The think-aloud controversy in second language research

The Think-Aloud Controversy in Second Language Research

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 1-172

  Bowles, Melissa A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84905789622     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203856338     Document Type: Book

References (237)

1. Abbott, M. (2006). ESL reading strategies: Differences in Arabic and Mandarin speaker test performance. Language Learning, 56(4), 633-670.
2. Ahlum-Heath, M. E., & di Vesta, F. J. (1986). The effect of conscious controlled verbalization of a cognitive strategy on transfer in problem solving. Memory and Cognition, 14(3), 281-285.
3. Allport, A. (1988). What concept of consciousness? In A. J. Marcel & E. Bisiach (Eds.), Consciousness in contemporary science (pp. 159-182). London: Clarendon Press.
4. Allwood, C. M. (1990). On the relation between justification of solution method and correctness of solution in statistical problem solving. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 31(3), 181-190.
5. Alvermann, D. E. (1984). Second graders' strategic preferences while reading basal stories. Journal of Educational Research, 77(3), 184-189.
6. Anderson, M. (1985). Some evidence on the effect of verbalization on process: A methodological note. Journal of Accounting Research, 23, 843-852.
7. Anderson, N. J. (1991). Individual differences in strategy use in second language reading and testing. Modern Language Journal, 75(4), 460-472.
8. Anderson, N. J., Bachman, L., Perkins, K., & Cohen, A. (1991). An exploratory study into the construct validity of a reading comprehension test: Triangulation of data sources. Language Testing, 8(1), 41-66.
9. Anderson, U., & Wright, W. F. (1988). Expertise and the explanation effect. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 42, 250-269.
10. Baddeley, A. D. (1986). Working memory. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
11. Baumann, J. F., Jones, L. A., & Seifert Kessell, N. (1993). Using think alouds to enhance children's comprehension monitoring abilities. Reading Teacher, 47(3), 184-193.
12. Beare, S. (2001). Differences in content generating and planning processes of adult L1 and L2 proficient writers. Dissertation Abstracts International, A: The Humanities and Social Sciences, 62(2), 547-A.
13. Berardi-Coletta, B., Buyer, L. S., Dominowski, R. L., & Rellinger, E. R. (1995). Metacognition and problem solving: A process-oriented approach. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21(1), 205-223.
14. Berg, H. P. (2002). Remediating cognitive perspective-taking in children with autism. Unpublished dissertation, Columbia University Teachers College, New York, NY.
15. Bernardi, L., Wdowczyk-Szulc, J., Valenti, C., Castoldi, S., Passino, C., Spadacini, G. et al. (2000). Effects of controlled breathing, mental activity, and mental stress with or without verbalization on heart rate variability. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 35(6), 1462-1469.
16. Berry, D. C. (1983). Metacognitive experience and transfer of logical reasoning. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 35A, 39-49.
17. Berry, D. C., & Broadbent, D. E. (1984). On the relationship between task performance and associated verbalizable knowledge. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 36A, 209-231.
18. Biehal, G., & Chakravarti, D. (1989). The effects of concurrent verbalization on choice processing. Journal of Marketing Research, 26, 84-96.
19. Biggs, S. F., Rosman, A. J., & Sergenian, G. K. (1993). Methodological issues in judgment and decision-making research: Concurrent verbal protocol validity and simultaneous traces of process data. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 9, 234-248.
20. Block, E. L. (1986). The comprehension strategies of second language readers. TESOL Quarterly, 20, 463-494.
21. Bower, A. C., & King, W. L. (1967). The effect of number of irrelevant stimulus dimensions, verbalization, and sex on learning bi-conditional classification rules. Psychonomic Science, 8, 453-454.
22. Bowles, M. (2003). The effects of textual input enhancement on language learning: An online/offline study of fourth-semester Spanish students. In P. Kempchinsky & C. E. Piñeros (Eds.), Theory, practice, and acquisition: Papers from the 6th Hispanic Linguistics Symposium and the 5th Conference on the Acquisition of Spanish and Portuguese (pp. 395-411). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
23. Bowles, M. (2004). L2 glossing: To CALL or not to CALL. Hispania, 87(3), 543-555.
24. Bowles, M. (2008). Task type and reactivity of verbal reports in SLA: A first look at a task other than reading. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 30(3), 359-387.
25. Bowles, M., & Leow, R. P. (2005). Reactivity and type of verbal report in SLA research methodology: Expanding the scope of investigation. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27(3), 415-440.
26. Bowles, M., Foote, R., Perpiñán, S., & Bhatt, R. (Eds.). (2008). Selected proceedings of the 2007 Second Language Research Forum. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.
27. Box, J. A. (2002). Guided writing in the early childhood classroom. Reading Improvement, 39(3), 111-113.
28. Bozarth, J. (1970). Verbal protocol patterns of college dormitory counselors. Counselor Education and Supervision, 10(1), 23-29.
29. Breetvelt, I. (1994). Relations between writing processes and text quality: When and how? Cognition and Instruction, 12(2), 103-123.
