The case against the case against recasts

Studies in Second Language Acquisition

Volumn 35, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 127-165

  Goo, Jaemyung ^a   MacKey, Alison ^b  

^a Gwangju National University of Education   (South Korea)

^b GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84870522292     PISSN: 02722631     EISSN: 14701545     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0272263112000708     Document Type: Article

References (135)

1. Ammar, A. (2008). Prompts and recasts: Differential effects on second language morphosyntax. Language Teaching Research, 12, 183-210.
2. Ammar, A., & Spada, N. (2006). One size fi ts all? Recasts, prompts, and L2 learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28, 543-574.
3. Ayoun, D. (2001). The role of negative and positive feedback in the second language acquisition of the passé composé and imparfait. Modern Language Journal, 85, 226-243. (Pubitemid 33778028)
4. Baker, N. D., & Nelson, K. E. (1984). Recasting and related conversational techniques for triggering syntactic advances by young children. First Language, 5, 3-22.
5. Bohannon, J. N., & Stanowicz, L. (1988). The issue of negative evidence: Adult responses to children's language errors. Developmental Psychology, 24, 684-689.
6. Braidi, S. M. (2002). Reexamining the role of recasts in native-speaker/nonnative-speaker interactions. Language Learning, 52, 1-42.
7. Carpenter, H., Jeon, K.-S., MacGregor, D., & Mackey, A. (2006). Learners' interpretations of recasts. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28, 209-236. (Pubitemid 43615573)
8. Chapelle, C. (Ed.). (2012). The encyclopedia of applied linguistics. Oxford: Blackwell.
9. de Graaff, R., & Housen, A. (2009). Investigating the effects and effectiveness of L2 instruction. In M. H. Long & C. J. Doughty (Eds.), The handbook of language teaching (pp. 726-755). Oxford: Blackwell.
10. DeKeyser, R. M. (2005). What makes learning second-language grammar diffi cult? A review of issues. Language Learning, 55, 1-25.
11. Dilans, G. (2010). Corrective feedback and L2 vocabulary development: Prompts and recasts in the adult ESL classroom. Canadian Modern Language Review, 66, 787-815.
12. Dörnyei, Z. (2005). The psychology of the language learner: Individual differences in second language acquisition. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
13. Dörnyei, Z. (2009). Psychology of second language acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
14. Dörnyei, Z., & Skehan, P. (2003). Individual differences in second language learning. In C. J. Doughty & M. H. Long (Eds.), The handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 589-630). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
15. Doughty, C. J. (2001). Cognitive underpinnings of focus on form. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 206-257). New York: Cambridge University Press.
16. Doughty, C. J., & Varela, E. (1998). Communicative focus on form. In C. J. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 114-138). New York: Cambridge University Press.
17. Egi, T. (2007 a). Interpreting recasts as linguistic evidence: The roles of linguistic target, length, and degree of change. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 29, 511-537.
18. Egi, T. (2007 b). Recasts, learners' interpretations, and L2 development. In A. Mackey (Ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition: A collection of empirical studies (pp. 249-267). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
19. Egi, T. (2010). Uptake, modifi ed output, and learner perceptions of recasts: Learner responses as language awareness. Modern Language Journal, 94, 1-21.
20. Ellis, R. (2004). Individual differences in second language learning. In A. Davies & C. Elder (Eds.), The handbook of applied linguistics (pp. 525-551). Oxford: Blackwell.
21. Ellis, R. (2007). The differential effects of corrective feedback on two grammatical structures. In A. Mackey (Ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition: A collection of empirical studies (pp. 339-360). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
22. Ellis, R., Basturkmen, H., & Loewen, S. (2001). Learner uptake in communicative ESL lessons. Language Learning, 51, 281-318.
23. Ellis, R., Loewen, S., & Erlam, R. (2006). Implicit and explicit corrective feedback and the acquisition of L2 grammar. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28, 339-368. (Pubitemid 43615577)
24. Ellis, R., & Sheen, Y. (2006). Reexamining the role of recasts in second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28, 575-600.
25. Erlam, R., & Loewen, S. (2010). Implicit and explicit recasts in L2 oral French interaction. Canadian Modern Language Review, 66, 877-905.
