The social identity theory of leadership: Theoretical origins, Research findings, And conceptual developments

European Review of Social Psychology

Volumn 23, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 258-304

  Hogg, Michael A ^a   Rast, David E ^a   van Knippenberg, Daan ^b  

^a CLAREMONT GRADUATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b ERASMUS UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Group processes; Influence; Intergroup behavior; Leadership; Social identity

Indexed keywords

EID: 84886062244     PISSN: 10463283     EISSN: 1479277X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10463283.2012.741134     Document Type: Article

References (147)

1. Abrams, D., & Hogg, M. A. (1990). Social identification, self-categorisation and social influence. European Review of Social Psychology, 1, 195-228.
2. Abrams, D., & Hogg, M. A. (1998). Prospects for research in group processes and intergroup relations. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 1, 7-20.
3. Abrams, D., & Hogg, M. A. (2010). Social identity and self-categorisation. In J. F. Dovidio, M. Hewstone, P. Glick, & V. M. Esses (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of prejudice, stereotyping and discrimination (pp. 179-193). London: Sage.
4. Abrams, D., Randsley de Moura, G., Marques, J. M., & Hutchison, P. (2008). Innovation credit: When can leaders oppose their group’s norms? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 662-678.
5. Abrams, D., Randsley de Moura, G., & Travaglino, G. A. (2011, October). Transgression credit, or: Moral blindness - its part in our downfall. Invited address at the 2011 Society of Experimental Social Psychology conference. Washington, DC, USA. 13-15 October 2011.
6. Alabastro, A. B., Rast, D. E. III, Lac, A., Hogg, M. A. & Crano W D. (in press). Intergroup bias and perceived similarity: The effects of successes and failures on support for in- and outgroup political leaders. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations.
7. Avolio B. J. & Yammarino F. J. (Eds.). (2003). Transformational and charismatic leadership: The road ahead. New York: Elsevier.
8. Balmer, J. M. T. (2008). Identity based views of the corporation: Insights from corporate identity, organisational identity, social identity, visual identity, corporate brand identity and corporate image. European Journal of Marketing 42, 879-906.
9. Bass, B. M. (1985). Leadership and performance beyond expectations. New York: Free Press.
10. Berson, Y., Dan, O., & Yammarino, F. J. (2006). Attachment style and individual differences in leadership perception and emergence. The Journal of Social Psychology, 146, 165-182.
11. Blascovich, J., & Tomaka, J. (1996). The biopsychosocial model of arousal regulation. In M. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 28, pp. 1-51). New York: Academic Press.
12. Bowles, H. R., & McGinn, K. L. (2005). Claiming authority: Negotiating challenges for women leaders. In D. M. Messick & R. M. Kramer (Eds.), The psychology of leadership: New perspectives and research (pp. 191-208). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
13. Brewer, M. B., & Gardner, W. (1996). Who is this ‘We’? Levels of collective identity and self representation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 83-93.
14. Brown, R. J., & Hewstone, M. (2005). An integrative theory of intergroup contact. In M. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 37, pp. 255-343). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
15. Byrne, D. (1971). The attraction paradigm. New York: Academic Press.
16. Cartwright, D., & Zander, D. (Eds.). (1953). Group dynamics: Research and theory. New York: Harper & Row.
17. Chemers, M. M. (1997). An integrative theory of leadership. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
18. Chemers, M. M. (2001). Leadership effectiveness: An integrative review. In M. A. Hogg & R. S. Tindale (Eds.), Blackwell handbook of social psychology: Group processes (pp. 376-399). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
19. Chen, S., Boucher, H. C., & Tapias, M. P. (2006). The relational self revealed: Integrative conceptualisation and implications for interpersonal life. Psychological Bulletin, 132,151-179.
20. Cheng, G. H -L., Fielding, K. S., Hogg, M. A., & Terry, D. J. (2009). Reactions to procedural discrimination in an intergroup context: The role of social identity of the authority. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 12, 463-478.
