Task complexity, focus on form, and second language development

Studies in Second Language Acquisition

Volumn 31, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 437-470

  Révész, Andrea ^a  

^a LANCASTER UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 71749084223     PISSN: 02722631     EISSN: 14701545     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0272263109090366     Document Type: Article

References (68)

1. Bardovi-Harlig, K. (2000). Tense and aspect in second language acquisition: Form, meaning, and use. Oxford: Blackwell.
2. Bygate, M. (1996). Effects of task repetition: Appraising the developing language of learners. In J. Willis & D. Willis (Eds.), Challenge and change in language teaching (pp. 136-146). London: Heinemann.
3. Bygate, M., Skehan, P., & Swain, M. (Eds.). (2001). Researching pedagogic tasks, second language learning, teaching and testing. London: Longman.
4. DeKeyser, R. (1998). Beyond focus on form: Cognitive perspectives on learning and practicing second language grammar. In C. J. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 42-63). New York: Cambridge University Press.
5. Doughty, C. J. (2001). Cognitive underpinnings of focus on form. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 206-257). New York: Cambridge University Press.
6. Doughty, C. J. (2003). Instructed SLA: Constraints, compensation, and enhancement. In C. J. Doughty & M. H. Long (Eds.), The handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 256-310). Oxford: Blackwell.
7. Doughty, C. J., & Varela, E. (1998). Communicative focus on form. In C. J. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 114-138). New York: Cambridge University Press.
8. Doughty, C. J., & Williams, J. (1998). Pedagogical choices in focus on form. In C. J. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 197-261). New York: Cambridge University Press.
9. Ellis, R. (1995). Interpretation tasks for grammar teaching. TESOL Quarterly, 29, 87-103.
10. Ellis, R. (2003). Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
11. Ellis, R. (Ed.). (2005). Planning and task performance in a second language. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
12. Ellis, R., Basturkmen, H., & Loewen, S. (2001). Learner uptake in communicative ESL lessons. Language Learning, 51, 281-318.
13. Ellis, R., & Sheen, Y. (2006). Reexamining the role of recasts in second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28, 575-600.
14. Gass, S. M. (1997). Input, interaction and the development of second languages. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
15. Gass, S. M., Mackey, A., Fernandez, M., & Alvarez-Torres, M. (1999). The effects of task repetition on linguistic output. Language Learning, 49, 549-580.
16. Gass, S. M., Mackey, A., & Ross-Feldman, L. (2005). Task-based interactions in classroom and laboratory settings. Language Learning, 55, 575-611.
17. Gilabert, R. (2007). The simultaneous manipulation of task complexity along the planning time and +/- here-and-now dimensions: Effects on L2 oral production. In M. del Pilar García-Mayo (Ed.), Investigating tasks in formal language learning (pp. 44-68). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
18. Goldschneider, J., & DeKeyser, R. (2001). Explaining the "natural order of L2 morpheme acquisition" in English: A meta-analysis of multiple determinants. Language Learning, 51, 1-50.
19. Han, Z. (2002). A study of the impact of recasts on tense consistency in L2 output. TESOL Quarterly, 36, 543-572.
20. Ishikawa, T. (2007). The effect of manipulating task complexity along the (+/- here-and-now) dimension on L2 written narrative discourse. In M. del Pilar García-Mayo (Ed.), Investigating tasks in formal language learning (pp. 136-156). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
21. Iwashita, N., Elder, C., & McNamara, T. (2001). Can we predict task diffi culty in an oral profi ciency test? Exploring the potential of an information-processing approach to task design. Language Learning, 51, 401-436.
22. Jeon, K. S. (2007). Interaction-driven L2 learning: Characterizing linguistic development. In A. Mackey (Ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition: A series of empirical studies (pp. 379-403). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
23. Kim, J. H., & Han, Z. (2007). Recasts in communicative EFL classes: Do teacher intent and learner interpretation overlap? In A. Mackey (Ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition: A series of empirical studies (pp. 269-297). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
24. Kormos, J. (2000). The role of attention in monitoring second language speech production. Language Learning, 50, 343-384.
25. Lin, Y. H., & Hedgcock, J. (1996). Negative feedback incorporation among high-profi ciency and low-profi ciency Chinese-speaking learners of Spanish. Language Learning, 46, 567-611.
26. Linacre, J. M. (1989). Many-facet Rasch measurement. Chicago: MESA Press.
27. Linacre, J. M. (2006). Facets (Version 3.61) [Computer program]. Chicago: MESA Press.
28. Loewen, S. (2004). Uptake in incidental focus on form in meaning-focused ESL lessons. Language Learning, 54, 153-188.
29. Loewen, S. (2005). Incidental focus on form and second language learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27, 361-386.
30. Loewen, S., & Philp, J. (2006). Recasts in the adult L2 classroom: Characteristics, explicitness and effectiveness. Modern Language Journal, 90, 536-556.
31. Long, M. H. (2000). Focus on form in task-based language teaching. In R. Lambert & E. Shohamy (Eds.), Language policy and pedagogy: Essays in honor of A. Ronald Walton (pp. 179-192). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
32. Long, M. H. (2007). Recasts: The story so far. In M. H. Long (Ed.), Problems in SLA (pp. 75-116). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
33. Long, M. H., & Crookes, G. (1992). Three approaches to task-based syllabus design. TESOL Quarterly, 24, 27-56.
34. Long, M. H., Inagaki, S., & Ortega, L. (1998). The role of implicit negative evidence in SLA: Models and recasts in Japanese and Spanish. Modern Language Journal, 82, 357-371.
