Attention and awareness in second language acquisition

The Routledge Handbook of Second Language Acquisition

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 247-267

  Robinson, Peter ^a   Mackey, Alison ^b   Gass, Susan M ^c   Schmidt, Richard ^d  

^a AOYAMA GAKUIN UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85064372153     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203808184     Document Type: Chapter

References (153)

1. Ackerman, P. and Ciancolo, A. (2002). Ability and task determinants of complex taskperformance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 8 194—208.
2. Alanen, R. (1995). Input enhancement and rule presentation in second language acquisition. In R. Schmidt (Ed.), Attention and awareness in foreign language learning and teaching (pp. 259—302). Honolulu, HI: University of Hawai’i Press.
3. Allport, A. (1989). Visual attention. In M. Posner (Ed.), Foundations of cognitive science.MA: MIT Press: Cambridge.
4. Anderson, J. R. (1993). Rules of the mind. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
5. Arabski, J. and Woltaszek, A. (Eds.) (2010). Neurolinguistic and psycholinguistic perspectives on SLA. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
6. Baars, B. (2003). Introduction: Treating consciousness as a variable—The fading taboo. In B. Baars, W. Banks, and J. Newman (Eds.), Essential sources in the scientific study of consciousness (pp. 1—10). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
7. Baddeley, A. D. and Hitch, G. J. (1974). Working memory. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 8, pp. 47—90). New York: Academic Press.
8. Beck, D., Rees, G., Frith, C., and Lavie, N. (2001). Neural correlates of change detection and change blindness. Nature Neuroscience 4 645—650.
9. Bell, P. and Collins, L. (2009). “It’s vocabulary”/“It’s gender”: Learner awareness and incidental learning. Language Awareness 18, 277—293.
10. Bialystok, E. (1978). A theoretical model of second language learning. Language Learning, 28 69—83.
11. Bordag, D. and Pechmann, T. (2007). Factors influencing L2 gender processing. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 10(3), 299—314.
12. Bordag, D., Opitz, A., and Pechmann, T. (2006). Gender processing in L1 and L2: The role of noun termination. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 32(5), 1090—1101.
13. Bowles, M. (2010). The think-aloud controversy in second language research. New York: Routledge.
14. Candlin, C. (1987). Toward task-based learning. In C. Candlin and D. Murphy (Eds.), Language learning tasks(pp. 5-22). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
15. Carroll, J. B. (1973). Implications of aptitude test research and psycholinguistic theory for foreign-language teaching. Linguistics, 112 5-14.
16. Carroll, J. B. (1981). Twenty-five years of research on foreign language aptitude. In K. C. Diller (Ed.), Individual differences and universals in language learning aptitude (pp. 83-118). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
17. Carroll, S. (1999). Input and SLA: Adults’ sensitivity to different sorts of cues to French gender. Language Learning, 49 37-92.
18. Chaudron, C. (1985). Intake: On models and methods for discovering learners processing of input. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 7, 1-14.
19. Chee, M. W. (2005). Brain differences between bilinguals of differing proficiency: An empirical look at an emotional issue. Singapore Medical Journal, 46 49-53.
20. Chee, M. W. (2009). fMR-Adaptation and the bilingual brain. Brain and Language, 109 75-79.
21. Conway, C. and Christiansen, M. (2006). Statistical learning within and between modalities. Psychological Science17 905-912.
22. Corder, S. P. (1967). The significance of learners’ errors. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 5161-170.
23. Cowan, N. (1988). Evolving conceptions of memory storage, selective attention, and theirmutual constraints within the human information processing system. Psychological Bulletin, 104 163-191.
24. Cowan, N. (1995). Attention and memory: An integrated framework. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
25. de Diego-Balaguer, R. and Lopez-Barroso, D. (2010). Cognitive and neural mechanisms sustaining rule-learning from speech. Language Learning, 60 (Supplement 1), 151-182.
26. deGraaff, R. (1997). The eXperanto experiment: effects of explicit instruction on second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19 249-275.
27. DeKeyser, R. (2000). The robustness of critical period effects in second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 22, 499-533.
28. Dienes, Z., Altmann, G., Kwan, L., and Goode, A. (1995). Unconscious knowledge of artificial grammars is applied strategically. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory and Cognition, 21, 1322-1338.
29. Dienes, Z. and Scott, R. (2005). Measuring unconscious knowledge: Distinguishing structural knowledge and judgment knowledge. Psychological Research, 69, 338-351.
