Learning design Rashomon i - Supporting the design of one lesson through different approaches

Research in Learning Technology

Volumn 21, Issue SUPPL.1, 2013, Pages

  Persico, Donatella ^a   Pozzi, Francesca ^a   Anastopoulou, Stamatina ^b   Conole, Gráinne ^c   Craft, Brock ^d   Dimitriadis, Yannis ^e   Hernández Leo, Davinia ^f   Kali, Yael ^g   Mor, Yishay ^h   Pérez Sanagustín, Mar ⁱ   Walmsley, Helen ^j  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GENOA   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF THE AEGEAN   (Greece)

^c UNIVERSITY OF LEICESTER   (United Kingdom)

^d UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^e UNIVERSITY OF VALLADOLID   (Spain)

^f UNIVERSITAT POMPEU FABRA   (Spain)

^g UNIVERSITY OF HAIFA   (Israel)

^h OPEN UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

ⁱ UNIVERSIDAD CARLOS III DE MADRID   (Spain)

^j STAFFORDSHIRE UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

more..

Author keywords

Inquiry learning; Learning design approaches; Pedagogical planning

Indexed keywords

EID: 84886687282     PISSN: 21567069     EISSN: 21567077     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3402/rlt.v21i0.20224     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Anastopoulou, S. et al., (2012) 'Creating personal meaning through technology-supported science inquiry learning across formal and informal settings', International Journal of Science Education, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 251-273.
2. Botturi, L. et al., (2007) 'Comparing visual instructional design languages: a case study', in Handbook of Visual Languages in Instructional Design: Theories and Practices, eds L. Botturi & T. Stubbs, Idea Group, Hershey, PA, pp. 315-343.
3. Britain, S. (2004) A review of learning design: concept, specifications and tools. A report for the JISC E-learning Pedagogy Programme, [online] Available at: http://www.jisc.ac.uk/uploaded- documents/ACF1ABB.doc
4. Conole, G. (2013) Designing for learning in an open world, Springer, New York.
5. Coomey, M. & Stephenson, J. (2001) 'Online learning: it's all about dialogue, involvement, support and control according to the research', in Teaching and Learning Online: New Pedagogies for New Technologies (Creating success), ed. J. Stephenson, Kogan Page, London, pp. 37-52.
6. Dillenbourg, P. et al., (2012) 'Design for classroom orchestration', Computers & Education, [online] Available at: http://www.sciencedirect.com/ science/article/pii/S0360131512002540, DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2012.10.026.
7. Dimitriadis, Y. & Goodyear P. (2013). 'Forward-oriented design for learning: Illustrating the approach', Research in Learning Technology, vol. 21. DOI: 10.3402/rlt.v21i3.19909.
8. Dobozy, E. (2011) 'Typologies of learning design and the introduction of a ''LD-Type 2'' case examplé, eLearning Papers, vol. 27, no. 27, pp. 1-11.
9. Duschl, R. A. Schweingruber, H. A. & Shouse, A. W., (eds) (2007) Taking science to school: learning and teaching science in grades K-8, National Academies Press, Washington, DC.
10. Earp, J. & Pozzi, F. (2006) 'Fostering reflection in ICT-based pedagogical planning', Proceedings of The First International LAMS Conference 2006 Designing the Future of Learning, Sydney, Australia, pp. 35-44, [online] Available at: http://lams2008.lamsfoundation.org/pdfs/Earp-Pozzi-LAMS06.pdf
11. Gagné, R. M., Briggs, L. J. & Wager, W. W. (1992) Principles of instructional design, 4th edn, Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Fort Worth, TX.
12. Goodyear, P. & Retalis, S. (2010) Technology-enhanced learning: design patterns and pattern languages, Sense Publishers, Rotterdam.
13. Gutiérrez, S. et al., (2007) 'A swarm approach for automatic auditing of pedagogical planning', Proceedings of the Seventh IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT) 2007, pp.136-138, [online] Available at: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/search/searchresult.jsp?searchWithin- p-Authors:.QT.Valigiani,%20G.QT.&newsearch- partialPref
14. Hernández-Leo, D., et al., (2011) 'LdShake: learning design solutions sharing and co-edition', Computers & Education, vol. 57, no. 4, pp. 2249-2260.
15. Kali, Y. (2006) 'Collaborative knowledge building using the design principles databasé, International Journal of Computer Support for Collaborative Learning, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 187-201. (Pubitemid 44084598)
16. Kali, Y. (2008) 'The design principles database as means for promoting design-based research', in Handbook of design research methods in education, eds A. E. Kelly, R. A. Lesh & J. Y. Baek, Routledge, New York, pp. 423-438.
17. Kali, Y., Levin-Peled, R. & Dori, Y. J. (2009) 'The role of design-principles in designing courses that promote collaborative learning in higher-education', Computers in Human Behavior, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 55-65.
18. Laurillard, D. (1993) Rethinking university teaching: a framework for the effective use of educational technology, Routledge, London.
19. Laurillard, D. (2012) Teaching as a design science: building pedagogical patterns for learning and technology, Routledge, Abingdon.
