Teaching Research Processes: The faculty role in the development of skilled student researchers

Teaching Research Processes: The Faculty Role in the Development of Skilled Student Researchers

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 1-222

  Badke, William ^a  

^a TRINITY WESTERN UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84903858104     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1533/9781780633053     Document Type: Book

References (191)

1. ACRL Presidential Committee on Information Literacy: Final Report Retrieved October 5, 2011 from. http://www.ala.org/ala/mgrps/divs/acrl/publications/whitepapers/presidential.cfm.
2. ACRL Information Literacy Competency Standards for Higher Education Retrieved October 2, 2011 from. http://www.ala.org/ala/mgrps/divs/acrl/standards/informationliteracycompetency.cfm.
3. ACRL Information Literacy in the Disciplines Retrieved October 2, 2011 from. http://wikis.ala.org/acrl/index.php/Information_literacy_in_the_disciplines.
4. Andretta S. Information literacy: The functional literacy for the 21st century. Change and Challenge: Information Literacy for the 21st Century 2007, 1-14. Auslib Press, Adelaide. S. Andretta (Ed.).
5. Andretta S., Pope A., Walton G. Information literacy education in the UK. Communications in Information Literacy 2008, Vol. 2(No. 1):36-51. Retrieved October 3, 2011 from http://www.comminfolit.org/index.php?journal=cil&page=article&op=view&path[]=Spring2008AR3&path[]=65.
6. Anon 2003-2004 completed research grant projects (2004). Law Library Journal 2004, Vol. 6(No. 4):867-869.
7. A.N.T.S Animated Tutorial Sharing Project Retrieved October 2, 2011 from. http://ants.wetpaint.com/.
8. Arum R., Roksa J. Academically Adrift: Limited Learning on College Campuses 2011, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
9. Association of American Colleges and Universities Information Literacy VALUE Rubric Retrieved October 2, 2011 from. http://www.aacu.org/value/rubrics/pdf/InformationLiteracy.pdf.
10. Atherton J.S. Approaches to Study: "Deep" and "Surface" Retrieved October 5, 2011 from. http://www.learningandteaching.info/learning/deepsurf.htm.
11. Avdic A., Eklund A. Searching reference databases: What students experience and what teachers believe that students experience. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science 2010, Vol. 42(No. 4):224-235. 10.1177/0961000610380119.
12. Badke W. All we need is a fast horse: Riding information literacy into the academy. Musings, Meanderings, and Monsters, Too: Essays on Academic Librarianship 2003, 75-88. Scarecrow Press, Lanham, MD. M.H. Raish (Ed.).
13. Badke W. Can't get no respect: Helping faculty to understand the educational power of information literacy. Reference Librarian 2005, Vol. 43(No. 89):63-80. 10.1300/J120v43n89_05.
14. Badke W. Stepping beyond Wikipedia. Educational Leadership 2009, Vol. 66(No. 6):54-58.
15. Badke W. How we failed the Net generation. Online 2009, Vol. 33(No. 4):47-49.
16. Badke W. Ramping up the one-shot. Online 2009, Vol. 33(No. 2):47-49. Retrieved October 5, 2011 from http://www.allbusiness.com/education-training/literacy-illiteracy/11797610-1.html.
17. Badke W. Information as tool, not destination. Online 2010, Vol. 34(No. 4):52-54.
18. Badke W. Using a strategic approach to build coherence and relevance in credit information literacy courses. Best Practices for Credit-Bearing Information Literacy Courses 2010, 147-159. Association of College and Research Libraries, Chicago. C. Hollister (Ed.).
19. Badke W. COMM 110 - Research Component Retrieved October 2, 2011 from. https://sites.google.com/site/williambadke2/COMM110Research.
20. Badke W. Research Strategies: Finding your Way through the Information Fog 2011, Bloomington, IN: iUniverse.com. 4th edn.
21. Badke W. Why information literacy is invisible. Communications in Information Literacy 2011, Vol. 4(No. 2):129-141. Retrieved from: http://thebrowers.net/comminfolit/index.php?journal=cil&page=article&op=viewFile&path[]=Vol4-2010PER3&path[]=119.
22. Baker R.K. Faculty perceptions towards student library use in a large urban community college. Journal of Academic Librarianship 1997, Vol. 23(No. 3):177-182.
23. Bennett S. "Campus cultures fostering information literacy", portal. Libraries and the Academy 2007, Vol. 7(No. 2):147-167.
24. Bent M., Stockdale E. Integrating information literacy as a habit of learning - assessing the impact of a thread of IL through the curriculum. Journal of Information Literacy 2009, Vol. 3(No. 1):43-57. Retrieved October 2, 2011 from http://ojs.lboro.ac.uk/ojs/index.php/JIL/article/view/PRA-V3-I1-2009-4/228.
25. Berrett D. In for nasty weather May 16. Retrieved October 5, 2011 from. http://www.insidehighered.com/news/2011/05/16/life_for_college_professors_is_no_longer_what_it_once_was.