30. Brehmer, B. (1974). Hypotheses about relations between scaled variables in the learning of probabilistic inference tasks. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 11, 1-27.
31. Brehmer, B., Kuylenstierna, J., & Liljegren, J. E. (1974). Effects of functional form and cue validity on the subjects' hypotheses in probabilistic inference tasks. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 11, 338-354.
32. Brinkman, J. A. (1993). Verbal protocol accuracy in fault diagnosis. Ergonomics, 36(11), 1381-1397.
33. Brunk, L., Collister, G., Swift, C., & Stayton, S. (1958). A correlation study of two reasoning problems. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 55, 236-241.
34. Carpenter, H., Jeon, K. S., MacGregor, D., & Mackey, A. (2006). Learners' interpretations of recasts. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28(2), 209-236.
35. Carpenter, P. A., Just, M. A., & Schell, P. (1990). What one intelligence measures: A theoretical account of the processing in the Raven's Progressive Matrices Test. Psychological Review, 97, 404-431.
36. Carr, T. H., & Curran, T. (1994). Cognitive factors in learning about structured sequences: Applications to syntax. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 16(2), 205-230.
37. Carrell, P. L. (1989). Metacognitive awareness and second language reading. The Modern Language Journal, 73, 121-134.
38. Castro, C. D. (2004). The role of Tagalog in ESL writing: Clues from students' think-aloud protocols. Philippine Journal of Linguistics, 35(2), Dec., 23-39.
39. Castro, D. (2005). Investigating the use of the native language in the process of writing in a second language: A qualitative approach. Revista Virtual de Estudos da Linguagem, ReVEL, 3(5), n.p.
40. Cavalcanti, M. C., & Cohen, A. D. (1990). Comentarios em composições: Uma comparação dos pontos de vista do professor e do aluno [Comments on compositions: A comparison of the teacher's and student's points of view]. Trabalhos em Lingüística Aplicada (Vol. 15, pp. 7-23).
41. Chamot, A. U., & El Dinary, P. B. (1999). Children's learning strategies in language immersion classrooms. The Modern Language Journal, 83(3), 319-338.
42. Chan, R. C., Hoosain, R., & Lee, T. M. (2002). Talking while performing a task: A better attentional performance in patients with closed head injury? Journal of Clinical Experimental Neuropsychology, 24(5), 695-704.
43. Chenoweth, N. A., & Hayes, J. R. (2001). Fluency in writing: Generating text in L1 and L2. Written Communication, 18(1), 80-98.
44. Clark, C. M. (1987). A note on method. Computer storage and manipulation of field notes and verbal protocols: Three cautions. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 18(1), 56-58.
45. Cohen, A. D. (1986). Mentalistic measures in reading strategy research: Some recent findings. English for Specific Purposes, 5(2), 131-145.
46. Cohen, A. D. (1987). Recent uses of mentalistic data in reading strategy research. Revista de Documentação de Estudos em Lingüística Teorica e Aplicada, 3(1), 57-84.
47. Cohen, A. D. (1998a). Contrastive analysis of speech acts: What do we do with the research findings? Studia Anglica Posnaniensia, 33, 81-92.
48. Cohen, A. D. (1998b). Strategies in learning and using a second language. New York: Longman.
49. Cohen, A. D. (2000). Exploring strategies in test taking: Fine-tuning verbal reports from respondents. In G. Ekbatani & H. Pierson (Eds.), Learnerdirected assessment in ESL (pp. 127-150). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
50. Cohen, A. D., & Cavalcanti, M. C. (1987). Viewing feedback on compositions from the teacher's and the student's perspective. ESPecialist, 16(Apr.), 13-28.
51. Cohen, A. D., & Hosenfeld, C. (1981). Some uses of mentalistic data in second language research. Language Learning, 31(2), 285-313.
52. Cohen, A. D., & Olshtain, E. (1993). The production of speech acts by EFL learners. TESOL Quarterly, 27, 33-56.
53. Cohen, A. D., & Upton, T. A. (2007). 'I want to go back to the text': Response strategies on the reading subtest of the new TOEFL. Language Testing, 24(2), 209-250.
54. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
55. Cooper, H., & Hedges, L. (Eds.). (1994). The handbook of research synthesis. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
56. Corder, S. P. (1973). The elicitation of interlanguage. In J. Svartik (Ed.), Errata: Papers in error analysis (pp. 36-48). Lund: CKW Geerup.
57. Cushman, D. (2002). From scribbles to stories. Instructor, 111(5), 32-33.
58. Davis, J., & Bistodeau, L. (1993). How do L1 and L2 reading differ? Evidence from think aloud protocols. The Modern Language Journal, 77, 459-472.
59. Davis, J. H., Carey, M. H., Foxman, P. N., & Tarr, D. B. (1968). Verbalization, experimenter presence, and problem solving. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 8, 299-302.
60. Deffner, G. (1984). Lautes Denken: Untersuchung zur Qualität eines Datenerhebungsverfahrens [Thinking aloud: An investigation into the quality of a data collection procedure]. Frankfurt: Lang.