20. Linn, M. C., Bell, P. & Davis, E. A. (2004) 'Specific design principles: elaborating the scaffolded knowledge integration framework', in Internet Environments for Science Education, eds M. C. Linn, E. A. Davis & P. Bell, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ, pp. 315-340.
21. Lockyer, L., et al., (2009) Handbook of research on learning design and learning objects: issues, applications, and technologies (2 volumes), IGI Global, Hershey, PA.
22. Mor, Y., et al., (2010) 'Formative e-Assessment: case stories, design patterns and future scenarios', in Problems Investigations of E-Learning Patterns: Context Factors, Problems and Solutions, eds C. Kohls & J. Wedekind, IGI Global, Hershey, PA, pp. 199-219.
23. Mor, Y. (2011) 'Design Narratives: An Intuitive Scientific Form for Capturing Design Knowledge in Education', 6th Chais Conference on Instructional Technologies Research: Learning in the Technological Era, Raanana, Israel, pp. 57-63.
24. Mor, Y. (2013) 'SNaP! Re-using, sharing and communicating designs and design knowledge using scenarios, narratives and patterns', in Handbook of Design in Educational Technology, eds R. Luckin et al., Routledge, London, UK.
25. Mor, Y. & Craft, B. (2012) 'Learning design: reflections on a snapshot of the current landscapé, Research in Learning Technology, vol. 20, Supplement: ALT-C 2012 Conference Proceedings, pp. 85-94.
26. Mor, Y., Warburton, S. & Winters, N. (2012) 'Participatory pattern workshops: a methodology for open learning design inquiry', Research in Learning Technology, vol. 20, Supplement: ALT-C 2012 Conference Proceedings, pp. 163-175.
27. Nicol, D. (2009) 'Assessment for learner self-regulation: enhancing achievement in the first year using learning technologies', Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 335-352.
28. Pérez-Sanagustín, M., Emin, V. & Hernández-Leo, D. (2012) 'Considering the space in the design of learning activities: the ISIS and 4SPPIces models applied to science inquiries', Proceedings of the 12th IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies, Roma, Italy, pp. 159-163.
29. Pérez-Sanagustín, M., et al., (2012a) 'Discovering the campus together: a mobile and computer-based learning experiencé, Journal of Network and Computer Applications, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 176-188.
30. Pérez-Sanagustín, M., et al., (2012b) '4SPPIces: a case study of factors in a scripted collaborative-learning blended course across spatial locations', International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 443-465.
31. Pernin, J-P. & Lejeune, A. (2006) Models for the reuse of learning scenarios, ''Imagining the future for ICT and Education'', IFIP conference Proceedings, A ° lesund, Norway, June 2006, [online] Available at: http://www-clips.imag.fr/arcade/User/jean-philippe.pernin/recherche/download/ PerninLejeune-IFIPAlesund2006-Paper.pdf
32. Peter, Y. & Vantroys, T. (2005) 'Platform Support for Pedagogical Scenarios', Journal of Educational Technology and Society, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 122-137. (Pubitemid 41205927)
33. Pozzi F. & Persico D. (2013). 'Sustaining learning design and pedagogical planning in CSCL', Research in Learning Technology, vol. 21. DOI: 10.3402/rlt.v21i3.17585.
34. Prieto, L. P. et al., (2013) 'Learning design Rashomon II - exploring one lesson through multiple tools', Research in Learning Technologies, vol. 21. DOI: 10.3402/rlt.v21i3.20057.
35. Race, P. (2010) Making Learning Happen: A Guide for Post-Compulsory Education, 2nd edn, Sage Publications, London.
36. Reiser, R. A. (2001) 'A history of instructional design and technology: part II', Educational Technology Research and Development, vol. 49, no. 2, pp. 57-67.
37. Schneider, D. K. (2003) 'Conception and implementation of rich pedagogical scenarios through collaborative portal sites: clear focus and fuzzy edges'. Working paper prepared for an invited keynote address and workshops atICOOL, International Conference on Open and Online Learning, December 7-13, 2003, University of Mauritius, [online] Available at: http://tecfa.unige.ch/ proj/seed/catalog/docs/icool03-schneider.pdf
38. Swan, K. (2005) 'A Constructivist model for thinking about learning onliné, in Elements of Quality Online Education: Engaging Communities, eds J. Bourne & J. C. Moore, The Sloan Consortium, Needham, MA, [online] Available at: http://emergingonlinelearningtechnology.org/publications/books/ pdf/interactions.pdf
39. The Larnaca Declaration on Learning Design (2012), [online] Available at: http://www.larnacadeclaration.org/
40. Vignollet, L., Martel, C. & Burgos, D. (2008) 'Editorial: comparing educational modelling languages on the ''Planet Gamé' case study', Journal of Interactive Media in Education, no. 2, [online] Available at: http://www-jime.open.ac.uk/jime/article/view/2008-16
41. Walmsley, H. (2011) Best Practice Models for e-Learning, [online] Available at: http://bestpracticemodels.wiki.staffs.ac.uk/
42. Waterfield, J. & West, B. (2006) Inclusive Assessment in Higher Education: A Resource for Change, [online] Available at: http://www.plymouth.ac. uk/pages/view.asp?page-10494.