26. Biggs J. Individual differences in study processes and the quality of learning outcomes. Higher Education 1979, Vol. 8(No. 4):381-394.
27. Bodi S. How do we bridge the gap between what we teach and what they do? Some thoughts on the place of questions in the process of research. Journal of Academic Librarianship 2002, Vol. 28(No. 3):109-114.
28. Boekhorst A.K., Horton F.W. Training-the-trainers in Information Literacy (TTT) Workshops Project, final report to UNESCO. International Information and Library Review 2009, Vol. 41(No. 4):224-230.
29. Bouffard M. The scientific method, modernism, and postmodernism revisited: A reaction to Shephard (1999). Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly 2001, Vol. 18(No. 3):221-234.
30. Boyer E.L. Scholarship Reconsidered: Priorities of the Professoriate 1990, Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, Princeton, NJ.
31. Brown C. Where do molecular biology graduate students find information?. Science & Technology Libraries 2005, Vol. 25(No. 3):89-104. 10.1300/J122v25n03-06.
32. Brown C.M. Information literacy of physical science graduate students in the information age. College and Research Libraries 1999, Vol. 60(No. 5):426-439. Retrieved September 27, 2011 from http://crl.acrl.org/content/60/5/426.full.pdf+html.
33. Brown J.F., Nelson J.L. Integration of information literacy into a revised medical school curriculum. Medical Reference Services Quarterly 2003, Vol. 22(No. 3):63-74.
34. Brown J.S., Collins A., Duguid P. Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher 1989, Vol. 18(No. 1):32-42.
35. Bruce C. Faculty-librarian partnerships in Australian higher education: Critical dimensions. Reference Services Review 2001, Vol. 29(No. 2):106-116.
36. Bundy A. Information literacy: The key competency for the 21st century 2002, Retrieved September 27, 2011 from http://eric.ed.gov/PDFS/ED434662.pdf.
37. Bundy A. Australian and New Zealand Information Literacy Framework 2004, Australian and New Zealand Institute for Information Literacy, Adelaide, Retrieved October 2, 2011 from http://www.library.unisa.edu.au/learn/infolit/Infolit-2nd-edition.pdf. 2nd edn.
38. Bury S. Faculty attitudes, perceptions and experiences of information literacy: A study across multiple disciplines at York University, Canada. Journal of Information Literacy 2011, Vol. 5(No. 1):45-64. Retrieved October 4, 2011 from http://ojs.lboro.ac.uk/ojs/index.php/JIL/article/view/PRA-V5-I1-2011-1/1554.
39. Caccavo F. Teaching undergraduates to think like scientists. College Teaching 2009, Vol. 57(No. 1):9-14.
40. California State University Information Competence Initiative Retrieved October 2, 2011 from. http://www.calstate.edu/LS/infocomp.shtml.
41. Canadian Library Association 2005, Retrieved October 2, 2011 from http://www.cla.ca/conference/2005/a_thursday.htm.
42. Cannon A. Faculty survey on library research instruction. RQ 1994, Vol. 33(No. 4):524-541.
43. Carpenter B., Tait G. The rhetoric and reality of good teaching: A case study across three faculties at the Queensland University of Technology. Higher Education 2001, Vol. 42(No. 2):191-203. Retrieved October 5, 2011 from http://eprints.qut.edu.au/archive/00001391/02/1391.pdf.
44. Carter M. Ways of knowing, doing, and writing in the disciplines. CCC - National Council of Teachers of English 2007, Vol. 58(No. 3):385-418. Retrieved October 5, 2011 from http://thelemming.com/lemming/POP-CULTURE/ways%20of%20knowing.pdf.
45. Collier P.J., Morgan D.L. Is that paper really due today?': Differences in first-generation and traditional college students' understandings of faculty expectations. Higher Education 2008, Vol. 55(No. 4):425-446. Retrieved September 27, 2011 from http://alabamafirst.ua.edu/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/collier.pdf.
46. Conclusions and Recommendations to UNESCO and CEI (draft) 2006, Retrieved October 1, 2011 from http://portal.unesco.org/ci/en/files/21870/11453537729Conclusions_and_recommendations_Ljubjana_Meeting.doc/Conclusions%2Band%2Brecommendations%2BLjubjana%2BMeeting.doc.
47. Corrall S. Benchmarking strategic engagement with information literacy in higher education: Towards a working model. Information Research 2007, Vol. 12(No. 4):12-14. Retrieved October 2, 2011 from http://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=2390558&orden=138911&info=link.
48. Council of Europe, Council for Cultural Co-operation, Culture Committee 2000, Council of Europe, Strasbourg, Retrieved September 27, 2011 from http://www.coe.int/t/dg4/cultureheritage/Resources/Texts/CC-CULT(2000)49rev_EN.pdf?L=EN.
