Reactions to procedural discrimination in an intergroup context: The role of group membership of the authority

Group Processes and Intergroup Relations

Volumn 12, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 463-478

  Cheng, Grand H L ^a   Fielding, Kelly S ^a   Hogg, Michael A ^b   Terry, Deborah J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

^b CLAREMONT GRADUATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Discrimination; Group membership; Intergroup relations; Procedural justice

Indexed keywords

EID: 70449596215     PISSN: 13684302     EISSN: 14617188     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1368430209105041     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Bettencourt, B.A., Charlton, K., Dorr, N., & Hume, D.L. (2001). Status differences and ingroup bias: A meta-analytic examination of the effects of status stability, status legitimacy, and group permeability. Psychological Bulletin, 127, 520-542.
2. Brown, R. (2000). Group processes: Dynamics within and between groups (2nd ed.). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers.
3. Cohen, R.L. (1991). Membership, intergroup relations, and justice. In R. Vermunt & H. Steensma (Eds.), Social justice in human relations (Vol. 1, pp. 239-258). New York: Plenum Press.
4. Cohen-Charash, Y., & Spector, P.E. (2001). The role of justice in organizations: A meta-analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 86, 278-321.
5. Colquitt, J.A. (2004). Does the justice of the one interact with the justice of the many? Reactions to procedural justice in teams. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 633-646.
6. De Cremer, D., & Sedikides, C. (2005). Self-uncertainty and responsiveness to procedural justice. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 41, 157-173.
7. De Cremer, D., & van Hiel, A. (2006). Effects of another person's fair treatment on one's own emotions and behaviors: The moderating role of how much the other cares for you. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 100, 231-249.
8. Duck, J.M., & Fielding, K.S. (2003). Leaders and their treatment of subgroups: Implications for evaluations of the leader and the superordinate group. European Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 387-401.
9. Folger, R., & Cropanzano, R. (1998). Organizational justice and human resource management. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
10. Greenberg, J., & Colquitt, J.A. (2005). Handbook of organizational justice. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
11. Grienberger, I.V., Rutte, C.G., & van Knippenberg, A.F.M. (1997). Influence of social comparisons of outcomes and procedures on fairness judgments. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 913-919.
12. Guimond, S., & Dambrun, M. (2002). When prosperity breeds hostility: The effects of relative deprivation and gratification on prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 900-912.
13. Hogg, M.A. (2005). The social identity perspective. In S. A. Wheelan (Ed.), The handbook of group research and practice (pp. 133-158). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
14. Hogg, M.A. (2006). Social identity theory. In P. J. Burke (Ed.), Contemporary social psychological theories (pp. 111-136). Stanford, CA: Stanford Social Sciences.
15. Hornsey, M.J., Spears, R., Cremers, I., & Hogg, M.A. (2003). Relations between high and low power groups: The importance of legitimacy. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 216-227.
16. Jetten, J., Duck, J., Terry, D.J., & O'Brien, A. (2002). Being attuned to intergroup differences in mergers: The role of aligned leaders for low-status groups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 1194-1201.
17. Leventhal, G.S. (1980). What should be done with equity theory? New approaches to the study of fairness in social relationships. In K. J. Gergen, M. S. Greenberg, & R. H. Willies (Eds.), Social exchange: Advances in theory and research (pp. 27-55). New York: Plenum Press.
18. Lind, E.A., & Tyler, T.R. (1988). The social psychology of procedural justice New York: Plenum Press.
19. Opotow, S. (1990). Moral exclusion and injustice: An introduction. Journal of Social Issues, 46, 1-20.
20. Platow, M.J., Hoar, S., Reid, S., Harley, K., & Morrison, D. (1997). Endorsement of distributively fair and unfair leaders in interpersonal and intergroup situations. European Journal of Social Psychology, 27, 465-494.
21. Platow, M.J., Reid, S., & Andrew, S. (1998). Leadership endorsement: The role of distributive and procedural behavior in interpersonal and intergroup contexts. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 1, 35-47.
22. Smith, H.J., & Ortiz, D.J. (2002). Is it just me? The different consequences of personal and group relative deprivation. In I. Walker & H. J. Smith (Eds.), Relative deprivation: Specification, development, and integration (pp. 91-115). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
23. Smith, H.J., Tyler, T.R., Huo, Y.J., Ortiz, D.J., & Lind, E.A. (1998). The self-relevant implications of the group-value model: Group membership, self-worth, and treatment quality. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 34, 470-493.
24. Stahl, T., van Prooijen, J.-W., & Vermunt, R. (2004). On the psychology of procedural justice: Reactions to procedures of ingroup vs. outgroup authorities. European Journal of Social Psychology, 34, 173-189.
25. Tyler, T.R., Degoey, P., & Smith, H. (1996). Understanding why the justice of group procedures matters: A test of the psychological dynamics of the group-value model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 913-930.
26. Tyler, T.R., & Lind, E.A. (1992). A relational model of authority in groups. In M. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 25, pp. 115-191). New York: Academic Press.
27. Tyler, T.R., & Lind, E.A. (2002). Understanding the nature of fraternalistic deprivation: Does group-based deprivation involve fair outcomes or fair treatment? In I. Walker & H. J. Smith (Eds.), Relative deprivation: Specification, development, and integration (pp. 44-65). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
28. van den Bos, K. (1999). What are we talking about when we talk about no-voice procedures? On the psychology of the fair outcome effect. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 35, 560-577.
29. van den Bos, K. (2003). On the subjective quality of social justice: The role of affect as information in the psychology of justice judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 482-498.
30. van den Bos, K., & Lind, E.A. (2001). The psychology of own versus others' treatment: Self-oriented and other-oriented effects on perceptions of procedural justice. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 1324-1333.
31. van den Bos, K., & van Prooijen, J.-W. (2001). Referent Cognitions Theory: The role of closeness of reference points in the psychology of voice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 616-626.
32. van den Bos, K., Vermunt, R., & Wilke, H.A.M. (1996). The consistency rule and the voice effect: The influence of expectations on procedural fairness judgments and performance. European Journal of Social Psychology, 26, 411-428.
33. van den Bos, K., Vermunt, R., & Wilke, H.A.M. (1997). Procedural and distributive justice: What is fair depends more on what comes first than on what comes next. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 95-104.
34. van Prooijen, J.-W., van den Bos, K., Lind, E.A., & Wilke, H.A.M. (2006). How do people react to negative procedures? On the moderating role of authority's biased attitudes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42, 632-645.
35. van Prooijen, J.-W., van den Bos, K., & Wilke, H.A.M. (2002). Procedural justice and status: Status salience as antecedent of procedural fairness effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 1353-1361.
36. van Prooijen, J.-W., van den Bos, K., & Wilke, H.A.M. (2004). Group belongingness and procedural justice: Social inclusion and exclusion by peers affects the psychology of voice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 66-79.
37. van Prooijen, J.-W., van den Bos, K., & Wilke, H.A.M. (2005). Procedural justice and intragroup status: Knowing where we stand in a group enhances reactions to procedures. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 41, 664-676.
38. Weiss, H.M., Suckow, K., & Cropanzano, R. (1999). Effects of justice conditions on discrete emotions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 786-794.