61. Deffner, G. (1989). Interaktion zwischen Lautem Denken, Bearbeitungsstrategien und Aufgabenmerkmalen? Eine experimentelle Prüfung des Modells von Ericsson und Simon [Interaction of thinking aloud, solution strategies, and task characteristics? An experimental test of the Ericsson and Simon model]. Sprache & Kognition, 8, 98-111.
62. de Larios, R., Marin, J., & Murphy, L. (2001). A temporal analysis of formulation processes in L1 and L2 writing. Language Learning, 51(3), 497-538.
63. Dickson, J., McLennan, J., & Omodei, M. M. (2000). Effects of concurrent verbalization on a time-critical, dynamic decision-making task. The Journal of General Psychology, 127(2), 217-228.
64. Dubin, R., & Taveggia, T. (1968). The teaching-learning paradox: A comparative analysis of college teaching methods. Eugene, OR: University of Oregon Press.
65. Durst, R. K. (1987). Cognitive and linguistic demands of analytic writing. Research in the Teaching of English, 21(4), 347-376.
66. Earthman, E. A. (1992). Creating the virtual work: Readers' processes in understanding literary texts. Research in the Teaching of English, 26(4), 351-384.
67. Ellis, R. (2001). Introduction: Investigating form-focused instruction. Language Learning, 51(Suppl. 1), 1-46.
68. Ellis, R. (2004). The definition and measurement of L2 explicit knowledge. Language Learning, 54(2), 227-275.
69. Ellis, R. (2005). Measuring implicit and explicit knowledge of a second language: A psychometric study. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27, 141-172.
70. El Mortaji, L. (2001). Writing ability and strategies in two discourse types: A cognitive study of multilingual Moroccan university students writing in Arabic (L1) and English (L3). Dissertation Abstracts International, C: Worldwide, 62(4), 499-C.
71. Enkvist, I. (1995). Intellectual and linguistic processes in foreign language students: Students' development during their first year of Spanish at a Swedish university. In Studies of Higher Education and Research. Washington, DC: ERIC Clearinghouse.
72. Ericsson, K. A. (2002). Towards a procedure for eliciting verbal expression of non-verbal experience without reactivity: Interpreting the verbal overshadowing effect within the theoretical framework for protocol analysis. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 16, 981-987.
73. Ericsson, K. A., & Simon, H. A. (1984). Protocol analysis: Verbal reports as data. Cambridge, MA: MIT.
74. Ericsson, K. A., & Simon, H. A. (1993). Protocol analysis: Verbal reports as data (rev. ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT.
75. Evans, J. S. B. T., Barston, J. L., & Pollard, P. (1983). On the conflict between logic and belief in syllogistic reasoning. Memory & Cognition, 11, 295-306.
76. Ewert, P. H., & Lambert, J. F. (1932). Part II: The effect of verbal instructions upon the formation of a concept. Journal of General Psychology, 6, 400-413.
77. Færch, C., & Kasper, G. (1986). One learner - two languages: Investigating types of interlanguage knowledge. In J. House & S. Blum-Kulka (Eds.), Interlingual and intercultural communication (pp. 211-227). Tubingen: Gunter Narr.
78. Farrington-Flint, L., & Wood, C. (2007). The role of lexical analogies in beginning reading: Insights from children's self-reports. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(2), 326-338.
79. Fehrenbach, C. R. (1991). Gifted/average readers: Do they use the same reading strategies? Gifted Child Quarterly, 35(3), 125-127.
80. Félix-Brasdefer, J. (2004). Interlanguage refusals: Linguistic politeness and length of residence in the target community. Language Learning, 54(4), 587-653.
81. Félix-Brasdefer, J. (2008). Perceptions of refusals to invitations: Exploring the minds of foreign language learners. Language Awareness, 17(3), 195-211.
82. Fidler, E. J. (1983). The reliability and validity of concurrent, retrospective, and interpretive verbal reports: An experimental study. In P. Humphreys, O. Svenson, & A. Vari (Eds.), Analyzing and aiding decision processes (pp. 429-440). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishing Company.
83. Folger, T. L. (2001). Readers' parallel text construction while talking and thinking about the reading process. Dissertation Abstracts International, A: The Humanities and Social Sciences, 62(4), 1329-A.
84. Fowler, L. P. (1997). Clinical reasoning strategies used during care planning. Clinical Nursing Research, 6(4), 349-361.
85. Fraser, J. (1993). Public accounts: Using verbal protocols to investigate community translation. Applied Linguistics, 14(4), 325-343.
86. Fresch, M. J., Wheaton, A., & Zutell, J. B. (1998). Thinking aloud during spelling word sorts. National Reading Conference Yearbook, 47, 285-294.
87. Friedman, P., & Mulhern, S.T. (1976). Relationship of clinician feedback to child-initiated verbalization during language training. Journal of Communication Disorders, 9(4), 289-299.
