The impact of self- And peer-grading on student learning

Educational Assessment

Volumn 11, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 1-31

  Sadler, Philip M ^a   Good, Eddie ^b  

^a HARVARD SMITHSONIAN CENTER FOR ASTROPHYSICS   (United States)

^b Ephraim Curtis Middle School   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33645065584     PISSN: 10627197     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1207/s15326977ea1101_1     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Abedi, J. (1996). Interrater/test reliability system (ITRS). Multivariate Behavioral Research, 31, 409-417.
2. Agresti, A., & Findlay, B. (1997). Statistical methods for the social sciences. San Francisco: Prentice Hall.
3. Alexander, P. A., Schallert, D. I., & Hare, V. C. (1991). Coming to terms. How researchers in learning and literacy talk about knowledge. Review of Educational Research, 61, 315-343.
4. Baird, J. R., & Northfield, J. R. (1992). Learning from the PEEL experience. Melbourne, Australia: Monash University.
5. Black, P., & Atkin, J. M. (1996). Changing the subject. Innovations in science, math, and technology education. London: Routledge.
6. Black, P., & Harrison, C. (2001). Self- and peer-assessment and taking responsibility, the science student's role in formative assessment. School Science Review, 83, 43-48.
7. Bloom, B. S. (1971). Mastery learning. In J. H. Block (Ed.), Mastery learning, theory and practice (pp. 47-63). New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
8. Bloom, B. S., & Krathwohl, D. R. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives. The classification of educational goals, by a committee of college and university examiners. Handbook I, Cognitive domain. New York: Longmans, Green.
9. Boud, D. (1989). The role of self-assessment in student grading. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 14, 20-30.
10. Brown, A. (1987). Metacognition, executive control, self-regulation, and other more mysterious mechanisms. In F. E. Weinhart & R. H. Kluwe (Eds.), Metacognition, motivation, and understanding (pp. 65-116). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
11. Burke, R. J. (1969). Some preliminary data on the use of self-evaluations and peer ratings in assigning university grades. Journal of Educational Research, 62, 444-448.
12. Crocker, A. C., & Cheeseman, R. G. (1988). The ability of young children to rank themselves for academic ability. Educational Studies, 14, 105-110.
13. Darling-Hammond, L., Ancess, J., & Faulk, B. (1995). Authentic assessment in action: Studies of schools and students at work. New York: Teachers College Press.
14. Davis, J. K., & Rand, D. C. (1980). Self-grading versus instructor grading. Journal of Educational Research, 73, 207-211.
15. Doyle, R. D., & Green, R. H. (1994). Self and peer appraisal in higher education. Higher Education, 28, 241-264.
16. Fairbrother, R., Black, P., & Gill, P. (Eds.). (1995). Teachers assessing pupils. Lessons from science classrooms. Hatfield, UK: Association for Science Education.
17. Falchikov, N. (1986). Product comparisons and process benefits of collaborative peer group and self assessments. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 11, 146-166.
18. Falchikov, N., & Boud, D. (1989). Student self-assessment in higher education. A meta-analysis, Review of Educational Research, 59, 395-430.
19. Falchikov N., & Goldfinch, J. (2000). Student peer assessment in higher education. A meta-analysis comparing peer and teacher marks. Review of Educational Research, 70, 287-322.
20. Falvo v. Owasso Independent School District (2000), Court of Appeals, 10th. U.S. Circuit.
21. Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act, 20 U.S.C. 1232g; 34 CFR Part 99. (1974).
22. Fleiss, J. L., & Cohen, J. (1973). The equivalence of weighted kappa and the intraclass correlation coefficient as measures of reliability. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 33, 613-619.
23. Janssen, T., & Rijlaarsdam, G. (1996). Students as self-assessors, learning experiences of literature teaching in secondary schools. In E. Marum (Ed.), Children and books in the modern world. Contemporary perspectives on literacy (pp. 98-115). London: Falmer Press.
24. Kelly, E., Kelly, A., Simpara, C., Ousmane, S., & Makinen, M. (2002). The impact of self-assessment provider performance in Mali. Bethesda, MD: ABT Associates.
