Students' peer evaluation calibration through the administration of vignettes

ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages

  Wang, Junqiu ^a   Imbrie, P K ^a  

^a PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CALIBRATION; EDUCATION; ENGINEERING EDUCATION; RATING;

CENTRAL TENDENCIES; COLLABORATIVE TEAMS; FIRST YEAR ENGINEERING COURSE; REAL ENGINEERING; STUDENT PERFORMANCE; STUDENTS' EVALUATIONS; TEAM EFFECTIVENESS; THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK;

STUDENTS;

EID: 85029087499     PISSN: None     EISSN: 21535965     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (15)

1. ABET (2002). Engineering Criteria 2002-2003. Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology, http://www.abet.org/criteria.html, accessed 2/1/2009.
2. J. McGourty, P. Dominick, and R.R. Reilly. Incorporating student peer review and feedback into the assessment process. presented at theBest Assessment Processes in Engineering Education: A Working Symposium Sponsored by National Science Foundation, ABET, andRose-Hulman Institute of Technology, Terre Haute, IN, Apr. 1997.
3. M. Besterfield-Sacre, L.J. Shuman, H. Wolfe, C.J. Atman, J. McGourty, R.L. Miller, B.M. Olds, and G.M. Rogers. Defining the outcomes: A framework for EC-2000. IEEE Transactions on Education, 43(2):100-110, 2000.
4. L.J. Shuman, M. Besterfield-Sacre, and J. McGourty. The ABET " professional skills"- can they be taught? Can they be assessed? Journal of Engineering Education, 94(1):41-55, 2005.
5. M.W. Ohland and R.A. Layton. Comparing the reliability of two peer evaluation instruments. In Proceedings. ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, St. Louis, MO, 2000.
6. D.F. Baker. Peer assessment in small groups: A comparison of methods. Journal of Management Education, 32(2):183, 2008.
7. P.G. Dominick, R.R. Reilly, and J.W. McGourty. The effects of peer feedback on team member behavior. Group & Organization Management, 22(4):508, 1997.
8. N. Falchikov and J. Goldfinch. Student peer assessment in higher education: A meta-analysis comparing peer and teacher marks. Review of Educational Research, 70(3):287, 2000.
9. L.E. Gueldenzoph and G.L. May. Collaborative peer evaluation: Best practices for group member assessments. Business Communication Quarterly, 65(1):9, 2002.
10. Imbrie, P.K., Maller, S.J., and Immekus, J.C. (2005) Assessing Team Effectiveness, Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, Portland, Oregon.
11. Wang, J., Imbrie, P.K., "Assessing Team Effectiveness: Comparing Peer-evaluations to a Team Effectiveness Instrument" Proceedings of the 2009 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, Austin, TX.
12. R.L. Holzbach. Rater bias in performance ratings: Superior, self-, and peer ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 63(5):579-588, 1978.
13. K.G. Love. Comparison of peer assessment methods: Reliability, validity, friendship bias, and user reaction. Journal of Applied Psychology, 66(4):451-457, 1981.
14. R.J. Klimoski and M. London. Role of the rater in performance appraisal. Journal of Applied Psychology, 59(4):445-451, 1974.
15. C.S. Alexander and H.J. Becker. The use of vignettes in survey research. Public opinion quarterly, 42(1):93, 1978.