49. Cronon W. Only connect. American Scholar 1998, Vol. 67(No. 4):73.
50. Culp K.M., Honey M., Mandinach E. A Retrospective on Twenty Years of Education Technology Policy 2003, Department of Education, Office of Educational Technology, U.S, Retrieved September 27, 2011 from http://www.ed.gov/rschstat/eval/tech/20years.pdf.
51. Dede C. A seismic shift in epistemology. Educause Review 2008, Vol. 43(No. 3):80-81. Retrieved September 27, 2011 from http://net.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/ERM0837.pdf.
52. Ding H. The use of cognitive and social apprenticeship to teach a disciplinary genre: Initiation of graduate students into NIH grant writing. Written Communication 2008, Vol. 25(No. 1):3-52.
53. Downes S. ACRLog: The Great (?) Debate: Is Information Literacy a Fad and a Waste of Time? July 4. Retrieved October 2, 2011 from. http://acrlog.org/2006/07/04/the-great-debate-is-information-literacy-a-fad-and-a-waste-of-time/.
54. Dressen-Hammouda D. From novice to disciplinary expert: Disciplinary identity and genre mastery. English for Specific Purposes 2008, Vol. 27(No. 2):233-252.
55. Duke T.S., Ward J.D. Preparing information literate teachers: A metasynthesis. Library and Information Science Research 2009, Vol. 31(No. 4):247-256.
56. Ebbinghouse C. Disclaiming liability. Searcher 2000, Vol. 8(No. 3):61-66. Retrieved from http://choo.fis.utoronto.ca/FIS/courses/LIS1325/Readings/ebbinghouse.pdf.
57. Educational Testing Service 2006 ICT Literacy Assessment Preliminary Findings 2006, Educational Testing Service, Princeton, NJ, Retrieved September 27, 2011 from http://www.ets.org/Media/Products/ICT_Literacy/pdf/2006_Preliminary_Findings.pdf.
58. Ehrlinger J., Johnson K., Banner M., Dunning D., Kruger J. Why the unskilled are unaware: Further explorations of (absent) self-insight among the incompetent. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 2008, Vol. 105(No. 1):98-121.
59. Elmborg J. Critical information literacy: Implications for instructional practice. The Journal of Academic Librarianship 2006, Vol. 32(No. 2):192-199.
60. Feder T. Cold fusion gets chilly encore. Physics Today 2005, Vol. 58(No. 31). Retrieved October 5, 2011 from http://scitation.aip.org/journals/doc/PHTOAD-ft/vol_58/iss_1/31_1.shtml. 10.1063/1.1881896.
61. Feldman D., Sciammarella S. Both sides of the looking glass: Librarian and teaching faculty perceptions of librarianship at six community colleges. College and Research Libraries 2000, Vol. 61(No. 6):491-498.
62. Feldman S., Duhi J. The hidden costs of information work Retrieved October 6, 2011 from. http://www.scribd.com/doc/6138369/Whitepaper-IDC-Hidden-Costs-0405.
63. First Year Information Literacy in the Liberal Arts Assessment (FYILLAA) Lawrence McKinley Gould Library, Carleton University Retrieved September 27, 2011 from. http://apps.carleton.edu/campus/library/about/infolit/fyillaa/.
64. Fischhoff B., MacGregor D. Calibrating databases. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 1986, Vol. 37(No. 4):222-233.
65. Five Colleges of Ohio Integrating Information Literacy into the Liberal Arts Curriculum Retrieved October 2, 2011 from. http://collaborations.denison.edu/ohio5/grant/.
66. Flanagin A.J., Metzger M.J., Hartsell E. Kids and Credibility: An Empirical Examination of Youth, Digital Media Use, and Information Credibility 2010, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, Retrieved September 27, 2011 from http://mitpress.mit.edu/books/full_pdfs/Kids_and_Credibility.pdf.
67. Gallacher I. Who are those guys?: The results of a survey studying the information literacy of incoming law students. California Western Law Review 2007, Vol. 44:1-47. Retrieved September 27, 2011 from http://works.bepress.com/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1000andcontext=ian_gallacher.
68. Garner S. 2006, Retrieved October 2, 2011 from http://www.ifla.org/III/wsis/High-Level-Colloquium.pdf.
69. George C., Bright A., Hurlbert T., Linke E.C., Clair G.S., Stein J. Scholarly use of information: Graduate students' information seeking behaviour. Information Research 2006, Vol. 11(No. 4):11-14. Retrieved October 7, 2011 from http://informationr.net/ir/11-4/paper272.html.
70. Gilchrist D.L. Academic libraries at the center of instructional change: Faculty and librarian experience of library leadership in the transformation of teaching and learning unpublished Ph.D., Oregon State University. Retrieved October 5, 2011 from. http://ir.library.oregonstate.edu/jspui/bitstream/1957/5150/1/gilchrist%20dissertation.pdf.
71. Grant D.M., Malloy A.D., Murphy M.C. A comparison of student perceptions of their computer skills to their actual abilities. Journal of Information Technology Education 2009, Vol. 8:141-160. Retrieved October 1, 2011 from http://jite.org/documents/Vol8/JITEv8p141-160Grant428.pdf.
