Reactivity and type of verbal report in SLA research methodology. Expanding the scope of investigation

Studies in Second Language Acquisition

Volumn 27, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 415-440

  Bowles, Melissa A ^a   Leow, Ronald P ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

^b GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33644500454     PISSN: 02722631     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0272263105050187     Document Type: Article

References (75)

1. Ahlum-Heath, M. E., & di Vesta, F. J. (1986). The effect of conscious controlled verbalization of a cognitive strategy on transfer in problem solving. Memory and Cognition, 14, 281-285.
2. Alanen, R. (1995). Input enhancement and rule presentation in second language acquisition. In R. Schmidt (Ed.), Attention and awareness in foreign language learning (pp. 259-302). Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.
3. Allwood, C. M. (1990). On the relation between justification of solution method and correctness of solution in statistical problem solving. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 31, 181-190.
4. Anderson, M. (1985). Some evidence on the effect of verbalization on process: A methodological note. Journal of Accounting Research, 23, 843-852.
5. Berardi-Coletta, B., Buyer, L. S., Dominowski, R. L., & Rellinger, E. R. (1995). Metacognition and problem solving: A process-oriented approach. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 205-223.
6. Berry, D. C. (1983). Metacognitive experience and transfer of logical reasoning. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 35A, 39-49.
7. Berry, D. C., & Broadbent, D. E. (1984). On the relationship between task performance and associated verbalizable knowledge. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 36A, 209-231.
8. Biehal, G., & Chakravarti, D. (1989). The effects of concurrent verbalization on choice processing. Journal of Marketing Research, 26, 84-96.
9. Bower, A. C., & King, W. L. (1967). The effect of number of irrelevant stimulus dimensions, verbalization, and sex on learning bi-conditional classification rules. Psychonomic Science, 8, 453-454.
10. Brehmer, B. (1974). Hypotheses about relations between scaled variables in the learning of probabilistic inference tasks. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 11, 1-27.
11. Brunk, L., Collister, G., Swift, C., & Stayton, S. (1958). A correlation study of two reasoning problems. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 55, 236-241.
12. Carpenter, P. A., Just, M. A., & Schell, P. (1990). What one intelligence measures: A theoretical account of the processing in the Ravens Progressive Matrices Test. Psychological Review, 97, 404-431.
13. Cavalcanti, M. C., & Cohen, A. D. (1990). Comentarios em composições: Uma comparação dos pontos de vista do professor e do aluno [Comments in compositions: A comparison of the teacher's and student's viewpoints]. Trabalhos em Lingüística Aplicada, 15, 7-23.
14. Chamot, A. U., & El Dinary, P. B. (1999). Children's learning strategies in language immersion classrooms. Modern Language Journal, 83, 319-338.
15. Cohen, A. D. (1986). Mentalistic measures in reading strategy research: Some recent findings. English for Specific Purposes, 5, 131-145.
16. Cohen, A. D. (1987). Recent uses of mentalistic data in reading strategy research. Revista de Documentação de Estudos em Lingüística Teorica e Aplicada, 3, 57-84.
17. Cohen, A. D. (2000). Exploring strategies in test taking: Fine-tuning verbal reports from respondents. In G. Ekbatani & H. Pierson (Eds.), Learner-directed assessment in ESL (pp. 127-150). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
18. Cohen, A. D., & Cavalcanti, M. C. (1987). Viewing feedback on compositions from the teacher's and the student's perspective. ESPecialist, 16, 13-28.
19. Cohen, A. D., & Hosenfeld, C. (1981). Some uses of mentalistic data in second language research. Language Learning, 31, 285-313.
20. Corder, S. P. (1973). The elicitation of interlanguage. In J. Svartik (Ed.), Errata: Papers in error analysis (pp. 36-48). Lund, Sweden: CKW Geerup.
21. Davis, J., & Bistodeau, L. (1993). How do L1 and L2 reading differ? Evidence from think aloud protocols. Modern Language Journal, 77, 459-472.
22. Davis, J. H., Carey, M. H., Foxman, P. N., & Tarr, D. B. (1968). Verbalization, experimenter presence, and problem solving. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 8, 299-302.
23. Dickson, J., McLennan, J., & Omodei, M. M. (2000). Effects of concurrent verbalization on a time-critical, dynamic decision-making task. Journal of General Psychology, 127, 217-228.
24. Ellis, R. (2001). Investigating form-focused instruction. Language Learning, 51, 1-46.
