ESL reading strategies: Differences in Arabic and Mandarin speaker test performance

Language Learning

Volumn 56, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 633-670

  Abbott, Marilyn L ^a,b  

^a Alberta Education ^*  (Canada)

^b Alberta Education   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33750577616     PISSN: 00238333     EISSN: 14679922     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9922.2006.00391.x     Document Type: Article

References (78)

1. Abu-Rabia, S. (1997). Reading in Arabic orthography: The effect of vowels and context on reading accuracy of poor and skilled native Arabic readers. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 9, 65-78.
2. Abu-Rabia, S. (1999). The effect of Arabic word vowels on the reading comprehension of second- and sixth-grade native Arab children. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 28, 93-101.
3. Ackerman, T., Simpson, M., & de la Torre, J. (2000, April). A comparison of the dimensionality of TOEFL response data from different first language groups. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education, New Orleans, LA.
4. Akamatsu, N. (1999). The effects of first language orthographic features on word recognition processing in English as a second language. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 11, 381-403.
5. Akamatsu, N. (2003). The effects of first language orthographic features on second language reading in text. Language Learning, 53, 207-231.
6. Alderson, J. (1984). Reading in a foreign language: A reading problem or a language problem? In J. Alderson & A. Urquhart (Eds.), Reading in a foreign language (pp. 1-24). London: Longman.
7. Alderson, J. (2000). Assessing reading. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
8. Alexander, P., & Jetton, T. (2000). Learning from text: A multidimensional and developmental perspective. In M. Kamil, O. Mosenthal, P. Pearson, & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 3, pp. 285-310). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
9. Anderson, N. (1991). Individual differences in strategy use in second language reading and testing. Modern Language Journal, 75, 460-472.
10. Barnett, M. (1988). Reading through context: How real and perceived strategy use affects L2 comprehension. Modern Language Journal, 72, 150-160.
11. Bedell, D., & Oxford, R. (1996). Cross-cultural comparisons of language learning strategies in the People's Republic of China and other countries. In R. Oxford (Ed.), Language learning strategies around the world: Cross-cultural perspectives (pp. 47-60). University of Hawaii at Manoa: Second Language Teaching and Curriculum Center.
12. Birch, B. (2002). English L2 reading: Getting to the bottom. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
13. Block, E. (1986). The comprehension strategies of second language readers. TESOL Quarterly, 20, 463-494.
14. Bolt, D. (2002, April). Studying the potential of nuisance dimensions using bundle DIP and multidimensional IRT analyses. Paper presented a the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education, New Orleans, LA.
15. Brantmeier, C. (2000). The relationship between readers' gender, passage content, comprehension and strategy use in reading Spanish as a second language. Dissertation Abstracts International, 61(04), 1376. (UMI No. 9966039)
16. Brantmeier, C. (2003a). Beyond linguistic knowledge: Individual differences in second language reading. Foreign Language Annals, 36, 33-43.
17. Brantmeier, C. (2003b). Does gender make a difference? Passage content and comprehension in second language reading. Reading in a Foreign Language, 75(1), 1-15. Retrieved October 1, 2004, from http://nflrc.hawaii.edu/rfl/ April2003/
18. Brown, J. (1999). The relative importance of persons, items, subtests and languages to TOEFL test variance. Language Testing, 16, 217-238.
19. Burnaby, B., & Sun, Y. (1989). Chinese teachers' views of western language teaching: Context informs paradigms. TESOL Quarterly, 23, 219-238.
20. Cameron, J., & Derwing, T. (2004). Being Canadian (2nd ed.). Saint-Laurent, Quebec: Longman.
21. Camilli, G., & Shepard, L. (1994). Methods for identifying biased test items. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
22. Carrell, P. (1983). Some issues in studying the role of schemata, or background knowledge in second language comprehension. Reading in a Foreign Language, 1, 81-92.
23. Carrell, P. (1989). Metacognitive awareness and second language reading. Modern Language Journal, 73, 121-133.