21. Christie, R., & Geis, F. (1970). Studies in Machiavellianism. New York: Academic Press.
22. Cialdini, R. B., Borden, R. J., Thorne, A., Walker, M. R., Freeman, S., & Sloan, L. R. (1976). Basking in reflected glory: Three (football) field studies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34, 366-375.
23. Cicero, L., Bonaiuto, M., Pierro, A., & van Knippenberg, D. (2008). Employees work effort as a function of leader group prototypicality: The moderating role of team identification. Revue Europeenne de Psychologie Appliquee, 58, 117-124.
24. Cicero, L., Pierro, A., & van Knippenberg, D. (2007). Leader group prototypicality and job satisfaction: The moderating role of job stress and team identification. Group Dynamics, 11, 165-175.
25. Cicero, L., Pierro, A., & van Knippenberg, D. (2010). Leadership and uncertainty: How role ambiguity affects the relationship between leader group prototypicality and leadership effectiveness. British Journal of Management, 21, 411-421.
26. Colquitt, J. A., Conlon, D. E., Wesson, M. J., Porter, C. O. L. H., & Ng, K. Y. (2001). Justice at the millennium: A meta-analytic review of 25 years of organisational justice research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 425-445.
27. Crisp, R. J., & Hewstone, M. (2007). Multiple social categorisation. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 39, pp. 163-254). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
28. Danserau, F. Jr, Graen, G., & Haga, W. J. (1975). A vertical dyad linkage approach to leadership within formal organisations: A longitudinal investigation of the role making process. Organisational Behaviour and Human Performance, 13, 46-78.
29. Dawes, R. M., & Messick, D. M. (2000). Social dilemmas. International Journal of Psychology, 35, 111-116.
30. De Cremer, D., & Tyler, T. R. (2005). Managing group behaviour: The interplay between procedural fairness, self, and cooperation. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 37, pp. 151-218). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
31. De Cremer, D., van Dijke, M., & Mayer, D. M. (2010). Cooperating when ‘‘you’’ and ‘‘I’’ are treated fairly: The moderating role of leader prototypicality. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95, 1121-1133.
32. De Cremer, D., & van Knippenberg, D. (2003). Cooperation with leaders in social dilemmas: On the effects of procedural fairness and outcome favourability in structural cooperation. Organisational Behaviour and Human Decision Processes, 91, 1-11.
33. De Cremer, D., & van Vugt, M. (1999). Social identification effects in social dilemmas: A transformation of motives. European Journal of Social Psychology, 29, 871-893.
34. De Cremer, D., & van Vugt, M. (2002). Intergroup and intragroup aspects of leadership in social dilemmas: A relational model of cooperation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 126-136.
35. Duck, J. M., & Fielding, K. S. (1999). Leaders and sub-groups: One of us or one of them? Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 2, 203-230.
36. Duck, J. M., & Fielding, K. S. (2003). Leaders and their treatment of subgroups: Implications for evaluations of the leader and the superordinate group. European Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 387-401.
37. Eagly, A. H., & Carli, L. L. (2007). Through the labyrinth: The truth about how women become leaders. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
38. Eagly, A. H., Johannesen-Schmidt, M., van Engen, M. L., & Vinkenburg, C. (2002). Transformational, transactional, and laissez-faire styles: A meta-analysis comparing men and women. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 569-591.
39. Eagly, A. H., & Karau, S. J. (2002). Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. Psychological Review, 109, 573-598.
40. Eagly, A. H., Karau, S. J., & Makhijani, M. G. (1995). Gender and the effectiveness of leaders: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 125-145.
41. Ellemers, N., de Gilder, D., & Haslam, S. A. (2004). Motivating individuals and groups at work: A social identity perspective on leadership and group performance. Academy of Management Review, 29, 459-478.
42. Fiedler, F. E. (1964). A contingency model of leadership effectiveness. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 149-190). New York: Academic Press.
43. Fiedler, F. E. (1967). A theory of leadership effectiveness. New York: McGraw-Hill.
44. Fielding, K. S., & Hogg, M. A. (1997). Social identity, self-categorisation, and leadership: A field study of small interactive groups. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 1, 39-51.
