Informing learning design with learning analytics to improve teacher inquiry

British Journal of Educational Technology

Volumn 46, Issue 2, 2015, Pages 230-248

  Persico, Donatella ^a   Pozzi, Francesca ^a  

^a Istituto Tecnologie Didattiche   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ELECTRIC GROUNDING; LEARNING SYSTEMS; QUALITY CONTROL;

COMMON LANGUAGES; DESIGN PROCESS; EDUCATIONAL INTERVENTION; INNOVATIVE PRACTICES; LEARNING DESIGNS; LEARNING PROCESS; METHODOLOGICAL APPROACH; TACIT KNOWLEDGE;

DESIGN;

EID: 84925363104     PISSN: 00071013     EISSN: 14678535     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/bjet.12207     Document Type: Review

References (65)

1. Agostinho, S., (2009). Learning design representations to document, model, and share teaching practice. In, L. Lockyer, S. Bennett, S. Agostinho, &, B. Harper, (Eds), Handbook of research on learning design and learning objects: issues, applications, and technologies (pp. 1-19). Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference.
2. Agostinho, S., (2011). The use of a visual learning design representation to support the design process of teaching in higher education. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 27, 6, 961-978.
3. Aviv, R., Erlich, Z., Ravid, G., &, Geva, A., (2003). Network analysis of knowledge construction in asynchronous learning networks. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 7, 3, 1-23.
4. Bakharia, A., &, Dawson, S., (2011). SNAPP: a bird's-eye view of temporal participant interactions. In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Learning Analytics & Knowledge (pp. 168-173). NY, USA: ACM NEW York.
5. Blikstein, P., (2011). Using learning analytics to assess students' behavior in open-ended programming tasks. In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Learning Analytics & Knowledge (pp. 110-116). NY, USA: ACM NEW York.
6. Britain, S., (2004). A review of learning design: concept, specifications and tools: a report for the JISC E-learning pedagogy programme. Retrieved July 30, 2014, from http://www.jisc.ac.uk/media/documents/programmes/elearningpedagogy/learningdesigntoolsfinalreport.pdf
7. Burgos, D., (2010). What is wrong with the IMS Learning Design specification? Constraints and recommendations. Proceedings of LWA2010-workshop-woche: lernen, wissen\& adaptivitaet, Kassel, Germany. Retrieved July 30, 2014, from http://www.kde.cs.uni-kassel.de/conf/lwa10/papers/abis8.pdf
8. Conole, G., (2010a). Learning design-making practice explicit. ConnectEd 2010: 2nd International conference on Design Education, 28 June-1 July 2010, Sydney, Australia.
9. Conole, G., (2010b). An overview of design representations. In, L. Dirckinck-Holmfeld, V. Hodgson, C. Jones, M. de Laat, D. McConnell, &, T. Ryberg, (Eds), Proceedings of the 7th International Conference of on Networked Learning (pp. 482-489). Retrieved July 30, 2014, from http://celstec.org/system/files/file/conference-proceedings/NLC2010-Proceedings/abstracts/PDFs/Conole-2.pdf
10. Conole, G., (2013). Designing for learning in an open world. New York: Springer.
11. Dalziel, J. R., (2003). Implementing learning design: the Learning Activity Management System (LAMS). In, G. Crisp, D. Thiele, I. Scholten, S. Barker, &, J. Baron, (Eds), Interact, Integrate, Impact: Proceedings of the 20th Annual Conference of the Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education (pp. 593-599). Adelaide: ASCILITE. 7-10 December 2003. Retrieved July, 30, 2014, from http://www.ascilite.org/conferences/adelaide03/program/conf-prog-index.htm
12. Dalziel, J., Conole, G., Wills, S., Walker, S., Bennett, S., Dobozy, E., et al., (2013). The larnaca declaration on learning design. Retrieved July 30, 2014, from http://www.larnacadeclaration.org/
13. De Laat, M., Lally, V., Lipponen, L., &, Simons, R.-J., (2007). Investigating patterns of interaction in networked learning and computer-supported collaborative learning: a role for social network analysis. International Journal of Computer Supported Collaborative Learning, 2, 87-103.
