Cooperation with leaders in social dilemmas: On the effects of procedural fairness and outcome favorability in structural cooperation

Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes

Volumn 91, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 1-11

  De Cremer, David ^a   van Knippenberg, Daan ^b  

^a MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b ERASMUS UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0038395847     PISSN: 07495978     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0749-5978(02)00539-3     Document Type: Review

References (52)

1. Brewer, M. B., & Schneider, S. K. (1990). Social identity and social dilemmas: A double-edged sword. In D. Abrams & M. A. Hogg (Eds.), Social identity theory: Constructive and critical advances (pp. 169-184). Wheatsheaf. Harvester.
2. Brockner, J. (2002). Making sense of procedural fairness: How high procedural fairness can reduce or heighten the influence of outcome favorability. Academy of Management Review, 27, 58-79.
3. Brockner, J., Ackerman, G., & Fairchild, G. (2001). When do elements of procedural fairness make a difference? A classification of moderating differences. In J. Greenberg & R. Cropanzano (Eds.), Advances in organizational justice (pp. 179-212). Standford, California: Stanford University Press.
4. Brockner, J., Heuer, L., Siegel, P. A., Wiesenfeld, B., Martin, C., Grover, S., Reed, T., & Bjorgvinsson, S. (1998). The moderating effect of self-esteem in reaction to voice: Converging evidence from five studies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 394-407.
5. Brockner, J., Siegel, P., Daly, J., Tyler, T. R., & Martin, C. (1997). When trust matters: The moderating effect of outcome favorability. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42, 558-583.
6. Brockner, J., & Wiesenfeld, B. M. (1996). An integrative framework for explaining reactions to decisions: Interactive effects of outcomes and procedures. Psychological Bulletin, 120, 189-208.
7. Buckley, W., Burns, T., & Meeker, L. D. (1974). Structural solutions of collective action problems. Behavioral Science, 19, 277-297.
8. Cross, J. G., & Guyer, M. J. (1980). Social traps. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan.
9. De Cremer, D. (2000). Leadership selection in social dilemmas - not all prefer it: The moderating effect of social value orientation. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research and Practice, 4, 330-337.
10. De Cremer, D. (2002a). Charismatic leadership and cooperation in social dilemmas: A matter of transforming motives? Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32, 997-1016.
11. De Cremer, D. (2002b). Respect and cooperation in social dilemmas: The importance of feeling included. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 1335-1341.
12. De Cremer, D., Snyder, M., & Dewitte, S. (2001). The less I trust, the less I contribute or not?: Effects of trust, accountability and self-monitoring in social dilemmas. European Journal of Social Psychology, 31, 93-107.
13. De Cremer, D., & van Knippenberg, D. (2002). How do leaders promote cooperation? The effects of charisma and procedural fairness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 858-866.
14. De Cremer, D., & Van Vugt, M. (2002). Intergroup and intragroup, aspects of leadership in social dilemmas: A relational model of cooperation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 126-136.
15. Folger, R. (1977). Distributive and procedural justice: Combined impact of "voice" and improvement of experienced inequity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 108-119.
16. Folger, R. (1986). Rethinking equity theory: A referent cognitions model. In H. W. Bierhoff, R. L. Cohen, & J. Greenberg (Eds.), Justice in social relations (pp. 145-162). New York: Plenum.
17. Folger, R. (1993). Justice, motivation, and performance beyond role requirements. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 6, 239-248.
18. Gilliland, S. W. (1994). Effects of procedural and distributive justice on reactions to a selection system. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 691-701.
19. Hollander, E. P. (1985). Leadership and power. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (pp. 485-537 . New York: Random House.
20. Komorita, S. S., & Parks, C. D. (1994). Social dilemmas. Dubuque, IA: Brown & Benchmark.
21. Konovsky, M. A., & Cropanzano, R. (1991). Perceived fairness of employee drug testing as a predictor of employee attitudes and job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 698-707.
22. Koper, G., van Knippenberg, D., Bouhuijs, F., Vermunt, R., & Wilke, H. (1993). Procedural fairness and self-esteem. European Journal of Social Psychology, 23, 313-325.
23. Kramer, R. M. (1999). Trust and distrust in organizations: Emerging perspectives, enduring questions. Annual Review of Psychology, 50, 569-598.
24. Leventhal, G. S. (1980). What should be done with equity theory? New approaches to the fairness in social relationships. In K. Gergen, M. Greenberg, & R. Willis (Eds.), Social exchange theory (pp. 12-15). New York: Plenum Press.