45. Fiske, S. T. (2010). Interpersonal stratification: Status, power, and subordination. In S. T. Fiske, D. T. Gilbert, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (5th ed., Vol. 2, pp. 941-982). New York: Wiley.
46. Fiske, S. T., & Depret, E. (1996). Control, interdependence and power: Understanding social cognition in its social context. European Review of Social Psychology, 7, 31-61.
47. Gaertner S. L., & Dovidio, J. F. (2000). Reducing intergroup bias: The common ingroup identity model. New York: Psychology Press.
48. Gawronski, B. (2004). Theory-based bias correction in dispositional inference: The fundamental attribution error is dead, long live the correspondence bias. European Review of Social Psychology, 15, 183-217.
49. Giessner, S. R., & van Knippenberg, D. (2008). ‘‘License to fail’’: Goal definition, leader group prototypicality, and perceptions of leadership effectiveness after leader failure. Organisational Behaviour and Human Decision Processes, 105, 14-35.
50. Giessner, S. R., van Knippenberg, D., & Sleebos, E. (2009). License to fail?: How leader group prototypicality moderates the effects of leader performance on perceptions of leadership effectiveness. The Leadership Quarterly, 20, 434-451.
51. Gilbert, D. T., & Malone, P. S. (1995). The correspondence bias. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 21-38.
52. Goethals, G. R., Sorenson, G. J., & Burns, J. M. (Eds.). (2004). Encyclopedia of leadership. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
53. Gordon, R. A. (1996). Impact of ingratiation on judgments and evaluations: A meta-analytic investigation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 54-70.
54. Graen, G. B., & Uhl-Bien, M. (1995). Relationship-based approach to leadership: Development of leader-member exchange (LMX) theory of leadership over 25 years: Applying a multi-level multi-domain approach. The Leadership Quarterly, 6, 219-247.
55. Hains, S. C., Hogg, M. A., & Duck, J. M. (1997). Self-categorisation and leadership: Effects of group prototypicality and leader stereotypicality. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 1087-1100.
56. Halevy, N., Berson, Y., & Galinsky, A. D. (2011). The mainstream is not electable: When vision triumphs over representativeness in leader emergence and effectiveness. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37, 893-904.
57. Haller, J., & Hogg, M. A. (in press). All power to our great leader: Political leadership under uncertainty. In J. -W. van Prooijen & P. A. M. van Lange (Eds.), Power, politics, and paranoia.
58. Haslam, N., Bastian, B., & Bissett, M. (2004). Essentialist beliefs about personality and their implications. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 1661-1673.
59. Haslam, S. A., Oakes, P. J., McGarty, C., Turner, J. C., & Onorato, S. (1995). Contextual changes in the prototypicality of extreme and moderate outgroup members. European Journal of Social Psychology, 25, 509-530.
60. Haslam, S. A., & Platow, M. J. (2001a). The link between leadership and followership: How affirming social identity translates vision into action. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 1469-1479.
61. Haslam, S. A., & Platow, M. J. (2001b). Your wish is our command: The role of shared social identity in translating a leader’s vision into followers’ action. In M. A. Hogg & D. J. Terry (Eds.), Social identity processes in organisational contexts (pp. 213-228). Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.
62. Haslam, S. A., Reicher, S. D., & Platow, M. J. (2011). The new psychology of leadership: Identity, influence and power. New York: Psychology Press.
63. Haslam, S. A., & Ryan, M. K. (2008). The road to the glass cliff: Differences in the perceived suitability of men and women for leadership positions in succeeding and failing organisations. The Leadership Quarterly, 19, 530-546.
64. Hirst, G., van Dick, R., & van Knippenberg, D. (2009). A social identity perspective on leadership and employee creativity. Journal of Organisational Behaviour, 30, 963-982.
65. Hogg, M. A. (1992). The social psychology of group cohesiveness: From attraction to social identity. Hemel Hempstead, UK: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
66. Hogg, M. A. (1993). Group cohesiveness: A critical review and some new directions. European Review of Social Psychology, 4, 85-111.
