Performance Appraisal for Groups: Models and Methods for Assessing Group Processes and Outcomes for Development and Evaluation

Consulting Psychology Journal

Volumn 59, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 175-188

  London, Manuel ^a  

^a STONY BROOK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

group assessment; group development and evaluation; group diagnosis and intervention; group performance appraisal

Indexed keywords

EID: 35748941217     PISSN: 10659293     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/1065-9293.59.3.175     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Argyris C., and Schön D. Organizational learning II: Theory, method, and practice. 2nd ed. (1995), Prentice Hall, New York
2. Borman W.C., and Motowidlo S.J. Expanding the criterion domain to include elements of contextual performance. In: Schmitt N., Borman W.C., and Associates (Eds). Personnel selection in organizations (1993), Jossey-Bass, San Francisco 71-98
3. Bunderson S., and Sutcliffe K. Management team learning orientation and business unit performance. Journal of Applied Psychology 88 (2003) 552-560
4. Cannon-Bowers J.A., Tannenbaum S.I., Salas E., and Volpe C.E. Defining competencies and establishing team training requirements. In: Guzzo R.A., and Salas E. (Eds). Team effectiveness and decision making in organizations (1995), Jossey-Bass, San Francisco 333-380
5. Cornelius Associates. Team roles analysis: Self-assessment form for team building (2004). http://www.corneliusassociates.com Available at http://www.corneliusassociates.com
6. Devine D.J. A review and integration of classification systems relevant to teams in organizations. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice 6 (2002) 291-310
7. Dweck C.S. Motivational processes affecting learning. American Psychologist 41 (1986) 1040-1048
8. Edmondson A.C. The local and variegated nature of learning in organizations: A group-level perspective. Organization Science 13 (2002) 128-146
9. Edmondson A.C., Bohmer R.M., and Pisano G.P. Disrupted routines: Team learning and new technology implementation in hospitals. Administrative Science Quarterly 46 (2001) 685-716
10. Ellis A.P.J., Bell B.S., Ployhart R.E., Hollenbeck J.R., and Ilgen D.R. An evaluation of generic teamwork skills training with action teams: Effects on cognitive and skill-based outcomes. Personnel Psychology 58 (2005) 641-672
11. Ericksen J., and Dyer L. Right from the start: Exploring the effects of early team events on subsequent project team development and performance. Administrative Science Quarterly 49 (2004) 438-471
12. Guzzo R.A., and Dickson M.W. Teams in organizations: Recent research on performance and effectiveness. Annual Review of Psychology 47 (1996) 307-338
13. Hackman J.R. Leading teams: Setting the stage for great performances (2002), Harvard Business School Press, Boston
14. Hackman J.R., and Wageman R. Total quality management: Empirical, conceptual, and practical issues. Administrative Science Quarterly 40 (1995) 309-342
15. Hackman J.R., and Wageman R. A theory of team coaching. Academy of Management Review 30 (2005) 269-287
16. Hulin C.L. Adaptation, persistence, and commitment in organizations. In: Dunnette M.D., and Hough L.M. (Eds). Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology 2 (1991), Consulting Psychologists Press, Palo Alto, CA 445-506
17. Ilgen D.R., Hollenbeck J.R., Johnson M., and Jundt D. Teams in organizatioins: From input-process-output models to IMOI models. Annual Review of Psychology 56 (2005) 517-543
18. Jackson C.L., Colquitt J.A., Wesson M.J., and Zapata-Phelan C.P. Psychological collectivism: A measurement validation and linkage to group member performance. Journal of Applied Psychology 91 (2006) 884-899
19. Kasl E., Marsick V.J., and Dechant K. Team as learners: A research-based model of team learning. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science 33 (1997) 227-246
20. Kirkpatrick D.L. Evaluating training programs: The four levels. 2nd ed. (1998), Jossey-Bass, San Francisco
21. Kozlowski S.W.J., Chao G.R., and Morrison R.F. Games raters play: Politics, strategies, and impression management in performance appraisal. In: Smither J.W. (Ed). Performance appraisal: State of the art in practice (1998), Jossey-Bass, San Francisco 163-207
22. Kozlowski S.W.J., Gully S.M., Nason E.R., and Smith E.M. Developing adaptive teams: A theory of compilation and performance across levels and time. In: Ilgen D.R., and Pulakos E.D. (Eds). The changing nature of performance: Implications for staffing, motivation, and development (1999), Jossey-Bass, San Francisco 240-292
23. Kozlowski S.W.J., and Ilgen D.R. Enhancing the effectiveness of work groups and teams. Psychological Science in the Public Interest 7 (2006) 77-124
24. Lefton R.E., and Buzzotta V.R. The team scorecard (2005). http://www.communicare.com Retrieved October 11, 2006, from http://www.communicare.com
25. Lewis K. Measuring transactive memory systems in the field: Scale development and validation. Journal of Applied Psychology 88 (2003) 587-604
26. Lewis K. Knowledge and performance in knowledge-worker teams: A longitudinal study of transactive memory systems. Management Science 50 (2004) 1519-1533