72. Greasley P., Cassidy A. When it comes round to marking assignments: How to impress and how to ';distress' lecturers...;. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 2010, Vol. 35(No. 2):173-189.
73. Griffiths J., Brophy P. Student searching behavior and the Web: Use of academic resources and Google. Library Trends 2005, Vol. 53(No. 4):539-554.
74. Gross M., Latham D. Undergraduate perceptions of information literacy: Defining, attaining, and self-assessing skills. College and Research Libraries 2009, Vol. 70(No. 4):336-350.
75. Hall L. A home-grown program for raising faculty information competence. Computers in Libraries 1999, Vol. 19(No. 8):28-30. 32, 34.
76. Hardesty L. Faculty culture and bibliographic instruction: An exploratory analysis. Library Trends 1995, Vol. 44(No. 2):339-367.
77. Harris T. The post-capitalist executive: An interview with Peter F. Drucker. Harvard Business Review 1993, Vol. 71(No. 3):114-122.
78. Research Associates Hart Raising the Bar: Employers' Views on College Learning in the Wake of the Economic Downturn: A Survey among Employers Conducted on the Behalf of the Association of American Colleges and Universities 2010, Hart Research Associates, Washington, DC, Retrieved October 5, 2011 from http://www.aacu.org/leap/documents/2009_EmployerSurvey.pdf.
79. Hase S., Kenyon C. From andragogy to heutagogy Retrieved October 5, 2011 from. http://ultibase.rmit.edu.au/Articles/dec00/hase1.pdf.
80. Hase S., Kenyon C. Heutagogy: A child of complexity theory. Complicity: An International Journal of Complexity and Education 2007, Vol. 4(No. 1):111-118. Retrieved October 5, 2011 from http://ejournals.library.ualberta.ca/index.php/complicity/article/view/8766/7086.
81. Head A.J. Beyond Google: How do students conduct academic research?. First Monday 2007, Vol. 12(No. 8). Retrieved October 4, 2011 from http://www.uic.edu/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/1998/1873.
82. Head A.J. Information literacy from the trenches: How do humanities and social science majors conduct academic research?. College and Research Libraries 2008, Vol. 69(No. 5):427-445. Retrieved September 27, 2011 from http://crl.acrl.org/content/69/5/427.full.pdf+html.
83. Head A.J., Eisenberg M.B. 2009, Retrieved September 27, 2011 from http://www.libraryng.com/sites/libraryng.com/files/PIL_ProgressReport_2_2009.pdf.
84. Head A.J., Eisenberg M.B. 2009, Retrieved October 1, 2011 from http://projectinfolit.org/pdfs/PIL_Fall2009_Year1Report_12_2009.pdf.
85. Head A.J., Eisenberg M.B. Truth be told: How college students evaluate and use information in the digital age 2010, Retrieved October 4, 2011 from: http://projectinfolit.org/pdfs/PIL_Fall2010_Survey_FullReport1.pdf.
86. Head A.J., Eisenberg M.B. College students eager to learn but need help negotiating information overload June 3. Retrieved October 5, 2011 from, comments retrieved from http://community.seattletimes.nwsource.com/reader_feedback/public/display.php?source_name-base&source_id=2015227485. http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/opinion/2015227485_guest05head.html.
87. Healey M., Jenkins A. Developing Undergraduate Research and Inquiry 2009, The Higher Education Academy, York, Retrieved October 5, 2011 from http://www.heacademy.ac.uk/assets/York/documents/resources/publications/DevelopingUndergraduate_Final.pdf.
88. Heath C., Heath D. Switch: How to Change Things When Change Is Hard 2010, Broadway Books, New York.
89. Hicks A., Graber A. Shifting paradigms: Teaching, learning and web 2.0. Reference Services Review 2010, Vol. 38(No. 4):621-633.
90. Hirsch E.D. Why do we have a knowledge deficit? (Policy perspectives, WestEd). The Knowledge Deficit: Closing the Shocking Education Gap for American Children 2006, 1-10. Houghton Mifflin, New York.
91. Hodge D. From convocation to capstone: Developing the student as scholar 2007, from http://www.aacu.org/meetings/undergraduate_research/documents/Keynote.pdf.
92. Horton F.W. Information literacy vs. computer literacy. Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science 1983, Vol. 9(No. 4):14-16.
93. Housewright R., Schonfeld R. Ithaka's 2006 Studies of Key Stakeholders in the Digital Transformation in Higher Education 2008, Ithaka, New York, Retrieved October 1, 2011 from http://www.ithaka.org/research/Ithakas%202006%20Studies%20of%20Key%20Stakeholders%20in%20the%20Digital%20Transformation%20in%20Higher%20Education.pdf.
94. Hrycaj P., Russo R. Reflections on surveys of faculty attitudes toward collaboration with librarians. The Journal of Academic Librarianship 2007, Vol. 33(No. 6):692-696.