67. Hogg, M. A. (2001a). A social identity theory of leadership. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5, 184-200.
68. Hogg, M. A. (2001b). Social identification, group prototypicality, and emergent leadership. In M. A. Hogg & D. J. Terry (Eds.), Social identity processes in organisational contexts (pp. 197-212). Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.
69. Hogg, M. A. (2001c). From prototypicality to power: A social identity analysis of leadership. In S. R. Thye, E. J. Lawler, M. W. Macy, & H. A. Walker (Eds.), Advances in group processes (Vol. 18, pp. 1-30). Oxford, UK: Elsevier.
70. Hogg, M. A. (2005a). All animals are equal but some animals are more equal than others: Social identity and marginal membership. In K. D. Williams, J. P. Forgas, & W. von Hippel (Eds.), The social outcast: Ostracism, social exclusion, rejection, and bullying (pp. 243-261). New York: Psychology Press.
71. Hogg, M. A. (2005b). Social identity and misuse of power: The dark side of leadership. Brooklyn Law Review, 70, 1239-1257.
72. Hogg, M. A. (2007a). Social psychology of leadership. In A. W. Kruglanski & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (2nd ed., pp. 716-733). New York: Guilford.
73. Hogg, M. A. (2007b). Uncertainty-identity theory. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 39, pp. 69-126). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
74. Hogg, M. A. (2007c). Organisational orthodoxy and corporate autocrats: Some nasty consequences of organisational identification in uncertain times. In C. A. Bartel, S. Blader, & A. Wrzesniewski (Eds.), Identity and the modern organisation (pp. 35-59). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
75. Hogg, M. A. (2008a). Social identity processes and the empowerment of followers. In R. E. Riggio, I. Chaleff, & J. Lipman-Blumen (Eds.), The art offollowership: How great followers create great leaders and organisations (pp. 267-276). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
76. Hogg, M. A. (2008b). Social identity theory of leadership. In C.L. Hoyt, G. R. Goethals, & D. R. Forsyth (Eds.), Leadership at the crossroads. Volume 1: Leadership and psychology (pp. 62-77). Westport, CT: Praeger.
77. Hogg, M. A. (2009). From group conflict to social harmony: Leading across diverse and conflicting social identities. In T. L. Pittinsky (Ed.), Crossing the divide: Intergroup leadership in a world of difference (pp. 17-30). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business Press.
78. Hogg, M. A. (2010). Influence and leadership. In S. T. Fiske, D. T. Gilbert, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (5th ed., Vol. 2, pp. 1166-1207). New York: Wiley.
79. Hogg, M. A. (2012a). Social identity and the psychology of groups. In M. R. Leary & J. P. Tangney (Eds.), Handbook of self and identity (2nd ed., pp. 502-519). New York: Guilford.
80. Hogg, M. A. (2012b). Uncertainty-identity theory. In P. A. M. Van Lange, A. W. Kruglanski, & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of theories of social psychology (pp. 62-80). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
81. Hogg, M. A. (2013). Leadership. In J. M. Levine (Ed.), Group processes (pp. 241-266). New York: Psychology Press.
82. Hogg, M. A., Fielding, K. S., Johnson, D., Masser, B., Russell, E., & Svensson, A. (2006). Demographic category membership and leadership in small groups: A social identity analysis. The Leadership Quarterly, 17, 335-350.
83. Hogg, M. A., & Giles, H. (2012). Norm talk and identity in intergroup communication. In H. Giles (Ed.), The handbook of intergroup communication (pp. 373-387). New York: Routledge.
84. Hogg, M. A., Hains, S. C., & Mason, I. (1998). Identification and leadership in small groups: Salience, frame of reference, and leader stereotypicality effects on leader evaluations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 1248-1263.
85. Hogg, M. A., & Martin, R. (2003). Social identity analysis of leader-member relations: Reconciling self-categorisation and leader-member exchange theories of leadership. In S. A. Haslam, D. van Knippenberg, M. J. Platow, & N. Ellemers (Eds.), Social identity at work: Developing theory for organisational practice (pp. 139-154). New York: Psychology Press.
