Leaders and subgroups: One of us or one of them?

Group Processes and Intergroup Relations

Volumn 2, Issue 3, 1999, Pages 203-230

  Duck, Julie M ^a   Fielding, Kelly S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

Author keywords

Comparative context; Leader evaluations; Social categorization; Subgroups

Indexed keywords

EID: 0000364194     PISSN: 13684302     EISSN: 14617188     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1368430299023001     Document Type: Article

References (77)

1. Alderfer, C. P., & Smith, K. K. (1982). Studying intergroup relations embedded in organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 27, 33-65.
2. Anderson, L. R., & Ager, J. W. (1978). Analysis of variance in small group research. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 4, 341-345.
3. Bales, R. F. (1950). Interaction process analysis: A method for the study of small groups. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
4. Bass, B. M. (1990). Bass and Stogdill's handbook of leadership: Theory, research and managerial applications. New York: Free Press.
5. Blake, R., & Mouton, J. (1984). Solving costly organizational conflicts. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
6. Blake, R., Shepard, H. A., & Mouton, J. (1964). Managing intergroup conflict in industry. Houston, TX: Gulf.
7. Brewer, M. B. (1979). In-group bias in the minimal intergroup situation: A cognitive-motivational analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 307-324.
8. Brewer, M. B., & Kramer, R. M. (1986). Choice behavior in social dilemmas: Effects of social identity, group size, and decision framing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 543-549.
9. Brewer, M. B., & Silver, M. (1978). Ingroup bias as a function of task characteristics. European Journal of Social Psychology, 8, 393-400.
10. Carnevale, P. J. D. (1985). Accountability of group representatives and intergroup relations. Advances in Group Processes, 2, 227-248.
11. Carter, L., Haythorn, W. W., Shriver, B., & Lanzetta, J. (1951). The behavior of leaders and other group members. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 46, 589-595.
12. Cheeseman, J., & Schneider, S. (1997). Leadership, power, and intergroup behavior: A structural analysis. Australian Journal of Psychology, 49 (Suppl. Combined Abstracts of 1997 Australian Psychology Conferences), 31.
13. Crockett, W. H. (1955). Emergent leadership in small decision-making groups. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 51, 378-383.
14. Diehl, M. (1989).Justice and discrimination between minimal groups: The limits of equity. British Journal of Social Psychology, 28, 227-238.
15. Diehl, M. (1990). The minimal group paradigm: Theoretical explanation and empirical findings. European Review of Social Psychology, 1, 265-292.
16. Duck, J. M., & Fielding, K. S. (1999). Leaders and subgroups: What is fair behavior? Manuscript submitted for publication.
17. Duncan, B. L. (1976). Differential social perception and attribution of intergroup violence: Testing the lower limits of stereotyping of blacks. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34, 590-598.
18. Fiedler, F. E. (1962). The leader's psychological distance and group effectiveness. In D. Cartwright & A. Zander (Eds.), Group dynamics: Research and theory. Evanston, IL: Row, Peterson.
19. Fiedler, F. E. (1965). A contingency model of leadership effectiveness. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 1, 149-190.
20. Fiedler, F. E. (1971). Leadership. Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press.
21. Fiedler, F. E. (1981). Leadership effectiveness. American Behavioral Scientist, 24, 619-632.
22. Fielding, K. S., & Hogg, M. A. (1997). Social identity, self-categorization and leadership: A field study of small interactive groups. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research and Practice, 1, 39-51.
23. Fleishman, E. A. (1973). Twenty years of consideration and structure. In E. A. Fleishman & J. G. Hunt (Eds.), Current developments in the study of leadership. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
24. Foddy, M., & Crettenden, A. (1994). Leadership and group identity as determinants of resource consumption in a social dilemma. In U. Schulz & W. Albers (Eds.), Social dilemmas and cooperation (pp. 207-232). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
25. Gaertner, S. L., Dovidio, J. F., Anastasio, P. A., Bachman, B. A., & Rust, M. C. (1993). The common ingroup identity model: Recategorization and the reduction of intergroup bias. European Review of Social Psychology, 4, 1-26.