95. Hughes H.E., Bruce C.S., Edwards S.L. Models for reflection and learning: A culturally inclusive response to the information literacy imbalance. Change and Challenge: Information Literacy for the 21st Century 2007, 59-84. Auslib Press, Adelaide. S. Andretta (Ed.).
96. Jenson J.D. It's the information age, so where's the information?. College Teaching 2004, Vol. 52(No. 3):107-112.
97. Johnston B., Webber S. Information literacy in higher education: A review and case study. Studies in Higher Education 2003, Vol. 28(No. 3):335-352.
98. Jones E.A., Hoffman S., National Center for Education Statistics National Assessment of College Student Learning: Identifying College Graduates' Essential Skills in Writing, Speech and Listening, and Critical Thinking: Final Project Report 1995, National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Dept. of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement, Washington, DC.
99. Kane M., Berryman S., Goslin D., Meltzer A. The Secretary's Commission on Achieving Necessary Skills: Identifying and Describing the Skills Required by Work 1990, U.S. Department of Labor, Washington, DC, Retrieved September 27, 2011 from http://wdr.doleta.gov/SCANS/idsrw/scansrep.pdf.
100. Kapitzke C. Information literacy: a positivist epistemology and a politics of outformation. Educational Theory 2003, Vol. 53(No. 1):37-53.
101. Katz I.R. ETS research finds college students fall short in demonstrating ICT literacy-national policy council to create national standards. College and Research Libraries News 2007, Vol. 68(No. 1):35. Retrieved September 27, 2011 from http://crln.acrl.org/content/68/1/35.full.pdf.
102. Katz I.R., Macklin A.S. Information and communication technology (ICT) literacy: Integration and assessment in higher education. Systemics Cybernetics and Informatics 2007, Vol. 5(No. 4):50-55. Retrieved September 27, 2011 from http://www.iiisci.org/Journal/CV$/sci/pdfs/P890541.pdf.
103. Kempcke K. "The art of war for librarians. Academic culture, curriculum reform, and wisdom from Sun Tzu", portal: Libraries and the Academy 2002, Vol. 2(No. 4):529-551.
104. Kennedy G.E., Judd T.S., Churchward A., Gray K., Krause K.L. First year students' experiences with technology: Are they really digital natives?. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology 2008, Vol. 24(No. 1):108-122. Retrieved September 27, 2011 from http://www.ascilite.org.au/ajet/ajet24/kennedy.html.
105. Kenny S.S. 1998, Retrieved October 5, 2011 from http://naples.cc.sunysb.edu/pres/boyer.nsf/673918d46fbf653e852565ec0056ff3e/d955b61ffddd590a852565ec005717ae/$FILE/boyer.pdf.
106. Keresztesi M. The science of bibliography: Theoretical implications for bibliographic instruction. Theories of Bibliographic Education 1982, 13-21. Bowker, New York. C. Oberman, K. Strauch (Eds.).
107. Kirton J., Barham L. Information literacy in the workplace. The Australian Library Journal 2005, Vol. 54(No. 4):365-376. Retrieved October 4, 2011 from: http://www.alia.org.au/publishing/alj/54.4/alj.Vol_54_No_04_2005.pdf#page=41.
108. Klusek L., Bornstein J. Information literacy skills for business careers: Matching skills to the workplace. Journal of Business and Finance Librarianship 2006, Vol. 11(No. 4):3-21.
109. Knight-Davis S., Sung J.S. Analysis of citations in undergraduate papers. College and Research Libraries 2008, Vol. 69(No. 5):447-458.
110. Kruger J., Dunning D. Unskilled and unaware of it: How difficulties in recognizing one's own incompetence lead to inflated self-assessments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1999, Vol. 77(No. 6):1121-1134.
111. Kuh G.D., Gonyea R.M. The role of the academic library in promoting student engagement in learning. College and Research Libraries 2003, Vol. 64(No. 4):256-282.
112. Kuh G.D., Kinzie J., Buckley J.A., Bridge B.K., Hayek J.C. What matters to student success: A review of the literature 2006, Retrieved September 27, 2011 from http://nces.ed.gov/npec/pdf/kuh_team_report.pdf.
113. Kuhlthau C. Information Search Process Retrieved October 4, 2011 from. http://www.scils.rutgers.edu/kuhlthau/information_search_process.htm.
114. Kuruppu P.U., Gruber A.M. Understanding the information needs of academic scholars in agricultural and biological sciences. Journal of Academic Librarianship 2006, Vol. 32(No. 6):609-623.
115. Leckie G.J. Desperately seeking citations: Uncovering faculty assumptions about the undergraduate research. Journal of Academic Librarianship 1996, Vol. 22(No. 3):201-208.
116. Leckie G.J., Fullerton A. Information literacy in science and engineering undergraduate education: Faculty attitudes and pedagogical practices. College & Research Libraries 1999, Vol. 60(No. 1):9-29.