27. Linkage Assessment Services. The HiPlay team assessment (2004), Linkage, Inc, Burlington, MA
28. London M. The great debate: Should multisource feedback be used for administration or development only?. In: Bracken D.W., Timmreck C.W., and Church A.H. (Eds). The handbook of multisource feedback: The comprehensive resource for designing and implementing MSF processes (2001), Jossey-Bass, San Francisco 368-385
29. London M., and Sessa V.I. Continuous learning in organizations: A living systems analysis of individual, group, and organization learning. Research in Multi-Level Issues 5 (2006) 123-172
30. London M., and Sessa V.I. Group feedback processes. Human Resource Development Review 5 (2006) 303-329
31. London M., Smither J.W., and Adsit D.J. Accountability: The Achilles heel of multi-source feedback. Group and Organization Management 22 (1997) 162-184
32. London M., and Tornow W.W. Introduction: 360-degree feedback-More than a tool!. In: Tornow W.W., and London M. (Eds). Maximizing the value of 360-degree feedback: A process for successful individual and organizational development (1998), Jossey-Bass, San Francisco 1-8
33. Marks M.A., Mathieu J.E., and Zaccaro S.J. A temporally based framework and taxonomy of team processes. Academy of Management Review 26 (2001) 356-376
34. Murphy K.R., and Cleveland J.N. Understanding performance appraisal: Social, organizational, and goal-based perspectives (1995), Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA
35. Myers N.D., Feltz D.L., and Short S.E. Collective efficacy and team performance: A longitudinal study of collegiate football teams. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice 8 (2004) 126-138
36. Parker G.R. 25 instruments for team building (1998), HRD Press, Amherst, MA
37. Petersen, T. (1994). Individual, collective, and systems rationality in work groups: Dilemmas and solutions. Institute of Industrial Relations, University of California, Berkeley, Working Paper Series Number 58-94.
38. Polzer J.R., Milton L.P., and Swann Jr. W.B. Capitalizing on diversity: Interpersonal congruence in small work groups. Administrative Science Quarterly 47 (2002) 296-324
39. Reilly R.R., and McGourty J. Performance appraisal in team settings. In: Smither J.W. (Ed). Performance appraisal: State of the art in practice (1998), Jossey-Bass, San Francisco 244-277
40. Reliable Surveys Online. Team effectiveness (2005). http://reliablesurveys.com Available at http://reliablesurveys.com
41. Sackett P.R., and DeVore C.J. Counterproductive behaviors at work. In: Anderson N., Ones D.S., Sinangil H.K., and Viswesvaran C. (Eds). Handbook of industrial, work, and organizational psychology 1 (2001), Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA 145-151
42. Senge P. The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organizations (1994), Currency Doubleday, New York
43. Sessa V.I., and London M. Continuous learning in organizations: Individual, group, and organizational perspectives (2006), Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ
44. Smith C.A., Organ D.W., and Near J.P. Organizational citizenship behavior: Its nature and antecedents. Journal of Applied Psychology 68 (1983) 653-663
45. Stevens M.J., and Campion M.A. The knowledge, skill, and ability requirements for teamwork: Implications for human resource management. Journal of Management 20 (1994) 503-530
46. Stout R.J., Cannon-Bowers J.A., Salas E., and Milanovich D.M. Planning, shared mental models, and coordinated performance: An empirical link is established. Human Factors 41 (1999) 71
47. Swezey R.W., and Salas E. Guidelines for use in team-training development. In: Swezey R.W., and Salas E. (Eds). Teams: Their training and performance (1992), Ablex, Norwood, NJ 219-245
48. Tziner A., Murphy K.R., and Cleveland J.N. Performance appraisal: Evolution and change. Group & Organization Management 30 (2005) 4-5
49. VandeWalle D. Development and validation of a work domain goal orientation instrument. Educational and Psychological Measurement 57 (1997) 995-1015
50. Wageman R., Hackman J.R., and Lehman E. Team diagnostic survey: Development of an instrument. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science 41 (2005) 373-398
51. Wegner D.M. Transactive memory: A contemporary analysis of the group mind. In: Mullen B., and Goethals G.R. (Eds). Theories of group behavior (1986), Springer-Verlag, New York 185-208
52. West M.A. Sparkling fountains or stagnant ponds: An integrative model of creativity and innovation implementation in work groups. Applied Psychology: An International Review 51 (2002) 355-424
53. West M.A., and Anderson N. Measuring climate for work group innovation: Development and validation of the team climate inventory. Journal of Organizational Behavior 19 (1998) 235-258
54. Wilkens R., and London M. Relationships between climate, process, and performance in hospital continuous quality improvement groups. Journal of Vocational Behavior 69 (2006) 510-523
55. Zaccaro, S. J., Hildebrand, K., & Shuffler, M. (in press). The leader's role in group learning. In V. I. Sessa & M. London (Eds.). Group learning. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
56. Zbaracki M.J. The rhetoric and reality of total quality management. Administrative Science Quarterly 43 (1998) 602-636