The effect of financial incentives on performance: A quantitative review of individual and team-based financial incentives

Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology

Volumn 87, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 102-137

  Garbers, Yvonne ^a   Konradt, Udo ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KIEL   (Germany)

Author keywords

Financial incentive; Meta analysis; Performance; Team based rewards

Indexed keywords

EID: 84892844059     PISSN: 09631798     EISSN: 20448325     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/joop.12039     Document Type: Article

References (246)

1. Adams, J. S. (1965). Inequity in social exchange. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology, Vol. 2 (pp. 267-296). New York, NY: Academic Press.
2. Aguinis, H., Pierce, C. A., Bosco, F. A., Dalton, D. R., & Dalton, C. M. (2011). Debunking myths and urban legends about meta-analysis. Organizational Research Methods, 14, 306-331. doi:10.1177/1094428110375720
3. Aime, F. A., Meyer, C. J., & Humphrey, S. E. (2010). Legitimacy of group rewards: Analyzing legitimacy as a condition for the effectiveness of group incentive designs. Journal of Business Research, 63, 60-66. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2009.02.014
4. *Allison, D. B., Silverstein, J. M., & Galante, V. (1992). Relative effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of cooperative, competitive, and independent monetary incentive systems. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 13, 85-112. doi:10.1300/J075v13n01_06
5. *Ashton, R. H. (1990). Pressure and performance in accounting decision settings: Paradoxical effects of incentives, feedback, and justification. Journal of Accounting Research, 28, 148-180. doi:10.2307/2491253
6. Atkinson, A. A., Banker, R., Kaplan, R. S., & Young, S. M. (2001). Management accounting. (3rd ed.) Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
7. *Awasthi, V., & Pratt, J. (1990). The effects of monetary incentives on effort and decision performance: The role of cognitive characteristics. The Accounting Review, 65, 797-811.
8. Babcock, P., Bedard, K., Charness, G., Hartman, J., & Royer, H. (2010). Letting down the team? Evidence of social effects of team incentives. NBER Working Paper #16687, Cambridge, MA.
9. Baiman, S. (1982). Agency research in managerial accounting: A survey. Journal of Accounting Literature, 1, 154-213.
10. Baiman, S. (1990). Agency research in managerial accounting: A second look. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 15, 341-371. doi:10.1016/0361-3682(90)90023-N
11. Balliet, D., Mulder, L. B., & Van Lange, P. A. M. (2011). Reward, punishment, and cooperation: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 137, 594-615. doi:10.1037/a0023489
12. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
13. Bandura, A. (1991). Social cognitive theory of self-regulation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 248-287. doi:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90022-L
14. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY: W.H. Freeman.
15. *Barkhi, R. (2005). Information exchange and induced cooperation in group decision support systems. Communication Research, 32, 646-678. doi:10.1177/0093650205279352
16. Bartol, K. M., & Hagman, L. L. (1992). Team-based pay plans: A key to effective teamwork. Compensation and Benefits Review, 24, 24-29. doi:10.1177/088636879202400606
17. Bateman, M. J., & Ludwig, T. D. (2003). Managing distribution quality through an adapted incentive program with tiered goals and feedback. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 23, 33-55. doi:10.1300/J075v23n01_03
18. Beal, D. J., Cohen, R. R., Burke, M. J., & McLendon, C. L. (2003). Cohesion and performance in groups: A meta-analytic clarification of construct relations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 989-1004. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.6.989
19. Beersma, B., & De Dreu, C. K. W. (2003). The aftermath of group negotiation: How social motives affect distal group functioning and performance. Working Paper, University of Amsterdam.
20. *Beersma, B., Hollenbeck, J. R., Conlon, D. E., Humphrey, S. E., Moon, H., & Ilgen, D. R. (2009). Cutthroat cooperation: The effects of team role decisions on adaptation to alternative reward structures. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 108, 131-142. doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2008.07.002
21. *Beersma, B., Hollenbeck, J. R., Humphrey, S. E., Moon, H., Conlon, D. E., & Ilgen, D. R. (2003). Cooperation, competition, and team performance: Toward a contingency approach. Academy of Management Journal, 46, 572-590. doi:10.2307/30040650
22. Benbasat, I., & Lim, L. (1993). The effects of group, task, context, and technology variables on the usefulness of Group Support Systems: A meta-analysis of experimental studies. Small Group Research, 24, 430-462. doi:10.1177/1046496493244002
23. *Berger, C. J., Cummings, L. L., & Heneman, H. G. (1975). Expectancy theory and operant conditioning predictions of performance under variable ratio and continuous schedules of reinforcement. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 14, 227-243. doi:10.1016/0030-5073(75)90026-4
24. *Blaul, G. (1994). Testing the effect of level and importance of pay referents on pay level satisfaction. Human Relations, 47, 1251-1268. doi:10.1177/001872679404701005
25. *Bloom, M. (1999). The performance effects of pay dispersion on individuals and organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 42, 25-40. doi:10.2307/256872
26. Bloom, M., & Michel, J. G. (2002). The relationships among organizational context pay dispersion and managerial turnover. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 33-42. doi:10.2307/3069283
27. *Bloom, M., & Milkovich, G. T. (1998). Relationships among risk, incentive pay, and organizational performance. Academy of Management Journal, 41, 283-297. doi:10.2307/256908
28. Bonner, S. E., Hastie, R., Sprinkle, G. B., & Young, M. (2000). A review of the effects of financial incentives on performance in laboratory tasks: Implications for management accounting. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 12, 19-57. doi:10.2308/jmar.2000.12.1.19
29. Bonner, S. E., & Sprinkle, G. B. (2002). The effects of monetary incentives on task performance: Theories, evidence, and a framework for research. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 27, 303-345. doi:10.1016/S0361-3682(01)00052-6
30. Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P. T., & Rothstein, H. R. (2006). Comprehensive meta-analysis (version 2.2.027). Englewood, NJ: Biostat.