117. Leckie G.J., Fullerton A. The roles of academic librarians in fostering a pedagogy for information literacy 1999, Retrieved October 1, 2011 from http://0-www.ala.org.sapl.sat.lib.tx.us/ala/mgrps/divs/acrl/events/pdf/leckie99.pdf.
118. LexisNexis 2010 International Workplace Productivity Survey Retrieved October 7, 2011 from. http://www.multivu.com/players/English/46619-LexisNexis-International-Workplace-Productivity-Survey/.
119. Lilienfeld S.O. Public skepticism of psychology: Why many people perceive the study of human behavior as unscientific. American Psychologist 2011, June 13. Advance online publication. 10.1037/a0023963.
120. Lippincott A., Kuchida H. 2005, Retrieved September 27, 2011 from http://repositories.cdlib.org/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1048andcontext=anderson.
121. Lippincott J.K. Net generation students and libraries. Educause Review 2005, Vol. 40(No. 2):56-66. Retrieved September 27, 2011 from http://net.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/ERM0523.pdf.
122. Liu Z., Yang Z. Factors influencing distance-education graduate students' use of information sources: A user study. Journal of Academic Librarianship 2004, Vol. 30(No. 1):24-35.
123. Lloyd A. Framing information literacy as information practice: Site ontology and practice theory. Journal of Documentation 2010, Vol. 66(No. 2):245-258. 10.1108/0022041101023643.
124. Lyotard J.-F. The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge 1984, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis.
125. Maclellan E. How reflective is the academic essay?. Studies in Higher Education 2004, Vol. 29(No. 1):75-89.
126. Marcum J. Rethinking information literacy. Library Quarterly 2002, Vol. 72(No. 1):1-26.
127. Markless S., Streatfield D. Three decades of information literacy: Redefining the parameters. Change and Challenge: Information Literacy for the 21st Century 2007, 15-36. Auslib Press, Adelaide. S. Andretta (Ed.).
128. Martin B. The politics of research. Information Liberation: Challenging the Corruptions of Information Power 1998, 123-142. Freedom Press, London, Retrieved October 4, 2011 from http://www.uow.edu.au/bmartin/pubs/98il/il07.pdf.
129. Marton F., Säljö R. On qualitative differences in learning. I. Outcome and process. British Journal of Educational Psychology 1976, Vol. 46(No. 1):4-11.
130. Marton F., Säljö R. On qualitative differences in learning. II. Outcome as a function of the learner's conception of the task. British Journal of Educational Psychology 1976, Vol. 46(No. 2):115-127.
131. Massey-Burzio V. From the other side of the reference desk: A focus group study. Journal of Academic Librarianship 1998, Vol. 24(No. 3):208-215.
132. Maughan P.D. Assessing information literacy among undergraduates: A discussion of the literature and the University of California-Berkeley assessment experience. College and Research Libraries 2001, Vol. 62(No. 1):71-85.
133. McEuen S.F. How fluent with information technology (FIT) are our students?. Educause Quarterly 2001, Vol. 24(No. 4):8-17. Retrieved September 27, 2011 from http://net.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/eqm0140.pdf.
134. McGuinness C. What faculty think: Exploring the barriers to information literacy development in undergraduate education. The Journal of Academic Librarianship 2006, Vol. 32(No. 6):573-582.
135. McGuire W.J. Attitude change: The information-processing paradigm. Experimental Social Psychology 1972, 108-141. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York. C. McClintock (Ed.).
136. McNeil B.J., Elfrink V., Beyea S.C., Pierce S.T., Bickford C.J. Computer literacy study: Report of qualitative findings. Journal of Professional Nursing: Official Journal of the American Association of Colleges of Nursing 2006, Vol. 22(No. 1):52-59.
137. Melville D. 2009, Committee of Inquiry into the Changing Learner Experience, Bristol.
138. Middle States Commission on Higher Education Developing Research and Communication Skills: Guidelines for Information Literacy in the Curriculum 2003, Middle States Commission on Higher Education, Philadelphia, Retrieved October 2, 2011 from http://www.msche.org/publications/Developing-Skills080111151714.pdf.
139. Middle States Commission on Higher Education Characteristics of Excellence in Higher Education: Eligibility Requirements and Standards for Accreditation 2009, Retrieved October 1, 2011 from http://www.msche.org/publications/CHX06_Aug08REVMarch09.pdf.
140. Mittermeyer D., Quirion D. Information Literacy: Study of Incoming First-Year Undergraduates in Quebec 2003, Retrieved September 27, 2011 from http://www.crepuq.qc.ca/documents/bibl/formation/studies_Ang.pdf.
141. Mutch A. Critical realism, managers and information. British Journal of Management 1999, Vol. 10(No. 4):323-333.
142. Nichols J.T. The 3 directions: Situated information literacy. College and Research Libraries 2009, Vol. 70(No. 6):515-530.