14. De Liddo, A., Shum, B., Derntl, M., Neumann, S., &, Oberhuemer, P., (2011). Community support for authoring, sharing, and reusing instructional models: the Open Graphical Learning Modeller (OpenGLM)'. In Proceedings of 10th IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies, ICALT 2011 (pp. 431-435). Athens, Georgia, USA.
15. Dias, S. B., &, Diniz, J. A., (2013). FuzzyQoI Model: a fuzzy logic-based modelling of users' quality of interaction with a learning management system under blended learning. Computers & Education, 69, 38-59. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2013.06.016.
16. Dobozy, E., (2011). Typologies of learning design and the introduction of a "LD-Type 2" case example'. eLearning Papers, 27, 27, 1-11.
17. Earp, J., Ott, M., &, Pozzi, F., (2013). Facilitating educators' knowledge transfer with information systems for sharing practices. Computers in Human Behaviour, 29, 445-455.
18. Emin, V., Pernin, J.-P., &, Guéraud, V., (2009). Model and tool to clarify intentions and strategies in learning scenarios design. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Technology-Enhanced Learning (EC-TEL 2009) (pp. 462-476). Nice, France.
19. Emin, V., Pernin, J.-P., &, Aguirre, J.-L., (2010). ScenEdit: an intention-oriented authoring environment to design learning scenarios. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Technology-Enhanced Learning (EC-TEL 2010) (pp. 626-631). Barcelona, Spain.
20. Falconer, I., Beetham, H., Oliver, R., Lockyer, L., &, Littlejohn, A., (2007). Mod4L final report: representing learning designs. Retrieved July, 30, 2014, from http://www.researchgate.net/publication/228379273-Mod4L-final-report-Representing-learning-designs/file/79e41510c2dba4e1e9.pdf
21. Ferguson, R., (2012). Learning analytics: drivers, developments and challenges. International Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning, 4, 5, 304-317.
22. Ferraris, M., Midoro, V., Olimpo, G., Persico, D., &, Sissa, G., (1985). Diagnostic evaluation in the learning process. In, K. Duncan, &, D. Harris, (Eds), Proc. 4th World Conference on Computers in Education (WCCE85) Norfolk, VA (USA), 29/7-2/8 1985 (pp. 251-258). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
23. Gewerc-Barujel, A., Montero-Mesa, L., &, Lama-Penín, M., (2014). Collaboration and social networking in higher education. Colaboraciõn y redes sociales en la enseñanza universitaria. Comunicar, 21, 42, 55-63.
24. Goodyear, P., &, Retalis, S., (2010). Technology-enhanced learning: design patterns and pattern languages. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
25. Gustafson, K. L., &, Branch, R. M., (2002). What is instructional design? In, R. A. Reiser, &, J. V. Dempsey, (Eds), Trends and issues in instructional design and technology (pp. 17-25). Columbus, OH: Merrill Prentice Hall.
26. Hernández-Leo, D., Villasclaras-Fernández, E. D., Asensio-Pérez, I. M., Jorrín-Abellán, I., Dimitriadis, Y., Ruiz-Requies, I., &, Rubia-Avi, B., (2006). Collage, a collaborative learning design editor based on patterns. Educational Technology & Society, 9, 1, 58-71.
27. Hernández-Leo, D., Romeo, L., Carralero, M. A., Chacõn, J., Carriõ, M., Moreno, P., et al (2011). LdShake: learning design solutions sharing and co-edition. Computers & Education, 57, 4, 2249-2260.
28. IMS Global Learning Consortium (2003). IMS learning design best practice and implementation guide. Retrieved July 30, 2014, from http://www.imsglobal.org/learningdesign/ldv1p0/imsld-bestv1p0.html#1534949
29. Kali, Y., (2008). The design principles database as means for promoting design-based research. In, A. E. Kelly, R. A. Lesh, &, J. Y. Baek, (Eds), Handbook of design research methods in education (pp. 423-438). New York: Routledge.
30. Katsamani, M., &, Retalis, S., (2011) Making learning design in layers. The cadmos approach. IADIS Multi Conference on Computer Science and Information Systems. Rome, Italy.
