The use of school self-evaluation results in the Netherlands and Flanders

British Educational Research Journal

Volumn 38, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 125-152

  Schildkamp, Kim ^a   Vanhoof, Jan ^b   Van Petegem, Peter ^b   Visscher, Adrie ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ANTWERP   (Belgium)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84868525367     PISSN: 01411926     EISSN: 14693518     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01411926.2010.528556     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Argyris, C. & Schön, D. A. (1978) Organizational learning: a theory of action perspective (Reading, MA, Addison-Wesley).
2. Blok, H., Sleegers, P. & Karsten, S. (2005) Schoolzelfevaluatie in het basisonderwijs; een terugblik op de zelfevaluatiefase van Ziezo [School self evaluation in primary education] (Amsterdam, SCOKohnstamm Instituut).
3. Bolhuis, S. & Simons, P. R. J. (2001) Naar een breder begrip van leren, in: J. W. M. Kessels & R. F. Poell (Eds) Human resource development: organiseren van het leren (Houten, Samsom), 37-51.
4. Bubb, S. & Earley, P. (2008) From self-evaluation to school improvement: the importance of effective staff development (Reading, CfBT Education Trust).
5. Chou, S.-W. & Tsai, Y.-H. (2004) Knowledge creation: individual and organizational perspectives, Journal of Information Science, 30(3), 205-218.
6. Clift, P. S., Nuttall, D. L. & McCormick, R. (Eds) (1989) Studies in school self evaluation (London, Falmer Press).
7. Coe, R., & Visscher, A. J. (2002a) Introduction, in: A. J. Visscher & R. Coe (Eds) School improvement through performance feedback (Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger B. V), xi-xix.
8. Coe, R., & Visscher, A. J. (2002b). Drawing up the balance sheet for school performance feedback systems, in: A. J. Visscher & R. Coe (Eds) School improvement through performance feedback (Lisse, Swets & Zeitlinger B. V.), 221-254.
9. Creemers, B. P. M. (2006) The importance and perspectives of international studies in educational effectiveness, Educational Research and Evaluation, 12(6), 499-511.
10. Creswell, J. W. (2005) Educational research: planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (Upper Saddle River, NJ, Pearson Prentice Hall).
11. Davies, D. & Rudd, P. (2001) Evaluating school self-evaluation (Slough, National Foundation for Educational Research).
12. De Heus, P., Van der Leeden, R. & Gazendam, B. (1995) Toegepaste data-analyse. Technieken voor niet-experimenteel onderzoek in de sociale wetenschappen [Applied data-analysis. Methods for nonexperimental research in social sciences] ('s-Gravenhage, Elsevier Bedrijfsinformatie).
13. Field, A. (2003) Discovering statistics using SPSS for Windows (London, Sage Publications Ltd).
14. Fullan, M. G. (1991) The new meaning of educational change (New York, Teachers College Press).
15. Geijsel, F., Van Den Berg, R. & Sleegers, P. (1996) Het innovatief vermogen van schoolleiders in het basisonderwijs: een tweede vooronderzoek [The innovation capacity of school leaders in primary education: a second pilot study], Pedagogische Studiën, 73, 42-55.
16. Geijsel, F., Van Den Berg, R. & Sleegers, P. (1999) The innovative capacity of schools in primary education: a qualitative study, Qualitative Studies in Education, 12(2), 175-191.
17. Gray, J. (2002) Jolts and reactions: two decades of feeding back information on schools' performance, in: A. J. Visscher & R. Coe (Eds) School improvement through performance feedback (Lisse, Swets & Zeitlinger), 143-162.
18. Güthe, K. A. K. (1997) Indicatoren van schoolontwikkeling [Indicators for school development] (Enschede, OCTO, University of Twente).
19. Hendriks, M. (2001) Systemen voor kwaliteitszorg in het primair en secundair onderwijs [Systems for quality control in primary and secondary education], in: R. J. Bosker (Ed.) Kwaliteitszorg. Onderwijskundig lexicon III (Alphen aan den Rijn, Samsom), 47-72.