31. Bowers, C. A., Pharmer, J. A., & Salas, E. (2000). When member homogeneity is needed in work teams. A meta-analysis. Small Group Research, 31, 305-327. doi:10.1177/104649640003100303
32. Bowles, S., & Reyes, S. P. (2009). Economic incentives and social preferences: A preference-based lucas critique of public policy. Paper presented at the CESifo Venice Summer Institute.
33. Bretz, R. D., Ash, R. A., & Dreher, G. F. (1989). Do the people make the place: An examination of the attraction-selection-attrition hypothesis. Personnel Psychology, 42, 561-581. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1989.tb00669.x
34. Brown, M. P., Sturman, M. C., & Simmering, M. J. (2003). Compensation policy and organizational performance: The efficiency and financial implications of pay levels and pay structure. Academy of Management Journal, 46, 752-762. doi:10.2307/30040666
35. *Brüggen, A., & Moers, F. (2007). The role of financial incentives and social incentives in multi-task settings. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 19, 25-50. doi:10.2308/jmar.2007.19.1.25
36. Bucklin, B. R., & Dickinson, A. M. (2001). Individual monetary incentives: A review of different types of arrangements between performance and pay. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 21 (3), 45-137. doi:10.1300/J075v21n03_03
37. Bucklin, B. R., McGee, H. M., & Dickinson, A. M. (2003). The effects of individual monetary incentives with and without feedback. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 23 (2/3), 65-94. doi:10.1300/J075v23n02_05
38. Burgess, S., Propper, C., Ratto, M., von Hinke Kessler Scholder, S., & Tominey, E. (2010). Smarter task assignment or greater effort: The impact of incentives on team performance. Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, 120, 968-989. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0297.2009.02331.x
39. Burke, M. J., Raju, N. S., & Pearlman, K. (1986). An empirical comparison of the results of five validity generalization procedures. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71, 349-353. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.71.2.349
40. Cable, D. M., & Judge, T. A. (1994). Pay preferences and job search decisions: A person organization fit perspective. Personnel Psychology, 47, 317-348. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1994.tb01727.x
41. *Cadsby, C. B., Song, F., & Tapon, F. (2007). Sorting and incentive effects of pay for performance: An experimental investigation. Academy of Management Journal, 50, 387-405. doi:10.5465/AMJ.2007.24634448
42. Camerer, C. F., & Hogarth, R. (1999). The effects of financial incentives in experiments: A review and capital-labor-production framework. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 19, 7-42. doi:10.1023/A:1007850605129
43. Cameron, J., & Pierce, W. D. (1994). Reinforcement, reward, and intrinsic motivation: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 64, 363-423. doi:10.3102/00346543064003363
44. *Campbell, D. J. (1984). The effects of goal-contingent payment on the performance of complex tasks. Personnel Psychology, 37, 23-40. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1984.tb02245.x
45. Campbell, J., & Pritchard, R. (1976). Motivation theory in industrial and organizational psychology. In M. D. Dunnette (Ed.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 63-130). Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.
46. Campion, M. A., Medsker, G. J., & Higgs, A. C. (1993). Relations between work group characteristics and effectiveness: Implications for designing effective work groups. Personnel Psychology, 49, 823-850. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1993.tb01571.x
47. Campion, M. A., Papper, E. M., & Medsker, G. (1996). Relations between work team characteristics and effectiveness: A replication and extension. Personnel Psychology, 49, 429-452. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1996.tb01806.x
48. Cardenas, J. C., Stranlund, J., & Willis, C. (2002). Economic inequality and burden-sharing in the provision local environmental quality. Ecological Economics, 40, 379-395. doi:10.1016/S0921-8009(01)00285-3
49. *Carpenter, M. A., & Sanders, W. (2004). The effects of top management team pay and firm internationalization on MNC performance. Journal of Management, 30, 509-528. doi:10.1016/j.jm.2004.02.001
50. Chen, G., & Kanfer, R. (2006). Toward a systems theory of motivated behavior in work teams. Research in Organizational Behavior, 27, 223-267. doi:10.1016/S0191-3085(06)27006-0
51. Cheung, M. W.-L., & Chan, W. (2005). Meta-analytic structural equation modeling: A two-stage approach. Psychological Methods, 10, 40-64. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.10.1.40
52. Chiaburu, D. S. (2010). Chief executives' self-regulation and strategic orientation: A theoretical model. European Management Journal, 28, 467-478. doi:10.1016/j.emj.2010.07.003
53. *Chung, K. H., & Vickery, W. D. (1976). Relative effectiveness and joint effects of three selected reinforcement in a repetitive task situation. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 16, 114-142. doi:10.1016/0030-5073(76)90009-X
54. *Cialdini, R. B., Eisenberg, N., Rhoads, K., & Bator, R. (1998). Undermining the undermining effect of reward on sustained interest. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 28, 249-263. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.1998.tb01705.x
55. Colquitt, J. A., Conlon, D. E., Wesson, M. J., Porter, C. O., & Ng, K. Y. (2001). Justice at the millennium: A meta-analytic review of 25 years of organizational justice research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 425-445. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.86.3.425
56. Colquitt, J. A., Noe, R. A., & Jackson, C. L. (2002). Justice in teams: Antecedents and consequences of procedural justice climate. Personnel Psychology, 55, 83-109. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2002.tb00104.x
57. Condly, S. J., Clark, R. E., & Stolovitch, H. D. (2003). The effects of incentives on workplace performance: A meta-analytic review of research studies. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 16, 46-63. doi:10.1111/j.1937-8327.2003.tb00287.x
58. *Cress, U., Kimmerle, J., & Hesse, F. W. (2006). Information exchange with shared databases as a social dilemma: The effect of metaknowledge, bonus systems, and costs. Communication Research, 33, 370-390. doi:10.1177/0093650206291481
59. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York, NY: Plenum.
60. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The "what" and "why" of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11, 227-268. doi:10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01
61. *Deckop, J. R., Merriman, K. K., & Gupta, S. (2006). The effects of CEO pay structure on corporate social performance. Journal of Management, 32, 329-342. doi:10.1177/0149206305280113
62. DeMatteo, J. S., Eby, L. T., & Sundstrom, E. (1998). Team-based rewards: Current empirical evidence and directions for future research. Research in Organizational Behavior, 20, 141-183.
63. Dennis, A. R., & Williams, M. L. (2005). A meta analysis of group size effects in electronic brainstorming: More heads are better than one. International Journal of e-Collaboration, 1, 24-42. doi:10.4018/jec.2005010102
64. Dobbins, G. H., Cardy, R. L., & Carson, K. P. (1991). Examining fundamental assumptions: A contrast of person and system approaches to human resource management. Research in Personnel and Human Resource Management, 9, 1-38.
65. *Doerr, K. H., Mitchell, T. R., Klastorin, T. D., & Brown, K. A. (1996). Impact of material flow policies and goals on job outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 142-152. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.81.2.142
66. Durham, C. C., & Bartol, K. M. (2000). Pay for performance. In E. A. Locke (Ed.), Blackwell handbook of principles of organizational behavior (pp. 150-165). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
67. Duval, S. J., & Tweedie, R. L. (2000a). A nonparametric "trim and fill" method of accounting for publication bias in meta-analysis. Journal of American Statistical Association, 95, 89-98. doi:10.1080/01621459.2000.10473905
68. Duval, S. J., & Tweedie, R. L. (2000b). Trim and fill: A simple funnel plot-based method of testing and adjusting for publication bias in meta-analysis. Biometrics, 56, 455-563. doi:10.1111/j.0006-341X.2000.00455.x
69. Dyer, L., & Schwab, D. (1982). Personnel/human resource management research. In T. Kochan, D. Mitchell, & L. Dyer (Eds.), Industrial relations research in the 1970s: Review and appraisal (pp. 87-120). Madison, WI: Industrial Relations Research Association.
70. Ehrenberg, R., & Bognanno, M. (1990). The incentive effects of tournaments revisited: Evidence from the European PGA Tour. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 43, 74-89. doi:10.2307/2523572
71. Eisenberger, R., & Cameron, J. (1996). Detrimental effects of rewards: Reality or myth? American Psychologist, 51, 1153-1166. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.51.11.1153
72. Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Agency theory: An assessment and review. Academy of Management Review, 14, 57-74. doi:10.2307/258191
73. *Evans, K. M., Kienast, P., & Mitchell, T. R. (1988). The effects of lottery incentive programs on performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 9, 113-135. doi:10.1300/J075v09n02_08
74. *Everett, S. A., Price, J. H., Bedell, A. W., & Telljohann, S. K. (1997). The effect of a monetary incentive in increasing the return rate of a survey to family physicians. Evaluation & the Health Professions, 20, 207-214. doi:10.1177/016327879702000206
75. Fama, E. F., & Jensen, M. C. (1983). Separation of ownership and control. Journal of Law and Economics, 26, 301-325. doi:10.2139/ssrn.94034
76. *Farh, J.-L., Griffeth, R. W., & Balkin, D. B. (1991). Effects of choice of pay plans on satisfaction, goal setting, and performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 12, 55-62. doi:10.1002/job.4030120105
77. *Farr, J. L. (1976). Incentive schedules, productivity, and satisfaction in work groups: A laboratory study. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 17, 159-170. doi:10.1016/0030-5073(76)90059-3
78. *Farr, J. L., Vance, R. J., & McIntyre, R. M. (1977). Further examinations of the relationship between reward contingency and intrinsic motivation. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 20, 31-53. doi:10.1016/0030-5073(77)90042-3
79. *Fatseas, V. A., & Hirst, M. K. (1992). Incentive effects of assigned goals and compensation schemes on budgetary performance. Accounting and Business Research, 22, 347-355. doi:10.1080/00014788.1992.9729450
80. *Ferrari, J. R., Barone, R. C., Jason, L. A., & Rose, T. (1985). The use of incentives to increase blood donations. The Journal of Social Psychology, 125, 791-793. doi:10.1080/00224545.1985.9713559
81. Field, A. P. (2001). Meta-analysis of correlation coefficients: A Monte Carlo comparison of fixed- and random-effects methods. Psychological Methods, 6, 161-180. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.6.2.161
82. Fleiss, J. L. (1981). Statistical methods for rates and proportions. New York, NY: Wiley.
83. Fong, C. L., & Shaffer, M. A. (2003). The dimensionality and determinants of pay satisfaction: A cross-cultural investigation of a group incentive plan. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 14, 559-580. doi:10.1080/0958519032000057592
84. *Frisch, C. J., & Dickinson, A. M. (1990). Work productivity as a function of the percentage of monetary incentives to base pay. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 11, 13-33. doi:10.1300/J075v11n01_03
85. Furnham, A., & Argyle, M. (1998). The psychology of money. London, UK: Routledge.
86. Galarza, L., & Dipboye, R. L. (1996). The effects of group heterogeneity on group performance: A meta-analysis. Paper presented at the Conference of the Society of Industrial and Organizational Psychology of Organizations.
87. Gardner, D. G., Van Dyne, L., & Pierce, J. L. (2004). The effects of pay level on organization-based self-esteem and performance: A field investigation. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 77, 1-16. doi:10.1348/0963179041752646
88. *Giacobbe-Miller, J. K., Miller, D. J., & Victorov, V. I. (1998). A comparison of Russian and U.S. pay allocation decisions, distributive justice judgments, and productivity under different payment conditions. Personnel Psychology, 51, 137-163. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1998.tb00719.x
89. *Gneezy, U., & Rustichini, A. (2000). Pay enough or don't pay at all. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 115, 791-810. doi:10.1162/003355300554917
90. Gomez-Mejia, L. R., & Balkin, D. B. (1992). Compensation, organizational strategy, and firm performance. Cincinnati, OH: Southwestern.