25. Enkvist, I. (1995). Intellectual and linguistic processes in foreign language students: Students' development during their first year of Spanish at a Swedish university. In Studies of higher education and research. Washington, DC: ERIC Clearinghouse. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED390253)
26. Ericsson, K. A. (2002). Towards a procedure for eliciting verbal expression of non-verbal experience without reactivity: Interpreting the verbal overshadowing effect within the theoretical framework for protocol analysis. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 16, 981-987.
27. Ericsson, K. A., & Simon, H. A. (1984). Protocol analysis: Verbal reports as data. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
28. Ericsson, K. A., & Simon, H. A. (1993). Protocol analysis: Verbal reports as data (rev. ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
29. Færch, C., & Kasper, G. (1986). One learner - two languages: Investigating types of interlanguage knowledge. In J. House & S. Blum-Kulka (Eds.), Interlingual and intercultural communication (pp. 211-227). Tübingen, Germany: Gunter Narr.
30. Fidler, E. J. (1983). The reliability and validity of concurrent, retrospective, and interpretive verbal reports: An experimental study. In P. Humphreys, O. Svenson, & A. Vari (Eds.), Analyzing and aiding decision processes (pp. 429-440). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
31. Gagné, R. H., & Smith, E. C. (1962). A study of the effects of verbalization on problem solving. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63, 12-18.
32. Gass, S. M., & Mackey, A. (2000). Stimulated recall methodology in second language research. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
33. Hosenfeld, C. (1976). Learning about learning: Discovering our students' strategies. Foreign Language Annals, 9, 117-129.
34. Hosenfeld, C. (1977). A preliminary investigation of the reading strategies of successful and nonsuccessful second language learners. System, 5, 110-123.
35. Hosenfeld, C. (1979). Cindy: A learner in today's foreign language classroom. In W. Borne (Ed.), The foreign language learner in today's classroom environment (pp. 53-75). Montpelier, VT: Northwest Conference on the Teaching of Foreign Languages.
36. Hosenfeld, C. (1984). Case studies of ninth grade readers. In J. C. Alderson & A. H. Urquhart (Eds.), Reading in a foreign language (pp. 231-249). London: Longman.
37. Hughes, J., & Parkes, S. (2003). Trends in the use of verbal protocol analysis in software engineering research. Behaviour & Information Technology, 22, 127-141.
38. Jaaskelainen, R. (2000). Focus on methodology in think-aloud studies on translating. In S. Tirkkonen Condit & R. Jaaskelainen (Eds.), Tapping and mapping the processes of translation and interpreting: Outlooks on empirical research (pp. 71-82). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
39. Jourdenais, R. (2001). Cognition, instruction, and protocol analysis. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 354-375). New York: Cambridge University Press.
40. Kasper, G., & Blum-Kulka, S. (1993). Interlanguage pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
41. Kern, R. G. (1994). The role of mental translation in second language reading. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 16, 441-461.
42. Lass, U., Klettke, W., Lüer, G., & Ruhlender, P. (1991). Does thinking aloud influence the structure of cognitive processes? In R. Schmid & D. Zambarbieri (Eds.), Oculomotor control and cognitive processes (pp. 385-396). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
43. Leow, R. P. (1997). Attention, awareness, and foreign language behavior. Language Learning, 47, 467-505.
44. Leow, R. P. (1998). Toward operationalizing the process of attention in SLA: Evidence for Tomlin and Villa's (1994) fine-grained analysis of attention. Applied Psycholinguistics, 19, 133-159.
45. Leow, R. P. (2000). A study of the role of awareness in foreign language behavior: Aware versus unaware learners. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 22, 557-584.
46. Leow, R. P. (2001a). Attention, awareness, and foreign language behavior. Language Learning, 51 (Suppl. 1), 113-155.
47. Leow, R. P. (2001b). Do learners notice enhanced forms while interacting with the L2? An online and offline study of the role of written input enhancement in L2 reading. Hispania, 84, 496-509.
48. Leow, R. P., & Morgan-Short, K. (2004). To think aloud or not to think aloud: The issue of reactivity in SLA research methodology. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26, 35-57.
49. Mackey, A., Gass, S., & McDonough, K. (2000). How do learners perceive interactional feedback? Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 22, 471-497.