88. Gagné, R. H., & Smith, E. C. (1962). A study of the effects of verbalization on problem solving. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63, 12-18.
89. Gass, S., & Mackey, A. (2000). Stimulated recall methodology in second language research. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
90. Gavin, C. A. (1989). The strategies of native and limited English proficient test-takers as revealed by think-aloud protocols. Dissertation Abstracts International, A: The Humanities and Social Sciences, 50(3), 640-A.
91. Gordon, C. J. (1990). Modeling an expository text structure strategy in think alouds. Reading Horizons, 31(2), 149-167.
92. Green, A. J. F. (1998). Using verbal protocols in language testing research: A handbook. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
93. Greenwood, J., & King, M. (1995). Some surprising similarities in the clinical reasoning of expert and novice orthopaedic nurses: Report of a study using verbal protocols and protocol analysis. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 22(5), 907-913.
94. Hafner, J. (1957). Influence of verbalization on problem solving. Psychological Reports, 3, 360.
95. Hagafors, R., & Brehmer, B. (1983). Does having to justify one's judgments change the nature of the judgment process? Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 31, 223-232.
96. Harmon, J. M. (2000). Assessing and supporting independent word learning strategies of middle school students. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 43(6), 518-527.
97. Hatasa, Y. A., & Soeda, E. (2000). Writing strategies revisited: A case of non-cognate L2 writers. In B. Swierzbin, F. Morris, M. Anderson, C. A. Klee, & E. Tarone (Eds.), Social and cognitive factors in second language acquisition: Selected proceedings of the 1999 Second Language Research Forum (pp. 375-396). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla.
98. Hedges, L., Shymansky, J., & Woodworth, G. (1989). A practical guide to modern methods of meta-analysis. Washington, DC: National Science Teachers Association.
99. Herwig, A. (2003). Plurilingual lexical organisation: Evidence from lexical processing in L1-L2-L3-L4 translation. In J. Cenoz, B. Hufeisen, & U. Jessner (Eds.), Cross linguistic influence in third language acquisition: Psychological perspectives (pp. 115-137). Clevedon, England: Multilingual Matters.
100. Hosenfeld, C. (1976). Learning about learning: Discovering our students' strategies. Foreign Language Annals, 9, 117-129.
101. Hosenfeld, C. (1977). A preliminary investigation of the reading strategies of successful and nonsuccessful second language learners. System, 5(2), 110-123.
102. Hosenfeld, C. (1979). Cindy: A learner in today's foreign language classroom. In W. Borne (Ed.), The foreign language learner in today's classroom environment (pp. 53-75). Montpelier, VT: Northwest Conference on the Teaching of Foreign Languages.
103. Hosenfeld, C. (1984). Case studies of ninth grade readers. In J. C. Alderson & A. H. Urquhart (Eds.), Reading in a foreign language (pp. 231-249). London: Longman.
104. Hu, G. (2002). Psychological constraints on the utility of metalinguistic knowledge in second language production. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24, 347-386.
105. Hughes, J., & Parkes, S. (2003). Trends in the use of verbal protocol analysis in software engineering research. Behaviour & Information Technology, 22(2), 127-141.
106. Hyona, J., & Nurminen, A.-M. (2006). Do adult readers know how they read? Evidence from eye movement patterns and verbal reports. British Journal of Psychology, 97(1), 31-50.
107. Jaaskelainen, R. (2000). Focus on methodology in think-aloud studies on translating. In S. Tirkkonen Condit & R. Jaaskelainen (Eds.), Tapping and mapping the processes of translation and interpreting: Outlooks on empirical research (pp. 71-82). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
108. Jannausch, U. H. (2002). A case study of native speakers of English composing in German as a foreign language. Dissertation Abstracts International, A: The Humanities and Social Sciences, 62(12), 4144-A.
109. Jimenez, R. T., Garcia, G. E., & Pearson, P. D. (1996). The reading strategies of bilingual Latina/o students who are successful English readers: Opportunities and obstacles. Reading Research Quarterly, 31(1), 90-112.
110. Jourdenais, R. (2001). Cognition, instruction, and protocol analysis. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
111. Karsenty, L. (2001). Adapting verbal protocol methods to investigate speech systems use. Applied Ergonomics, 32(1), 15-22.
112. Kasper, G. (1999). Data collection in pragmatics research. University of Hawai'i Working Papers in ESL, 18(1), 71-107.
113. Kasper, G., & Blum-Kulka, S. (1993). Interlanguage pragmatics. New York: Oxford University Press.
114. Kasper, G., & Rose, K. (2002). Pragmatic development in a second language. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
115. Katona, G. (1940). Organizing and memorizing. New York: Columbia University Press.
116. Keck, C. M., Iberri-Shea, G., Tracy-Ventura, N., & Wa-Mbaleka, S. (2006). Investigating the empirical link between task-based interaction and acquisition: A quantitative meta-analysis. In J. M. Norris & L. Ortega (Eds.), Synthesizing research on language learning and teaching. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
117. Kern, R. G. (1994). The role of mental translation in second language reading. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 16(4), 441-461.