35. Long, M. H., & Robinson, P. (1998). Focus on form: Theory, research, and practice. In C. J. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in second language acquisition (pp. 15-41). New York: Cambridge University Press.
36. Lyster, R. (1998). Recasts, repetition, and ambiguity in L2 classroom discourse. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 20, 51-81.
37. Lyster, R., & Mori, H. (2006). Interactional feedback and instructional counterbalance. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28, 321-341.
38. Mackey, A. (1999). Input, interaction, and second language development: An empirical study of question formation in ESL. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21, 557-587.
39. Mackey, A., & Goo, J. (2007). Interaction research in SLA: A meta-analysis and research synthesis. In A. Mackey (Ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition: A series of empirical studies (pp. 407-452). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
40. Mackey, A., Oliver, R., & Leeman, J. (2003). Interactional input and the incorporation of feedback: An exploration of NS-NNS and NNS-NNS adult and child dyads. Language Learning, 53, 35-66.
41. Mackey, A., & Philp, J. (1998). Conversational interaction and second language development: Recasts, responses, and red herrings? Modern Language Journal, 82, 338-356.
42. Mackey, A., Philp, J., Egi, T., Fujii, A., & Tatsumi, T. (2002). Individual differences in working memory, noticing of interactional feedback and L2 development. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Individual differences and instructed language learning (pp. 181-209). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
43. MacWhinney, B. (2001). The competition model: The input, the context, and the brain. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 69-90). New York: Cambridge University Press.
44. McDonough, K. (2005). Identifying the impact of negative feedback and learners' responses on ESL question development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27, 79-103.
45. McDonough, K., & Mackey, A. (2006). Responses to recasts: Repetitions, primed production, and linguistic development. Language Learning, 56, 693-720
46. Nicholas, H., Lightbown, P., & Spada, N. (2001). Recasts as feedback to language learners. Language Learning, 51, 719-758.
47. Norris, J., & Ortega, L. (2000). Effectiveness of L2 instruction: A research synthesis and quantitative meta-analysis. Language Learning, 50, 417-528.
48. Nuevo, A. (2006). Task complexity and interaction: L2 learning opportunities and interaction. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Georgetown University, Washington, DC.
49. Philp, J. (2003). Constraints on "noticing the gap": Non-native speakers' noticing of recasts in NS-NNS interaction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 25, 99-126.
50. Pollitt, A., & Hutchinson, C. (1987). Calibrated graded assessment: Rasch partial credit analysis of performance in writing. Language Testing, 4, 72-92.
51. Rahimpour, M. (1997). Task condition, task complexity, and variation in oral L2 discourse. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
52. Révész, A., & Han, Z. (2006). Task content familiarity, task type, and effi cacy of recasts. Language Awareness, 3, 160-179.
53. Robinson, P. (1995). Task complexity and second language narrative discourse. Language Learning, 45, 99-140.
54. Robinson, P. (2001). Task complexity, cognitive resources, and syllabus design: A triadic framework for investigating task infl uences on SLA. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 287-318). New York: Cambridge University Press.
55. Robinson, P. (2003). Attention and memory during SLA. In C. J. Doughty & M. H. Long (Eds.), The handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 631-678). Oxford: Blackwell.
56. Robinson, P. (2005). Cognitive complexity and task sequencing: Studies in a componential framework for second language task design. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 43, 1-32.
57. Robinson, P. (2007). Criteria for grading and sequencing pedagogic tasks. In M. del Pilar García-Mayo (Ed.), Investigating tasks in formal language learning (pp. 7-27). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
58. Robinson, P., & Gilabert, R. (2007). Task complexity, the cognition hypothesis and second language learning and performance. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 45, 161-176.
59. Schmidt, R. (2001). Attention. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 3-32). New York: Cambridge University Press.
60. Sharwood Smith, M. (1986). Comprehension versus acquisition: Two ways of processing input. Applied Linguistics, 7, 239-256.
61. Sheen, Y. (2004). Corrective feedback and learner uptake in communicative classrooms across instructional settings. Language Teaching Research, 8, 263-300.
62. Skehan, P. (1998). A cognitive approach to language learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
63. Skehan, P., & Foster, P. (1999). The infl uence of structure and processing conditions on narrative retellings. Language Learning, 49, 93-120.
64. Skehan, P., & Foster, P. (2001). Cognition and tasks. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 183-205). New York: Cambridge University Press.
65. Swain, M. (1995). Three functions of output in second language learning. In G. Cook & B. Seidlhofer (Eds.), Principle and practice in applied linguistics: Studies in honor of H. G. Widdowson (pp. 125-144). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
66. Trofi movich, P., Ammar, A., & Gatbonton, E. (2007). How effective are recasts? The role of attention, memory, and analytical ability. In A. Mackey (Ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition: A collection of empirical studies (pp. 171-195). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
67. Wickens, C. (1992). Engineering psychology and human performance (2nd ed.). New York: Harper Collins.
68. Wickens, C. (2007). Attention to the second language. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 45, 177-191.