Research synthesis and historiography: The case of assessment of second language proficiency

Language Learning and Language Teaching

Volumn 13, Issue , 2006, Pages 279-298

  Thomas, Margaret ^a  

^a BOSTON COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 38949156581     PISSN: 15699471     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (34)

1. Andresen, J. (1985). Why do we do linguistic historiography? Semiotica, 56, 357-370.
2. Bley-Vroman, R. (1983). The comparative fallacy in interlanguage studies: The case of systematicity. Language Learning, 33, 1-17.
3. Cooper, H., & Hedges, L. V. (Eds.). (1994). The handbook of research synthesis. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
4. Daller, H., van Hout, R., & Treffers-Daller, J. (2003). Lexical richness in the spontaneous speech of bilinguals. Applied Linguistics, 24, 197-222.
5. De Groot, A. M. B., & Keijzer, R. (2000). What is hard to learn is easy to forget: The roles of word concreteness, cognate status, and word frequency in foreign-language vocabulary learning and forgetting. Language Learning, 50, 1-56.
6. Leeser, M. J. (2004). The effects of topic, familiarity, mode, and pausing on second language learners' comprehension and focus on form. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26, 587-615.
7. Gass, S. M., & Selinker, L. (1994). Second language acquisition: An introductory course. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
8. Gass, S. M., & Selinker, L. (2001). Second language acquisition: An introductory course (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
9. Glass, G. V. (1976). Primary, secondary, and meta-analysis of research. Educational Researcher, 5 (10), 3-8.
10. Hancin-Bhatt, B. (2000). Optimality in second language phonology: Codas in Thai ESL. Second Language Research, 16, 210-232.
11. Hulstijn, J. H., & Laufer, B. (2001). Some empirical evidence for the Involvement Load Hypothesis in vocabulary acquisition. Language Learning, 51, 539-558.
12. Izumi, S. (2003). Processing difficulty in comprehension and production of relative clauses by learners of English as a second language. Language Learning, 53, 285-323.
13. Jensen, E. D., & Vinther, T. (2003). Exact repetition as input enhancement in second language acquisition. Language Learning, 53, 373-428.
14. Koerner, E. F. K. (1976). The importance of linguistic historiography and the place of history in linguistic science. Foundations of Language, 14, 541-574.
15. Law, V. (2003). The history of linguistics in Europe from Plato to 1600. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
16. Light, R. J., & Pillemer, D. B. (1984). Summing up: The science of reviewing research. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
17. Lightbown, P., & Spada, N. (1993). How languages are learned. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
18. Lightbown, P., & Spada, N. (1999). How languages are learned (Rev. ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
19. Mitchell, R., & Myles, F. (1998). Second language learning theories. London: Arnold.
20. Mitchell, R., & Myles, F. (2004). Second language learning theories (2nd ed.). London: Arnold.
21. Montrul, S. (2000). Transitivity alternations in L2 acquisition: Toward a modular view of transfer. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 22, 229-273.
22. Norris, J. M. & Ortega, L. (2000). Effectiveness of L2 instruction: A research synthesis and quantitative meta-analysis. Language Learning, 50, 417-528.
23. Norris, J. M. & Ortega, L. (2001). Does type of instruction make a difference? Substantive findings from a meta-analytic review. Language Learning, 51, 157-213.
24. Norris, J. M. & Ortega, L. (2003). Defining and measuring SLA. In C. J. Doughty and M. H. Long (Eds.), The handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 717-761). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
25. Platt, E., & Brooks, F. B. (2002). Task engagement: A turning point in foreign language development. Language Learning, 52, 365-400.
26. Poulisse, N., & Schils, E. (1989). The influence of task- and proficiency-related factors on the use of compensatory strategies: A quantitative analysis. Language Learning, 39, 15-48.
27. Roca de Larios, J., Marín, J., & Murphy, L. (2001). A temporal analysis of formulation processes in L1 and L2 writing. Language Learning, 51, 497-538.
28. Schneider, M., & Connor, U. (1990). Analyzing topical structure in ESL essays. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 12, 411-427.
29. Thomas, M. (1993). Knowledge of reflexives in a second language. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
30. Thomas, M. (1994). Assessment of L2 proficiency in second language acquisition research. Language Learning, 44, 307-336.
31. Thomas, M. (2003). Two textbook representations of second language acquisition and Universal Grammar: “Access” versus “constraint.” Second Language Research, 19, 359-376.
32. Thomas, M. (2004). Universal grammar in second language acquisition: A history. London: Routledge.
33. White, L. (1989). Universal Grammar and second language acquisition. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
34. White, L. (2003). Second language acquisition and Universal Grammar. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.