91. *Goomas, D. T., & Ludwig, T. D. (2007). Enhancing incentive programs with proximal goals and immediate feedback. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 27, 33-68. doi:10.1300/J075v27n01_02
92. Govindarajulu, N., & Daily, B. F. (2004). Motivating employees for environmental improvement. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 104, 364-372. doi:10.1108/02635570410530775
93. Grabke-Rundell, A., & Gomez-Mejia, L. R. (2002). Power as a determinant of executive compensation. Human Resource Management Review, 12, 3-23. doi:10.1016/S1053-4822(01)00038-9
94. *Greenberg, J., & Leventhal, G. S. (1976). Equity and the use of over-reward to motivate performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34, 179-199. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.34.2.179
95. *Greene, C. N. (1973). Causal connections among managers' merit pay, job satisfaction, and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 58, 95-100. doi:10.1037/h0035417
96. Griffin, M. A., Neal, A., & Parker, S. K. (2007). A new model of work role performance: Positive behavior in uncertain and interdependent contexts. Academy of Management Journal, 50, 327-347. doi:10.5465/AMJ.2007.24634438
97. *Guthrie, J. P., & Hollensbe, E. C. (2004). Group incentives and performance: A study of spontaneous goal setting, goal choice, and commitment. Journal of Management, 30, 263-284. doi:10.1016/j.jm.2003.02.001
98. Guzzo, R. A., & Dickson, M. W. (1996). Teams in organizations: Recent research on performance and effectiveness. Annual Review of Psychology, 47, 307-338. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.47.1.307
99. Hamilton, B. H., Nickerson, J. A., & Owan, H. (2003). Team incentives and worker heterogeneity: An empirical analysis of the impact of teams on productivity and participation. Journal of Political Economy, 111, 465-497. doi:10.1086/374182
100. *Hamner, W. C., & Foster, L. W. (1975). Are intrinsic and extrinsic rewards additive: A test of Deci's cognitive evaluation theory of task motivation. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 14, 398-415. doi:10.1016/0030-5073(75)90038-0
101. *Hampton, G. M., & Hampton, D. L. (2004). Relationship of professionalism, rewards, market orientation and job satisfaction among medical professionals: The case of Certified Nurse-Midwives. Journal of Business Research, 57, 1042-1053. doi:10.1016/S0148-2963(02)00356-9
102. Hannan, R. L. (2001). The effect of firm profit on fairness perceptions, wages and employee effort. Working paper, Georgia State University.
103. Hare, R. M. (1981). Moral thinking: Its levels, method and point. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.
104. *Harrison, D. A., Virick, M., & William, S. (1996). Working without a net: Time, performance, and turnover under maximally contingent rewards. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 331-345. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.81.4.331
105. *Hatcher, L., & Ross, T. L. (1991). From individual incentives to an organization-wide gain-sharing plan: Effects on teamwork and product quality. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 12, 169-183. doi:10.1002/job.4030120302
106. Hedges, L. V. (1981). Distribution theory for Glass's estimator of effect size and related estimators. Journal of Educational Statistics, 6, 107-128. doi:10.3102/10769986006002107
107. Hedges, L. V. (1982). Fitting categorical models to effect sizes from a series of experiments. Journal of Education Statistics, 7, 119-137. doi:10.3102/10769986007002119
108. Hedges, L. V., & Olkin, I. (1985). Statistical methods for meta-analysis. London, UK: Academic Press.
109. *Heneman, R. L., Greenberger, D. B., & Strasser, S. (1988). The relationship between pay-for- performance perceptions and pay satisfaction. Personnel Psychology, 41, 745-761. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1988.tb00651.x
110. Heneman, R. L., & von Hippel, C. (1995). Balancing group and individual rewards: Rewarding individual contributions to the team. Compensation and Benefits Review, 27, 63-68. doi:10.1177/088636879502700410
111. *Henry, R. A., & Strickland, O. J. (1994). Performance self predictions: The impact of expectancy strength and incentives. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 24, 1056-1069. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.1994.tb02373.x
112. Hertel, G., Deter, C., & Konradt, U. (2003). Motivation gains in computer-mediated work groups. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 33, 2080-2105. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2003.tb01876.x
113. *Hertel, G., Konradt, U., & Orlikowski, B. (2004). Managing distance by interdependence: Goal setting, task interdependence, and team-based rewards in virtual teams. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 13, 1-28. doi:10.1080/13594320344000228
114. Higgins, E. T. (1997). Beyond pleasure and pain. American Psychologist, 52, 1280-1300. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.52.12.1280
115. Hill, G. (1982). Group versus individual performance: Are N = I heads better than one? Psychological Bulletin, 91, 517-539. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.91.3.517
116. Hoffman, J. R., & Rogelberg, S. G. (1998). A guide to team incentive systems. Team Performance Management, 4, 23-32. doi:10.1108/13527599810212096
117. Holmstrom, B. (1982). Moral hazard in teams. The Bell Journal of Economics, 13, 324-340. doi:10.2307/3003457
118. Honeywell-Johnson, J. A., & Dickinson, A. M. (1999). Small group incentives: A review of the literature. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 19, 89-120. doi:10.1300/J075v19n02_06
119. Honeywell-Johnson, J. A., McGee, H. M., Culig, K. M., & Dickinson, A. M. (2002). Different effects of individual and small group incentives on high performance. The Behavior Analyst Today, 3 (1), 88-103.
120. Honmans, G. C. (1961). Social behavior: Its elementary forms. New York, NY: Harcourt, Brace & World.
121. Hunter, J. E., & Schmidt, F. L. (1990). Methods of meta-analysis: Correcting error and bias in research findings. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
122. Hunter, J. E., & Schmidt, F. L. (2004). Methods of meta-analysis: Correcting error and bias in research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
123. Ilgen, D. R. (1990). Pay for performance: Motivational issues. Working paper prepared for the Committee on Performance Appraisal for Merit Pay. National Research Council, Washington, D.C.
