Videobased lesson analysis: Effective science PD for teacher and student learning

Journal of Research in Science Teaching

Volumn 48, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 117-148

  Roth, Kathleen J ^a   Garnier, Helen E ^a,b   Chen, Catherine ^a   Lemmens, Meike ^a   Schwille, Kathleen ^c   Wickler, Nicole I Z ^d  

^a Biological Sciences Curriculum Study Colorado Springs   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH   (United States)

^c National Geographic Magazine   (United States)

^d CALIFORNIA STATE POLYTECHNIC UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

coherence; lesson analysis; professional development; science teaching; student science learning; student thinking; video based analysis of practice

Indexed keywords

COHERENCE; LESSON ANALYSIS; PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT; SCIENCE TEACHING; VIDEO-BASED ANALYSIS-OF-PRACTICE;

EMPLOYMENT; LENSES; OPTICAL INSTRUMENTS; PROFESSIONAL ASPECTS; STUDENTS;

TEACHING;

EID: 79251520686     PISSN: 00224308     EISSN: 10982736     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/tea.20408     Document Type: Article

References (89)

1. Abell, S.K., (2008). Twenty years later: Does pedagogical content knowledge remain a useful idea? International Journal of Science Education, 30 (10), 1405-1416.
2. Abell, S.K., &, Cennamo, K.S., (2004). Videocases in elementary science teacher preparation. In, J. Brophy, (Ed.), Advances in research on teaching: Using video in teacher education (Vol. 10, pp. 103-130). New York, NY: Elsevier JAI.
3. Akerson, V.L., Cullen, T.A., &, Hanson, D.L., (2009). Fostering a community of practice through a professional development program to improve elementary teachers' views of nature of science and teaching practice. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46, 1090-1113.
4. Akerson, V., &, Hanuscin, D.L., (2007). Teaching nature of science through inquiry: Results of a 3-year professional development program. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44, 653-680.
5. Alvermann, D.E., &, Reinking, D., (2005). Editorial: Revealing an exchange between authors and reviewers about statistical significance [Editorial]. Reading Research Quarterly, 40, 6-10.
6. American Association for the Advancement of Science, Project, 2061. (1993). Benchmarks for science literacy. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
7. Apelman, M., (1984). Critical barriers to the understanding of elementary science: Learning about light and color. In, C. Anderson, (Ed.), Observing science classrooms: Observing science perspectives from research and practice, AETS Yearbook (pp. 3-36). Columbus, OH: ERIC/SMEAC.
8. Ball, D.L., &, Cohen, D.K., (1999). Developing practice, developing practitioners: Toward a practice-based theory of professional education. In, G. Sykes, &, L. Darling-Hammond, (Eds.), Teaching as the learning profession: Handbook of policy and practice (pp. 3-32). San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.
9. Ball, D.L., Thames, M.H., &, Phelps, G., (2008). Content knowledge for teaching: What makes it special? Journal of Teacher Education, 59 (5), 389-407.
10. Banilower, E.R., Heck, D.J., &, Weiss, I.R., (2007). Can professional development make the vision of the standards a reality? The impact of the National Science Foundations' local systemic change through teacher enhancement initiative. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44, 375-395.
11. Brown, J.S., Collins, A., &, Duguid, P., (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18, 32-41.
12. Carlsen, W.S., (1993). Teacher knowledge and discourse control: Quantitative evidence from novice biology teachers' classrooms. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30, 471-481.
13. Carlson, J., Gardner, A., Stuhlsatz, M., &, Wilson, C., 2010. The role of transformative professional development based on educative materials in affecting teacher pck, classroom practice, and student achievement. Paper presented at the AERA Annual Conference, Denver, CO.
14. Carpenter, T.P., Fennema, E., Peterson, P.L., Chiang, C.-P., &, Loef, M., (1989). Using knowledge of children's mathematics thinking in classroom teaching: An experimental study. American Educational Research Journal, 26, 499-553.
15. Cobb, P., Wood, T., Yackel, E., Nicholls, J., Wheatley, G., Trigatti, B., &, Perlwitz, M., (1991). Assessment of a problem-centered second-grade mathematics project. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 22, 13-29.
16. Collins, A., (2006). Cognitive apprenticeship. In, R.K. Sawyer, (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 47-60). New York: Cambridge University Press.
