Cooperating When "You" and "I" Are Treated Fairly: The Moderating Role of Leader Prototypicality

Journal of Applied Psychology

Volumn 95, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 1121-1133

  De Cremer, David ^a   van Dijke, Marius ^a   Mayer, David M ^b  

^a ERASMUS UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

Author keywords

Cooperation; OCB; Others' procedural fairness; Procedural fairness; Prototypicality

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; COOPERATION; FEMALE; FORECASTING; GROUP PROCESS; HUMAN; LEADERSHIP; MALE; RANDOMIZATION; SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY; THEORETICAL MODEL; WORKPLACE;

ADULT; COOPERATIVE BEHAVIOR; FEMALE; FORECASTING; GROUP PROCESSES; HUMANS; LEADERSHIP; MALE; MODELS, THEORETICAL; RANDOM ALLOCATION; SOCIAL VALUES; WORKPLACE; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 78049469574     PISSN: 00219010     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0020419     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. Adams J.S. Inequity in social exchange. Advances in experimental social psychology 1965, 2:267-299. Academic Press, New York, NY. L. Berkowitz (Ed.).
2. Aiken L.S., West S.G. Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions 1991, Sage, New York, NY.
3. Blader S., Tyler T. Testing and extending the group engagement model: Linkages between social identity, procedural justice, economic outcomes, and extrarole behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology 2009, 94:445-464.
4. Bolino M.C. Citizenship and impression management: Good soldiers or good actors?. Academy of Management Review 1999, 24:82-98.
5. Bolino M.C., Turnley W.H. The personal costs of citizenship behavior: The relationship between individual initiative and role overload, job stress, and work-family conflict. Journal of Applied Psychology 2005, 90:740-748.
6. Cohen-Charash Y., Spector P.E. The role of justice in organizations: A meta-analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 2001, 86:278-321.
7. Colquitt J.A. On the dimensionality of organizational justice: A construct validation of a measure. Journal of Applied Psychology 2001, 86:386-400.
8. Colquitt J.A. Does the justice of the one interact with the justice of the many? Reactions to procedural justice in teams. Journal of Applied Psychology 2004, 89:633-646.
9. Crosby F. A model of egoistical relative deprivation. Psychological Review 1976, 83:85-113.
10. Dawson J.F., Richter A.W. Probing three-way interactions in moderated multiple regression: Development and application of a slope difference test. Journal of Applied Psychology 2006, 91:917-926.
11. De Cremer D., Stinglhamber F., Eisenberger R. Effects of own versus other's fair treatment on positive emotions: A field study. Journal of Social Psychology 2005, 145:741-744.
12. De Cremer D., Tyler T.R. Managing group behavior: The interplay between procedural justice, sense of self, and cooperation. Advances in experimental social psychology 2005, 37:151-218. Academic Press, San Diego, CA. M.P. Zanna (Ed.).
13. Degoey P. Contagious justice: Exploring the social construction of justice in organizations. Research in organizational behavior 2000, 22:51-102. JAI Press, Greenwich, CT. B.M. Staw, L.L. Cummings (Eds.).
14. Den Hartog D.N., Van Muijen J.J., Koopman P.L. Transactional versus transformational leadership: An analysis of the MLQ. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology 1997, 70:19-34.
15. Derlaga V.J., Grzelak J. Cooperation and helping behavior 1982, Academic Press, New York, NY.
16. Deutsch M. Distributive justice: A social psychological perspective 1985, Yale University Press, New Haven, CT.
17. Edwards J.R. Seven deadly myths of testing moderation in organizational research. Statistical and methodological myths and urban legends: Received doctrine, verity, and fable in the organizational and social sciences 2008, 145-166. Routledge, New York, NY. C.E. Lance, R.J. Vandenberg (Eds.).
18. Ensher E.A., Murphy S.E. Effects of race, gender, perceived similarity, and contact on mentor relationships. Journal of Vocational Behavior 1997, 50:460-481.
19. Epitropaki O., Martin R. The impact of relational demography on the quality of leader-member exchanges and employees' work attitudes and well-being. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology 1999, 72:237-240.