24. Chen, H. (1992). Reading comprehension in Chinese: Some implications from character reading times. In H. Chen & O. Tzeng (Eds.), Language processing in Chinese (pp. 175-205). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
25. Chen, Z., & Henning, G. (1985). Linguistic and cultural bias in language proficiency tests. Language Testing, 2, 155-163.
26. Coady, J. (1997). L2 vocabulary acquisition through extensive reading. In J. Coady & T. Huckin (Eds.), Second language vocabulary acquisition (pp. 225-237). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
27. Cohen, A. (1998). Strategies and processes in test taking and SLA. In L. Bachman & A. Cohen (Eds.), Interfaces between second language acquisition and language testing research (pp. 90-111). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
28. Davis, F. (1968). Research in comprehension in reading. Reading Research Quarterly, 3, 499-545.
29. Drum, P., Calfee, R., & Cook, L. (1981). The effects of surface structure variables on performance in reading comprehension tests. Reading Research Quarterly, 16, 486-514.
30. Duffy, G., Roehler, L., Sivan, E., Rackcliffe, G., Book, C., Meloth, M., et al. (1987). Effects of explaining the reasoning associated with using reading strategies. Reading Research Quarterly, 22, 347-368.
31. Durgunoglu, A., & Hancin, B. (1992). An over-view of cross-language transfer in bilingual reading. In R. Harris (Ed.), Cognitive processing in bilinguals (pp. 391-411). New York: Elsevier Science.
32. Ericsson, K., & Simon, H. (1993). Protocol analysis: Verbal report data. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
33. Eskey, D. (1997). Models of reading and the ESOL student: Implications and limitations. Focus on Basics, 1(B), 9-11.
34. Fender, M. (2003). English word recognition and word integration skills of native Arabic- and Japanese-speaking learners of English as a second language. Applied Psycholinguistics, 24, 289-315.
35. Ginther, A., & Stevens, J. (1998). Language background and ethnicity, and the internal construct validity of the Advanced Placement Spanish Language Examination. In A. Kunnan (Ed.), Validation in language assessment (pp. 169-194). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
36. Glaser, B. (1992). Basics of grounded theory analysis: Emergence vs. forcing. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
37. Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine.
38. Green, A. (1998). Verbal protocol analysis in language testing research: A handbook. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
39. Gubrium, J. (1995). Taking stock. Qualitative Health Research, 5, 267-269.
40. Harshbarger, B., Ross, T., Tafoya, S., & Via, J. (1986, March). Dealing with multiple learning styles in the ESL classroom. Symposium presented at the annual international meeting of Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages, San Francisco.
41. Hill, C., & Parry, K. (1989). Autonomous and pragmatic models of literacy: Reading assessment in adult education. Linguistics and Education, 1, 233-283.
42. Hill, C., & Parry, K. (1992). The test at the gate: Models of literacy in reading assessment. TESOL Quarterly, 26, 433-461.
43. Hosenfeld, C. (1977). A preliminary investigation of the reading strategies of successful and non-successful language learners. System, 5, 110-123.
44. Katz, L., & Frost, R. (1992). Reading in different orthographies: The orthographic depth hypothesis. In R. Frost & L. Katz (Eds.), Orthography, phonology, morphology, and meaning (pp. 67-84). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
45. Kharma, N. (1998). EFL and community needs. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 36, 49-69.
46. Koda, K. (1988). Cognitive processes in second language reading: Transfer of LI reading skills and strategies. Second Language Research, 4, 133-156.
47. Kohn, J. (1992). Literacy strategies for Chinese university learners. In F. Dubin & N. Kuhlman (Eds.), Cross-cultural literacy (pp. 113-125). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Regents.
48. Kunnan, A. (1994). Modelling relationships among some test-taker characteristics and performance on EFL tests: An approach to construct validation. Language Testing, 11, 225-252.
49. Levine, A., Reves, T., & Leaver, B. (1996). Relationship between language learning strategies and Israeli versus Russian cultural-educational factors. In R. Oxford (Ed.), Language learning strategies around the world: Cross-cultural perspectives (pp. 35-46). University of Hawaii at Manoa: Second Language Teaching and Curriculum Center.
