Investigating the empirical link between task-based interaction and acquisition: A meta-analysis

Language Learning and Language Teaching

Volumn 13, Issue , 2006, Pages 91-131

  Keck, Casey M ^a   Iberri Shea, Gina ^a   Tracy Ventura, Nicole ^a   Wa Mbaleka, Safary ^a  

^a NORTHERN ARIZONA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 78649980745     PISSN: 15699471     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (67)

1. Alcon, E. (1998). Input and input processing in second language acquisition. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 36, 343-362.
2. Ayoun, D. (2001). The role of negative and positive feedback in the second language acquisition of the passe compose and imparfait. Modern Language Journal, 85, 226-243.
3. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
4. Crookes, G., & Gass, S. (1993a). Tasks and language learning. Philadelphia: Multilingual Matters.
5. Crookes, G., & Gass, S. (1993b). Tasks in a pedagogical context. Philadelphia: Multilingual Matters.
6. de la Fuente, M. J. (2002). Negotiation and oral acquisition of L2 vocabulary: The roles of input and output in the receptive and productive acquisition of words. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24, 81-112.
7. Doughty, C., & Pica, T. (1986). “Information gap” tasks: Do they facilitate second language acquisition? TESOL Quarterly, 20, 305-325.
8. Doughty, C., & Varela, E. (1998). Communicative focus on form. In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 114-138). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
9. Ellis, R. (1994). The study of second language acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
10. Ellis, R. (1999). Learning a second language through interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
11. Ellis, R., Tanaka, Y., & Yamazaki, A. (1995). Classroom interaction, comprehension, and the acquisition of L2 word meaning. In B. Harley (Ed.), Lexical issues in language learning (pp. 187-228). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
12. Garcia, P., & Asención, Y. (2001). Interlanguage development of Spanish learners: Comprehension, production, and interaction. Canadian Modern Language Review, 57, 377-402.
13. Gass, S. M. (1997). Input, interaction, and the second language learner. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
14. Gass, S. M. & Alvarez Torres, M. J. (2005). Attention when? An investigation of the ordering effect of input and interaction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27, 1-31.
15. Gass, S. M., Mackey, A., & Pica, T. (1998). The role of input and interaction in second language acquisition: Introduction to the special issue. Modern Language Journal, 82, 299-305.
16. Gass, S. M., & Varonis, E. M. (1985). Variation in Native Speaker Speech Modification to Non-Native Speakers. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 7, 37-57.
17. Gass, S., & Varonis, E. (1994). Input, interaction, and second language production. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 16, 283-302.
18. Han, Z.-H. (2002). A study of the impact of recasts on tense consistency in L2 output. TESOL Quarterly, 36, 543-572.
19. He, X., & Ellis, R. (1999). Modified output and the acquisition of word meanings. In R. Ellis (Ed.), Learning a second language through interaction (pp. 115-132). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
20. Inagaki, S., & Long, M. H. (1999). Implicit negative feedback. In K. Kanno (Ed.), The acquisition of Japanese as a second language (pp. 9-30). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
21. Iwashita, N. (2003). Negative feedback and positive evidence in task-based interaction: Differential effects on L2 development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 25, 1-36.
22. Izumi, S. (2002). Output, input enhancement, and the noticing hypothesis: An experimental study on ESL relativization. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24, 541-577.
23. Krashen, S. (1985). The input hypothesis: Issues and implications. London: Longman.
24. Larsen-Freeman, & Long, M. (1991). An introduction to second language acquisition. London: Longman.
25. Lazaraton, A. (2000). Current trends in research methodology and statistics in applied linguistics. TESOL Quarterly, 34, 175-181.
26. Leeman, J. (2003). Recasts and second language development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 25, 37-63.
27. Light, R., & Pillemer, D. (1984). Summing up: The science of reviewing research. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
28. Linnell, J. (1995). Can negotiation provide a context for learning syntax in a second language? Working Papers in Educational Linguistics, 11, 83-103.
29. Lipsey, M. & Wilson, D. (2001). Practical meta-analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
30. Long, M. H. (1980). Input, interaction, and second language acquisition. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of California, Los Angeles.
31. Long, M. H. (1983). Native speaker/non-native speaker conversation and the negotiation of comprehensible input. Applied Linguistics, 4, 126-141.
32. Long, M. H. (1996). The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In W. Ritchie & T. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 413-468). New York: Academic Press.
33. Long, M. H., Inagaki, S., & Ortega, L. (1998). The role of implicit negative feedback in SLA: Models and recasts in Japanese and Spanish. Modern Language Journal, 82, 357-371.
34. Loschky, L. (1994). Comprehensible input and second language acquisition: What is the relationship? Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 16, 303-323.