17. Collins, A.M., Brown, J.S., &, Newman, S., (1989). Cognitive apprenticeship: Teaching the craft of reading, writing, and mathematics. In, L.B. Resnick, (Ed.), Knowing, learning and instruction: Essays in honor of Robert Glaser (pp. 453-494). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
18. Crockett, M.D., (2002). Inquiry as PD: Creating dilemmas through teachers' work. Teaching and Teacher Education, 18, 609-624.
19. Davis, E.A., &, Krajcik, J.S., (2005). Designing educative curriculum materials to promote teacher learning. Education Researcher, 34, 3-14.
20. Desimone, L., Porter, A.C., Garet, M., Yoon, K.S., &, Birman, B., (2002). Does professional development change teachers' instruction? Results from a three-year study. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 24 (2), 81-112.
21. Dunne, D.W., (2000). Math and science achievement: It starts with better teaching! Education World. Retrieved fromhttp://www.education-world.com/a-curr/ curr275.shtml.
22. Elmore, R.F., (2002). Bridging the gap between standards and achievement: The imperative for PD in education. Washington, DC: Albert Shanker Institute.
23. Feingold, A., (2009). Effect sizes for growth-modeling analysis for controlled clinical trials in the same metric as for classical analysis. Psychological Methods, 14, 43-53.
24. Fernandez, C., (2002). Learning from Japanese approaches to professional development: The case of lesson study. Journal of Teacher Education, 53, 393-405.
25. Fulp, S.L., (2002). 2000 National survey of science and mathematics education: Status of elementary school science teaching. Chapel Hill, NC: Horizon Research.
26. Gallimore, R., Ermeling, B., Saunders, W., &, Goldenberg, C., (2009). Moving the learning of teaching closer to practice: Teacher education implications of school-based inquiry teams. Elementary School Journal, 109 (5), 537-553.
27. Garet, M.S., Porter, A.C., Desimone, L., Birman, B.F., &, Yoon, K.S., (2001). What makes PD effective? Results from a national sample of teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 38, 915-945.
28. Gess-Newsome J., &, Lederman N.G., (Eds.). (2002). Examining pedagogical content knowledge: The construct and its implications for science education. New York, NY: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
29. Hammer, D., &, van Zee, E., (2006). Seeing the science in children's thinking: Case studies of student inquiry in physical science [Book and DVD]. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
30. Hand, B., &, Prain, V., (2002). Teachers implementing writing-to-learn strategies in junior secondary science: A case study. Science Education, 86, 737-755.
31. Hawley, W.D., &, Valli, L., (1999). The essentials of effective professional development: A new consensus. In, L. Darling-Hammond, &, G. Sykes, (Eds.), Teaching as the learning profession: Handbook of policy and practice (pp. 127-150). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
32. Hewson, P.W., (2007). Teacher professional development in science. In, S.K. Abell, &, N.G. Lederman, (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education. (pp. 1179-1203). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
33. Jeanpierre, B., Oberhauser, K., &, Freeman, C., (2005). Characteristics of professional development that effect change in secondary science teachers' classroom practices. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42, 668-690.
34. Johnson, C.C., Kahle, J.B., &, Fargo, J.D., (2006). A study of the effect of sustained, whole-school professional development on student achievement. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44, 775-786.
35. Kelly, G.J., Chen, C., &, Crawford, T., (1998). Methodological considerations for studying science-in-the-making in educational settings. Research in Science Education, 28, 23-49.
36. Kennedy, M., (1998). Form and substance in inservice teacher education. Madison, WI: National Institute for Science Education, University of Wisconsin-Madison.
37. Kersting, N., (2008). Using video clips of mathematics classroom instruction as item prompts to measure teachers' knowledge of teaching mathematics. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 68 (5), 845-861.
38. Lampert, M., &, Ball, D.L., (1999). Aligning teacher education with contemporary K-12 reform visions. In, L. Darling-Hammond, &, G. Sykes, (Eds.), Teaching as the learning profession: Handbook of policy and practice. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
39. Lave, J., (1988). Cognition in practice: Mind, mathematics, and culture in everyday life. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
40. Lawrenz, F., &, McCreath, H., (1988). Integrating quantitative and qualitative evaluation methods to compare two inservice training programs. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 25, 397-407.
