Social identity and self-categorization

The SAGE Handbook of Prejudice, Stereotyping and Discrimination

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 179-193

  Abrams, Dominic ^a   Hogg, Michael A ^b  

^a Claremont Graduate University ^*

^b CLAREMONT GRADUATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84949803007     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4135/9781446200919.n11     Document Type: Chapter

References (115)

1. Aberson, C. L. Healy, M. R., &Romero, V. L. Ingroup bias and self-esteem: A meta-analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4,157-173. (2000).
2. Abrams, D. Social self-regulation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20,473-483. (1994).
3. Abrams, D. Social identity on a national scale: Optimal distinctiveness and young people's self-expression through musical preference. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 12,303-317. (2009).
4. Abrams, D., &Christian, J. N.(2007). A relational analysis of social exclusion. In D.Abrams, J. N.Christian, & D.Gordon (Eds), Multidisciplinary Handbook of Social Exclusion Research (pp. 211-232).Oxford:Wiley-Blackwell.
5. Abrams, D., &Hogg, M. A. Comments on the motivational status of self-esteem in social identity and intergroup discrimination. European Journal of Social Psychology, 18,317-334. (1988).
6. Abrams, D., &Hogg, M. A.(1990). Social identification, self-categorization and social influence. In W.Stroebe, & M.Hewstone (Eds), European Review of Social Psychology (Vol 1, pp. 195-228).Chichester, UK:John Wiley.
7. Abrams, D., &Hogg, M. A.(2001). Collective identity: Group membership and self-conception. In M. A.Hogg, & R. S.Tindale, (Eds), Blackwell Handbook of Social Psychology: Group Processes (pp. 425-460).Oxford, UK:Blackwell.
8. Abrams, D., &Hogg, M. A. Metatheory: Lessons from social identity research. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8,98-106. (2004).
9. Abrams, D., &Randsley de Moura, G.(2002). The psychology of collective political protest. In V. C.Ottati, R. S.Tindale, J.Edwards, D.O'Connell, E.Posavac, E.Suarez-Balcazar, L.Heath, & F.Bryant (Eds). The Social Psychology of Politics: Social Psychological Application to Social Issues (Vol. 5, pp. 193-214).New York:Plenum Press.
10. Abrams, D. Randsley de Moura, G. Hutchison, P., &Marques, J. M. Innovation credit: When can leaders oppose their groups? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95,662-678. (2008).
11. Abrams, D. Rutland, A. Pelletier, J., &FerrellJ. Group nous and social exclusion: The role of theory of social mind, multiple classification skill and social experience of peer relations within groups. Child Development, 80,224-243. (2009).
12. Altemeyer, B.(1998). The other "authoritarian personality". In M.Zanna (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 30, pp. 47-92).Orlando, FL:Academic Press.
13. Ashforth, B. E., &Mael, F. A. Social identity theory and the organization. Academy of Management Review, 14,20-39. (1989).
14. Berger, J., &Heath, C. Who drives divergence? Identity-signaling, out-group dissimilarity, and the abandonment of cultural tastes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95,593-607. (2008).
15. Bond, R., &Smith, P. B. Culture and conformity: A meta-analysis of studies using Asch's (1952b, 1956) line judgment task. Psychological Bulletin, 119,111-137. (1996).
16. Bourhis, R. Y., Sachdev, I., &Gagnon, A.(1994). Intergroup research with the Tajfel matrices: Methodological notes. In M.Zanna, & J.Olson (Eds), The Psychology of Prejudice: The Ontario Symposium (Vol. 7, pp. 209-22).Hillsdale, NJ:Erlbaum.
17. Branscombe, N. R. Schmitt, M. T., &Harvey, R. D. Perceiving pervasive discrimination among African Americans: Implications for group identification and well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77,135-149. (1999).
18. Breakwell, G.(1986). Coping With Threatened Identities. London:Methuen.
19. Brewer, M. B. The social self: On being the same and different at the same time. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17,475-482. (1991).
20. Brewer, M. B. The many faces of social identity: Implications for political psychology. Political Psychology, 22,115-125. (2001).
21. Brewer, M. B., &Gardner, W. Who is this "we"? Levels of collective identity and self representations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71,83-93. (1996).
22. Brown, R. J., &Hewstone, M.(2005). An integrative theory of intergroup contact. In M. P.Zanna (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 37, pp. 255-343).Orlando, FL:Academic Press.