86. Hogg, M. A., Martin, R., Epitropaki, O., Mankad, A., Svensson, A., & Weeden, K. (2005). Effective leadership in salient groups: Revisiting leader-member exchange theory from the perspective of the social identity theory of leadership. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 991-1004.
87. Hogg, M. A., Martin, R., & Weeden, K. (2003). Leader-member relations and social identity. In D. van Knippenberg & M. A. Hogg (Eds.), Leadership and power: Identity processes in groups and organisations (pp. 18-33). London: SAGE.
88. Hogg, M. A., Meehan, C., & Farquharson, J. (2010). The solace of radicalism: Self-uncertainty and group identification in the face of threat. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 1061-1066.
89. Hogg, M. A., & Reid, S. A. (2001). Social identity, leadership, and power. In A. Y. Lee-Chai & J. A. Bargh (Eds.), The use and abuse of power: Multiple perspectives on the causes of corruption (pp. 159-180). Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.
90. Hogg, M. A., & Reid, S. A. (2006). Social identity, self-categorisation, and the communication of group norms. Communication Theory, 16, 7-30.
91. Hogg, M. A., Sherman, D. K., Dierselhuis, J., Maitner, A. T., & Moffitt, G. (2007). Uncertainty, entitativity, and group identification. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43, 135-142.
92. Hogg, M. A., & Smith, J. R. (2007). Attitudes in social context: A social identity perspective. European Review of Social Psychology, 18, 89-131.
93. Hogg, M. A., & Turner, J. C. (1987). Social identity and conformity: A theory of referent informational influence. In W. Doise & S. Moscovici (Eds.), Current issues in European social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 139-182). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
94. Hogg, M. A., & van Knippenberg, D. (2003). Social identity and leadership processes in groups. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 35, pp. 1-52). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
95. Hogg, M. A., van Knippenberg, D., & Rast, D. E. III. (2012). Intergroup leadership in organisations: Leading across group and intergroup boundaries. Academy of Management Review, 37, 232-255.
96. Hohman, Z. P., Hogg, M. A., & Bligh, M. C. (2010). Identity and intergroup leadership: Asymmetrical political and national identification in response to uncertainty. Self and Identity, 9, 113-128.
97. Hollander, E. P. (1958). Conformity, status, and idiosyncracy credit. Psychological Review, 65, 117-127.
98. Hollander, E. P. (1985). Leadership and power. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (3rd ed., Vol. 2, pp. 485-537). New York: Random House.
99. Hopkins, N., & Reicher, S. (1997). Social movement rhetoric and the social psychology of collective action: A case study of anti-abortion mobilization. Human Relations, 50, 261-286.
100. Hopkins, N., Reicher, S., & Kahani-Hopkins, V. (2003). Citizenship, participation, and identity construction: Political mobilization amongst British Muslims. Psychologica Belgica, 43(1/2), 33-54.
101. Moreland, R. L., Hogg, M. A., & Hains, S. C. (1994). Back to the future: Social psychological research on groups. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 30, 527-555.
102. Pierro, A., Cicero, L., Bonaiuto, M., van Knippenberg, D., & Kruglanski, A. W. (2005). Leader group prototypicality and leadership effectiveness: The moderating role of need for cognitive closure. The Leadership Quarterly, 16, 503-516.
103. Pierro, A., Cicero, L., Bonaiuto, M., van Knippenberg, D., & Kruglanski, A. W. (2007). Leader group prototypicality and resistance to organisational change: The moderating role of need for closure and team identification. Testing, Psychometrics, Methodology in Applied Psychology, 14, 27-40.
104. Pierro, A., Cicero, L., & Higgins, E. T. (2009). Followers’ satisfaction from working with group-prototypic leaders: Promotion focus as moderator. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 1105-1110.
105. Pinto, I., Marques, J., Levine, J. M., & Abrams, D. (2010). Membership status and subjective group dynamics: Who triggers the Black Sheep Effect? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99, 107-119.