118. Knoblich, G., & Rhenius, D. (1995). Zur Reaktivität Lauten Denkens beim komplexen Problemlösen [The reactivity of thinking aloud during complex problem solving]. Zeitschrift für Experimentelle Psychologie, 42, 419-454.
119. Ko, M. H. (2005). Glosses, comprehension, and strategy use. Reading in a Foreign Language, 17(2), 125-143.
120. Krippendorf, K. (2003). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. London: Sage.
121. Lass, U., Klettke, W., Lüer, G., & Ruhlender, P. (1991). Does thinking aloud influence the structure of cognitive processes? In R. Schmid & D. Zambarbieri (Eds.), Oculomotor control and cognitive processes (pp. 385-396). Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Co.
122. Lee, S.-K., & Huang, H.-T. (2008). Visual input enhancement and grammar learning: A meta-analytic review. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 30(3), 307-331.
123. Leow, R. P. (1997a). Attention, awareness, and foreign language behavior. Language Learning, 47(3), 467-505.
124. Leow, R. P. (1997b). The effects of input enhancement and text length on adult L2 readers' comprehension and intake in second language acquisition. Applied Language Learning, 8(2), 151-182.
125. Leow, R. P. (1998a). The effects of amount and type of exposure on adult learners' L2 development in SLA. Modern Language Journal, 82(1), 49-68.
126. Leow, R. P. (1998b). Toward operationalizing the process of attention in SLA: Evidence for Tomlin and Villa's (1994) fine-grained analysis of attention. Applied Psycholinguistics, 19(1), 133-159.
127. Leow, R. P. (1999). The role of attention in second/foreign language classroom research: Methodological issues. In F. M.-G. J. Gutiérrez-Rexach (Ed.), Advances in Hispanic Linguistics: Papers from the 2nd Hispanic Linguistics Symposium (pp. 60-71). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla.
128. Leow, R. P. (2000). A study of the role of awareness in foreign language behavior: Aware versus unaware learners. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 22(4), 557-584.
129. Leow, R. P. (2001a). Attention, awareness, and foreign language behavior. Language Learning, 51(Suppl. 1), 113-155.
130. Leow, R. P. (2001b). Do learners notice enhanced forms while interacting with the L2? An online and offline study of the role of written input enhancement in L2 reading. Hispania, 84(3), 496-509.
131. Leow, R. P., & Bowles, M. (2005). Attention and awareness in SLA. In C. Sanz (Ed.), Mind and context in adult second language acquisition: Methods, theory, and practice (pp. 179-203). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
132. Leow, R. P., & Morgan-Short, K. (2004). To think aloud or not to think aloud: The issue of reactivity in SLA research methodology. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26(1), 35-57.
133. Light, R., & Pillemer, D. (1984). Summing up: The science of reviewing research. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
134. Lipsey, M. W., & Wilson, D. B. (2001). Practical meta-analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
135. Liu, J. (2006). Measuring interlanguage pragmatic knowledge of Chinese EFL learners. Foreign Language Teaching and Research, 38(4), 259-265.
136. Lomicka, L. (1998). To gloss or not to gloss: An investigation of reading comprehension online. Language Learning & Technology, 1, 41-50.
137. Long, M. (1996). The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In W. C. Ritchie & T. K. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 413-468). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
138. McGeorge, P., & Burton, A. M. (1989). The effects of concurrent verbalization on performance in a dynamic systems task. British Journal of Psychology, 80, 455-465.
139. McGuire, K. L., & Yewchuk, C. R. (1996). Use of metacognitive reading strategies by gifted learning disabled students: An exploratory study. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 19(3), 293-314.
140. Mackey, A. (Ed.). (2007). Conversational interaction in second language acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
141. Mackey, A., & Gass, S. (2005). Second language research: Methodology and design. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
142. Mackey, A., & Goo, J. (2007). Interaction research in SLA: A meta-analysis and research synthesis. In A. Mackey (Ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition (pp. 407-452). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
143. Mackey, A., Gass, S., & McDonough, K. (2000). How do learners perceive interactional feedback? Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 22(4), 471-497.
144. Maeng, U. (2005). A comparative study of reading strategies in L1 and L2: Case study of five Korean graduate students. Ohak Yon'gu/Language Research, 41(2), June, 457-490.
145. Markee, N. (2005). Conversation analysis for second language acquisition. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (pp. 355-374). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
146. Marks, M. R. (1951). Problem solving as a function of the situation. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 41, 74-80.
147. Masgoret, A. M., & Gardner, R. C. (2003). Attitude, motivation, and second language learning: A meta-analysis of studies conducted by Gardner and associates. Language Learning, 53(123-163).
148. Mathews, R. C., Buss, R. R., Stanley, W. B., Blanchard-Fields, F., Cho, J. R., & Druhan, B. (1989). Role of implicit and explicit processes in learning from examples: A synergistic effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15, 1083-1100.
