SNAPP: A bird's-eye view of temporal participant interaction

ACM International Conference Proceeding Series

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 168-173

  Bakharia, Aneesha ^a   Dawson, Shane ^b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITY OF WOLLONGONG   (Australia)

Author keywords

Inferring social networks; Learning analytics

Indexed keywords

AFFORDANCES; BIRD'S EYE VIEW; DIAGNOSTIC TOOLS; DISCUSSION FORUM; FIREFOX; FUNCTIONAL FEATURES; INTERACTION PATTERN; INTERNET EXPLORERS; INTERVENTION STRATEGY; LEARNING ACTIVITY; LEARNING ANALYTICS; MONITORING NETWORK; OPEN-SOURCE LEARNING; PEDAGOGICAL PRACTICES; SOCIAL NETWORK ANALYSIS; SOCIAL NETWORKS; STUDENT ENGAGEMENT;

OPEN SYSTEMS; VISUALIZATION;

SOCIAL NETWORKING (ONLINE);

EID: 84856318424     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/2090116.2090144     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (37)

1. Aviv, R., Z. Erlich, G. Ravid, and A. Geva, (2003).Network analysis of knowledge construction in asynchronous learning networks. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks. 7(3): p. 1-23.
2. Bakharia, A., E. Heathcote, and S. Dawson, Social network adapting pedagogical practice: SNAPP, in ASCILITE 2009: Same places, different spaces. 2009, ASCILITE: Auckland.
3. Borgatti, S.P., (2002), NetDraw: Graph visualization software. 2002, Harvard: Analytic Technologies.
4. Brooks, C., W. Liu, C. Hansen, G. McCalla, and J. Greer, (2007). Making Sense of Complex Learner Data. in Workshop of Assessment of Group and Individual Learning Through Intelligent Visualization (AGILEeViz). AIED 2007.
5. Dawson, S. and E. McWilliam, Investigating the application of IT generated data as an indicator of learning and teaching performance. 2008, Australian Learning and Teaching Council: Canberra.
6. Dawson, S., E. McWilliam, and G. Poole, (2008). Monitoring student creative capacity: Using network visualisation to evaluate pedagogical practice. in Creating value between commerce and commons. Brisbane, Australia: Centre for Excellence for Creative Industries and Innovation.
7. Dawson, S., E. McWilliam, and J. Tan, (2008). Teaching Smarter: How mining ICT data can inform and improve learning and teaching practice. in Hello where are you in the landscape of educational technology. ASCILITE 2008. Melbourne, Australia.
8. Dawson, S., L. Macfadyen, and L. Lockyer, (2009). Learning or performance: Predicting drivers of student motivation. in Ascilite 2009 Conference: Same places, different spaces. Auckland, New Zealand.
9. Dawson, S., (2010).'Seeing' the learning community: An exploration of the development of a resource for monitoring online student networking. British Journal of Educational Technology. 41(5): p. 736-752.
10. Dawson, S., A. Bakharia, and E. Heathcote, (2010). SNAPP: Realising the affordances of real-time SNA within networked learning environments. in Networked Learning Conference 2010. Aalborg, Denmark.
11. Dawson, S., A. Bakharia, L. Lockyer, and E. Heathcote, 'Seeing' Networks: Visualising and evaluating student learning networks. 2010: Canberra.
12. Dawson, S., E. Heathcote, and G. Poole, (2010).Harnessing ICT potential: The adoption and analysis of ICT systems for enhancing the student learning experience. International Journal of Educational Management. 24(2): p. 116-128.
13. De Laat, M., (2002). Network and content analysis in an online community discourse. in Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning. Boulder, Colorado.
14. De Laat, M., V. Lally, L. Lipponen, and R.J. Simons, (2006).Analysing student engagement with learning and tutoring activities in networked learning communities: a multi-method approach. International Journal of Web Based Communities. 2(4): p. 394-412.
15. Dillenbourg, P., M. Baker, A. Blaye, and C. O'Malley, (1996). The evolution of research on collaborative learning, in Learning in Humans and Machine: Towards an interdisciplinary learning science., E. Spada and P. Reiman, Editors. Elsevier: Oxford. p. 189-211.
