Rubrics vs. self-assessment scripts: effects on first year university students’ self-regulation and performance / Rúbricas y guiones de autoevaluación: efectos sobre la autorregulación y el rendimiento de estudiantes universitarios de primer año

Infancia y Aprendizaje

Volumn 37, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 149-183

  Panadero, Ernesto ^a,b   Alonso Tapia, Jesús ^a   Huertas, Juan Antonio ^a  

^a UNIVERSIDAD AUTÓNOMA DE MADRID   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OULU   (Finland)

Author keywords

formative assessment; rubrics; self assessment scripts; self efficacy; self evaluation; self regulation

Indexed keywords

EID: 84888828520     PISSN: 02103702     EISSN: 15784126     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02103702.2014.881655     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. J.Alonso-Tapia,, J.A.Huertas,, & M.A.Ruiz, (2010). On the nature of motivational orientations: Implications of assessed goals and gender differences for motivational goal theory. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 13(1), 232–243.
2. J.Alonso-Tapia,, & E.Panadero, (2010). Effect of self-assessment scripts on self-regulation and learning. Infancia y Aprendizaje, 33(3), 385–397.
3. J.Alonso-Tapia,, E.Panadero,, & M.A.Ruiz, (2014). Development and validity of the Emotion and Motivation Self-regulation Questionnaire (EMSR-Q): Intertwined effects between self-regulation styles and classroom motivational climate. Spanish Journal of Psychology.
4. H.Andrade,, & Y.Du, (2005). Student perspectives on rubric-referenced assessment. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 10(3), 1–11.
5. H.Andrade,, Y.Du,, & X.Wang, (2008). Putting rubrics to the test: The effect of a model, criteria generation, and rubric-referenced self-assessment on elementary school students’ writing. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practices, 27(2), 3–13.
6. H.Andrade, & A.Valtcheva, (2009). Promoting learning and achievement through self-assessment. Theory Into Practice, 48(1), 12–19.
7. H.Andrade,, X.L.Wang,, Y.Du,, & R.L.Akawi, (2009). Rubric-referenced self-assessment and self-efficacy for writing. Journal of Educational Research, 102(4), 287–301.
8. M.Bannert, (2009). Promoting self-regulated learning through prompts. Zeitschrift Fur Padagogische Psychologie, 23(2), 139–145. doi:10.1024/1010-0652.23.2.139
9. J.W.Berry,, & S.L.Chew, (2008). Improving learning through interventions of student-generated questions and concept maps. Teaching of Psychology, 35(4), 305–312. doi:10.1080/00986280802373841
10. K.Berthold,, M.Nückles,, & A.Renkl, (2007). Do learning protocols support learning strategies and outcomes? The role of cognitive and metacognitive prompts. Learning and Instruction, 17(5), 564–577. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.09.007
11. M.Boekaerts,, & L.Corno, (2005). Self-regulation in the classroom: A perspective on assessment and intervention. Applied Psychology-an International Review-psychologie Appliquee-revue Internationale, 54(2), 199–231.
12. N.Falchikov,, & D.Boud, (1989). Student self-assessment in higher education: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 59(4), 395–430.
13. J.S.Halonen,, T.Bosack,, S.Clay,, M.McCarthy,, D.S.Dunn,, I.G.W.Hill, K.… Whitlock, (2003). A rubric for learning, teaching, and assessing scientific inquiry in psychology. Teaching of Psychology, 30(3), 196–208. doi:10.1207/s15328023top3003_01
14. J.M.Jacobs-Lawson,, & D.A.Hershey, (2002). Concept maps as an assessment tool in psychology courses. Teaching of Psychology, 29(1), 25–29. doi:10.1207/s15328023top2901_06
15. A.Jonsson,, & G.Svingby, (2007). The use of scoring rubrics: Reliability, validity and educational consequences. Educational Research Review, 2, 130–144.
16. B.Kramarski,, & V.Dudai, (2009). Group-metacognitive support for online inquiry in mathematics with differential self-questioning. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 40(4), 377–404.
17. B.Kramarski,, & T.Michalsky, (2009). Three metacognitive approaches to training pre-service teachers in different learning phases of technological pedagogical content knowledge. Educational Research and Evaluation: An International Journal on Theory and Practice, 15(5), 465–485.
18. B.Kramarski,, & T.Michalsky, (2010). Preparing preservice teachers for self-regulated learning in the context of technological pedagogical content knowledge. Learning and Instruction, 20(5), 434–447. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.05.003
19. E.Kyndt,, F.Dochy,, K.Struyven,, & E.Cascallar, (2011). The perception of workload and task complexity and its influence on students’ approaches to learning: A study in higher education. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 26(3), 339–415. doi:10.1007/s10212-010-0053-2