23. Bruner, J. S. On perceptual readiness. Psychological Review, 64,123-152. (1957).
24. Cadinu, M. R., &Rothbart, M. Self-anchoring and differentiation processes in the minimal group setting. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70,661-677. (1996).
25. Cameron, J. E. A three-factor model of social identity. Self and Identity, 3,239-262. (2004).
26. Crisp, R., Ensari, N., Hewstone, M., &Miller, N.(2003). A dual-route model of crossed categorization effects. In W.Stroebe, & M.Hewstone (Eds), Euorpean Review of Social Psychology (Vol 13, pp. 35-74).New York:Psychology Press.
27. Deaux, K. Reid, A. Mizrahi, K., &Ethier, K. A. Parameters of social identity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68,280-291. (1995).
28. de Cremer, D., &van Vugt, M. Social identification effects in social dilemmas: A transformation of motives. European Journal of Social Psychology, 29,871-893. (1999).
29. Diener, E.(1980). Deindividuation: The absence of self-awareness and self-regulation in group members. In P. B.Paulus (Ed.), Psychology of Group Influence (pp. 209-242).Hillsdale, NJ:Erlbaum.
30. Ellemers, N., Spears, R., & Doojse, B. (Eds) (1999a). Social Identity. Oxford, UK:Blackwell.
31. Ellemers, N. Kortekaas, P., &Ouwerkerk, J. W. Self-categorization, commitment to the group and group self-esteem as related but distinct aspects of social identity. European Journal of Social Psychology, 29,371-389. (1999b).
32. Emler, N., &Reicher, S.D.(2005). Delinquency: Causes or consequences of social exclusion? In D.Abrams, M. A.Hogg, & J. M.Marques (Eds). The Social Psychology of Inclusion and Exclusion (pp. 211-242).New York:Psychology Press.
33. Fiske, S. T. Cuddy, A. J. C. Glick, P., &Xu, J. A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82,878-902. (2002).
34. Furnham, A., &Procter, E. Belief in a just world: Review and critique of the individual difference literature. British Journal of Social Psychology, 28,365-384. (1989).
35. Gaertner, L. Sedikides, C., &Graetz, K. In search of self-definition: Motivational primacy of the individual self, motivational primacy of the collective self, or contextual primacy? JournalofPersonalityand Social Psychology, 76,5-18. (1999).
36. Gaertner, S. L., &Dovidio, J. F.(2000). Reducing Intergroup Bias: The Common In-group Identity Model. New York:Psychology Press.
37. Greenwald, A. G., &Pratkanis, A. R.(1984). The self. In R. S.Wyer, & T. K.Srull (Eds), Handbook of Social Cognition (Vol. 3, pp. 129-178).Hillsdale, NJ:Erlbaum.
38. Hamilton, D. L., &Sherman, S. J. Perceiving persons and groups. Psychological Review, 103,336-355. (1996).
39. Haslam, S. A.(2004). Psychology in Organisations: The Social Identity Approach (2nd edition). London:Sage.
40. Hennessy, J., &West, M. A. Intergroup behavior in organizations. Small Group Research, 30,361-382. (1999).
41. Henry, K. B. Arrow, H., &Carini, B. A tripartite model of group identification: theory and measurement. Small Group Research, 30,558-581. (1999).
42. Hogg, M. A.(1993). Group cohesiveness: A critical review and some new directions. In W.Stroebe, & M.Hewstone (Eds), European Review of Social Psychology (Vol. 4, pp. 85-111).Chichester, UK:John Wiley.
43. Hogg, M. A.(2007). Uncertainty-identity theory. In M. P.Zanna (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 39, pp. 69-126).San Diego, CA:Academic Press.
44. Hogg, M. A., &Abrams, D.(1988). Social Identifications: A Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations and Group Processes. London and New York:Routledge.
45. Hogg, M. A., &Terry, D.J. Social identity and self-categorization processes in organizational contexts. Academy of Management Review, 25,121-140. (2000).
46. Hogg, M. A., &van Knippenberg, D.(2003). Social identity and leadership processes in groups. In M. P.Zanna (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 35, pp. 1-52).San Diego, CA:Academic Press.
47. Hornsey, M. J., &Hogg, M. A. Assimilation and diversity: An integrative model of subgroup relations. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4,143-156. (2000).