26. Gaertner, S. L., Mann, J., Murrell, A., & Dovidio, J. F. (1989). Reducing intergroup bias: The benefits of recategorization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 239-249.
27. Gaertner, S. L., Rust, M. C., Dovidio, J. F., Bachman, B. A., & Anastasio, P. A. (1994). The contact hypothesis: The role of common ingroup identity on reducing intergroup bias. Small Groups Research, 25, 224-249.
28. Hains, S. C., Hogg, M. A., & Duck, J. M. (1997). Self-categorization and leadership: Effects of leader prototypicality and leader stereotypicality. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 1087-1099.
29. Hewstone, M., & Ward, C. (1985). Ethnocentrism and causal attribution in Southeast Asia. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 614-623.
30. Hogg, M. A. (1992). The social psychology of group cohesiveness: From attraction to social identity. Hemel Hempstead, UK; Harvester Wheatsheaf.
31. Hogg, M. A. (1996). Intragroup processes, group structure and social identity. In W. P. Robinson (Ed.), Social groups and identities: Developing the legacy of Henri Taffel (pp. 65-93). Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.
32. Hogg, M. A., & Abrams, D. (1988). Social identifications: A social psychology of intergroup relations and group processes. London: Routledge.
33. Hogg, M. A., & Hardie, E. A. (1991). Social attraction, personal attraction, and self-categorization: A field study. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17, 175-180.
34. Hollander, E. P. (1958). Conformity, status, and idiosyncrasy credit. Psychological Review, 65, 117-127.
35. Hollander, E. P., & Julian, J. W. (1970). Studies in leader legitimacy, influence, and innovation. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 33-69). New York: Academic Press.
36. Horwitz, M. & Rabbie, J. M. (1982). Individuality and group membership in the intergroup system. In H. Tajfel (Ed.), Social identity and intergroup relations (pp. 241-274). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
37. Horwitz, M., & Rabbie, J. M. (1989). Stereotypes of groups, group members and individuals in categories: A differential analysis. In D. Bar-Tal (Ed.), Stereotyping and prejudice: Changing conceptions (pp. 105-129). New York: Springer-Verlag.
38. House, R. J., & Baetz, M. L. (1990). Leadership: Some empirical generalizations and new research directions. In L. L. Cummings & B. M. Staw (Eds.), Leadership, participation, and group behavior (pp. 1-84). Greenwich, CT:JAI.
39. Kramer, R. M. (1991). Intergroup relations and organizational dilemmas: The role of categorization processes. Research in Organizational Behavior, 13, 191-228.
40. Kramer, R. M., & Brewer, M. B. (1984). Effects of group identity on resource use in a simulated commons dilemma. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 1044-1057.
41. Lippitt, R., & White, R. (1943). The 'social climate' of children's groups. In R. G. Barker, J. Kounin, & H. Wright (Eds.), Child behavior and development (pp. 485-508). New York: McGraw-Hill.
42. Lord, R. G. (1977). Functional leadership behavior: Measurement and relations to social power and leadership perceptions. Administrative Science Quarterly, 22, 114-133.
43. Lord, R. G. (1985). An information processing approach to social perception, leadership and behavioral measurement in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 7, 87-128.
44. Lord, R. G., Foti, R., & De Vader, C. (1984). A test of leadership categorization theory: Internal structure, information processing and leadership perceptions. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 34, 343-378.
45. Mannix, E. A. (1993). Organizations as resource dilemmas: The effects of power balance on coalition formation in small groups. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 55, 1-22.
46. Moy, J., & Ng, S. H. (1996). Expectation of outgroup behavior: Can you trust the outgroup?European Journal of Social Psychology, 26, 333-340.
47. Mullen, B., Brown, R., & Smith, C. (1990). Ingroup bias as a function of salience, relevance and status: An integration. European Journal of Social Psychology, 22, 103-133.
48. Mullen, B., Salas, E., & Driskell, J. E. (1989). Slience, motivation, and artifact as contributions to the relation between participation rate and leadership. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 25, 545-559.
49. Ng, S. H. (1981). Equity theory and the allocation of rewards between groups. European Journal of Social Psychology, 11, 439-443.
50. Nye, J. L., & Forsyth, D. R. (1991). The effects of prototype-based biases on leadership appraisals: A test of leadership categorization theory. Small Group Research, 22360-379.