20. M.Mateos,, R.Villalón,, M.J.de Dios,, & E.Martín, (2007). Reading and writing tasks on different university degree courses: what do the students say they do? Studies in Higher Education, 32(4), 489–510.
21. F.Pajares, (2008). Motivational role of self-efficacy beliefs in self-regulated learning. In D.H.Schunk & B.J.Zimmerman (Eds.), Motivation and self-regulated learning. Theory, research and applications (pp. 111–168). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
22. E.Panadero, (2011). Instructional help for self-assessment and self-regulation: Evaluation of the efficacy of self-assessment scripts vs. rubrics (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, España.
23. E.Panadero,, & J.Alonso-Tapia, (2013). Revisión sobre autoevaluación educativa: evidencia empírica de su implementación a través de la autocalificación sin criterios de evaluación, rúbricas y guiones. Revista de Investigación en Educación, 11(2), 172–197.
24. E.Panadero,, J.Alonso-Tapia,, & J.A.Huertas, (2012). Rubrics and self-assessment scripts effects on self-regulation, learning and self-efficacy in secondary education. Learning and Individual Differences(0). doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2012.04.007
25. E.Panadero,, J.Alonso-Tapia,, & E.Reche, (2013). Rubrics vs. self-assessment scripts effect on self-regulation, performance and self-efficacy in pre-service teachers. Studies In Educational Evaluation, 39(3), 125–132. doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2013.04.001
26. E.Panadero,, & A.Jonsson, (2013). The use of scoring rubrics for formative assessment purposes revisited: A review. Educational Research Review, 9(0), 129–144. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2013.01.002
27. P.R.Pintrich, (2004). A conceptual framework for assessing motivation and self-regulated learning in college students. Educational Psychology Review, 16(4), 385–407.
28. M.Puustinen,, & L.Pulkkinen, (2001). Models of self-regulated learning: A review. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 45(3), 269–286. doi:10.1080/00313830120074206
29. Y.M.Reddy,, & H.Andrade, (2010). A review of rubric use in higher education. Assessment & Evaluation In Higher Education, 35(4), 435–448. doi:10.1080/02602930902862859
30. C.A.Reitmeier,, & D.A.Vrchota, (2009). Self-assessment of oral communication presentations in food science and nutrition. Journal of Food Science Education, 8(4), 88–92.
31. L.Reynolds-Keefer, (2010). Rubric-referenced assessment in teacher preparation: An opportunity to learn by using. Practical Assessment Research & Evaluation, 15(8). Retrieved from http://pareonline.net/getvn.asp?v=15&n=8
32. P.M.Sadler,, & E.Good, (2006). The impact of self- and peer-grading on student learning. Educational Assessment, 11(1), 1–31.
33. M.S.Samuelstuen,, & I.Bråten, (2007). Examining the validity of self-reports on scales measuring students’ strategic processing. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 77(2), 351–378. doi:10.1348/000709906x106147
34. M.Taras, (2010). Student self-assessment: Processes and consequences. Teaching in Higher Education, 15(2), 199–209. doi:10.1080/13562511003620027
35. M.Torenbeek,, E.Jansen,, & A.Hofman, (2010). The effect of the fit between secondary and university education on first-year student achievement. Studies in Higher Education, 35(6), 659–675.
36. M.van Dinther,, F.Dochy,, & M.Segers, (2010). Factors affecting students’ self-efficacy in higher education. Educational Research Review, 6(2), 95–108. doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2010.10.003
37. P.H.Winne,, & A.F.Hadwin, (1998). Studying as self-regulated engagement in learning. In D.Hacker, J.Dunlosky & A.Graesser (Eds.), Metacognition in educational theory and practice (pp. 277–304). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
38. C.A.Wolters, (1998). Self-regulated learning and college students’ regulation of motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90(2), 224–235.
39. B.J.Zimmerman, (2000). Attaining self-regulation: A social cognitive perspective. In M.Boekaerts, P.R.Pintrich & M.Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 13–40). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
40. B.J.Zimmerman,, & A.Kitsantas, (2005). The hidden dimension of personal competence: Self-Regulated learning and practice. In A.J.Elliot & C.S.Dweck (Eds.), Handbook of competence and motivation (pp. 509–526). New York: Guilford Press.
41. B.J.Zimmerman,, & A.R.Moylan, (2009). Self-regulation: Where metacognition and motivation intersect. In D.J.Hacker, J.Dunlosky & A.C.Graesser (Eds.), Handbook of Metacognition in Education (pp. 299–315). New York: Routledge.