26. Farrar, M. J. (1992). Negative evidence and grammatical morpheme acquisition. Developmental Psychology, 28, 90-98.
27. Gass, S. M. (1997). Input, interaction, and the second language learner. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
28. Gass, S. M. (2003). Input and interaction. In C. J. Doughty & M. H. Long (Eds.), The handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 224-255). Oxford: Blackwell.
29. Gass, S. M., & Mackey, A. (2006). Input, interaction and output: An overview. AILA Review, 19, 3-17.
30. Gass, S. M., & Mackey, A. (2007). Input, interaction, and output in second language acquisition. In B. VanPatten & J. Williams (Eds.), Theories in second language acquisition: An Introduction (pp. 175-199). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
31. Gass, S. M., & Mackey, A. (2012). The Routledge handbook of second language acquisition. London: Routledge.
32. Goo, J. (2012). Corrective feedback and working memory capacity in interaction-driven L2 learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 34, 445-474.
33. Gordon, P. (1990). Learnability and feedback. Developmental Psychology, 26, 217-220.
34. Grimshaw, J., & Pinker, S. (1989). Positive and negative evidence in language acquisition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 12, 341-342.
35. Han, Z. (2002). A study of the impact of recasts on tense consistency in L2 output. TESOL Quarterly, 36, 543-572.
36. Hinkel, E. (Ed.). (2011). Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (Vol. 2). London: Routledge.
37. Hulstijn, J. H. (2012). Is the second language acquisition discipline disintegrating? Language Teaching. Advance online publication. doi:10.1017/S0261444811000620.
38. Ishida, M. (2004). Effects of recasts on the acquisition of the aspectual form-te i-(ru) by learners of Japanese as a foreign language. Language Learning, 54, 311-394. (Pubitemid 38846208)
39. Iwashita, N. (2003). Negative feedback and positive evidence in task-based interaction: Differential effects on L2 development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 25, 1-36.
40. Keck, C. M., Iberri-Shea, G., Tracy-Ventura, N., & Wa-Mbaleka, S. (2006). Investigating the empirical link between task-based interaction and acquisition: A meta-analysis. In J. M. Norris & L. Ortega (Eds.), Synthesizing research on language learning and teaching (pp. 91-131). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
41. Krashen, S. (1982). Principles and practice in second language acquisition. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
42. Krashen, S. (1985). The input hypothesis. London: Longman.
43. Lai, C., Fei, F., & Roots, R. (2008). The contingency of recasts and noticing. CALICO Journal, 26, 70-90.
44. Leeman, J. (2003). Recasts and second language development: Beyond negative evidence. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 25, 37-63.
45. Li, S. (2010). The effectiveness of corrective feedback in SLA: A meta-analysis. Language Learning, 60, 309-365.
46. Loewen, S. (2009). Recasts in multiple response focus on form episodes. In A. Mackey & C. Polio (Eds.), Multiple perspectives on interaction (pp. 176-196). London: Routledge.
47. Loewen, S., & Erlam, R. (2006). Corrective feedback in the chatroom: An experimental study. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 19, 1-14. (Pubitemid 44100577)
48. Loewen, S., & Nabei, T. (2007). Measuring the effects of oral corrective feedback on L2 knowledge. In A. Mackey (Ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition: A collection of empirical studies (pp. 361-377). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
49. Loewen, S., & Philp, J. (2006). Recasts in the adult English L2 classroom: Characteristics, explicitness, and effectiveness. Modern Language Journal, 90, 536-556. (Pubitemid 44782662)
50. Long, M. H. (1996). The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In W. C. Ritchie & T. K. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 413-468). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
51. Long, M. H. (2007). Problems in SLA. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
52. Long, M. H., Inagaki, S., & Ortega, L. (1998). The role of implicit negative feedback in SLA: Models and recasts in Japanese and Spanish. Modern Language Journal, 82, 357-371. (Pubitemid 128770154)
53. Long, M. H., & Robinson, P. (1998). Focus on form: Theory, research, process. In C. J. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 15-41). New York: Cambridge University Press.
54. Lyster, R. (1998 a). Negotiation of form, recasts, and explicit correction in relation to error types and learner repair in immersion classrooms. Language Learning, 48, 183-218.
55. Lyster, R. (1998 b). Recasts, repetition, and ambiguity in L2 classroom discourse. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 20, 51-81.
56. Lyster, R. (2004). Differential effects of prompts and recasts in form-focused instruction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26, 399-432.