48. Hornsey, M. J. Grice, T. Jetten, J. Paulsen, N., &Callan, V. Group directed criticisms and recommendations for change: Why newcomers arouse more resistance than old-timers. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33,1036-1048. (2007).
49. Houston, D. M., &Andreopoulou, A. Tests of both corollaries of social identity theory's self-esteem hypothesis in a real group setting. British Journal of Social Psychology, 42,357-370. (2003).
50. Hutchison, P. Abrams, D. Gutierrez, R., &Viki, T. Getting rid of the bad ones: The relationship between group identification, deviant derogation and identity maintenance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44,874-881. (2008).
51. Jackson, J. W., &Smith, E. R. Conceptualizing social identity: A new framework and evidence for the impact of different dimensions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25,120-135. (1999).
52. Jetten, J. Branscombe, N., &Spears, R. On being peripheral: effects of identity insecurity on personal and collective self esteem. European Journal of Social Psychology, 32,105-123. (2002b).
53. Jetten, J. Postmes, T., &McAuliffe, B. J. "We're all individuals": Group norms of individualism and collectivism, levels of identification, and identity threat. European Journal of Social Psychology, 32,189-207. (2002a).
54. Jost, J. T., &Hunyadi, O.(2002). The psychology of system justification and the palliative function of ideology. In W.Stroebe, & M.Hewstone (Eds), European Review of Social Psychology (Vol. 13, pp. 111-153).Hove, UK:Psychology Press.
55. Kawakami, K., &Dion, K. L. Social identity and affect as determinants of collective action: towards an integration of relative deprivation and social identity theories. Theory and Psychology, 5,551-577. (1995).
56. Kelly, C., &Breinlinger, S.(1996). The Social Psychology of Collective Action: Identity, Injustice and Gender. London:Taylor & Francis.
57. Klandermans, B.(1997). The Social Psychology of Protest. Oxford, UK:Blackwell.
58. Leader, T. Mullen, B., &Abrams, D. Without mercy: The immediate impact of group size on lynch mob atrocity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33,1340-1352. (2008).
59. Levy, S. R., & Killen, M. (Eds) (2008). Intergroup Attitudes and Relations in Childhood Through Adulthood. Oxford, England:Oxford University Press.
60. Mackie, D. M. Devos, T., &Smith, E. R. Intergroup emotions: Explaining offensive action tendencies in an intergroup context. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79,602-616. (2000).
61. Major, B., Quinton, W. J., &McCoy, S. K.(2002). Antecedents and consequences of attributions to discrimination: Theoretical and empirical advances. In M. P.Zanna (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 34, pp. 251-330).San Diego, CA:Academic Press.
62. Markus, H., &Kitayama, S. Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion and motivation. Psychological Review, 98,224-253. (1991).
63. Marques, J. Abrams, D. Páez, D., &Martinez-Taboada, C. The role of categorization and in-group norms in judgments of groups and their members. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75,976-988. (1998).
64. Marques, J. M. Abrams, D., &Serodio, R. Being better by being right: Subjective group dynamics and derogation of in-group deviants when generic norms are undermined. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81,436-447. (2001).
65. Marques, J. M., &Páez, D.(1994). The black sheep effect: Social categorization, rejection of in-group deviates, and perception of group variability. In W.Stroebe, & M.Hewstone (Eds), European Review of Social Psychology (Vol. 5, pp. 37-68).Chichester, UK:John Wiley.
66. McAuliffe, B. J. Jetten, J. Hornsey, M. J., &Hogg, M. A. Individualist and collectivist group norms: When it's OK to go your own way. European Journal of Social Psychology, 33:57-70. (2003).
67. McGarty, C., Yzerbyt, V.Y., & Spears, R., (Eds) (2002). Stereotypes as Explanations. The Formation of Meaningful Beliefs About Social Groups. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
68. Oakes, P. J.(1987). The salience of social categories. In J. C.Turner, M. A.Hogg, P. J.Oakes, S. D.Reicher, & M. S.Wetherell (Eds). Rediscovering the Social Group: A Self-Categorization Theory (pp. 117-141).Oxford:Blackwell.
69. Oakes, P. J., Haslam, S. A., &Turner, J. C.(1994). Stereotyping and Social Reality. Oxford, UK:Blackwell.
70. Otten, S.(2002). "Me" and "us" or "us" and "them"? The self as heuristic for defining novel ingroups. In W.Stroebe, & M.Hewstone (Eds), European Review of Social Psychology (Vol. 13, pp. 1-33).Hove, UK:Psychology Press.