20. Evans M.G. A Monte Carlo study of the effects of correlated method variance in moderated multiple regression analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 1985, 36:305-323.
21. Fielding K.S., Hogg M.A. Social identity, self-categorization, and leadership: A field study of small interactive groups. Group Dynamics 1997, 1:39-51.
22. Giessner S.R., van Knippenberg D. " License to fail": Goal definition, leader group prototypicality, and perceptions of leadership effectiveness after leader failure. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 2008, 105:14-35.
23. Grant A.M., Mayer D.M. Good soldiers and good actors: Prosocial and impression management motives as interactive predictors of affiliative citizenship behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology 2009, 94:900-912.
24. Hains S.C., Hogg M.A., Duck J.M. Self-categorization and leadership: Effects of group prototypicality and leader stereotypicality. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 1997, 23:1087-1100.
25. Harrison D.A., Price K.H., Bell M.P. Beyond relational demography: Time and the effects of surface- and deep-level diversity on work group cohesion. Academy of Management Journal 1998, 41:96-107.
26. Hogan R., Curphy G.J., Hogan J. What we know about leadership: Effectiveness and personality. American Psychologist 1994, 49:493-504.
27. Hogg M.A. Subjective uncertainty reduction through self-categorization: A motivational theory of social identity processes. European review of social psychology 2001, 11:223-256. Wiley, New York, NY. W. Stroebe, M. Hewstone (Eds.).
28. Hogg M.A., van Knippenberg D. Social identity and leadership processes in groups. Advances in experimental social psychology 2003, 35:1-52. Academic Press, San Diego, CA. M.P. Zanna (Ed.).
29. Jones D.A., Skarlicki D.P. The effects of overhearing peers discuss an authority's fairness reputation on reactions to subsequent treatment. Journal of Applied Psychology 2005, 90:363-372.
30. Kray L.J., Lind E.A. The injustices of others: Social reports and the integration of others' experiences in organizational justice judgments. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 2002, 89:906-924.
31. Lee K., Allen N.J. Organizational citizenship behavior and workplace deviance: The role of affect and cognitions. Journal of Applied Psychology 2002, 87:131-142.
32. Liden R.C., Erdogan B., Wayne S.J., Sparrowe R.T. Leader-member exchange, differentiation, and task interdependence: Implications for individual and group performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior 2006, 27:723-746.
33. Lind E.A., Kray L., Thompson L. The social construction of injustice: Fairness judgments in response to own and others' unfair treatment by authorities. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 2001, 75:1-22.
34. Lind E.A., Tyler T.R. The social psychology of procedural justice 1988, Plenum Press, New York, NY.
35. Lipponen J., Koivisto S., Olkkonen M.E. Procedural justice and status judgments: The moderating role of leader ingroup prototypicality. Leadership Quarterly 2005, 16:517-528.
36. Moorman R.H., Blakely G.L. Individualism-collectivism as an individual difference predictor of organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior 1995, 16:127-142.
37. Platow M.J., Reid S., Andrew S. Leadership endorsement: The role of distributive and procedural behavior in interpersonal and intergroup contexts. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations 1998, 1:35-47.
38. Platow M.J., van Knippenberg D. A social identity analysis of leadership endorsement: The effects of leader ingroup prototypicality and distributive intergroup fairness. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 2001, 27:1508-1519.
39. Podsakoff P.M., Ahearne M., MacKenzie S.B. Organizational citizenship behavior and the quantity and quality of work group performance. Journal of Applied Psychology 1997, 82:262-270.
40. Reicher S., Hopkins N. Seeking influence through characterizing self-categories: An analysis of anti-abortionist rhetoric. British Journal of Social Psychology 1996, 35:297-312.
41. Scandura T., Graen G.B. Moderating effects of initial leader-member exchange status on the effects of leadership intervention. Journal of Applied Psychology 1984, 69:428-436.