51. Oakes, P. J. (1987). The salience of social categories. In J. C. Turner, P.J. Oakes, S. D. Reicher, & M. S. Wetherell (Eds.), Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
52. Pavitt, C., & Sackaroff, P. (1990). Implicit theories of leadership and judgements of leadership among group members. Small Group Research, 21, 374-392.
53. Phillips, J. S., & Lord, R. G. (1981). Causal attributions and perceptions of leadership. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 28, 143-163.
54. Platow, M. J., Harley, K., Hunter, J. A., Hanning, P., Shave, R., & O'Connell, A. (1997). Interpreting ingroup-favouring allocations in the minimal group paradigm. British Journal of Social Psychology, 36, 107-118.
55. Platow, M. J., Hoar, S., Reid, S., Harley, K., & Morrison, D. (1997). Endorsement of distributively fair and unfair leaders in interpersonal and intergroup situations. European Journal of Social Psychology, 27, 465-494.
56. Platow, M. J., O'Connell, A., Shave, R., & Hanning, P. (1995). Social evaluations of fair and unfair allocators in interpersonal and intergroup situations. British Journal of Social Psychology, 34, 363-381.
57. Platow, M. J., Reid, S., & Andrew, S. (1998). Leadership endorsement: The role of distributive and procedural behavior in interpersonal and intergroup contexts. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 1, 35-47.
58. Rutte, C. G., & Wilke, H. A. M. (1984). Social dilemmas and leadership. European Journal of Social Psychology, 14, 105-121.
59. Salancik, G. R., & Pfeffer, J. (1974). The bases and uses of power in organizational decision making: The case of a university. Administrative Science Quarterly, 19, 453-473.
60. Samuelson, C. D. (1993). When do people want to change the rules for allocating shared resources? In D. Schroeder (Ed.), Social dilemmas: Social psychological perspectives. New York: Praeger.
61. Samuelson, C. D., & Messick, D. M. (1986). Alternative structural solutions to resource dilemmas. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 37, 139-155.
62. Samuelson, C. D., Messick, D. M., Wilke, H. A. M., & Rutte, C. G. (1986). Individual restraint and structural change as solutions to social dilemmas. In H. A. Wilke, D. M. Messick, & C. G. Rutte (Eds.), Psychology of decision and conflict: Experimental social dilemmas. Frankfurt: Verlag.
63. Schopler, J., & Insko, C. A. (1992). The discontinuity effect in interpersonal and intergroup relations: Generality and mediation. In W. Stroebe & M. Hewstone (Eds.), European Revieo of Social Psychology (Vol. 3, pp. 121-151). Chichester: Wiley.
64. Shaw, M. E. (1981). Group dynamics: The psychology of small group behavior. New York: McGraw-Hill.
65. Stogdill, R. (1974). Handbook of leadership. New York: Free Press.
66. Stroebe, W., & Frey, B. S. (1982). Self-interest and collective action: The economics and psychology of public goods. British Journal of Social Psychology, 21, 121-137.
67. Tajfel, H. (1970). Experiments in intergroup discrimination. Scientific American, 223, 96-102.
68. Tajfel, H., & Turmer, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (2nd ed., pp. 7-24). Chicago, IL: Nelson-Hall.
69. Taylor, D. M., & Jaggi, V. (1974). Ethnocentrism and causal attribution in a South Indian context. Journal of Cross Cultural Psychology, 5, 162-171.
70. Taylor, D. M., & Moghaddam, F. M. (1994). Theories of intergroup relations: International social psychological perspectives (2nd ed.). Westport, CT: Praeger.
71. Turner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S. D., & Wetherell, M. S. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
72. Turner, J. C., Oakes, P. J., Haslam, S. A., & McGarty, C. (1994). Self and collective: Cognition and social context. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20, 454-463.
73. Tyler, T. R. (1997). The psychology of legitimacy: A relational perspective on voluntary defence to authorities. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 1, 323-345.
74. Vanbeselaere, N. (1993). Ingroup bias in the minimal group situation: An experimental test of the inequity prevention hypothesis. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 14, 385-400.
75. Vivian, J. E., & Berkowitz, N. H. (1992). Anticipated bias from an outgroup: An attributional analysis. European Journal of Social Psychology, 22, 415-424.
76. Wit, A., & Wilke, H. A. M. (1988). Subordinates' endorsement of an allocating leader in a commons dilemma: An equity theoretical approach. Journal of Economic Psychology, 9, 151-168.
77. Yukl, G. (1981). Leadership in organizations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.