124. *Irlenbusch, B., & Ruchala, G. K. (2008). Relative rewards within team-based compensation. Labour Economics, 15, 141-167. doi:10.1016/j.labeco.2007.02.003
125. Ivancevich, J. M. (1979). High and low task-stimulation jobs: A causal analysis of performance-satisfaction relationships. Academy of Management Journal, 22, 206-232. doi:10.2307/255585
126. Jenkins, G. D. (1986). Financial incentives. In E. A. Locke (Ed.), Generalizing from laboratory to field settings (pp. 167-180). Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
127. Jenkins, G. D., Mitra, A., Gupta, N., & Shaw, J. D. (1998). Are financial incentives related to performance? A meta-analytic review of empirical research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 777-787. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.83.5.777
128. *Jessup, P. A., & Stahelski, A. J. (1999). The effects of a combined goal setting, feedback and incentive intervention on job performance in a manufacturing environment. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 19, 5-26. doi:10.1300/J075v19n03_02
129. *Johnson, D. A., Dickinson, A. M., & Huitema, B. E. (2008). The effects of objective feedback on performance when individuals receive fixed and individual incentive pay. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 20 (3-4), 53-74. doi:10.1002/piq.20003
130. *Johnson, M. D., Hollenbeck, J. R., Humphrey, S. E., Ilgen, D. R., Jundt, D., & Meyer, C. J. (2006). Cutthroat cooperation: Asymmetrical adaptation to changes in team reward structures. Academy of Management Journal, 49, 103-119. doi:10.5465/AMJ.2006.20785533
131. *Jorgenson, D. O., Dunnette, M. D., & Pritchard, R. D. (1973). Effects of the manipulation of a performance-reward contingency on behavior in a simulated work setting. Journal of Applied Psychology, 57, 271-280. doi:10.1037/h0034717
132. Judge, T. A., Thoresen, C. J., Bono, J. E., & Patton, G. K. (2001). The job satisfaction-job performance relationship: A qualitative and quantitative review. Psychological Bulletin, 127, 376-407. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.127.3.376
133. Keeney, A., Jr, (1994). Personnel planning. In J. A. Tompkins & D. Harmelink (Eds.), The distribution management handbook (pp. 21.1-21.21). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
134. *Kelly, K. (2010). The effects of incentives on information exchange and decision quality in groups. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 22, 43-65. doi:10.2308/bria.2010.22.1.43
135. Kepes, S., Delery, J., & Gupta, N. (2009). Contingencies in the effects of pay range on organizational effectiveness. Personnel Psychology, 62, 497-531. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2009.01146.x
136. Kerr, N. L., & Tindale, R. S. (2004). Group performance and decision making. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 623-655. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.142009
137. Kirkman, B. L., & Shapiro, D. L. (2000). Understanding why team members won't share: An examination of factors related to employee receptivity to team-based rewards. Small Group Research, 31, 175-209. doi:10.1177/104649640003100203
138. Klein, K. J., Conn, B., Smith, A., Speer, D. B., & Sorra, J. (2001). Implementing computerized technology: An organizational analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 811-824. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.86.5.811
139. *Knight, D., Durham, C. C., & Locke, E. A. (2001). The relationship of team goals, incentives, and efficacy to strategic risk, tactical implementation, and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 326-338. doi:10.2307/3069459
140. Kozlowski, S. W. J., & Bell, B. S. (2003). Work groups and teams in organizations. In W. C. Borman, D. R. Ilgen, & R. J. Klimoski (Eds.), Handbook of psychology (Vol. 12): Industrial and Organizational Psychology (pp. 333-375). New York, NY: Wiley-Blackwell.
141. Kozlowski, S. W. J., & Ilgen, D. R. (2006). Enhancing the effectiveness of work groups and teams. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 7, 77-124. doi:10.1111/j.1529-1006.2006.00030.x
142. *LaMere, J. M., Dickinson, A. M., Henry, M., Henry, G., & Poling, A. (1996). Effects of a multi-component monetary incentive program on the performance of truck drivers. Behavior Modification, 20, 385-405.
143. Landy, F. J., & Farr, J. L. (1983). The measurement of work performance. New York, NY: Academic Press.
144. *Latham, G. P., & Dossett, D. L. (1978). Designing incentive plans for unionized employees: A comparison of continuous and variable ratio reinforcement schedules. Personnel Psychology, 31, 47-61. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1978.tb02108.x
145. *Latham, G. P., Mitchell, T. R., & Dossett, D. L. (1978). Importance of participative goal setting and anticipated rewards on goal difficulty and job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 63, 163-171. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.63.2.163
146. Laughlin, P. R., Hatch, E. C., Silver, J. S., & Boh, L. (2006). Groups perform better than best individuals on letter-to-numbers problems: Effects of group size. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 644-651. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.90.4.644