149. Midanik, L. T., & Hines, A. M. (1991). "Unstandard" ways of answering standard questions: Protocol analysis in alcohol survey research. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 27, 245-252.
150. Nabei, T., & Swain, M. (2002). Learner awareness of recasts in classroom interaction: A case study of an adult EFL student's second language learning. Language Awareness, 11, 43-63.
151. Nassaji, H. (2006). The relationship between depth of vocabulary knowledge and L2 learners' lexical inferencing strategy use and success. The Modern Language Journal, 90(3), 387-401.
152. Nevo, N. (1989). Test-taking strategies on a multiple-choice test of reading comprehension. Language Testing, 6(2), 199-215.
153. Nisbett, R. E., & Wilson, T. D. (1977). Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes. Psychological Review, 84, 231-259.
154. Nissen, M., & Bullemer, P. (1987). Attentional requirements of learning: Evidence from performance measures. Cognitive Psychology, 19, 1-32.
155. Nist, S. L., & Kirby, K. (1986). Teaching comprehension and study strategies through modeling and thinking aloud. Reading Research and Instruction, 25(4), 254-264.
156. Norris, J. M., & Ortega, L. (2000). Effectiveness of L2 instruction: A research synthesis and quantitative meta-analysis. Language Learning, 50, 417-528.
157. Norris, J. M., & Ortega, L. (Eds.). (2006). Synthesizing research on language learning and teaching. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
158. Norris, S. P. (1990). Effect of eliciting verbal reports of thinking on critical thinking test performance. Journal of Educational Measurement, 27, 41-58.
159. Norris, S. P. (1992). A demonstration of the use of verbal reports of thinking in multiple-choice critical thinking test design. The Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 38(3), 155-176.
160. Payne, J. W., Braunstein, M. L., & Carroll, J. S. (1978). Exploring predecisional behavior: An alternative approach to decision research. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 22, 17-44.
161. Philp, J. (2003). Nonnative speakers' noticing of recasts in NS-NNS interaction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 25, 99-126.
162. Piolat, A., & Olive, T. (2000). Comment étudier le coût et le déroulement de la rédaction de textes? La méthode de la triple tâche: Un bilan méthodologique [How can the process and cost of writing be studied?: The triple task method, a methodological review]. L'Annee Psychologique, 465, 465-502.
163. Poehner, M. (2007). Beyond the test: L2 dynamic assessment and the transcendence of mediated learning. The Modern Language Journal, 91(3), 323-340.
164. Polio, C., & Wang, J. (in review). Another look at the reactivity of concurrent verbal protocols in second language reading research: A replication of Leow and Morgan-Short (2004). Studies in Second Language Acquisition.
165. Polio, C., Gass, S., & Chapin, L. (2006). Using stimulated recall to investigate native speaker perceptions in native-nonnative speaker interaction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28(2), 237-267.
166. Poulisse, N. (1990). The use of compensatory strategies by Dutch learners of English. Dordrecht: Foris.
167. Poulisse, N., Bongaerts, T., & Kellerman, E. (1987). The use of retrospective verbal reports in the analysis of compensatory strategies. In C. Faersch & G. Kasper (Eds.), Introspection in second language research (pp. 213-229). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
168. Pressley, M., & Afflerbach, P. (1995). Verbal protocols of reading: The nature of constructively responsive reading. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
169. Pritchard, R. (1990). The effects of cultural schemata on reading processing strategies. Reading Research Quarterly, 25, 273-295.
170. Qi, D., & Lapkin, S. (2001). Exploring the role of noticing in a three-stage second language writing task. Journal of Second Language Writing, 10, 277-303.
171. Rhenius, D., & Deffner, G. (1990). Evaluation of concurrent thinking aloud using eye-tracking data. In M. E. Wiklund (Ed.), Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 34th Annual Meeting. Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors Society.
172. Rhenius, D., & Heydemann, M. (1984). Lautes Denken beim Bearbeiten von RAVEN-Aufgaben [Thinking aloud while processing Raven's Matrices]. Zeitschrift für experimentelle und angewandte Psychologie, 31, 308-327.
173. Robertson, B. (1995). Why think along? Using "think alouds" in the classroom. State of Reading, 2(1), 19-22.
174. Robinson, K. M. (2001). The validity of verbal reports in children's subtraction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 211-222.
175. Robinson, M. (1991). Introspective methodology in interlanguage pragmatics research. In Pragmatics of Japanese as native and target language (pp. 29-84). Honolulu: University of Hawai'i Second Language Teaching and Curriculum Center.
176. Robinson, P. (1995). Attention, memory, and the "noticing" hypothesis. Language Learning, 45(2), 283-331.
177. Robinson, P. (1996). Consciousness, rules, and instructed second language acquisition. New York: Peter Lang Publishing, Inc.
178. Ronowicz, E., Hehir, J., Kaimi, T., Kojima, K., & Lee, D.-S. (2005). Translator's frequent lexis store and dictionary use as factors in SLT comprehension and translation speed: A comparative study of professional, paraprofessional and novice translators. Meta, 50(2), 580-596.