50. Mathews, R. C., Buss, R. R., Stanley, W. B., Blanchard-Fields, F., Cho, J. R., & Druhan, B. (1989). Role of implicit and explicit processes in learning from examples: A synergistic effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15, 1083-1100.
51. McGeorge, P., & Burton, A. M. (1989). The effects of concurrent verbalization on performance in a dynamic systems task. British Journal of Psychology, 80, 455-465.
52. Nabei, T., & Swain, M. (2002). Learner awareness of recasts in classroom interaction: A case study of an adult EFL student's second language learning. Language Awareness, 11, 43-63.
53. Nevo, N. (1989). Test-taking strategies on a multiple-choice test of reading comprehension. Language Testing, 6, 199-215.
54. Norris, S. P. (1990). Effect of eliciting verbal reports of thinking on critical thinking test performance. Journal of Educational Measurement, 27, 41-58.
55. Norris, S. P. (1992). A demonstration of the use of verbal reports of thinking in multiple-choice critical thinking test design. Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 38, 155-176.
56. O'Malley, J. M., Chamot, A. U., Stewner-Manzanares, G., Kupper, L., & Russo, R. P. (1985). Learning strategies used by beginning and intermediate ESL students. Language Learning, 35, 21-46.
57. Philp, J. (2003). Nonnative speakers' noticing of recasts in NS-NNS interaction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 25, 99-126.
58. Rhenius, D., & Deffner, G. (1990). Evaluation of concurrent thinking aloud using eye-tracking data. Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 34th Annual Meeting: Orlando '90 - Countdown to the 21st Century (pp. 1265-1269). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors Society.
59. Robinson, K. M. (2001). The validity of verbal reports in children's subtraction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 211-222.
60. Robinson, P. (1995). Aptitude, awareness, and the fundamental similarity of implicit and explicit second language learning. In R. Schmidt (Ed.), Attention and awareness in foreign language learning (pp. 303-357). Honolulu: University of Hawai'i Press.
61. Robinson, P. (1997a). Generalizability and automaticity of second language learning under implicit, incidental, enhanced, and instructed conditions. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19, 223-247.
62. Robinson, P. (1997b). Individual differences and the fundamental similarity of implicit and explicit adult second language learning. Language Learning, 47, 45-99.
63. Robinson, P. (2001). Individual differences, cognitive abilities, aptitude complexes, and learning conditions in second language acquisition. Second Language Research, 17, 368-392.
64. Rosa, E., & Leow, R. P. (2004a). Awareness, different learning conditions, and L2 development. Applied Psycholinguistics, 25, 269-292.
65. Rosa, E., & Leow, R. P. (2004b). Computerized task-based exposure, explicitness, type of feedback, and Spanish L2 development. Modern Language Journal, 88, 193-217.
66. Rosa, E., & O'Neill, M. D. (1999). Explicitness, intake, and the issue of awareness. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21, 511-556.
67. Russo, J. E., Johnson, E. J., & Stephens, D. L. (1989). The validity of verbal protocols. Memory & Cognition, 17, 759-769.
68. Selinker, L. (1972). Interlanguage. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 10, 209-231.
69. Short, E. J., Schatschneider, C., Cuddy, C. L., Evans, S. W., Dellick, D. M., & Basili, L. A. (1991). The effect of thinking aloud on the problem solving performance of bright, average, learning disabled, and developmentally handicapped students. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 16, 139-153.
70. Stanley, W. B., Mathews, R. C., Buss, R. R., & Kotler-Cope, S. (1989). Insight without awareness: On the interaction of verbalization, instruction, and practice in a simulated process control task. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 41A, 553-577.
71. Stratman, J. F., & Hamp-Lyons, L. (1994). Reactivity in concurrent think-aloud protocols. In P. Smagorinsky (Ed.), Speaking about writing: Reflections on research methodology (pp. 89-112). London: Sage.
72. Warren, J. (1996). How students pick the right answer: A 'think aloud' study of the French CAT. Occasional Papers Applied Linguistics Association of Australia, 15, 79-94.
73. Wilder, L., & Harvey, D. J. (1971). Overt and covert verbalization and problem solving. Speech Monographs, 38, 171-176.
74. Wilson, T. D., & Schooler, J. W. (1991). Thinking too much: Introspection can reduce the quality of preferences and decisions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 181-192.
75. Yamashita, J. (2002). Reading strategies in L1 and L2: Comparison of four groups of readers with different reading ability in L1 and L2. ITL, Review of Applied Linguistics, 135-136, 1-35.