57. Lyster, R., & Izquierdo, J. (2009). Prompts versus recasts in dyadic interaction. Language Learning, 59, 453-498.
58. Lyster, R., & Mori, H. (2006). Interaction feedback and instructional counterbalance. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28, 269-300.
59. Lyster, R., & Ranta, L. (1997). Corrective feedback and learner uptake. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19, 37-66.
60. Lyster, R., & Saito, K. (2010). Oral feedback in classroom SLA: A meta-analysis. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32, 265-302.
61. Mackey, A. (2007). Interaction as practice. In R. M. DeKeyser (Ed.), Practice in a second language: Perspectives from applied linguistics and cognitive psychology (pp. 85-110). New York: Cambridge University Press.
62. Mackey, A. (2012). Input, interaction and corrective feedback in L2 learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
63. Mackey, A., Abbuhl, R., & Gass, S. M. (2012). The interaction approach. In S. M. Gass & A. Mackey (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 7-23). London: Routledge.
64. Mackey, A., Gass, S. M., & McDonough, K. (2000). How do learners perceive interactional feedback? Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 22, 471-497.
65. Mackey, A., & Goo, J. (2007). Interaction research in SLA: A meta-analysis and research synthesis. In A. Mackey (Ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition: A collection of empirical studies (pp. 407-452). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
66. Mackey, A., & Goo, J. (in press). Interaction approach in second language acquisition. In C. A. Chapelle (Ed.), The encyclopedia of applied linguistics. Oxford: Blackwell.
67. Mackey, A., Oliver, R., & Leeman, J. (2003). Interactional input and incorporation of feedback: An exploration of NS-NNS and NNS-NNS adult and child dyads. Language Learning, 53, 35-66. (Pubitemid 36820403)
68. Mackey, A., & Philp, J. (1998). Conversational interaction and second language development: Recasts, responses, and red herrings? Modern Language Journal, 82, 338-356. (Pubitemid 128770153)
69. Mackey, A., Philp, J., Egi, T., Fujii, A., & Tatsumi, T. (2002). Individual differences in working memory, noticing of interactional feedback and L2 development. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Individual differences and instructed language learning (pp. 181-209). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
70. McDonough, K. (2005). Identifying the impact of negative feedback and learners' responses on ESL question development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27, 79-103. (Pubitemid 43298389)
71. McDonough, K. (2007). Interactional feedback and the emergence of simple past activity verbs in L2 English. In A. Mackey (Ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition: A collection of empirical studies (pp. 323-338). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
72. McDonough, K., & Mackey, A. (2006). Responses to recasts: Repetitions, primed production, and linguistic development. Language Learning, 56, 693-720. (Pubitemid 44684081)
73. Morgan, J. L., Bonamo, K. M., & Travis, L. L. (1995). Negative evidence on negative evidence. Developmental Psychology, 31, 180-197.
74. Nassaji, H. (2009). Effects of recasts and elicitations in dyadic interaction and the role of feedback explicitness. Language Learning, 59, 411-452.
75. Nicholas, H., Lightbown, P. M., & Spada, N. (2001). Recasts as feedback to language learners. Language Learning, 51, 719-758.
76. Nobuyoshi, J., & Ellis, R. (1993). Focused communication tasks and second language acquisition. ELT Journal, 47, 203-210.
77. Ohta, A. S. (2000). Rethinking recasts: A learner-centered examination of corrective feedback in the Japanese language classroom. In J. K. Hall & L. S. Verplaeste (Eds.), The construction of second and foreign language learning through classroom instruction (pp. 47-71). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
78. Oliver, R. (1995). Negative feedback in child NS-NNS conversation. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 17, 459-481.
79. Oliver, R. (1998). Negotiation of meaning in child interactions. Modern Language Journal, 82, 372-386.
80. Oliver, R. (2000). Age differences in negotiation and feedback in classroom and pairwork. Language Learning, 50, 119-151.
81. Oliver, R., & Mackey, A. (2003). Interactional context and feedback in child ESL classrooms. Modern Language Journal, 87, 519-533.
82. Ortega, L., & Long, M. H. (1997). The effects of models and recasts on the acquisition of object topicalization and adverb placement in L2 Spanish. Spanish Applied Linguistics, 1, 65-86.
83. Panova, I., & Lyster, R. (2002). Patterns of corrective feedback and uptake in an adult ESL classroom. TESOL Quarterly, 36, 573-595.
84. Petersen, K. A. (2010). Implicit corrective feedback in computer-guided interaction: Does mode matter? (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Georgetown University, Washington, DC.