179. Rosa, E. (1999). A cognitive approach to task-based research: Explicitness, awareness and L2 development. Dissertation Abstracts International, A: The Humanities and Social Sciences, 60(12), 4405-A.
180. Rosa, E., & Leow, R. P. (2004a). Awareness, different learning conditions, and L2 development. Applied Psycholinguistics, 25(2), 269-292.
181. Rosa, E., & Leow, R. P. (2004b). Computerized task-based exposure, explicitness, type of feedback, and Spanish L2 development. The Modern Language Journal, 88(2), 192-216.
182. Rosa, E., & O'Neill, M. (1999). Explicitness, intake, and the issue of awareness. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21(4), 511-556.
183. Rosenshine, B., & Meister, C. (1992). The use of scaffolds for teaching higher-level cognitive strategies. Educational Leadership, 49(7), 26-33.
184. Rosenthal, M. C. (1994). The fugitive literature. In H. Cooper & L. Hedges (Eds.), Handbook of research synthesis (pp. 85-94). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
185. Rosenthal, R. (1991). Meta-analytic procedures for social research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
186. Rossomondo, A. E. (2007). The role of lexical temporal indicators and text interaction format in the incidental acquisition of the Spanish future tense. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 29(1), 39-66.
187. Rott, S. (2005). Processing glosses: A qualitative exploration of how formmeaning connections are established and strengthened. Reading in a Foreign Language, 17(2), 95-124.
188. Russell, J., & Spada, N. (2006). The effectiveness of corrective feedback for the acquisition of L2 grammar: A meta-analysis of the research. In J. M. Norris & L. Ortega (Eds.), Synthesizing research on language learning and teaching (pp. 133-164). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
189. Russo, J. E., Johnson, E. J., & Stephens, D. L. (1989). The validity of verbal protocols. Memory & Cognition, 17, 759-769.
190. Sachs, R., & Polio, C. (2007). Learners' uses of two types of written feedback on an L2 writing revision task. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 29(1), 67-100.
191. Sachs, R., & Suh, B. R. (2007). Textually enhanced recasts, learner awareness, and L2 outcomes in synchronous computer-mediated interaction. In A. Mackey (Ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition: A collection of empirical studies (pp. 197-227). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
192. Sanz, C., Lin, H.-J., Lado, B., Bowden, H. W., & Stafford, C. A. (2009). Concurrent verbalizations, pedagogical conditions, and reactivity: Two CALL studies. Language Learning, 59(1), 33-71.
193. Scardamalia, M. (1984). Teachability of reflective processes in written composition. Cognitive Science: A Multidisciplinary Journal of Artificial Intelligence, 8(2), 173-190.
194. Schmid, R., & Zambarbieri, D. (Eds.). (1991). Oculomotor control and cognitive processes. Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing.
195. Schmidt, R. (1990). The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 11(2), 129-158.
196. Schmidt, R. (1993). Awareness and second language acquisition. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 13, 206-226.
197. Schmidt, R. (1994). Deconstructing consciousness in search of useful definitions for applied linguistics. AILA Review, 11, 11-26.
198. Schmidt, R. (1995). Consciousness and foreign language learning: A tutorial on the role of attention and awareness in learning. In R. W. Schmidt (Ed.), Attention and awareness in foreign language learning. Honolulu, HI: University of Hawai'i.
199. Schmidt, R. (2001). Attention. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 3-32). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
200. Schooler, J. W., Ohlsson, S., & Brooks, K. (1993). Thoughts beyond words: When language overshadows insight. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 122(2), 166-183.
201. Seguinot, C. (1996). Some thoughts about think-aloud protocols. Target, 8(1), 75-95.
202. Selinker, L. (1972). Interlanguage. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 10, 209-231.
203. Seng, G. H., & Hashim, F. (2006). Use of L1 in L2 reading comprehension among tertiary ESL learners. Reading in a Foreign Language, 18(1), 29-54.
204. Shlesinger, M. (2000). Interpreting as a cognitive process: How can we know what really happens? In S. Tirkkonen Condit & R. Jaaskelainen (Eds.), Tapping and mapping the processes of translation and interpreting: Outlooks on empirical research (pp. 3-15). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
205. Short, E. J., Schatschneider, C., Cuddy, C. L., Evans, S. W., Dellick, D. M., & Basili, L. A. (1991). The effect of thinking aloud on the problem solving performance of bright, average, learning disabled, and developmentally handicapped students. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 16, 139-153.
206. Smagorinsky, P. (2001). Rethinking protocol analysis from a cultural perspective. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 21, 233-245.
207. Stanley, W. B., Mathews, R. C., Buss, R. R., & Kotler-Cope, S. (1989). Insight without awareness: On the interaction of verbalization, instruction, and practice in a simulated process control task. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 41A, 553-577.
208. Steinberg, I., Bohning, G., & Chowning, F. (1991). Comprehension monitoring strategies of nonproficient college readers. Reading Research and Instruction, 30(3), 63-75.