42. Shamir B., House R.J., Arthur M.B. The motivational effects of charismatic leadership: A self-concept based concept. Organizational Science 1993, 4:577-594.
43. Simon B., Lücken M., Stürmer S. The added value of respect: Reaching across inequality. British Journal of Social Psychology 2006, 45:535-546.
44. Skarlicki D.P., Folger R. Retaliation in the workplace: The roles of distributive, procedural, and interactional justice. Journal of Applied Psychology 1997, 82:434-443.
45. Smith K.G., Carroll S.J., Ashford S.J. Intra- and interorganizational cooperation: Toward a research agenda. Academy of Management Journal 1995, 38:7-23.
46. Stroebe K., Lodewijkx H.F.M., Spears R. Do unto others as they do unto you: Reciprocity and social identification as determinants of ingroup favoritism. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 2005, 31:831-845.
47. Tajfel H., Turner J.C. The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. Psychology of intergroup relations 1986, 7-24. Nelson Hall, Chicago, IL. S. Worchel, W.G. Austin (Eds.).
48. Tsui A.S., Porter L.W., Egan T.D. When both similarities and dissimilarities matter: Extending the concept of relational demography. Human Relations 2002, 55:899-929.
49. Turner J.C., Hogg M.A., Oakes P.J., Reicher S.D., Wetherell M.S. Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory 1987, Blackwell, New York, NY.
50. Tyler T.R. Why people cooperate with organizations: An identity-based perspective. Research in organizational behavior 1999, 21:201-246. JAI Press, Greenwich, CT. R.I. Sutton, B.M. Staw (Eds.).
51. Tyler T.R., Blader S.L. Autonomous vs. comparative status: Must we be better than others to feel good about ourselves?. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 2002, 89:813-838.
52. Tyler T.R., Blader S.L. The group engagement model: Procedural justice, social identity, and cooperative behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Review 2003, 7:349-361.
53. Tyler T.R., Degoey P. Collective restraint in social dilemmas: Procedural justice and social identification effects on support for authorities. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1995, 69:482-497.
54. Tyler T.R., Lind E.A. A relational model of authority in groups. Advances in experimental social psychology 1992, 25:115-191. Academic Press, San Diego, CA. M.P. Zanna (Ed.).
55. Ullrich J., Christ O., van Dick R. Substitutes for procedural fairness: Prototypical leaders are endorsed whether they are fair or not. Journal of Applied Psychology 2009, 94:235-244.
56. Valeyre A., Lorenz E., Cartron D., Csizmadia P., Gollac M., Illéssy M., Makó C. Working conditions in the European Union: Work organization 2009, Retrieved from http://www.eurofound.europa.eu/publications/htmlfiles/ef0862.htm.
57. van den Bos K., Lind E.A. The psychology of own versus others' treatment: Self-oriented and other-oriented effects on perceptions of procedural justice. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 2001, 27:1324-1333.
58. van Dijke M.H., De Cremer D. How leader prototypicality influences followers' status: The role of procedural fairness. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology 2008, 17:226-250.
59. van Dijke M.H., De Cremer D. Procedural fairness and endorsement of prototypical leaders: Leader benevolence or follower control?. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 2010, 46:85-96.
60. Van Dyne L., Cummings L.L., McLean Parks J.M. Extra-role behaviors: In pursuit of construct and definitional clarity (A bridge over muddied waters). Research in organizational behavior 1995, 17:215-285. JAI Press, Greenwich, CT. L.L. Cummings, B.M. Staw (Eds.).
61. van Knippenberg B., van Knippenberg D. Leader self-sacrifice and leadership effectiveness: The moderating role of leader prototypicality. Journal of Applied Psychology 2005, 90:25-37.
62. van Knippenberg D., De Cremer D., van Knippenberg B. Leadership and fairness: The state of the art. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology 2007, 16:113-140.
63. van Knippenberg D., Hogg M.A. A social identity model of leadership effectiveness in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior 2003, 25:243-296.
64. van Knippenberg D., van Knippenberg B., van Dijk E. Who takes the lead in risky decision making? Effects of ingroup members' individual riskiness, and prototypicality. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 2000, 83:213-234.