30. Dornyei, Z. (2005). The psychology of the language learner: Individual differences in second language acquisition. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
31. Dornyei, Z. and Skehan, P. (2003). Individual differences in second language learning. In C. J. Doughty and M. H. Long (Eds.), The handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 589-630). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
32. Doughty, C. and Williams, J. (1998). Pedagogical choices in focus on form. In C. Doughty and J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 197-262). New York: Cambridge University Press.
33. Ellis, N. C. (1993). Rules and instances in foreign language learning: Interactions of explicit and implicit knowledge. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 5 289-318.
34. Ellis, N. C. (1996). Sequencing and SLA: Phonological memory, chunking and points of order. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18 91-126.
35. Ellis, N. C. (1998). Emergentism, connectionism and language learning. Language Learning, 48, 631—664.
36. Ellis, N. C. (2002). Frequency effects in language processing: A review with implications for theories of implicit and explicit acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24 143—188.
37. Ellis, N. C. (2005). At the interface: How explicit knowledge affects implicit language learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 27, 305—352.
38. Ellis, N. C. (2006a). Language acquisition as rational contingency learning. Applied Linguistics 27, 1—24.
39. Ellis, N. C. (2006b). Selective attention and transfer phenomena in L2 acquisition: Contingency, cue competition, salience, interference, overshadowing, blocking and perceptual learning. Applied Linguistics 27, 164—194.
40. Ellis, N. C. (2008). The dynamics of second language emergence: Cycles of language use, language change, and language acquisition. The Modern Language Journal, 92 232—249.
41. Ellis, R. (1993). A theory of instructed second language acquisition. In N. C. Ellis (Ed.), Implicit and explicit learning of languages (pp. 79—114). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
42. Ellis, R. (Ed.), (2001). Form-focused instruction and second language learning. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
43. Ellis, R. (2009). The differential effects of three types of task planning on the fluency, accuracy and complexity of L2 oral production. Applied Linguistics30 474—509.
44. Engle, R. W. (2001). What is working memory capacity? In H. L. Roediger, J. S. Nairne, I. Neath, and A. M. Suprenant (Eds.), The nature of remembering: Essays in honor of Robert G. Crowder (pp. 297—314). Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association Press.
45. Fabbro, F. (1999). The neurolinguistics of bilingualism. Hove: Psychology Press.
46. Felix-Brasdefer, J. C. (2008). Perceptions of refusals to invitations: Exploring the minds of foreign language learners. Language Awareness, 17 195—211.
47. Franceschina, F. (2005). Fossilized second languagegrammars: the acquisition of grammaticalgender. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: J. Benjamins.
48. Gass, S. (1988). Integrating research areas: A framework for second language studies. Applied Linguistics, 9, 198-217.
49. Gass, S. (1997). Input, interaction, and the second language learner. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
50. Gass, S. M. and Mackey, A. (2000). Stimulated recall methodology in second language research. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
51. Gass, S. M. and Mackey, A. (2006). Input, interaction and output: An overview. AILA Review, 19 3-17.
52. Gass, S., Svetics, I., and Lemelin, S. (2003). Differential effects of attention. Language Learning, 53 497-545.
53. Godfroid, A. (2010). Cognitive processes in second language acquisition: The role of noticing, attention and awareness in processing words in written L2 input. Unpublished PhD dissertation. Vrije Universiteit Brussels, Belgium.
54. Godfroid, A., Housen, A., and Boers, F. (2010). A procedure for testing the noticing hypothesis in the context of vocabulary acquisition. In M. Putz and L. Sicola (Eds.), Cognitive processing in second language acquisition: Inside the learner's mind (pp. 169-197). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
55. Goldschneider, J. and DeKeyser, R. (2001). Explaining the “natural order of L2 morpheme acquisition” in English: A meta-analysis of multiple determinants. Language Learning, 51 1-50.
56. Gomez, R. and Gerken, L. (1999). Artificial grammar learning by 1-year olds leads to specific and abstract knowledge. Cognition, 70 109-135.
57. Green, D. (2003). The neural basis of the lexicon and the grammar in L2 acquisition. In R. van Hout, A. Hulk, F. Kuiken, and R. Towell (Eds.), The interface between syntax and the lexicon in second language acquisition (pp. 197-218). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
58. Green, D., Crinion, J., and Price, C. (2006). Convergence, degeneracy and control. Language Learning, 56(Supplement 1), 99-125.