50. Liontas, J. (1999). Developing a pragmatic methodology of idiomaticity: The comprehension and interpretation of SL vivid phrasal idioms during reading. Dissertation Abstracts International, 60(09), 3346. (UMI No. 9946784)
51. Messick, S. (1996). Validity and washback in language testing. Language Testing, 13, 241-256.
52. Munby, J. (1978). Communicative syllabus design. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
53. O'Malley, J., & Chamot, A. (1990). Learning strategies in second language acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
54. Oxford, R. (1990). Language learning strategies. New York: Newbury House.
55. Parry, K. (1993). The social construction of reading strategies: New directions for research. Journal of Research in Reading, 16, 148-158.
56. Parry, K. (1996). Culture, literacy and L2 reading. TESOL Quarterly, 30, 665-692.
57. Penner, J. (1995). Change and conflict: Introduction of the communicative approach in China. TESL Canada Journal, 12(2), 1-17.
58. Phakiti, A. (2003). A closer look at the relationship of cognitive and metacognitive strategy use to EFL reading achievement test performance. Language Testing, 20, 26-56.
59. Pressley, M., & Afflerbach, P. (1995). Verbal reports of reading: The nature of constructively responsive reading. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
60. Pritchard, R. (1990). The effects of cultural schemata on reading processing strategies. Reading Research Quarterly, 25, 273-295.
61. Purpura, J. (1997). An analysis of the relationships between test takers' cognitive and metacognitive strategy use and second language test performance. Language Learning, 47, 289-325.
62. Reid, J. (1995). Learning styles in the EFLIESL classroom. Boston: Heinle & Heinle.
63. Rennie, D. (1984, May). Clients'tape-assisted recall of psychotherapy: A qualitative analysis. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Canadian Psychological Association, Ottawa, Ontario.
64. Robb, L. (1996). Reading strategies that work: Teaching your students to become better readers. New York: Scholastic.
65. Roussos, L., & Stout, W. (1996). A multidimensionality-based DIF analysis paradigm. Applied Psychological Measurement, 20, 355-371.
66. Ryan, K., & Bachman, L. (1992). Differential item functioning on two tests of EFL proficiency. Language Testing, 9, 12-29.
67. Sasaki, M. (1991). A comparison of two methods for detecting differential item functioning in an ESL placement test. Language Testing, 8, 95-111.
68. Scheuneman, J. (1979). A new method for assessing bias in test items. Journal of Educational Measurement, 16, 143-152.
69. Schueller, J. (2004). Gender and foreign language reading comprehension: The effects of strategy training. Southern Journal of Linguistics, 27(1), 45-65.
70. Shealy, R., & Stout, W. (1993). A model-based standardization approach that separates true bias/DIF from group ability differences and detects test bias/DIF as well as item bias/DIF. Psychometrika, 58, 159-194.
71. Shepard, L., Camilli, G., & Averill, M. (1981). Comparison of six procedures for detecting test item bias using both internal and external ability criteria. Journal of Educational Statistics, 6, 317-375.
72. Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing. (1999). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, & National Council on Measurement in Education.
73. Storey, P. (1997). Examining the test-taking process: A cognitive perspective on the discourse cloze test. Language Testing, 14, 214-231.
74. Stout, W., & Roussos, L. (1995). SIBTEST manual. Chicago: University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Department of Statistics, Statistical Laboratory for Educational and Psychological Measurement.
75. Stout, W., & Roussos, L. (1999). Dimensionality-based DIP/DBF package [Computer software]. Chicago: William Stout Institute for Measurement, University of Illinois.
76. Weinstein, C., & Mayer, R. (1986). The teaching of learning strategies. In M. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 315-327). New York: Macmillan.
77. Willing, K. (1988). Learning styles in adult migration education. Adelaide: National Curriculum Resource Centre.
78. Young, D., & Oxford, R. (1997). A gender-related analysis of strategies used to process input in the native language and a foreign language. Applied Language Learning, 8, 43-73.