16. Fischer, F., J. Bruhn, C. Grasel, and H. Mandl, (2002).Fostering collaborative knowledge construction with visualization tools. Learning and Instruction. 12(2): p. 213- 232.
17. Garrison, D.R. and T. Anderson, (2003), E-learning in the 21st century: A framework for research and practice. 2003, London and New York: RoutledgeFalmer.
18. Granovetter, M., (1983).The strength of weak ties: A network theory revisited. Sociological theory. 1(1): p. 201-233.
19. Gunawardena, C.N., C.A. Lowe, and T. Anderson, (1998).Analysis of a global online debate and the development of an interaction analysis model for examining social construction of knowledge in computer conferencing. Journal of Educational Computing Research. 17(4): p. 397- 431. (Pubitemid 127337039)
20. Haythornthwaite, C. and M. Twidale, Visualization of Conversationally Constructed Social Networks, in CHI 2002. 2002, Citeseer: Minneapolis, MN.
21. Henri, F., (1992).Computer conferencing and content analysis. Collaborative learning through computer conferencing: The Najaden Papers. 90: p. 117-136.
22. Hmelo-Silver, C.E., (2003).Analyzing collaborative knowledge construction: multiple methods for integrated understanding. Computers & Education. 41(4): p. 397-420.
23. Lapadat, J., (2002).Written interaction: A key component in online learning. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication. 7(4).
24. Light, R.J., (2001), Making the most of college: Students speak their minds. 2001, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
25. Macfadyen, L. and S. Dawson, (2010).Mining LMS data to develop an "early warning system" for educators: A proof of concept. Computers & Education. 54(2): p. 588-599.
26. Marcos-Garcfa, J.A., A. Martinez-Mones, Y. Dimitriadis, R. Anguita-Martinez, I. Ruiz-Requies, and B. Rubia-Avi, (2009). Detecting and Solving Negative Situations in Real CSCL Experiences with a Role-Based Interaction Analysis Approach., in Intelligent Collaborative E-Learning Systems and Applications T. Daradoumis, S. Caballé, and J.M. Marquès, Editors. Springer: Berlin, Germany.
27. Martinez, M. (2003). High Attrition Rates in e-Learning: Challenges, Predictors and Solutions. The eLearning Developers Journal 2003 [cited 2009 3 July]; Available from: http://www.elearningguild.com/pdf/2/071403MGTL.pdf.
28. McDonald, B., N. Noakes, B. Stuckey, and S. Nyrop, (2005). Breaking down learner isolation: How social network analysis informs design and facilitation for online learning. in AERA. Montreal, Canada.
29. Picciano, A.G., (2002).Beyond student perceptions: Issues of interaction, presence and performance in an online course. JALN. 6(1): p. 21-40.
30. Pozzi, F., S. Manca, D. Persico, and L. Sarti, (2007).A general framework for tracking and analysing learning processes in computer-supported collaborative learning environments. Innovations in Education and Teaching International. 44(2): p. 169-179.
31. Reffay, C. and T. Chanier, How social network analysis can help to measure cohesion in collaborative distance learning. 2003. p. 343-352.
32. Rovai, A.P. (2002). Building sense of community at a distance. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning 2002 [cited 2005 25 January]; Available from: http://www.irrodl.org/content/v3.1/rovai.html.
33. Tinto, V., (1993), Leaving college: rethinking the causes and cures of student attrition. 2nd ed. 1993, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
34. Weinberger, A. and F. Fischer, (2006).A framework to analyze argumentative knowledge construction in computersupported collaborative learning. Computers & Education. 46(1): p. 71-95. (Pubitemid 41562938)
35. Welser, T., E. Gleave, D. Fisher, and M. Smith, (2007).Visualizing the signatures of social roles in online discussion groups. The Journal of Social Structure. 8(2).
36. White, S., J. O'Madadhain, D. Fisher, and Y.B. Boey. (2004). JUNG-Java Universal Network/graph Framework. 2004; Available from: http://jung. sourceforge.net/.
37. Willging, P.A., (2005).Using Social Network Analysis Techniques to Examine Online Interactions. US-China Education Review. 2(9).