71. Oyserman, D. Coon, H. M., &Kemmelmeier, M. Rethinking individualism and collectivism: Evaluation of theoretical assumptions and metaanalyses. Psychological Bulletin, 128,3-72. (2002).
72. Packer, D. J. On being with us and against us: A normative conflict model of dissent in social groups. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 12,50-72. (2008).
73. Pickett, C. L., &Brewer, M. B.(2005). The role of exclusion in maintaining in-group inclusion. In D.Abrams, M. A.Hogg, & J. M.Marques (Eds), The Social Psychology of Inclusion and Exclusion (pp. 89-112).New York:Psychology Press.
74. Prentice, D. A. Miller, D., &Lightdale, J. R. Asymmetries in attachment to groups and to their members: Distinguishing between common-identity and common-bond groups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20,484-493. (1994).
75. Pyszczynski, T. Greenberg, J., &Solomon, S. Why do we need what we need? A terror management perspective on the roots of human social motivation. Psychological Inquiry, 8,1-20. (1997).
76. Randsley de Moura, G. Abrams, D. Retter, C. Gunnarsdottir, S., &Ando, K. Identification as an organizational anchor: How identification and job satisfaction combine to predict turnover intention. European Journal of Social Psychology, 39,540-557. (2009).
77. Randsley de Moura, G.R., Leader, T.I., Pelletier, J.P., &Abrams, D.(2008). Prospects for group processes and intergroup relations research: A review of 70 years" progress. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 11, 575-596.
78. Reicher, S. D., Spears, R., &Postmes, T.(1995). A social identity model of deindividuation phenomena. In W.Stroebe, & M.Hewstone (Eds), European Review of Social Psychology (Vol. 6, pp 161-198).Chichester, UK:John Wiley.
79. Reid, S. A., &Giles, H. Intergroup relations: Its linguistic and communicative parameters. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 8,211. (2005).
80. Roccas, S., &Brewer, M. B. Social identity complexity. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 6,88-109. (2002).
81. Roccas, S. Sagiv, L. Schwartz, S. Halevy, N., &Eidelson, R. Toward a unifying model of identification with groups: Integrating theoretical perspectives. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 12,280-306. (2008).
82. Rubin, M., &Hewstone, M. Social identity theory's self-esteem hypothesis: A review and some suggestions for clarification. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2,40-62. (1998).
83. Runciman, W.G.(1966). Relative Deprivation and Social Justice. London:Routledge.
84. Sani, F., &Reicher, S.D. Contested identities and schisms in groups: Opposing the ordianation of women as priests in the Church of England. British Journal of Social Psychology, 39,95-112. (2000).
85. Sassenberg, K., &Woltin, K.(2008). Group-based self-regulation: The effects of regulatory focus. In W.Stroebe, & M.Hewstone (Eds), European Review of Social Psychology (Vol. 19, pp. 126-164).New York:Psychology Press.
86. Sedikides, C., &Gaertner, L.(2001). A homecoming to the individual self. Emotional and motivational primacy. In C.Sedikides, & M. B.Brewer (Eds), Individual Self, Relational Self, Collective Self (pp. 7-25).Philadelphia:Psychology Press.
87. Sedikides, C., &Strube, M. J.(1997). Self-evaluation: To thine own self be good, to thine own self be sure, to thine own self be true, and to thine own self be better. In M. P.Zanna (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 29, pp. 209-296).New York:Academic Press.
88. Sidanius, J., &Pratto, F.(1999). Social Dominance: An Intergroup Theory of Social Hierarchy and Oppression. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
89. Simmel, G.(1955). Conflict and the Web of Group Affiliations. New York:Free Press.
90. Simon, B.(2004). Identity in a Modern Society: A Social Psychological Perspective. Oxford:Blackwell.
91. Simon, B., &Klandermans, B. Politicized collective identity: A social psychological analysis. American Psychologist, 56,319-331. (2001).
92. Simon, B. Loewy, M. Sturmer, S. Weber, U. Freytang, P. Habig, C., et al. Collective identification and social movement participation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74,646-658. (1998).
93. Spears, R. Doosje, B., &Ellemers, N. Self-stereotyping in the face of threats to group status and distinctiveness: The role of group identification. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23,538-553. (1997).