25. Kim, Y., Putjuk, F., Basuki, E., & Kols, A. (2000). Self-assessment and peer review: Improving Indonesian service providers' commmication with clients. International Family Planning Perspectives, 26, 4-12.
26. Lehrer, J. (2001, October 28). Courting student rights. McNeil-Lehrer Productions. Public Broadcasting System. Retrieved October 25, 2005, from http://www.pbs.org/newshour/extra/features/july-dec01/sc_cases.html
27. Leslie, G. P. (2001). Amicus Brief to the U.S. Supreme Court, No. 00-1073, Owasso Independent School District v. Kristja J. Falvo.
28. Lynam, P., Rabinovitz, L., & Shobowale, M. (1993). Using self-assessment to improve the quality of family planning clinic services. Studies in Family Planning, 24, 252-260
29. McLeod, A. (2001). In lieu of tests. Retrieved August 4, 2005, from National Teaching and Learning Forum's Frequently Asked Questions at www.ntlf.com/html/lib/faq/al-ntlf.htm
30. Neukom, J. R. (2000). Alternative assessment, rubrics - Students' self assessment process. Unpublished master's thesis, Pacific Lutheran University, Tacoma, WA.
31. Ory, J., & Ryan, K. (1993). Tips for improving testing and grading. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
32. Owasso Independent School District No. I-011 v. Falvo (2002), 534 U.S. 426.[Supreme Court of the United States. No. 00-1073. Decided 2/9/2003.]
33. Parkin, C., & Richards, N. (1995). Introducing formative assessment at KS3, and attempt using pupil self-assessment. In R. Fairbrother, P. J. Black, & P. Gill (Eds.), Teachers assessing pupils. Lessons from science classrooms (pp. 13-28). Hatfield, UK: Association for Science Education.
34. Pearl, N. (2001, August). Making the grade public. On the Docket. Medill News Service, Northwestern University, Medill School of Journalism. Retrieved August 6, 2005, from www.medill.northwestern.edu/archives/000035.php
35. Pfeifer, J. K. (1981). The effects of peer evaluation and personality on writing anxiety and writing performance in college freshmen. Unpublished master's thesis, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX.
36. Phelps, R. P. (1997). The extent and character of system-wide student testing in the United States. Educational Assessment, 4, 89-121.
37. Ragsdale, S. (2001, December 9). Ask the kids how peer grading feels. Des Moines Register. Retrieved October 25, 2005, from http://desmoinesregister.com/ news/stories/c5917686/16663282.html
38. Reed, D. E. (1996). High school teachers' grading practices: A description of methods for collection and aggregation of grade information in three schools. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Riverside.
39. Romano, L. (2001, October 20). Supreme Court to test Okla. schools' policy of pupils grading peers. Washington Post, p. A03.
40. Sadler, D. R. (1989). Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems. Instructional Science, 18, 119-144.
41. Schuster, C. (in press). A note on the interpretation of weighted kappa and its relations to other rater agreement statistics for metric scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement.
42. Walsh, M. (2001). Grading case takes high court back to school. Education Week, 21(14), 28, 31.
43. Weaver, R. L., & Cotrell, H. W. (1986). Peer evaluation: A case study. Innovative Higher Education, 11, 25-39.
44. Werdelin, I. (1966). Teacher ratings, peer ratings, and self ratings of behavior in school. Educational and Psychological Interactions, 11, 1-21.
45. Winer, B. J. (1962). Statistical principles in experimental design. New York: McGraw-Hill.
46. Zola, J. (1992). Scored discussions. Social Education, 56, 121-125.
47. Zoller, U. (1993) Are lecture and learning compatible? Journal of Chemical Education, 70, 195-197.
48. Zoller, U., & Ben-Chaim, D. (1998). Student self-assessment in HOCS science examinations: Is there a problem? Journal of Science Education and Technology, 7, 135-147.
49. Zoller, U., Ben-Chaim, D., & Kamm, S. D. (1997). Examination-type preference of college students and their faculty in Israel and USA: A comparative study. School Science and Mathematics, 97(1), 3-12.
50. Zoller, U., Tsaparlis, G., Fastow, M., & Lubezky, A. (1997). Student self-assessment of higher-order cognitive skills in college science teaching. Journal of College Science Teaching, 27, 99-101.