143. O'Connor L., Newby J. Entering unfamiliar territory: Building an information literacy course for graduate students in interdisciplinary areas. Reference and User Services Quarterly 2011, Vol. 50(No. 3):224-229.
144. Oakleaf M. Using rubrics to assess information literacy: An examination of methodology and interrater reliability. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 2009, Vol. 60(No. 5):969-983.
145. Oakleaf M., Kaske N. Guiding questions for assessing information literacy in higher education. portal: Libraries and the Academy 2009, Vol. 9(No. 2):273-286.
146. Obama B. National Information Literacy Awareness Month, 2009, by the President of the United States of America: A Proclamation 2009, Retrieved October 2, 2011 from http://www.whitehouse.gov/the_press_office/Presidential-Proclamation-National-Information-Literacy-Awareness-Month/.
147. Oblinger D.G., Hawkins B.L. The myth about student competency Educause Review, Vol. 41, No. 2. Retrieved October 1, 2011 from. http://www.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/ERM0627.pdf.
148. Ojala M. The unfriendly skies of computer glitches and human error. Online 2008, Vol. 32(No. 6):5.
149. Ontario (Canada) Confederation of University Faculty Associations Students less prepared for university education Ontario University Report, Vol. 3, No. 1. Retrieved October 3, 2011 from. http://notes.ocufa.on.ca/OntarioUniversityReport.nsf/0/EE9751D6CD86DEB485257590005738F4?OpenDocument.
150. Pan B., Hembrooke H., Joachims T., Lorigo L., Gay G., Granka L. In Google we trust: Users' decisions on rank, position, and relevance. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 2007, Vol. 12(No. 3):801-823.
151. Partnership for 21st Century Skills The MILE Guide: Milestones for Improving Learning and Education 2009, Partnership for 21st Century Skills, Tucson, AZ, Retrieved September 27, 2011 from http://www.21stcenturyskills.org/documents/MILE_Guide_091101.pdf.
152. Pedler M., Burgoyne J., Boydell T. The Learning Company: A Strategy For Sustainable Development 1991, McGraw-Hill, London.
153. Perrett V. Graduate information literacy skills: The 2003 ANU skills audit. Australian Library Journal 2004, Vol. 53(No. 2):161-172. Retrieved September 27, 2011 from http://alia.org.au/publishing/alj/53.2/full.text/perrett.html.
154. Peters M. Education and the postmodern condition: Re-visiting Jean-François Lyotard. Journal of Philosophy of Education 1995, Vol. 29(No. 3):387-400.
155. Pidgeon N., O'Leary M. Man-made disasters: Why technology and organizations (sometimes) fail. Safety Science 2000, Vol. 34(No. 1-3):15-30.
156. Primary Research Group College Information Literacy Efforts Benchmarks 2008, Primary Research Group, New York.
157. Programme for International Student Assessment The Definition and Selection of Key Competencies: Executive Summary 2005, OECD, Geneva, Retrieved September 27, 2011 from http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/47/61/35070367.pdf.
158. Randall R., Smith J., Clark K., Foster N. The Next Generation of Academics: A Report of a Study Conducted at the University of Rochester 2008, University of Rochester Libraries, Rochester, NY, Retrieved September 27, 2011 from http://hdl.handle.net/1802/6053.
159. Ren W. Library instruction and college student self-efficacy in electronic information searching. Journal of Academic Librarianship 2000, Vol. 26(No. 5):323-328.
160. Response to Barbara Fister [Anonymous] Why the research paper isn't working Retrieved September 27, 2011 from. http://www.insidehighered.com/blogs/library_babel_fish/why_the_research_paper_isn_t_working#Comments.
161. Riordan T. Disciplinary expertise revisited: The scholarship of teaching and learning philosophy. Arts and Humanities in Higher Education: An International Journal of Theory, Research and Practice 2008, Vol. 7(No. 3):262-275.
162. Rogers M., Oder N., Albanese A. Could librarians' help have prevented Hopkins tragedy?. Library Journal 2001, Vol. 126(No. 14):16.
163. Rogers W. 1986, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Retrieved from http://history.nasa.gov/rogersrep/genindex.htm.
164. Rosenblatt S. They can find it but they don't know what to do with it: Describing the use of scholarly literature by undergraduate students. Journal of Information Literacy 2010, Vol. 4(No. 2):50-61. Retrieved September 27, 2011 from http://ojs.lboro.ac.uk/ojs/index.php/JIL/article/view/LLC-V4-I2-2010-1/1506.
165. Saunders L. The future of information literacy in academic libraries: A Delphi study. portal: Libraries and the Academy 2009, Vol. 9(No. 1):99-114.
166. SCONUL Working Group on Information Literacy The SCONUL Seven Pillars Of Information Literacy: Core Model for Higher Education 2011, Society of College, National and University Libraries, London, Retrieved October 2, 2011 from http://www.sconul.ac.uk/groups/information_literacy/publications/coremodel.pdf.
167. Selwyn N. The use of computer technology in university teaching and learning: A critical perspective. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 2007, Vol. 23:83-94.