41. Lee, V.E., &, Bryk, A., (1989). A multilevel model of the social distribution of educational achievement. Sociology of Education, 62, 172-192.
42. Lee, O., Deaktor, R., Enders, C., &, Lambert, J., (2008). Impact of a multiyear professional development intervention on science achievement of culturally and linguistically diverse elementary students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45, 726-747.
43. Lee, V.E., &, Smith, J.B., (1997). High school size: Which works best and for whom? Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 19, 205-227.
44. LeFevre, D.M., (2004). Designing for teacher learning: Video-based curriculum design. In, J. Brophy, (Ed.), Advances in research on teaching: Using video in teacher education (Vol. 10, pp. 235-258). New York, NY: Elsevier JAI.
45. Lewis, C.C., Perry, R., &, Hurd, J., (2004). A deeper look at lesson study. Educational Leadership, 61, 18-22.
46. Lieberman, A., &, Mace, D.P., (2010). Making practice public: Teacher learning in the 21st century. Journal of Teacher Education, 61 (1-2), 77-88.
47. Loucks-Horsley, S., Hewson, P.W., Love, N., &, Stiles, K.E., (2003). Designing professional development for teachers of science and mathematics (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
48. Loughran, J., Mulhall, P., &, Berry, A., (2008). Exploring pedagogical content knowledge in science teacher education. International Journal of Science Education, 30 (10), 1301-1320.
49. Luft, J., (2001). Changing inquiry practices and beliefs: The impact of an inquiry-based professional development programme on beginning and experienced secondary science teachers. International Journal of Science Education, 23, 517-534.
50. Magnusson, S., Krajcik, J.S., &, Borko, H., (2002). Nature, sources and development of pedagogical content knowledge for science teaching. In, J. Gess-Newsome, &, N. Lederman, (Eds.), Examining pedagogical content knowledge: The construct and its implications for science education. New York, NY: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
51. Marek, E.A., &, Methven, S.B., (1991). Effects of the learning cycle upon student and classroom teacher performance. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28, 41-53.
52. Mayer, D.P., (1998). Do new teaching standards undermine performance? Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 20, 53-73.
53. McMillan, J.H., (2007). Randomized field trials and internal validity: Not so fast my friend. Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation, 12 (15), 1-6. Retrieved from.http://pareonline.net/getvn.asp?v=12&n=15
54. Mumme, J., &, Seago, N., (2002). Issues and challenges in facilitating videocases for mathematics PD. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association New Orleans, LA.
55. National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
56. National Research Council. (2002). Learning and understanding: Improving advanced study of mathematics and science in U.S. high schools. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
57. National Research Council. (2005). How students learn: Science in the classroom. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
58. National Research Council. (2007). Taking science to school: Learning and teaching science in grades K-8. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
59. National Science Foundation. (2010). Discovery research K-12 program solicitation NSF10-610. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation.
60. Ogura, Y., (2000). Japanese expert teachers' science teaching evaluation framework and its application to teacher education. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, New Orleans, LA.
61. Oliveira, A.W., (2010). Improving teacher questioning in science inquiry discussions through professional development. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47, 422-453.
62. Raudenbush, S.W., (2003). Designing field trials of educational innovations. Paper prepared for a national invitational conference, Conceptualizing Scale-UP: Multidisciplinary Perspectives, Washington, DC.
63. Raudenbush, S.W., &, Bryk, A.S., (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
64. Raudenbush, S.W., &, Liu, X., (2001). Effects of study duration, frequency of observation, and sample size on power in studies of group differences in polynomial change. Psychological Methods, 6, 387-401.
65. Roth, K.J., Anderson, C.W., &, Smith, E.L., (1987). Curriculum materials, teacher talk and student learning: Case studies in fifth grade science teaching. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 19, 527-548.