59. Guillelmon, D. and Grosjean, F. (2001). The gender marking effect in spoken word recognition: The case of bilinguals. Memory & Cognition, 29 503-511.
60. Holmes, V. M. and Dejean de la Batie, B. (1999). Assignment of grammatical gender by native speakers and foreign learners of French. Applied Psycholinguistics, 20 479-506.
61. Indefrey, P., Hagoort, P., Herzog, H., Seitz, R., and Brown, C. (2001). Syntactic processing in left prefTontal cortex is independent of lexical meaning. Neuroimage, 14 546-555.
62. Izumi, S. (2003). Comprehension and production processes in second language learning: In search of the psycholinguistic rationale of the output hypothesis. Applied Linguistics, 24 168-192.
63. Jiang, N. (2004). Morphological insensitivity in second language processing. Applied Psycholinguistics, 25 603-634.
64. Kahneman, D. (1973). Attention and effort. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
65. Kormos, T. (2006). Speech production in second language acquisition. Mahwah, NT: Erlbaum.
66. Krashen, S. (1982). Principles and practice in second language acquisition. Oxford: Pergamon.
67. Lardiere, D. (1998). Case and tense in the “fossilized” steady-state. Second Language Research, 14 1—26.
68. Leow, R. (2000). A study of the role of awareness in foreign language behavior: Aware versus unaware learners. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 22 557—584.
69. Leow, R. (2002). Models, attention and awareness in SLA. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24 113—119.
70. Leow, R. P. (2007). Input in the L2 classroom: An attentional perspective on receptive practice. In R. M. DeKeyser (Ed.), Practice in second language: Perspectives from applied linguistics and cognitive psychology (pp. 21—50). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
71. Leow, R. and Morgan-Short, K. (2004). To think aloud or not to think aloud: The issue of reactivity in SLA research methodology. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26 35—58.
72. Lew-Williams, C. (2009). Real-time processing of gender-marked articles by native and non-native Spanish-speaking children and adults. PhD Dissertation. Stanford University.
73. Logan, G. D. (1988). Toward an instance theory of automatization. Psychological Review, 95 492—527.
74. Long, M. H. (1991). Focus on form: A design feature in language teaching methodology. In K. de Bot, D. Coste, R. Ginsberg, and C. Kramsch (Eds.), Foreign language research in cross-cultural perspective (pp. 39—52). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
75. Long, M. H. and Robinson, P. (1998). Focus on form: Theory, research, and practice. In C. Doughty and J. Williams (Eds.), Focus onform in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 15—41). New York: Cambridge University Press.
76. Mackey, A. (2006). Feedback, noticing and instructed second language learning. Applied Linguistics 27, 405—430.
77. Mackey, A., Adams, R., Stafford, C., and Winke, P. (2010). Exploring the relationship between modified output and working memory capacity. Language Learning, 60 501—533.
78. Mackey, A., Gass, S., and McDonough, K. (2000). How do learners perceive interactional feedback? Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 22 471—497.
79. Mackey, A., Philp, J., Egi, T., Fujii, A., and Tatsumi, T. (2002). Individual differences in working memory, noticing of interactional feedback and L2 development. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Individual differences and instructed language learning (pp. 181—210). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
80. Mackey, A. and Sachs, R. (2011). Older learners in SLA research: A first look at working memory, feedback, and L2 development. Language Learning.
81. MacWhinney, B. (1997). Implicit and explicit processes. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19 277—281.
82. McDonough, K. and Tromfimovich, P. (2008). Using priming methods in second language research. London: Routledge.
83. McLaughlin, B., Rossman, T., and McLeod, B. (1988). Second language learning: An informationprocessing perspective. Language Learning, 33 135—158.
84. Merikle, P. and Reingold, E. (1991). Comparing direct (explicit) and indirect (implicit) measures to study unconscious memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 17 224—233.
85. Miyake, A. and Shah, P. (Eds.) (1999). Models of working memory: Mechanisms of active maintenance and executive control. New York: Cambridge University Press.
86. Neumann, O. (1987). Beyond capacity: A functional view of attention. In H. Heuer and A. Sanders (Eds.), Perspectives on perception and action (pp. 361—394). Berlin: Springer.
87. Paradis, M. (2009). Declarative and procedural determinants of second languages. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
88. Perruchet, P. (2008). Implicit learning. In H. L. Roediger III (Ed.), Learning and memory: Cognitive psychology of memory (Vol. 2, pp. 597—621).Oxford: Elsevier.