85. Philp, J. (2003). Constraints on noticing the gap: Nonnative speakers' noticing of recasts in NS-NNS interaction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 25, 99-126.
86. Philp, J., & Mackey, A. (2010). Interaction research: What can socially informed approaches offer to cognitivists (and vice versa) ? In R. Batstone (Ed.), Sociocognitive perspectives on language use and language learning (pp. 210-224). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
87. Pica, T. (1994). Research on negotiation: What does it reveal about second-language learning conditions, processes, and outcomes? Language Learning, 44, 493-527.
88. Pica, T. (1996). Do second language learners need negotiation? International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 34, 1-21.
89. Pienemann, M., & Johnston, M. (1987). Factors infl uencing the development of language profi ciency. In D. Nunan (Ed.), Applying second language acquisition research (pp. 45-141). Adelaide, Australia: National Curriculum Resource Centre, AMEP.
90. Pinker, S. (1989). Learnability and cognition: The acquisition of argument structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
91. Révész, A. (2009). Task complexity, focus on form, and second language development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 31, 437-470.
92. Révész, A., & Han, Z. (2006). Task content familiarity, task type, and effi cacy of recasts. Language Awareness, 15, 160-179.
93. Révész, A., Sachs, R., & Mackey, A. (2011). Task complexity, uptake of recasts, and second language development. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Second language task complexity: Researching the cognition hypothesis of language learning and performance (pp. 203-235). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
94. Robinson, P. (Ed.). (2002). Individual differences and instructed language learning. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
95. Robinson, P. (2005). Aptitude and second language acquisition. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 25, 46-73. (Pubitemid 40938078)
96. Robinson, P. (2007). Aptitudes, abilities, contexts, and practice. In R. M. DeKeyser (Ed.), Practice in a second language: Perspectives from applied linguistics and cognitive psychology (pp. 256-286). New York: Cambridge University Press.
97. Robinson, P., Mackey, A., Gass, S. M., & Schmidt, R. (2012). Attention and awareness in second language acquisition. In S. M. Gass & A. Mackey (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 247-267). London: Routledge.
98. Romanova, N. (2010). Planning, recasts, and learning of L2 morphology. Canadian Modern Language Review, 66, 843-875.
99. Ross-Feldman, L. (2007). Interaction in the L2 classroom: Does gender infl uence learning opportunities? In A. Mackey (Ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition: A collection of empirical studies (pp. 53-77). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
100. Russell, J., & Spada, N. (2006). The effectiveness of corrective feedback for the acquisition of L2 grammar: A meta-analysis of the research. In J. Norris & L. Ortega (Eds.), Synthesizing research on language learning and teaching (pp. 133-164). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
101. Sachs, R., & Suh, B.-R. (2007). Textually enhanced recasts, learner awareness, and L2 outcomes in synchronous computer-mediated interaction. In A. Mackey (Ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition: A collection of empirical studies (pp. 197-227). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
102. Sagarra, N. (2007). From CALL to face-to-face interaction: The effect of computer-delivered recasts and working memory on L2 development. In A. Mackey (Ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition: A collection of empirical studies (pp. 229-248). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
103. Saito, K., & Lyster, R. (2012). Effects of form-focused instruction and corrective feedback on L2 pronunciation development of/?/by Japanese learners of English. Language Learning, 62, 595-633.
104. Sato, M., & Lyster, R. (2007). Modifi ed output of Japanese EFL learners: Variable effects of interlocutor vs. feedback types. In A. Mackey (Ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition: A collection of empirical studies (pp. 123-142). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
105. Sauro, S. (2009). Computer-mediated corrective feedback and the development of L2 grammar. Language Learning and Technology, 13, 96-120.
106. Sawyer, M., & Ranta, L. (2001). Aptitude, individual differences, and instructional design. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 319-353). New York: Cambridge University Press.