106. Pittinsky, T. (Ed.) (2009). Crossing the divide: Intergroup leadership in a world of difference. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
107. Pittinsky, T. L., & Simon, S. (2007). Intergroup leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 18, 586-605.
108. Platow, M. J., Reicher, S. D., & Haslam, S. A. (2009). On the social psychology of intergroup leadership: The importance of social identity and self-categorisation processes. In T. Pittinsky (Ed.), Crossing the divide: Intergroup leadership in a world of difference (pp. 31-42). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
109. Platow, M. J., Reid, S., & Andrew, S. (1998). Leadership endorsement: The role of distributive and procedural behaviour in interpersonal and intergroup contexts. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 1, 35-47.
110. Platow, M. J., & van Knippenberg, D. (2001). A social identity analysis of leadership endorsement: The effects of leader ingroup prototypicality and distributive intergroup fairness. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 1508-1519.
111. Platow, M. J., van Knippenberg, D., Haslam, S. A., van Knippenberg, B., & Spears, R. (2006). A special gift we bestow on you for being representative of us: Considering leader charisma from a self-categorisation perspective. British Journal of Social Psychology, 45, 303-320.
112. Randsley de Moura, G., & Abrams, D. (2011, July). When leaders behave badly: Transgression credit and the double standard. Invited address at the 16th general meeting of the European Association of Social Psychology. Stockholm, Sweden. 12-16 July (2011).
113. Randsley de Moura, G., Abrams, D., Hutchison, P., & Marques, J. M. (2011). Leadership deviance. In J. Jetten & M. Hornsey (Eds.), Rebels in groups: Dissent, deviance, difference and defiance (pp. 238-258). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
114. Rast, D. E. III, Gaffney, A. M., & Hogg, M. A. (2013). The tyranny of normative distance: A social identity account of the exercise of power by remote leaders. In M. C. Bligh & R. E. Riggio (Eds.), Exploring distance in leader-follower relationships: When near is far and far is near (pp. 215-240). New York: Taylor & Francis.
115. Rast, D. E. III, Gaffney, A. M., Hogg, M. A., & Crisp, R. J. (2012). Leadership under uncertainty: When leaders who are non-prototypical group members can gain support. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 646-653.
116. Rast, D. E. III, Hogg, M. A., & Giessner, S. R. (in press). Self-uncertainty and support for autocratic leadership. Self and Identity.
117. Reicher, S. D. (1984). The St Pauls’ riot: An explanation of the limits of crowd action in terms of a social identity model. European Journal of Social Psychology, 14, 1-21.
118. Reicher, S., Haslam, S. A., & Hopkins, N. (2005). Social identity and the dynamics of leadership: Leaders and followers as collaborative agents in the transformation of social reality. The Leadership Quarterly, 16, 547-568.
119. Turner, J. C., & Oakes, P. J. (1989). Self-categorisation and social influence. In P. B. Paulus (Ed.), The psychology of group influence (2nd ed., pp. 233-275). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
120. Tyler, T. R. (1997). The psychology of legitimacy: A relational perspective on voluntary deference to authorities. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 1, 323-345.
121. Tyler, T. R., & Blader, S. (2000). Cooperation in groups: Procedural justice, social identity, and behavioural engagement. Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.
122. Tyler, T. R., & Lind, E. A. (1992). A relational model of authority in groups. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 25, 115-191.
123. Ullrich, J., & van Dick, R. (2007). The group psychology of mergers and acquisitions. In C. L. Cooper & S. Finkelstein (Eds.), Advances in mergers and acquisitions (Vol. 6, pp. 1-15). Bingley, UK: Emerald.
124. Ullrich, J., Christ, O., & van Dick, R. (2009). Substitutes for procedural fairness: Prototypical leaders are endorsed whether they are fair or not. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 235-244.
125. Van den Bos, K., & Lind, E. A. (2010). The social psychology of fairness and the regulation of personal uncertainty. In R. M. Arkin, K. C. Oleson, & P. J. Carroll (Eds.), Handbook of the uncertain self (pp. 122-141). New York: Psychology Press.