25. Lind, E. A. (2001). Fairness heuristic theory: Justice judgments as pivotal cognitions in organizational relations. In J. Greenberg & R. Cropanzano (Eds.), Advances in organizational justice (pp. 56-88). Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.
26. Lind, E. A., Kanfer, R., & Earley, P. C. (1990). Voice, control, and procedural justice: Instrumental and noninstrumental concerns in fairness judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 952-959.
27. Lind, E. A., & Tyler, T. R. (1988). The social psychology of procedural justice. New York: Plenum Press.
28. Macy, M. W. (1995). PAVLOV and the evolution of cooperation: An experimental test. Social Psychology Quarterly, 58, 74-87.
29. Messick, D. M. (1984). Solving social dilemmas: Individual and collective approaches. Representative Research in Social Psychology, 14, 72-87.
30. Messick, D. M., & Brewer, M. B. (1983). Solving social dilemmas. In L. Wheeler & P. R. Shaver (Eds.), Review of Personality and Social Psychology (Vol. 4, pp. 11-44). Beverly Hills: Sage.
31. Messick, D. M., Wilke, H. A. M., Brewer, M. B., Kramer, R. M., Zemke, P., & Lui, L. (1983). Individual adaptations and structural change as solutions to social dilemmas. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 294-309.
32. Moorman, R. H. (1991). The relationship between organizational justice and organizational citizenships behaviors. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 845-855.
33. Organ, D. W. (1988). Organizational citizenship behavior: The good soldier syndrome. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
34. Pearce, J. L., & Gregersen, H. B. (1991). Task interdependence and extrarole behavior: A test of the mediating effects of felt responsibility. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 838-844.
35. Pfeffer, J. (1998). Understanding organizations: Concepts and controversies. In D. Gilbert, S. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (4th ed., pp. 733-777). New York: Oxford University Press.
36. Rutte, C. G., & Wilke, H. A. M. (1984). Social dilemmas and leadership. European Journal of Social Psychology, 14, 294-309.
37. Rutte, C. G., & Wilke, H. A. M. (1985). Preference for decision structures in a social dilemma situation. European Journal of Social Psychology, 15, 367-370.
38. Samuelson, C. D., & Messick, D. M. (1986). Inequities in access to and use of shared resource in social dilemmas. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 960-967.
39. Smith, K. G., Carroll, S. J., & Ashford, S. J. (1995). Intra- and interorganizational cooperation: Toward a research agenda. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 7-23.
40. Tenbrunsel, A. E., & Messick, D. M. (1999). Sanctioning systems, decision frames, and cooperation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 684-707.
41. Thibaut, J., & Walker, L . (1975). Procedural justice: A psychological analysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
42. Tyler, T. R., & Blader, S. (2000). Cooperation in groups: Procedural justice, social identity, and behavioral engagement. Philadelphia: Taylor & Francis.
43. Tyler, T. R., & DeGoey, P. (1995). Collective restraint in social dilemmas: Procedural justice and social identification effects on supports of authorities. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 482-497.
44. Tyler, T. R., & DeGoey, P. (1996). Trust in organizational authorities: The influence of motive attributions on willingness to accept decisions. In R. Kramer & T. R. Tyler (Eds.), Trust in organizations: Frontiers of theory and research (pp. 331-356). Thousand Oakes, CA: Sage.
45. Tyler, T. R., & Lind, E. A. (1992). A relational model of authority in groups. In M. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 25, pp. 115-191). New York: Academic Press.
46. Van den Bos, K., Bruins, J., Wilke, H. A. M., & Dronkert, E. (1999). Sometimes unfair procedures have nice aspects: On the psychology of the fair process effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 324-336.
47. Van Vugt, M., & De Cremer, D. (1999). Leadership in social dilemmas: The effects of group identification on collective actions to provide public goods. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 587-599.
48. Victor, R., & Blackburn, R. S. (1987). Interdependence: An alternative conceptualization. Academy of Management Review, 12, 486-498.
49. Wageman, R. (1995). Interdependence and group effectiveness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40, 145-180.
50. Wilke, H. A. M. (1991). Greed, efficiency and fairness in resource management situations. European Review of Social Psychology, 2, 165-187.
51. Weiner, B. (1985). "Spontaneous" causal thinking. Psychological Bulletin, 97, 74-84.
52. Yamagishi, T. (1986). The structural goal/expectation theory of cooperation in social dilemmas. In E. Lawler (Ed.), Advances in group processes (Vol. 3, pp. 51-87).