France.
33. Palmer D.J., Stough L.M., Burdenski T.K., Gonzales M. Identifying teacher expertise: an examination of researchers' decision making. Educational Psychologist 2005, 40(1):13-25.
34. Paul S., Dawson K.P., Lanphear J.H., Cheema M.Y. Video recording feedback: a feasible and effective approach to teaching history-taking and physical examination skills in undergraduate paediatric medicine. Medical Education 1998, 32(3):332-336.
35. Pinsky L.E., Wipf J.E. A picture is worth a thousand words: practical use of videotape in teaching. Journal of General Internal Medicine 2000, 15(11):805-810.
36. Putnam R.T., Borko H. What do new views of knowledge and thinking have to say about research on teacher learning?. Educational Researcher 2000, 29(1):4-15.
37. Rosaen C., Schram P., Herbel-Eisenmann B. Using hypermedia technology to explore connections among mathematics, language, and literacy in teacher education. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education 2002, 2:2-31.
38. Roth K.J. Using video studies to transform science teaching and learning: results from the STeLLA professional development program. The power of video studies in investigating teaching and learning in the classroom 2009, 23-37. Waxmann, Münster, Germany. T. Janik, T. Seidel (Eds.).
39. Santagata R. Designing video-based professional development for mathematics teachers in low-performing schools. Journal of Teacher Education 2009, 60(1):38-51.
40. Santagata R., Zannoni C., Stigler J. The role of lesson analysis in pre-service teacher education: an empirical investigation of teacher learning from a virtual video-based field experience. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education 2007, 10(2):123-140.
41. Schwan S., Riempp R. The cognitive benefits of interactive videos: learning to tie nautical knots. Learning and Instruction 2004, 14:293-305.
42. Schwindt K. Lehrpersonen betrachten Unterricht: Kriterien für die kompetente Unterrichtswahrnehmung 2008, Waxmann, Münster, Germany.
43. Seago N. Using videos as an object of inquiry for mathematics teaching and learning. Using video in teacher education 2004, 259-286. Elsevier, Oxford, UK. J. Brophy (Ed.).
44. Seidel T., Prenzel M. Stability of teaching patterns in physics instruction: findings from a video study. Learning and Instruction 2006, 16(3):228-240.
45. Seidel T., Prenzel M. Wie Lehrpersonen Unterricht wahrnehmen und einschätzen: Erfassung pädagogisch-psychologischer Kompetenzen bei Lehrpersonen mit Hilfe von Videosequenzen. Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft 2007, 8:201-218. [Special issue].
46. How to run a video study: Technical report of the IPN video study 2005, Waxmann, Münster, Germany. T. Seidel, M. Prenzel, M. Kobarg (Eds.).
47. Seidel T., Prenzel M., Rimmele R., Dalehefte I.M., Herweg C., Kobarg M., et al. Blicke auf den Physikunterricht. Ergebnisse der IPN Videostudie. Zeitschrift für Pädagogik 2006, 52(6):798-821.
48. Seidel T., Prenzel M., Schwindt K., Stürmer K., Blomberg G., Kobarg M. LUV and observe: two projects using video to diagnose teachers' competence. The power of video studies in investigating teaching and learning in the classroom 2009, 243-258. Waxmann, Münster, Germany. T. Janik, T. Seidel (Eds.).
49. Seidel T., Rimmele R., Prenzel M. Clarity and coherence of lesson goals as a scaffold for student learning. Learning and Instruction 2005, 15(6):539-556.
50. Seidel T., Shavelson R.J. Teaching effectiveness research in the last decade: role of theory and research design in disentangling meta-analysis results. Review of Educational Research 2007, 77:454-499.
51. Sherin M.G. New perspectives on the role of video in teacher education. Using video in teacher education 2004, 1-28. Elsevier, Amsterdam, Netherlands. J. Brophy (Ed.).
52. Sherin M.G. The development of teachers' professional vision in video clubs. Video research in the learning sciences 2007, 383-395. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ. R. Goldman, R. Pea, B. Barron, S.J. Derry (Eds.).
53. Sherin M.G., van Es E. Effects of video club participation on teachers' professional vision. Journal of Teacher Education 2009, 60:20-37.
54. Spiro R.J., Collins B.P., Ramchandran A. Reflections on a post-Gutenberg epistemology of video use in ill-structured domains: fostering complex learning and cognitive flexibility. Video research in the learning sciences 2007, 93-100. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ. R. Goldman, R. Pea, B. Barron, S.J. Derry (Eds.).
55. Star J.R., Strickland S.K. Learning to observe: using video to improve preservice mathematics teachers' ability to notice. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education 2008, 11(2):107-125.
56. Stigler, J. W., and Staley, L. (2002, June). LessonLab Viewer: A software platform for teacher training. Paper presented at the international conference on teaching culture and the quality of learning, Monte Verit, Switzerland.
57. van Es E. Participants' roles in the context of a video club. Journal of the Learning Sciences 2009, 18(1):100-137.
58. van Es E., Sherin M.G. Mathematics teachers' "learning to notice" in the context of a video club. Teaching and Teacher Education 2008, 24(2):244-276.