126. van Dijke, M., & De Cremer, D. (2008). How leader prototypicality affects followers’ status: The role of procedural fairness. European Journal of Work and Organisational Psychology, 17, 226-250.
127. van Dijke, M., & De Cremer, D. (2010). Procedural fairness and endorsement of prototypical leaders: Leader benevolence or follower control? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 85-96.
128. van Knippenberg, B., & van Knippenberg, D. (2005). Leader self-sacrifice and leadership effectiveness: The moderating role of leader prototypicality. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 25-37.
129. van Knippenberg, B., van Knippenberg, D., De Cremer, D., & Hogg, M. A. (2005). Research in leadership, self, and identity: A sample of the present and a glimpse of the future. The Leadership Quarterly, 16, 495-500.
130. van Knippenberg, D. (2011). Embodying who we are: Leader group prototypicality and leadership effectiveness. The Leadership Quarterly, 22, 1078-1091.
131. van Knippenberg, D. (2012). Leadership and identity. In D. V. Day & J. Antonakis (Eds.), The nature of leadership (2nd ed., pp. 477-507). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
132. van Knippenberg, D., De Cremer, D., & van Knippenberg, B. (2007). Leadership and fairness: The state of the art. European Journal of Work and Organisational Psychology, 16, 113-140.
133. van Knippenberg, D., & Hogg, M. A. (2003a). A social identity model of leadership effectiveness in organisations. In R. M. Kramer & B. M. Staw (Eds.), Research in organisational behaviour (Vol. 25, pp. 243-295). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
134. van Knippenberg, D., & Hogg, M. A. (Eds.) (2003b). Leadership and power: Identity processes in groups and organisations. London: Sage.
135. van Knippenberg, D., van Knippenberg, B., & Bobbio, A. (2008). Leaders as agents of continuity: Self continuity and resistance to collective change. In F. Sani (Ed.), Selfcontinuity: Individual and collective perspectives (pp. 175-186). New York: Psychology Press.
136. van Knippenberg, D, van Knippenberg, B., De Cremer, D., & Hogg, M. A. (2004). Leadership, self, and identity: A review and research agenda. The Leadership Quarterly, 15, 825-856.
137. van Knippenberg, D., van Knippenberg, B., & van Dijk, E. (2000). Who takes the lead in risky decision making? Effects of group members’ individual riskiness and prototypicality. Organisational Behaviour and Human Decision Processes, 83, 213-234.
138. Van Vugt, M. (2006). The evolutionary origins of leadership and followership. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10, 354-372.
139. Van Vugt, M., & de Cremer, D. (1999). Leadership in social dilemmas: The effects of group identification on collective actions to provide public goods. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 587-599.
140. Van Vugt, M., Hogan, R., & Kaiser, R. (2008). Leadership, followership, and evolution: Some lessons from the past. American Psychologist, 63, 182-196.
141. Wallwork, J., & Dixon, J. A. (2004). Foxes, green fields, and Britishness: On the rhetorical construction of place and national identity. British Journal of Social Psychology, 43, 21-39.
142. Webster, D. M., & Kruglanski, A. W. (1994). Individual differences in the need for cognitive closure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 1049-1062.
143. Wenzel, M., Mummendey, A., & Waldzus, S. (2007). Superordinate identities and intergroup conflict: The ingroup projection model. European Review of Social Psychology, 18, 331-372.
144. Wittenbaum, G. M., & Moreland, R. L. (2008). Small group research in social psychology: Topics and trends over time. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2, 187-205.
145. Wood, W., & Eagly, A. H. (2010). Gender. In S. T. Fiske, D. T. Gilbert, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (5th ed., Vol. 1, pp. 629-667). New York: Wiley.
146. Yukl, G. (2010). Leadership in organisations (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.
147. Yzerbyt, V., & Demoulin, S. (2010). Intergroup relations. In S. T. Fiske, D. T. Gilbert, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (5th ed., Vol. 2, pp. 1024-1083). New York: Wiley.