209. Stinessen, L. (1985). The influence of verbalization on problem solving. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 26, 342-347.
210. Storey, P. (1997). Examining the test-taking process: A cognitive perspective on the discourse cloze test. Language Testing, 14(2), 214-231.
211. Stratman, J. F., & Hamp-Lyons, L. (1994). Reactivity in concurrent thinkaloud protocols. In P. Smagorinsky (Ed.), Speaking about writing: Reflections on research methodology (pp. 89-112). London: Sage.
212. Swain, M. (2006a). Languaging, agency and collaboration in advanced language proficiency. In H. Byrnes (Ed.), Advanced language learning: The contribution of Halliday and Vygotsky (pp. 95-108). London: Continuum.
213. Swain, M. (2006b). Verbal protocols: What does it mean for research to use speaking as a data collection tool? In M. Chalhoub-Deville, C. Chapelle, & P. Duff (Eds.), Inference and generalizability in applied linguistics: Multiple perspectives (pp. 97-113). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
214. Taguchi, N. (2008). Pragmatic comprehension in Japanese as a foreign language. The Modern Language Journal, 92(4), 558-576.
215. Thomas, M. (2006). Research synthesis and historiography: The case of assessment of second language proficiency. In J. M. Norris & L. Ortega (Eds.), Synthesizing research on language learning and teaching (pp. 279-298). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
216. Tomlin, R. S., & Villa, V. (1994). Attention in cognitive science and second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 16(2), 183-203.
217. Upton, T. A., & Lee Thompson, L. C. (2001). The role of the first language in second language reading. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 23(4), 469-495.
218. Uzawa, K. (1996). Second language learners' processes of L1 writing, L2 writing, and translation from L1 into L2. Journal of Second Language Writing, 5(3), 271-294.
219. Vygotsky, L. (1987). The collected works of L.S. Vygotsky (Vol. I.). New York: Plenum.
220. Wade, S. E. (1990). Using think alouds to assess comprehension. Reading Teacher, 43(7), 442-451.
221. Walczyk, J., Marsiglia, C. S., Bryan, K. S., & Naquin, P. J. (2001). Overcoming inefficient reading skills. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(4), 750-757.
222. Walters, F. S. (2007). A conversation-analytic hermeneutic rating protocol to assess L2 oral pragmatic competence. Language Testing, 24(2), 155-183.
223. Wang, H. (2001). Designing short answer reading comprehension questions for a college English test in China. Dissertation Abstracts International, A: The Humanities and Social Sciences, 62(5), 1819-A.
224. Wang, W., & Wen, Q. (2002). L1 use in the L2 composing process: An exploratory study of 16 Chinese EFL writers. Journal of Second Language Writing, 11(3), 225-246.
225. Warren, J. (1996). How students pick the right answer: A "think aloud" study of the French CAT. Occasional Papers Applied Linguistics Association of Australia, 15, 79-94.
226. Weber, R. P. (1990). Basic content analysis. London: Sage.
227. Wijgh, I. F. (1996). A communicative test in analysis: Strategies in reading authentic texts. In A. Cumming & R. Berwick (Eds.), Validation in Language Testing (pp. 154-170). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
228. Wilder, L., & Harvey, D. J. (1971). Overt and covert verbalization and problem solving. Speech Monographs, 38, 171-176.
229. Wilhelm, J. (2001). Getting kids into the reading game: You gotta know the rules. Voices from the Middle, 8(4), 25-36.
230. Williams, A. M., & Davids, K. (1997). Assessing cue usage in performance contexts: A comparison between eye-movement and concurrent verbal report methods. Behavior Research Method, Instruments, & Computers, 29(3), 364-375.
231. Wilson, T. D., & Schooler, J. W. (1991). Thinking too much: Introspection can reduce the quality of preferences and decisions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 181-192.
232. Witte, S. P., & Cherry, R. D. (1994). Think-aloud protocols, protocol analysis, and research design: An exploration of the influence of writing tasks on writing processes. In P. Smagorinsky (Ed.), Speaking about writing: Reflections on research methodology (pp. 20-54). London: Sage.
233. Woodfield, H. (2008). Problematising discourse completion tasks: Voices from verbal report. Evaluation and Research in Education, 21(1), 43-69.
234. Yamashita, J. (2002). Reading strategies in L1 and L2: Comparison of four groups of readers with different reading ability in L1 and L2. ITL, Review of Applied Linguistics, 135-136, 1-35.
235. Yang, Y.-F. (2006). Reading strategies or comprehension monitoring strategies? Reading Psychology, 27(4), 313-343.
236. Yoshida, M. (2008). Think-aloud protocols and type of reading task: The issue of reactivity in L2 reading research. In M. Bowles, R. Foote, S. Perpiñán, & R. Bhatt (Eds.), Selected proceedings of the 2007 Second Language Research Forum (pp. 199-209). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.
237. Zellermayer, M., & Cohen, J. (1996). Varying paths for learning to revise. Instructional Science, 24(3), 177-195.