The effects of instructional rubrics on learning to write

Current Issues in Education

Volumn 4, Issue , 2001, Pages 1-39

  Goodrich Andrade, Heidi ^a,b  

^a OHIO UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 3042608654     PISSN: 1099839X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Bangert-Drowns, R., Kulik, C., Kulik, J., & Morgan, M. (1991). The instructional effect of feedback in test-like events. Review of Educational Research, 61, 213-238.
2. Butler, D. & Winne, P. (1995). Feedback and self-regulated learning: A theoretical synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 65(3), 245-281.
3. Cooper, C. (1999). What we know about genres, and how it can help us assign and evaluate writing. In C. Cooper and L. Odell (Eds.), Evaluating writing: The role of teachers' knowledge about text, learning and culture. National Council of Teachers of English: Urbana, IL.
4. Cooper, C. & Odell, L. (1999). Evaluating writing: The role of teachers' knowledge about text, learning and culture. National Council of Teachers of English: Urbana, IL.
5. Gardner, H. (1991). Assessment in context: The alternative to standardized testing. In B. R. Gifford and M. C. O'Connor (Eds.), Changing assessments: Alternative views of aptitude, achievement and instruction. Boston: Kluwer.
6. Goodrich Andrade, H. (2000). Using rubrics to promote thinking and learning. Educational Leadership, 57(5), 13-18.
7. Goodrich Andrade, H., & Delamater, E. (in preparation). Gender and the role of rubric-referenced self-assessment in learning to write.
8. Goodrich, H. (1997b). Thinking-centered assessment. In S. Veenema, L. Hetland, & K. Chalfen (Eds.), The Project Zero classroom: New approaches to thinking and understanding. Cambridge, MA: Project Zero, Harvard Graduate School of Education.
9. Goodrich, H. (1997a). Understanding rubrics. Educational Leadership, 54(4), 14-17.
10. Hawkins, J., Frederikson, J., Collins, A., Bennet, D., & Collins, E. (1993). Assessment and technology: New ways to assess student learning. Technology and Education, 36(5).
11. Jensen, K. (1995). Effective rubric design: Making the most of this powerful assessment tool. Science Teacher, 62(5), 34-37.
12. Ketter, J. (1997). Using rubrics and holistic scoring of writing. In Tchudi, S. (Ed.) Alternatives to grading student writing. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
13. Luft, J. (1997). Design your own rubric. Science Scope, 20(5), 25-27.
14. Moffett, James (1983). Teaching the universe of discourse. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Co.
15. Perkins, D. N., Jay, E., & Tishman, S. (1993). Beyond abilities: A dispositional theory of thinking. The Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 39(1), 1-21.
16. Popham, W. J. (1997). What's wrong-and what's right-with rubrics. Educational Leadership, 55(2), 72-75.
17. Shepard, L. (2000). The role of assessment in a learning culture. Educational Researcher, 29(7), 4-14.
18. White, E. (1994). Teaching and assessing writing: Recent advances in understanding, evaluating, and improving student performance, 2nd edition. Portland, ME: Calendar Islands Publishers.
19. White, E. (2000). Bursting the bubble sheet: How to improve evaluations of teaching. The Chronicle of Higher Education, XLVII(11), B11.
20. Wiggins, G. (1989b). Teaching to the (authentic) test. Educational Leadership, 46(7), 41-47.
21. Wiggins, G. (1989a). A true test: Toward more authentic and equitable assessment. Phi Delta Kappan, 70(9), 703-713.
22. Wolf, D., & Pistone, N. (1991). Taking full measure: Rethinking assessment through the arts. New York: College Board Publications.