20. Hendriks, M. A. & Bosker, R. J. (2003) ZEBO instrument voor zelfevaluatie in het basisonderwijs. Handleiding bij een geautomatiseerd hulpmiddel voor kwaliteitszorg in basisscholen [ZEBO instrument for self-evaluation in primary schools. Manual for a computerized instrument for quality control in primary schools] (Enschede, Twente University Press).
21. Hendriks, M., Doolaard, S., & Bosker, R. J. (2002) Using school effectiveness as a knowledge base for self-evaluation in Dutch schools: the ZEBO project, in: A. J. Visscher & R. Coe (Eds) School improvement through performance feedback (Lisse, Swets & Zeitlinger), 115-142.
22. Inspectie van het Onderwijs (2002) Veranderend toezicht. De Inspectie van het Onderwijs en de Wet op Onderwijstoezicht [Changing supervision. The Inspectorate and the Dutch quality law] (Utrecht, Inspectie van het Onderwijs).
23. Kimball, S. M. (2002) Analysis of feedback, enabling conditions and fairness perceptions of teachers in three school districts with new standards-based evaluation systems, Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 16(4), 241-268.
24. Leithwood, K., Aitken, R. & Jantzi, D. (2001) Making schools smarter: a system for monitoring school and district progress (Thousand Oaks, CA, Corwin Press).
25. MacBeath, J. (2008) Leading learning in the self-evaluating school, School Leadership and Management, 28(4), 385-399.
26. Maslowski, R. (2001) School culture and school performance (Enschede, Twente University Press).
27. McEwan, E. K. (2003) 7 steps to effective instructional leadership (Thousand Oaks, CA, Corwin Press).
28. Meuret, D. & Morlaix, S. (2003) Conditions of success of a school's self-evaluation: some lessons of a European experience, School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 14(1), 53-71.
29. Ministerie van Onderwijs, Cultuur & Wetenschappen (1999) Variëteit en waarborg: Voorstellen voor de ontwikkeling van het toezicht oponderwijs [Diversity and a guarantee: proposals for the development of the supervision of education] (Zoetermeer Ministerie van Onderwijs, Cultuur & Wetenschappen).
30. Ministerie van Onderwijs, Cultuur & Wetenschappen; Ministerie van Landbouw, Natuuren Visserij (2000-2002) Wet op het onderwijs toezicht [Education supervision act 3] (Den Haag, SDU).
31. Mitchell, C. & Sackney, L. (2000) Profound improvement: building capacity for a learning community (Lisse, Swets & Zeitlinger).
32. Mortimore, P. & MacBeath, J. (2001) School effectiveness and improvement: the story so far, in: P. Mortimore & J. MacBeath (Eds) Improving school effectiveness (Philadelphia, PA, Open University Press), 1-21.
33. Nevo, D. (2002) Dialogue evaluation: combining internal and external evaluation, in: D. Nevo (Ed.) School-based evaluation: an international perspective (Oxford, Elsevier).
34. Nonaka, I. & Takeuchi, H. (1995) The knowledge-creating company: how Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation (New York, Oxford University Press).
35. Norton Grubb, W. (1999) Improvement or control? A U.S. view of English inspection, in: C. Cullingford (Ed.) An inspector calls: OFSTED and its effect on school standards (London, Kogan Page).
36. Office for Standards in Education (Ofsted) (2004) A new relationship with schools: improving performance through school self-evaluation (Nottingham, DfES Publications).
37. Petty, R. E. & Wegener, D. T. (1998) Attitude change: multiple roles for persuasion variables, in: D. Gilbert, S. Fiske & G. Lindzey (Eds) The handbook of social psychology (New York, McGraw-Hill).
38. Plowright, D. (2007) Self-evaluation and Ofsted inspection: developing an integrative model of school improvement, Educational Management Administration and Leadership, 35(3), 373-393.
39. Quinn, R., Faerman, S. R., Thompson, M. P. & McGrath, M. (2003) Becoming a master manager: a competency framework (New York, Wiley).
40. Quinn, R. & Rohrbaugh, J. (1983) A spatial model of effectiveness criteria: towards a competing values approach to organizational analysis, Management Science, 29, 363-377.
41. Renkema, G. (2002) Kwaliteitszorg, wat levert het op? [Quality assurance - what are the gains?], Basis School Management, 15(8).