94. Tajfel, H. Quantitative judgement in social perception. British Journal of Psychology, 50,16-29. (1959).
95. Tajfel, H. Cognitive aspects of prejudice. Journal of Social Issues, 25,79-97. (1969).
96. Tajfel, H.(1972). Social categorization. English manuscript of "La catégorisation sociale". In S.Moscovici (Ed.), Introduction à la Psychologie Sociale (Vol. 1, pp. 272-302).Paris:Larousse.
97. Tajfel, H.(1974). Intergroup Behaviour, Social Comparison and Social Change. Unpublished Katz-Newcomb lectures, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
98. Tajfel, H.(1981). Social stereotypes and social groups. In J. C.Turner, & H.Giles (Eds), Intergroup Behaviour (pp. 144-167).Oxford:Blackwell.
99. Tajfel, H., &Turner, J. C.(1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G.Austin, & S.Worchel (Eds), The Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations (pp. 33-47).Monterey, CA:Brooks/Cole. (reprinted in M. A. Hogg, & D. Abrams (2001) Intergroup Relations). New York: Psychology Press.
100. Taylor, D. M., &Moghaddam, F. M.(1984). Theories of Intergroup Relations: International Social Psychological Perspectives. Westport Conn.:Praeger.
101. Terry, D. J. Carey, C. J., &Callan, V. J. Employee adjustment to an organizational merger: An intergroup perspective. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27,267-280. (2001).
102. Turner, J. C.(1982). Towards a cognitive redefinition of the social group. In H.Tajfel (Ed.), Social Identity and Intergroup Relations (pp. 15-40).Cambridge, UK:Cambridge University Press.
103. Turner, J. C.(1985). Social categorization and the self-concept: A social cognitive theory of group behavior. In E. J.Lawler (Ed.), Advances in Group Processes: Theory and Research (Vol. 2, pp. 77-122).Greenwich, CT:JAI Press.
104. Turner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S. D., &Wetherell, M. S.(1987). Rediscovering the Social Group: A Self-Categorization Theory. Oxford, UK:Blackwell.
105. Tyler, T. R. The psychology of legitimacy: A relational perspective on voluntary deference to authorities. PersonalityandSocialPsychologyReview, 1,323-345. (1997).
106. Tyler, T. R., &Blader, S. L. The Group Engagement Model: Procedural justice social identity and cooperative behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 7,349-361. (2003).
107. van Leeuwen, E. van Knippenberg, D., &Ellemers, N. Continuing and changing group identities: The effects of merging on social identification and ingroup bias. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29,697-690. (2003).
108. Van Zomeren, M. Postmes, T., &Spears, R. Towards an integrative social identity model of collective action. A quantitative research synthesis of three socio-psychological perspectives. Psychological Bulletin, 134,504-535. (2008).
109. Wagner, U., Tripp, L.R., Finchilescu, G., & Tredoux, C. (Eds) (2008). Improving Intergroup Relations: Building on the Legacy of Thomas F. Pettigrew. Oxford:Blackwell.
110. Waldzus, S., &Mummendey, A. Inclusion in a superordinate category, in-group prototypicality, and attitudes towards out-groups. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40,466-477. (2004).
111. Walker, I., &Mann, L. Unemployment, relative deprivation and social protest. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 13,275-283. (1987).
112. Wenzel, M., Mummendey, A., &Waldzus, S.(2007). Superordinate identities and intergroup conflict: The ingroup projection model. In W.Stroebe, & M.Hewstone (Eds), European Review of Social Psychology (Vol. 18, pp. 331-372).Hove, UK:Psychology Press.
113. Wright, S. C., Aron, A., &Tropp, L. R.(2002). Including others (and groups) in the self: Self-expansion and intergroup relations. In J. P.Forgas, & K. D.Williams (Eds), The Social Self: Cognitive, Interpersonal, and Intergroup Perspectives (pp. 343-363).New York:Psychology Press.
114. Wright, S. C. Taylor, D. M., &Moghaddam, F. M. Responding to membership in a disadvantaged group: From acceptance to collective protest. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58,994-1003. (1990).
115. Yzerbyt, V., Judd, C., & Corneille, O. (Eds) (2004). The Psychology of Group Perception: Perceived Variability, Entitativity, and Essentialism. New York:Psychology Press.