31. Koper, R., &, Manderveld, J., (2004). Educational modelling language: modelling reusable, interoperable, rich and personalised units of learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 35, 5, 537-552.
32. Laurillard, D., (2008). The teacher as action researcher. Studies in Higher Education, 33, 2, 139-154.
33. Laurillard, D., (2012). Teaching as a design science: building pedagogical patterns for learning and technology. New York: Routledge.
34. Laurillard, D., Charlton, P., Craft, B., Dimakopoulos, D., Ljubojevic, D., Magoulas, G., et al (2011). A constructionist learning environment for teachers to model learning designs. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 29, 1, 15-30.
35. Lejeune, A., &, Gueraud, V., (2012). Embedding observation means into the learning scenarios: authoring approach and environment for simulation-based learning. In Proceedings of the 12th IEEE International conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT).
36. Lockyer, L., &, Dawson, S., (2011). Learning designs and learning analytics. In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge (LAK'11), 153-156.
37. Lockyer, L., Bennett, S., Agostinho, S., &, Harper, B., (Eds) (2009). Handbook of research on learning design and learning objects: issues, applications and technologies. Hershey, PA: Information Science Publishing.
38. Lockyer, L., Heathcote, E., &, Dawson, S., (2013). Informing pedagogical action: aligning learning analytics with learning design. American Behavioral Scientist, 57, 10, 1439-1459.
39. McAndrew, P., Goodyear, P., &, Dalziel, J., (2006). Patterns, designs and activities: unifying descriptions of learning structures. International Journal Learning Technology, 2, 2/3, 216-242.
40. Molenda, M., (2003). In search of the elusive ADDIE model. Performance Improvement, 42, 5, 34-37. Retrieved July 30, 2014, from http://www.comp.dit.ie/dgordon/Courses/ILT/ILT0004/InSearchofElusiveADDIE.pdf
41. Mor, Y., (2011). Design narratives: an intuitive scientific form for capturing design knowledge in education. In, Y. Eshet-Alkalai, A. Caspi, S. Eden, N. Geri, &, Y. Yair, (Eds), Learning in the Technological Era 6th Chais Conference (pp. 57-63). Israel: Open University.
42. Mor, Y., &, Craft, B., (2012). Learning design: reflections upon the current landscape. Research in Learning Technology-Supplement: ALT-C 2012 Conference Proceedings, 20, 85-94. Retrieved July 30, 2014, from http://www.researchinlearningtechnology.net/index.php/rlt/article/view/19196
43. Mor, Y., &, Mogilevsky, O., (2013). The learning design studio: collaborative design inquiry as teachers' professional development. Research in Learning Technology, 21, 22054. Retrieved September 3, 2014, from http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v21i0.22054
44. Olimpo, G., (1995). La struttura dei contenuti nello sviluppo del courseware. TD Tecnologie Didattiche, 3, 1, 15-21.
45. Olimpo, G., Bottino, R. M., Earp, J., Ott, M., Pozzi, F., &, Tavella, M., (2010). Pedagogical plans as communication oriented objects. Computers & Education, 55, 2, 476-488.
46. Paquette, G., Léonard, M., &, Lundgren-Cayrol, K., (2008). The MOT+ visual language for knowledge-based instructional design. In, L. Botturi, &, S. T. Stubbs, (Eds), Handbook of visual languages for instructional design: theories and practices (pp. 133-154). Hershey, NY: Information Science Reference.
47. Pérez-Sanagustín, M., Santos, P., Hernández-Leo, D., &, Blat, J., (2012). 4SPPIces: a case study of factors in a scripted collaborative-learning blended course across spatial locations. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 7, 3, 443-465.
48. Persico, D., (1997). Methodological constants in courseware design. British Journal of Educational Technology, 28, 2, 111-124.
49. Persico, D., &, Pozzi, F., (2013). The role of representations for the development of a participatory culture of Learning Design among educators. In, D. Parmigiani, V. Pennazio, &, A. Traverso, (Eds), ATEE-SIREM Winter Conference Proceedings, Learning & Teaching with Media & Technology, 7-9/3/2013, Genoa, Italy (pp. 365-372). Brussels, Belgium: ATEE AISBL.