66. Roth, K.J., Druker, S.D., Garnier, H.E., Lemmens, M., Chen, C., Kawanaka, T., Rasmussen, D., Trubacova, S., Warvi, D., Okamoto, Y., Gonzales, P., Stigler, J., &, Gallimore, R., (2006). Teaching science in five countries: Results from the TIMSS 1999 video study (NCES 2006-011). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics. Retrieved from.
67. Rubin, R.L., &, Norman, J.T., (1992). Systematic modeling versus the learning cycle: Comparative effects of integrated science process skill achievement. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 20, 715-727.
68. Sawchuk, S., (2010). Professional development: Sorting through the jumble to achieve success. Education Week, 30 (Suppl), 52-58.
69. Schmidt, W., &, Buchmann, M., (1983). Six teachers' beliefs and attitudes and their curriculum time allocations. The Elementary School Journal, 84, 162-171.
70. Seago, N., (2004). Using video as an object of inquiry for mathematics teaching and learning. In, J. Brophy, (Ed.), Advances in research on teaching: Using video in teacher education (Vol. 10, pp. 259-286). New York, NY: Elsevier JAI.
71. Sherin, M.G., (2003). Using video clubs to support conversations among teachers and researchers. Action in Teacher Education, 4, 33-45.
72. Sherin, M.G., (2004). New perspectives on the role of video in teacher education. In, J. Brophy, (Ed.), Advances in research on teaching: Using video in teacher education (Vol. 10, pp. 1-27). New York, NY: Elsevier JAI.
73. Sherin, M.G., &, Han, S.Y., (2002). Teacher learning in the context of a video club. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
74. Sherin, M.G., &, van Es, E.A., (2002). Using video to support teachers' ability to interpret classroom interactions. In Society for information technology and teacher education: Information technology and teacher education annual (Vol. 4, pp. 2532-2536). Norfolk, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education.
75. Shulman, L., (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15, 4-14.
76. Smith, D., (1987). Primary teachers' substantive, syntactic and pedagogical content knowledge. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association of Research in Science Teaching, Washington, DC.
77. Smith, D., &, Neale, D.C., (1989). The construction of subject matter knowledge in primary science teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 5, 1-20.
78. Stigler, J.W., Gallimore, R., &, Hiebert, J., (2000). Using video surveys to compare classrooms and teaching across cultures: Examples and lessons from the TIMSS video studies. Educational Psychologist, 35, 87-100.
79. Stoddart, T., Connell, M., Stofflett, R., &, Peck, D., (1993). Reconstructing elementary teacher candidates' understanding of mathematics and science content. Teaching and Teacher Education, 9, 229-241.
80. Supovitz, J.A., &, Turner, H.M., (2000). The effects of professional development on science teaching practices and classroom culture. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37, 963-980.
81. Van Driel, J.H., Verloop, N., &, deVos, W., (1998). Developing science teachers pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35 (6), 673-695.
82. Vescio, V., Ross, D., &, Adams, A., (2008). A review of research on the impact of professional learning communities on teaching practice and student learning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24, 80-91.
83. Wang-Iverson P., &, Yoshida M., (Eds.), (2005). Building our understanding of lesson study. Philadelphia, PA: Research for Better Schools.
84. Wayne, A.J., Yoon, K.S., Zhu, P., Cronen, S., &, Garet, M.S., (2008). Experimenting with teacher professional development: Motives and methods. Educational Researcher, 37, 469-479.
85. Wier, E., (1987). Primary teachers' perceptions of barriers to teaching science. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Washington, DC.
86. Wilson, S.M., &, Berne, J., (1999). Teacher learning and the acquisition of professional knowledge: An examination of research on contemporary professional development. In, A. Iran-Nejad, &, P.D. Pearson, (Eds.), Review of research in education (pp. 173-209). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
87. Wood, T., &, Sellers, P., (1996). Assessment of a problem-centered mathematics program: Third grade. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 27, 337-353.
88. Zannoni, C., &, Santagata, R., (2002). The use of Lessonlab software for teacher PD. Paper presented at the XII AIRIPA National Conference, Udine, Italy.
89. Zembal-Saul, C., (2005). Preservice teachers' understanding of teaching elementary school science as argument. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association of Research in Science Teaching, Dallas, TX.