35. Loschky, L., & Bley-Vroman, R. (1993). Grammar and task-based methodology. In G. Crookes & S. Gass (Eds.), Tasks and language learning (pp. 123-167). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
36. Mackey, A. (1999). Input, interaction, and second language development: An empirical study of question formation in ESL. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21, 557-587.
37. Mackey, A., & Philp, J. (1998). Conversational interaction and second language development: Recasts, responses, and red herrings? Modern Language Journal, 82, 338-356.
38. Mackey, A., Oliver, R., & Leeman, J. (2003). Interactional input and the incorporation of feedback: An exploration of NS-NNS and NNS-NNS adult and child dyads. Language Learning, 53, 35-66.
39. McDonough, K. (2004). Learner-learner interaction during pair and small group activities in a Thai EFL context. System, 32, 207-224.
40. Miller, N., & Pollock, V. E. (1994). Meta-analytic synthesis for theory development. In H. Cooper & L. V. Hedges (Eds.), Handbook of Research Synthesis (pp. 457-483) New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
41. Mitchell, R., & Myles, F. (1998). Second language learning theories. London: Arnold.
42. Norris, J. M., & Ortega, L. (2000). Effectiveness of L2 instruction: A research synthesis and quantitative meta-analysis. Language Learning, 50, 417-528.
43. Nunan, D. (1989). Designing tasks for the communicative classroom. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
44. Oliver, R. (1995). Negative feedback in child NS/NNS conversation. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 17, 459-481.
45. Oliver, R. (2002). Age differences in negotiation and feedback in classroom and pairwork. Language Learning, 50, 119-151.
46. Philp, J. (2003). Constraints on “noticing the gap”: Nonnative speakers' noticing of recasts in NS-NNS interaction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 25, 99-126.
47. Pica, T. (1988). Interlanguage adjustments as an outcome of NS-NNS negotiated interaction. Language Learning, 38, 45-73.
48. Pica, T. (1994). Research on negotiation: What does it reveal about second language learning conditions, processes and outcomes? Language learning, 44, 493-527.
49. Pica, T. (2005). Classroom learning, teaching, and research: A task-based perspective. Modern Language Journal, 89, 339-352.
50. Pica, T., & Doughty, C. (1985). Input and interaction in the communicative language classroom: A comparison of teacher-fronted and group activities. In S. Gass & C. Madden (Eds.), Input in second language acquisition (pp. 115-1132). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
51. Pica, T., Young, R., & Doughty, C. (1987). The impact of interaction on comprehension. TESOL Quarterly, 21, 737-758.
52. Pica, T. Kanagy, R., & Falodun, J. (1993). Choosing and using communication tasks for second language instruction and research. In G. Crookes & S. Gass (Eds.), Tasks and language learning: Integrating theory and practice (pp. 9-34). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
53. Pica, T., Holliday, L., Lewis, N., & Morgenthaler, L. (1989). Comprehensible output as an outcome of linguistic demands on the learner. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 11, 63-90.
54. Polio, C., & Gass, S. M. (1998). The role of interaction in native speaker comprehension of nonnative speaker speech. Modern Language Journal, 82, 308-320.
55. Rosenthal, R. (1994). Parametric measures of effect size. In H. Cooper & L. Hedges (Eds.), Handbook of research synthesis (pp. 231-244). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
56. Rosenthal, R. (1995). Writing meta-analytic reviews. Psychological Bulletin, 118, 183-192.
57. Schmidt, R. (1990). The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 11, 129-158.
58. Shehadeh, A. (2001). Self- and other-initiated modified output during task-based interaction. TESOL Quarterly, 35, 433-457.
59. Skehan, P. (1996). A framework for the implementation of task-based instruction. Applied linguistics, 17, 38-62.
60. Skehan, P. & Foster, P. (2001). Cognition and tasks. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 183-205). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
61. Storch, N. (2001). How collaborative is pair work? ESL tertiary students composing in pairs. Language Teaching Research, 5, 29-53.
62. Swain, M. (1985). Communicative competence: Some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development. In S. Gass & C. Madden (Eds.), Input in second language acquisition (pp. 235-253). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
63. Swain, M. (2000). The output hypothesis and beyond: Mediating acquisition through collaboration. In J. P. Lantolf (Ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
64. Swain, M., & Lapkin, S. (2002). Talking it through: Two French immersion learners' response to reformulation. International Journal of Educational Research, 37, 285-304.
65. Swain, M., & Lapkin, S. (2001). Focus on form through collaborative dialogue: Exploring task effects. In M. Bygate, P. Skehan, & M. Swain (Eds.), Researching pedagogic tasks (pp. 99-118). New York: Longman.
66. Takashima, H., & Ellis, R. (1999). Output enhancement and the acquisition of the past tense. In R. Ellis (Ed.), Learning a second language through interaction (pp. 173-188). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
67. Thomas, M. (1994). Assessment of L2 proficiency in second language acquisition research. Language Learning, 44, 307-336.