147. Lawler, E. E. (1981). Pay and organizational development. Reading, MA: Addison-Wiley.
148. *Lee, C. (1988). The effects of goal setting and monetary incentives on self-efficacy and performance. Journal of Business and Psychology, 2, 366-372. doi:10.1007/BF01013767
149. Lee, C., & Farh, J.-F. (2004). Joint effects of group efficacy and gender diversity on group cohesion and performance. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 53, 136-154. doi:10.1111/j.1464-0597.2004.00164.x
150. *Lee, T. W., Locke, E. A., & Phan, S. H. (1997). Explaining the assigned goal incentive interaction: The role of self efficacy and personal goals. Journal of Management, 23, 541-559. doi:10.1016/S0149-2063(97)90047-7
151. *Locke, E. A., Bryan, J. E., & Kendall, L. M. (1968). Goals and intentions as mediators of the effects of monetary incentives on behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 52, 104-121. doi:10.1037/h0025492
152. Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (1990). A theory of goal setting and task performance. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
153. Locke, E. A., Latham, G. P., & Erez, M. (1988). The determinants of goal commitment. Academy of Management Review, 13, 23-39. doi:10.2307/258352
154. London, M. (2007). Performance appraisal for groups: Models and methods for assessing group processes and outcomes for development and evaluation. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 59, 175-188. doi:10.1037/1065-9293.59.3.175
155. *London, M., & Oldham, G. R. (1977). A comparison of group and individual incentive plans. Academy of Management Journal, 20, 34-41. doi:10.2307/255460
156. *Lorenzi, P. (1988). Underestimated effects of goals and rewards: A systematic replication. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 9, 59-71. doi:10.1300/J075v09n02_05
157. *Luthans, P., Paul, R., & Baker, D. (1981). An experimental analysis of the impact of continent reinforcement on salespersons' performance behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 66, 314-323. doi:10.1037//0021-9010.66.3.314
158. Magjuka, R. J., & Baldwin, T. T. (1991). Team-based employee involvement programs: Effects of design and administration. Personnel Psychology, 44, 793-812. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1991.tb00699.x
159. Marcus, B., & Schuler, H. (2004). Antecedents of counterproductive behavior at work: A general perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 647-660. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.89.4.647
160. *Mason, W., & Watts, D. J. (2010). Financial incentives and the "performance of crowds". SIGKDD Explorations, 11, 100-108. doi:10.1145/1809400.1809422
161. Mathieu, J. E., Maynard, M. T., Rapp, T., & Gilson, L. (2008). Team effectiveness 1997-2007: A review of recent advancements and a glimpse into the future. Journal of Management, 34, 410-476. doi:10.1177/0149206308316061
162. McAfee, R. P., & McMillan, J. (1991). Optimal contracts for teams. International Economic Review, 32, 561-577. doi:10.2307/2527107
163. McDaniel, M. A., Rothstein, H. R., & Whetzel, D. L. (2006). Publication bias: A case study of four test vendors. Personnel Psychology, 59, 927-953. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2006.00059.x
164. *McGee, H. M., Dickinson, A. M., Huitema, B. E., & Culig, K. M. (2006). The effects of individual and group monetary incentives on high performance. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 19, 101-124. doi:10.1111/j.1937-8327.2006.tb00387.x
165. McGrath, J. E. (1984). Groups: Interaction and performance. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
166. Meidinger, C., Rullière, J.-L., & Villeval, M.-C. (2003). Does team-based compensation give rise to problems when agents vary in their ability? Experimental Economics, 6, 253-272. doi:10.1023/A:1026221318302
167. *Menguc, B., & Barker, A. T. (2003). The performance effects of outcome-based incentive pay plans on sales organizations: A contextual analysis. Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management, 23, 341-358.
168. Messersmith, J. G., Guthrie, J. P., Ji, Y.-Y., & Lee, J.-Y. (2011). Executive turnover: The influence of dispersion and other pay system characteristics. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96, 457-469. doi:10.1037/a0021654
169. Milgrom, P., & Roberts, J. (1992). Economics, organization and management. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
170. *Miller, C. E., & Komorita, S. S. (1995). Reward allocation in task-performing groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 80-90. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.69.1.80
171. Mohrman, A. M., Mohrman, S. A., & Lawler, E. E. (1992). The performance management of teams. In W. J. Bruns (Ed.), Performance measurement, evaluation, and incentives (pp. 217-241). Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
172. Moser, K. S., & Wodzicki, K. (2007). The effect of reward interdependence on cooperation and information-sharing intentions. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 66, 117-127. doi:10.1024/1421-0185.66.2.117
173. *Muraven, M., Rosman, H., & Gagné, M. (2007). Lack of autonomy and self-control: Performance contingent rewards lead to greater depletion. Motivation Emotion, 31, 322-330. doi:10.1007/s11031-007-9073-x
174. Murphy, K. R., & Cleveland, J. N. (1995). Understanding performance appraisal: Social, organizational and goal-based perspectives. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
175. *Murray, J. P., & Heide, J. B. (1998). Managing promotion program participation within manufacturer-retailer relationships. Journal of Marketing, 62, 58-68. doi:10.2307/1251803
176. *Nederhof, A. J. (2000). The effects of material incentives in mail surveys: Two studies. Public Opinion Quarterly, 47, 103-111. doi:10.1086/268770
177. *Oah, S., & Dickinson, A. M. (1991). A comparison of the effects of a linear and an exponential performance pay function on work productivity. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 12, 85-123. doi:10.1300/J075v12n01_05
178. *Oden, L., & Price, J. H. (1999). Effects of a small monetary incentive and follow-up mailings on return rates of a survey to nurse practitioners. Psychological Reports, 85, 1154-1156. doi:10.2466/PR0.85.7.1154-1156
179. *Orpen, C. (1982). The effects of contingent and noncontingent rewards on employee satisfaction and performance. Journal of Psychology, 110, 145-150. doi:10.1080/00223980.1982.9915335
180. *Papamarcos, S. D., Latshaw, C., & Watson, G. W. (2007). Individualism-collectivism and incentive system design as predictive of productivity in a simulated cellular manufacturing environment. International Journal of Cross Cultural Management, 7, 253-265. doi:10.1177/1470595807079392
181. Patten, T. H., Jr, (1977). Pay: Employee compensation and incentive plans. London, UK: Free Press.
182. Pearsall, M. J., Christian, M. S., & Ellis, A. P. J. (2010). Motivating interdependent teams: Individual rewards, shared rewards, or something in between? Journal of Applied Psychology, 95, 183-191. doi:10.1037/a0017593
183. Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. R. (1978). The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
184. *Pinder, C. C. (1976). Additivity versus nonadditivity of intrinsic and extrinsic incentives: Implications for work motivation, performance, and attitudes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 61, 693-700. doi:10.1037//0021-9010.61.6.693
185. Podsakoff, N. P., Whigting, S. W., Podsakoff, P. M., & Blume, B. D. (2009). Individual- and organizational-level consequences of organizational citizenship behaviors: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 122-141. doi:10.1037/a0013079
186. Podsakoff, P. M., & Williams, L. J. (1986). The relationship between job performance and job satisfaction. In E. A. Locke (Ed.), Generalizing from laboratory to field settings (pp. 207-253). Lexington, MA: Lexington Press.