107. Saxton, M. (1997). The contrast theory of negative input. Journal of Child Language, 24, 139-161. (Pubitemid 127359935)
108. Saxton, M., Backley, P., & Gallaway, C. (2005). Negative input for grammatical errors: Effects after a lag of 12 weeks. Journal of Child Language, 32, 643-672. (Pubitemid 43316936)
109. Saxton, M., Kulcsar, B., Marshall, G., & Rupra, M. (1998). Longer-term effects of corrective input: An experimental approach. Journal of Child Language, 25, 701-721. (Pubitemid 128366346)
110. Schmidt, R. (1990). The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 11, 129-158.
111. Schmidt, R. (1993). Consciousness, learning, and interlanguage pragmatics. In G. Kasper & S. Blum-Kulka (Eds.), Interlanguage pragmatics (pp. 21-42). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
112. Schmidt, R. (1995). Consciousness and foreign language learning: A tutorial on the role of attention and awareness in learning. In R. Schmidt (Ed.), Attention and awareness in foreign language learning (pp. 1-63). Honolulu: University of Hawai'i Press.
113. Schmidt, R. (2001). Attention. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 3-32). New York: Cambridge University Press.
114. Schmidt, R., & Frota, S. (1986). Developing basic conversational ability in a second language: A case study of an adult learner of Portuguese. In R. Day (Ed.), Talking to learn: Conversation in second language acquisition (pp. 237-322). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
115. Sheen, Y. (2004). Corrective feedback and learner uptake in communicative classrooms across instructional settings. Language Teaching Research, 8, 263-300.
116. Sheen, Y. (2006). Exploring the relationship between characteristics of recasts and learner uptake. Language Teaching Research, 10, 361-392.
117. Sheen, Y. (2007 a). The effect of focused written corrective feedback and language aptitude on ESL learners' acquisition of articles. TESOL Quarterly, 41, 255-283.
118. Sheen, Y. (2007 b). The effects of corrective feedback, language aptitude, and learner attitudes on the acquisition of English articles. In A. Mackey (Ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition: A collection of empirical studies (pp. 301-322). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
119. Sheen, Y. (2008). Recasts, language anxiety, modifi ed output, and L2 learning. Language Learning, 58, 835-874.
120. Sheen, Y. (2010). Differential effects of oral and written corrective feedback in the ESL classroom. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32, 203-234.
121. Shintani, N., & Ellis, R. (2010). The incidental acquisition of English plural-s by Japanese children in comprehension-based and production-based lessons: A process-product study. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32, 607-637.
122. Skehan, P. (2002). Theorising and updating aptitude. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Individual differences and instructed language learning (pp. 69-93). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
123. Smith, B. (2010). Employing eye-tracking technology in researching the effectiveness of recasts in CMC. In F. M. Hult (Ed.), Directions and prospects for educational linguistics (pp. 79-97). New York: Springer Verlag.
124. Smith, B., & Renaud, C. (in press). Eyetracking and classroom interaction. In K. McDonough & A. Mackey (Eds.), New perspectives on classroom interaction in second language research. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
125. Spada, N. (2011). Beyond form-focused instruction: Refl ections on past, present and future research. Language Teaching, 44, 225-236.
126. Spada, N., & Lightbown, P. M. (2008). Form-focused instruction: Isolated or integrated? TESOL Quarterly, 42, 181-207.
127. Spada, N., & Lightbown, P. M. (2009). Interaction research in second/foreign language classrooms. In A. Mackey & C. Polio (Eds.), Multiple perspectives on interaction (pp. 157-175). London: Routledge.
128. Swain, M. (1985). Communicative competence: Some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development. In S. M. Gass & C. Madden (Eds.), Input in second language acquisition (pp. 235-253). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
129. Swain, M. (1993). The output hypothesis: Just speaking and writing aren't enough. Canadian Modern Language Review, 50, 158-164.
130. Swain, M. (1995). Three functions of output in second language learning. In G. Cook & B. Seidlhofer (Eds.), Principle and practice in applied linguistics: Studies in honour of H. G. Widdowson (pp. 125-144). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
131. Swain, M. (2005). The output hypothesis: Theory and research. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (pp. 471-483). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
132. Takashima, H., & Ellis, R. (1999). Output enhancement and the acquisition of the past tense. In R. Ellis (Ed.), Learning a second language through interaction (pp. 173-188). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
133. Trofi movich, P., Ammar, A., & Gatbonton, E. (2007). How effective are recasts? The role of attention, memory, and analytical ability. In A. Mackey (Ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition: A collection of empirical studies (pp. 171-195). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
134. Varnosfadrani, A. D., & Basturkmen, H. (2009). The effectiveness of implicit and explicit error correction on learners' performance. System, 37, 82-98.
135. Yang, Y., & Lyster, R. (2010). Effects of form-focused practice and feedback on Chinese EFL learners' acquisition of regular and irregular past tense forms. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32, 235-263.