168. Shen Y. Information seeking in academic research: A study of the sociology faculty at the University of Wisconsin-Madison. Information Technology & Libraries 2007, Vol. 26(No. 1):4-13.
169. Shephard R.J. The scientific method, modernism, and postmodernism revisited: A response to Bouffard (2001). Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly 2001, Vol. 18(No. 3):235-239.
170. Singleton-Jackson J., Lumsden D.B., Newsom R. Johnny still can't write, even if he goes to college: A study of writing proficiency in higher education graduate students. Current Issues in Education 2009, Vol. 12(No. 10). Retrieved September 27, 2011 from http://cie.asu.edu/ojs/index.php/cieatasu/article/viewFile/45/9.
171. Steinbrook R. Protecting research subjects: The crisis at Johns Hopkins. New England Journal of Medicine 2002, Vol. 346(No. 9):716-720.
172. Sterngold A.H. Rhetoric versus reality: A faculty perspective on information literacy instruction. Defining Relevancy: Managing the New Academic Library 2008, 85-95. Libraries Unlimited, Westport, CT. J.M. Hurlbert (Ed.).
173. Stoan S.K. Research and library skills: An analysis and interpretation. College and Research Libraries 1984, Vol. 45(No. 2):99-109.
174. Stoan S.K. Research and information retrieval among academic researchers: Implications for library instruction. Library Trends 1991, Vol. 39(No. 3):238-258. Retrieved October 1, 2011 from http://www.ideals.illinois.edu/bitstream/handle/2142/7725/librarytrendsv39i3g_opt.pdf?sequence=1.
175. Stone J.A., Madigan E. Inconsistencies and disconnects. Communications of the ACM 2007, Vol. 50(No. 4):76-79.
176. Sturges P., Gastinger A. Information literacy as a human right. Libri: International Journal of Libraries & Information Services 2010, Vol. 60(No. 3):195-202. 10.1515/libr.2010.017.
177. Svensson L. On qualitative differences in learning. III. Study skill and learning. British Journal of Educational Psychology 1977, Vol. 47(No. 3):233-243.
178. The Big Blue: Information Skills for Students. Retrieved November 15, 2011 from onlineiscourses.html. http://www.leeds.ac.uk/bigblue/.
179. The Prague Declaration: "Towards an Information Literate Society". Information Literacy Meeting of Experts, Prague, 20-23 September, 2003. Retrieved October 2, 2011 from . http://portal.unesco.org/ci/en/files/19636/11228863531PragueDeclaration.pdf/PragueDeclaration.pdf.
180. University College London (UCL) CIBER Group Information Behaviour of the Researcher of the Future 2008, CIBER Briefing Paper No. 9, University College London, London, Retrieved September 27, 2011 from http://www.jisc.ac.uk/media/documents/programmes/reppres/gg_final_keynote_11012008.pdf.
181. University of Alberta, Augustana Campus It Changed the Way I Do Research: Period [video] Retrieved October 2, 2011 from. http://www.library.ualberta.ca/augustana/infolit/video/.
182. University of Alberta, Augustana Campus Augustana Information Literacy Retrieved October 2, 2011 from. http://www.library.ualberta.ca/augustana/infolit/.
183. Valentine B. The legitimate effort in research papers: Student commitment versus faculty expectations. Journal of Academic Librarianship 2001, Vol. 27(No. 2):107-715.
184. Wang Y., Artero M. Caught in the Web: University student use of Web resources. Educational Media International 2005, Vol. 42(No. 1):71-82.
185. Webber S., Johnston B. Conceptions of information literacy: New perspectives and implications. Journal of Information Science 2000, Vol. 26(No. 6):381-397.
186. Webber S., Johnston B. Working towards the information literate university. Information Literacy: Recognising the Need. Staffordshire University, Stoke-on-Trent: 17 May 2006 2006, 47-58. Chandos, Oxford, Retrieved October 1, 2011 from http://dis.shef.ac.uk/sheila/staffs-webber-johnston.pdf. G. Walton, A. Pope (Eds.).
187. Weetman J. Osmosis - Does it work for the development of information literacy?. Journal of Academic Librarianship 2005, Vol. 31(No. 5):456-460.
188. Weetman J. The ';Seven pillars of wisdom' model: A case study to test academic staff perceptions. SCONUL Focus 2005, Vol. 34:31-36.
189. Williams D., Wavell C. Secondary school teachers' conceptions of student information literacy. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science 2007, Vol. 39(No. 4):199-212.
190. Yi S. Information seeking in academic research: A study of the sociology faculty at the University of Wisconsin-Madison. Information Technology and Libraries 2007, Vol. 26(No. 1):4-13.
191. Zurkowski P., National Commission on Libraries and Information Science The Information Service Environment Relationships and Priorities Related Paper No. 5. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED100391.) Retrieved October 2, 2011 from. http://www.eric.ed.gov/PDFS/ED100391.pdf.