187. *Pokorny, K. (2008). Pay - but do not pay too much: An experimental study on the impact of incentives. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 66, 251-264. doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2006.03.007
188. Porter, L. W., & Lawler, E. E. (1968). What job attitudes can tell us about employee motivation. Harvard Business Review, 46, 118-126.
189. *Pritchard, R. D., Campbell, K. M., & Campbell, D. J. (1977). Effects of extrinsic financial rewards on intrinsic motivation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 62, 9-15. doi:10.1037//0021-9010.62.1.9
190. *Pritchard, R. D., & Curts, M. I. (1973). The influence of goal setting and financial incentives on task performance. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 10, 175-183. doi:10.1016/0030-5073(73)90011-1
191. *Pritchard, R. D., & DeLeo, P. J. (1973). Experimental test of the valence-instrumentality relationship in job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 57, 264-270. doi:10.1037/h0034719
192. *Pritchard, R. D., DeLeo, P. J., & von Bergen C. W. Jr (1976). A field test of expectancy-valence incentive motivation techniques. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 15, 355-406. doi:10.1016/0030-5073(76)90046-5
193. *Pritchard, R. D., Hollenback, J., & DeLeo, P. J. (1980). The effects of continuous and partial schedules of reinforcement on effort, performance, and satisfaction. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 25, 336-353. doi:10.1016/0030-5073(80)90032-X
194. *Pritchard, R. D., Leonard, D. W., von Bergen, C. W. Jr, & Kirk, R. J. (1976). The effects of varying schedules of reinforcement on human task performance. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 16, 205-230. doi:10.1016/0030-5073(76)90014-3
195. *Quigley, N., Tesluk, P. E., Locke, E. A., & Bartol, K. M. (2007). A multilevel investigation of the motivational mechanisms underlying knowledge sharing and performance. Organization Science, 18, 71-88. doi:10.1287/orsc.1060.0223
196. *Rack, O., Ellwart, T., Konradt, U., & Hertel, G. (2011). Team-based rewards in computer-mediated groups. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 26, 419-438. doi:10.1108/02683941111139029
197. Renn, R. W. (1998). Participation's effect on task performance: Mediating roles of goal acceptance and procedural justice. Journal of Business Research, 41, 115-125. doi:10.1016/S0148-2963(97)00020-9
198. *Riedel, J. A., Nebeker, D. M., & Cooper, B. L. (1988). The influence of monetary incentives on goal choice, goal commitment, and task performance. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 42, 155-180. doi:10.1016/0749-5978(88)90010-6
199. *Rosenbaum, M. E., Moore, D. L., Cotton, J. L., Cook, M. S., Hieser, R. A., Shovar, M. N., & Gray, M. J. (1980). Group productivity and process: Pure and mixed reward structures and task interdependence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 626-642. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.39.4.626
200. Rosenthal, R. (1979). The 'file drawer problem' and tolerance for null results. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 638-641. doi:10.1037//0033-2909.86.3.638
201. Rosenthal, R., & DiMatteo, M. R. (2001). Meta-analysis: Recent developments in quantitative methods for literature reviews. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 59-70. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.59
202. Rothstein, H. R., McDaniel, M. A., & Borenstein, M. (2002). Meta-analysis: A review of quantitative cumulation methods. In N. Schmitt & F. Drasgow (Eds.), Advances in measurement and data analysis (pp. 534-570). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
203. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55, 68-78. doi:10.1037//0003-066X.55.1.68
204. Rynes, S. L., & Bono, J. E. (2000). Psychological research on determinants of pay. In S. L. Rynes & B. Gerhart (Eds.), Compensation in organizations. Current research and practice (pp. 3-31). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
205. Rynes, S. L., Gerhart, B., & Parks, L. (2005). Performance evaluation and pay for performance. Annual Review of Psychology, 56, 571-600. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.56.091103.070254
206. *Saari, L. M., & Latham, G. P. (1982). Employee reactions to continuous and variable ratio reinforcement schedules involving a monetary incentive. Journal of Applied Psychology, 67, 506-508. doi:10.1037//0021-9010.67.4.506
207. *Salvemini, N. J., & Reilly, R. R. (1993). The influence of rater motivation on assimilation effects and accuracy in performance ratings. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 55, 41-60. doi:10.1006/obhd.1993.1023
208. *Sarin, S., & Mahajan, V. (2001). The effect of reward structures on the performance of cross-functional product development teams. Journal of Marketing, 65, 35-53. doi:10.1509/jmkg.65.2.35.18252
209. *Schei, V., & Rognes, J. K. (2005). Small group negotiation: When members differ in motivational orientation. Small Group Research, 36, 289-320. doi:10.1177/1046496404273145
210. Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (1999). Comparison of three meta-analysis methods revisited: An analysis of Johnson, Mullen and Salas (1995). Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 144-148. doi:10.1037//0021-9010.84.1.144
211. *Schulte, M., Ostroff, C., Shmulyian, S., & Kinicki, A. (2009). Organizational climate configurations: Relationships to collective attitudes, customer satisfaction, and financial performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 618-634. doi:10.1037/a0014365
212. Sharpe, D. (1997). Of apples and oranges, file drawers and garbage: Why validity issues in meta-analysis will not go away. Clinical Psychology Review, 17, 881-901. doi:10.1016/S0272-7358(97)00056-1
213. Shaw, J. D., Duffy, M. K., & Stark, E. M. (2001). Team reward attitude: Construct development and initial validation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22, 903-917. doi:10.1002/job.121
214. Sinclair, A. L. (2003). The effects of justice and cooperation on team effectiveness. Small Group Research, 43, 74-100. doi:10.1177/1046496402239578
215. Spink, L. (2000). Team rewards and incentives: Lessons from the literature. Tips & Tools Series: Collaborative Alliances, No. 3. The organizational Change Programme for the CGIAR Centres. Washington DC: TRG.