42. Rossi, P. H., Freeman, H. E. & Lipsey, M. W. (1999) Evaluation: a systematic approach (Thousands Oaks, CA, Sage).
43. Rowe, K. J., Turner, R. & Lane. K. (2002) Performance feedback to schools of students' year 12 assessments: the VCE data project, in: A. J. Visscher & R. Coe (Eds) School improvement through performance feedback (Lisse, Swets & Zeitlinger), 163-190.
44. Sammons, P. (2006) The contribution of international studies on educational effectiveness: current and future directions, Educational Research and Evaluation, 12(6), 583-593.
45. Scheerens, J. (1997) De bevordering van schooleffectiviteit in het basisonderwijs: Mogelijkheden tot 'flankerend beleid' bij klassenverkleining [The enhancemement of school effectiveness in primary education: opportunities for policy in reducing class size] (Enschede, Faculteit der Toegepaste Onderwijskunde, University of Twente).
46. Scheerens, J. & Bosker, R. J. (1997) The foundations of educational effectiveness (Oxford, Elsevier Science Ltd).
47. Schildkamp, K. (2007) The utilisation of a self-evaluation instrument for primary education (Enschede, Ipskamp).
48. Schildkamp, K., & Kuiper, W. (2010) Data-informed curriculum reform: which data, what purposes, and promoting and hindering factors. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26, 482-496.
49. Schildkamp, K., & Visscher, A. J. (2010a). Factors influencing the utilization of a school self-evaluation instrument. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 35, 150-159.
50. Schildkamp, K. & Visscher, A. J. (2010b) The utilization of a school self-evaluation instrument. Educational Studies, 36(4), 371-389.
51. Teddlie, C., Kochan, C. & Taylor, D. (2002) The ABC+ model for school diagnosis, feedback, and improvement, in: A. J. Visscher & R. Coe (Eds) School improvement through performance feedback (Lisse, Swets & Zeitlinger), 75-114.
52. Tymms, P. & Albone, S. (2002) Performance indicators in primary schools, in: A. J. Visscher & R. Coe (Eds) School improvement through performance feedback (Lisse, Swets & Zeitlinger), 191-218.
53. Van Petegem, P. (1998) Vormgeven aan schoolbeleid. Effectieve- scholenonderzoek als inspiratiebron voor de zelfevaluatie van scholen [Forming school policy: effective school research as an inspiration for school self-evaluation] (Leuven, Uitgeverij Acco).
54. Vanhoof, J. (2007) Zelfevaluatie binnenstebuiten: een onderzoek naar het verloop en de kwaliteit van zelfevaluaties in Vlaamse scholen (Antwerp, UA, Instituut voor Onderwijs-en Informatiewetenschappen).
55. Verbiest, E. (2002) Collectief leren in schoolorganisaties (Tilburg, Fontys Hogescholen).
56. Verbiest, E. & Vandenberghe, R. (2002) Professionele leergemeenschappen. Een nieuwe kijk op permanente onderwijsvernieuwing en ontwikkeling van leraren, Schoolleiding en Begeleiding - Personeel en organisatie, 1, 57-86.
57. Visscher, A. J. (2002) A framework for studying school performance feedback systems, in: A. J. Visscher & R. Coe (Eds) School improvement through performance feedback (Lisse, Swets & Zeitlinger B.V.), 41-72.
58. Visscher, A. J., & Coe, R. (2003) School performance feedback systems: conceptualisation, analysis, and reflection. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 14(3), 321-350.
59. Von Krogh, G., Ichijo, K. & Nonaka, I. (2000) Enabling knowledge creation: how to unlock the mystery of tacit knowledge and release the power of innovation (Oxford, Oxford University Press).
60. Webb, R., Vulliamy, G., Häkkinen, K. & Hämälä inen, S. (1998) External inspections or school self-evaluation? A comparative analysis of policy and practice in primary schools in England, British Educational Research Journal, 24(5), 539-566.
61. Weiss, C. H. (1998a) Have we learned anything new about the use of evaluation? American Journal of Evaluation, 19(1), 21-33.
62. Weiss, C. H. (1998b) Improving the use of evaluations: whose job is it anyway? in: A. J. Reynolds & H. J. Walberg (Eds) Advances in educational productivity, Vol. 7 (Greenwich, MA and London, JAI Press), 263-276.