50. Persico, D., Pozzi, F., &, Sarti, L., (2009). Design patterns for monitoring and evaluating CSCL processes. Computers in Human Behavior, 25, 5, 1020-1027.
51. Persico, D., Pozzi, F., Anastopoulou, S., Conole, G., Craft, B., Dimitriadis, Y., et al (2013). Learning design rashomon I-supporting the design of one lesson through different approaches. Research in Learning Technologies, 21, 20224. Supplement "Art and science of learning design". Retrieved September 3, 2014, from http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v21i0.20224
52. Pozzi, F., &, Persico, D., (2013). Sustaining learning design and pedagogical planning in CSCL. Research in Learning Technologies, 21, 17585. Supplement "Art and science of learning design". Retrieved September 3, 2014, from http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v21i0.17585
53. Pozzi, F., Persico, D., &, Earp, J., (2014). A multi-dimensional space for learning design representations and tools. In, B. Craft, Y. Mor, &, M. Maina, (Eds), The art and science of learning design. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers. Retrieved July 30, 2014, from http://cloudworks.ac.uk/cloud/view/6628
54. Prieto, L. P., Asensio-Pérez, J. I., Dimitriadis, Y., Gõmez-Sánchez, E., &, Muñoz-Cristõbal, J. A., (2011). GLUE!-PS: a multi-language architecture and data model to deploy TEL designs to multiple learning environments. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Technology-Enhanced Learning (EC-TEL 2011) (pp. 285-298). Palermo, Italy.
55. Prieto, L. P., Dimitriadis, Y., Craft, B., Derntl, M., Émin, V., Katsamani, M., et al (2013). Learning design rashomon II-exploring one lesson through multiple tools'. Research in Learning Technologies, 21, 20057. Supplement "Art and science of learning design". Retrieved September 3, 2014, from http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v21i0.20057
56. Reiser, R. A., (2001). A history of instructional design and technology: part II: a history of instructional design. Educational Technology Research and Development, 49, 2, 57-67.
57. Rogers, E., (1995). Diffusion of innovations. New York: Free Press.
58. Ronen, M., Kohen-Vacs, D., &, Raz-Fogel, N., (2006). Structuring, sharing and reusing asynchronous collaborative pedagogy, Paper presented at the International Conference of the Learning Sciences, ICLS 2006, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN.
59. San Diego, J. P., Laurillard, D., Boyle, T., Bradley, C., &, Ljubojevicb, D., (2008). Towards a user-oriented analytical approach to learning design. Research in Learning Technology ALT-J, 16, 1, 15-29.
60. Smith, P. K., Mahdavi, J., Carvalho, M., Fisher, S., Russell, S., &, Tippett, N., (2008). Cyberbullying: its nature and impact in secondary school pupils. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 49, 4, 376-385.
61. Smith, P. L., &, Ragan, T. J., (2005). Instructional design. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
62. Van Rooij, S. W., (2010). Project management in instructional design: ADDIE is not enough. British Journal of Educational Technology, 41, 5, 852-864.
63. Villasclaras-Fernández, E. D., Asensio-Pérez, J. I., Hernández-Leo, D., Dimitriadis, Y., de la Fuente-Valentín, L., &, Martínez-Monés, A., (2011). Implementing computer-interpretable CSCL scripts with embedded assessment: a pattern based design approach. In, F. Pozzi, &, D. Persico, (Eds), Techniques for fostering collaboration in online learning communities: theoretical and practical perspectives (pp. 261-277). Hershey, PA: IGI Global Publishing.
64. Walmsley, H., (2011). Best practice models for e-learning. Retrieved July 30, 2014, from http://bestpracticemodels.wiki.staffs.ac.uk/
65. Walmsley, H., (2012). Case study: a community of practice for constructivist professional development in e-learning. Innovative Practice in Higher Education, 1, 2.