216. Steel, P. D., & Kammeyer-Mueller, J. D. (2002). Comparing meta-analytic moderator estimation techniques under realistic conditions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 96-111. doi:10.1037//0021-9010.87.1.96
217. Steel, P., Schmidt, J., & Shultz, J. (2008). Refining the relationship between personality and subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 134, 138-161. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.134.1.138
218. *Stone, D. N., & Ziebart, D. A. (1995). A model of financial incentive effects in decision making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 61, 250-261. doi:10.1006/obhd.1995.1020
219. Taylor, E. Z. (2006). The effect of incentives on knowledge sharing in computer-mediated communication: An experimental investigation. Journal of Information Systems, 20, 103-114. doi:10.2308/jis.2006.20.1.103
220. *Terborg, J. R. (1976). The motivational components of goal setting. Journal of Applied Psychology, 61, 613-621. doi:10.1037//0021-9010.61.5.613
221. *Terborg, J. R., & Miller, H. E. (1978). Motivation, behavior and performance: A closer examination of goal setting and monetary incentives. Journal of Applied Psychology, 63, 29-39. doi:10.1037//0021-9010.63.1.29
222. *Terborg, J. R., & Ungson, G. R. (1985). Group-administered bonus pay and retail store performance: A two-year study of management compensation. Journal of Retailing, 61, 63-77.
223. Thornburg, L. (1992). Pay for performance: What you should know (Part 1). Human Research Magazine, 37 (6), 58-61.
224. *Toppen, J. T. (1965). Money reinforcement and human operant (work) behavior: III. Piecework-payment and time-payment comparisons. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 21, 907-913. doi:10.2466/pms.1965.21.3.907
225. *Turnage, J. J., & Muchinsky, P. M. (1976). The effects of reward contingency and participative decision making on intrinsically and extrinsically motivating tasks. Academy of Management Journal, 19, 482-489. doi:10.2307/255614
226. Tyron, W. W. (2001). Evaluating statistical difference, equivalence, and indeterminancy using inferential confidence intervals: An integrated alternative method of conducting null hypothesis statistical tests. Psychological Methods, 6, 371-386. doi:10.1037//1082-989X.6.4.371-386
227. Tziner, A. (1985). How team composition affects task performance: Some theoretical insights. Psychological Reports, 57, 1111-1119. doi:10.2466/pr0.1985.57.3f.1111
228. Van Dijk, F., Sonnemans, J., & Van Winden, F. (2001). Incentive systems in a real effort experiment. European Economic Review, 45, 187-214. doi:10.1016/S0014-2921(00)00056-8
229. *Vecchio, R. P. (1982). The contingent-noncontingent compensation controversy: An attempt at a resolution. Human Relations, 35, 449-462. doi:10.1177/001872678203500602
230. Vroom, V. (1964). Work and motivation. New York, NY: Wiley.
231. Wageman, R. (1995). Interdependence and group effectiveness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40, 145-180. doi:10.2307/2393703
232. *Wageman, R., & Baker, G. P. (1997). Incentives and cooperation: The joint effects of task and reward interdependence on group performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 18, 139-158. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1099-1379(199703)18:2%3c139:AID-JOB791%3e3.3.CO;2-I
233. Wagner, J. A., Rubin, P. A., & Callahan, T. J. (1988). Incentive payment and non-managerial productivity: An interrupted time series analysis of magnitude and trend. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 42, 47-74. doi:10.1016/0749-5978(88)90019-2
234. Williams, K. Y., & O'Reilly, C. A. (1998). Demography and diversity in organizations: A review of 40 years of research. Research in Organizational Behavior, 20, 77-140.
235. *Wimperis, B. R., & Farr, J. L. (1979). The effects of task content and reward contingency upon task performance and satisfaction. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 9, 229-249. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.1979.tb02708.x
236. Wood, R., Mento, A., & Locke, E. (1987). Task complexity as a moderator of goal effects. Journal of Applied Psychology, 17, 416-425. doi:10.1037//0021-9010.72.3.416
237. *Wright, P. M. (1989). Test of the mediating role of goals in the incentive performance relationship. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 699-705. doi:10.1037//0021-9010.74.5.699
238. *Wright, P. M. (1990). Monetary incentives and task experience as determinants of spontaneous goal setting, strategy development, and performance. Human Performance, 3, 237-258. doi:10.1207/s15327043hup0304_2
239. *Wright, P. M. (1992). An examination of the relationships among monetary incentives, goal level, goal commitment, and performance. Journal of Management, 18, 677-693. doi:10.1177/014920639201800405
240. *Wright, P. M., & Kacmar, K. M. (1995). Mediating roles of self-set-goals, goal commitment, self-efficacy, and attractiveness in the incentive-performance relation. Human Performance, 8, 263-296. doi:10.1207/s15327043hup0804_2
241. Young, S. M., Fisher, J., & Lindquist, T. M. (1993). The effects of intergroup competition and intragroup cooperation on slack and output in a manufacturing setting. The Accounting Review, 68, 466-481.
242. *Yukl, G. A., & Latham, G. P. (1975). Consequences of reinforcement schedules and incentive magnitudes for employee performance: Problems encountered in an industrial setting. Journal of Applied Psychology, 60, 294-298. doi:10.1037/h0076755
243. *Yukl, G. A., Latham, G. P., & Pursell, E. D. (1976). The effectiveness of performance incentives under continuous and variable ratio schedules of reinforcement. Personnel Psychology, 29, 221-231. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1976.tb00410.x
244. *Yukl, G. A., Wexley, K. N., & Seymore, J. D. (1972). Effectiveness of pay incentives under variable ratio and continuous reinforcement schedules. Journal of Applied Psychology, 56, 19-53. doi:10.1037/h0032137
245. Zenger, T. R. (1992). Why do employers only reward extreme performance? Examining the relationships among performance, pay, and turnover. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37, 198-219. doi:10.2307/2393221
246. Zenger, T. R., & Marshall, C. R. (2000). The determinants of incentive intensity in group-based rewards. Academy of Management Journal, 43, 149-163. doi:10.2307/1556373