89. Perruchet, P. and Pacteau, C. (1990). Synthetic grammar learning: Implicit rule abstraction or fragmentary knowledge? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 119 264—275.
90. Philp, J. (2003). Constraints on “noticing the gap”: Nonnative speakers’ noticing of recasts in NS-NNS interaction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 25 99—126.
91. Polio, C. (2007). A history of input enhancement: Defining an evolving concept. In C. Gascoigne (Ed.), Assessing the impact of input enhancement in second language education (pp. 1—17). Stillwater, OK: New Forums Press.
92. Posner, M. and Petersen, S. (1990). The attention system of the human brain. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 13 25-42.
93. Pothos, E. (2007). Theories of artificial grammar learning. Psychological Bulletin, 133 227-244.
94. Prévost, P. and White, L. (2000). Missing surface inflection or impairment in second language acquisition? Evidence from tense and agreement. Second Language Research, 16 103-133.
95. Raz, A. and Buhle, J. (2006). Typologies of attentional networks. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 7 367-380.
96. Reber, A. S. (1967). Implicit learning of artificial grammars. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 6, 855-863.
97. Reber, A. S. (1989). Implicit learning and tacit knowledge. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 118, 219-235.
98. Reber, A. S. (1993). Implicit learning and tacit knowledge: An essay on the cognitive unconscious. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
99. Rebuschat, P. (2008). Implicitlearning of natural language syntax. Unpublished PhD dissertation. University of Cambridge, UK.
100. Rebuschat, P. and Williams, J. (2010). Implicit learning of second language syntax. Manuscript submitted for publication.
101. Reichle, E., Pollatsek, A., and Rayner, K. (2006). E-Z reader: A cognitive-control, serial-attention model of eye-movement behavior. Cognitive Systems Research 7, 4-22.
102. Rescorla, R. A. and Wagner, A. R. (1972). A theory of Pavlovian conditioning: Variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and non rein forcement. In A. Black and W. Prokasy (Eds.), Classical conditioning II: Current theory and research (pp. 64-99). New York: Appleton-Century Crofts.
103. Robinson, P. (1995). Attention, memory and the “noticing” hypothesis. Language Learning, 45 283-331.
104. Robinson, P. (1996). Learning simple and complex second language rules under implicit, incidental, rule search and instructed conditions. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18 27-67.
105. Robinson, P. (1997a). Individual differences and the fundamental similarity of implicit and explicit adult second language learning. Language Learning, 47 45-99.
106. Robinson, P. (1997b). Generalizability and automaticity of second language learning under implicit, incidental, enhanced and instructed conditions. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19, 223-247.
107. Robinson, P. (2001). Task complexity, task difficulty, and task production: Exploring interactions in a componential framework. Applied Linguistics, 22 27-57.
108. Robinson, P. (2002). Learning conditions, aptitude complexes and SLA: A framework for research and pedagogy. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Individual Differences and Instructed Language Learning (pp. 113-133). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
109. Robinson, P. (2003). Attention and memory during SLA. In C. Doughty and M. Long (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 631-662). Oxford: Blackwell.
110. Robinson, P. (2005a). Aptitude and second language acquisition. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 2546-73.
111. Robinson, P. (2005b). Cognitive complexity and task sequencing: A review of studies in a componential framework for second language task design. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 43 1-32.
112. Robinson, P. (2007). Task complexity, theory of mind, and intentional reasoning: Effects on L2 speech production, interaction, uptake andperceptions oftask difficulty. Ternational reviewofAppliedLinguistics, 45, 193-213.
113. Robinson, P. (2010a). Implicit artificial grammar, and incidental natural second language learning: How comparable are they?. Language Learning, 60 (Supplement 1), 245-264.
114. Robinson, P. (2010b). Situating and distributing cognition across task demands: The SSARC model of pedagogic task sequencing. In M. Putz and L. Sicola (Eds.), Cognitiveprocessing in second language acquisition: Inside the learner's mind (pp. 243-268). Amsterdam: Benjaimins.
115. Rodriguez-Fornells, A., de Diego-Balaguer, R., and Munte, T. (2006). Executive control in bilingual processing. Language Learning, 56 (Supplement 1), 133-190.
116. Ross, B. H. and Bradshaw, G. (1994). Encoding effects of remindings. Memory & Cognition, 22 (5), 591-605.
117. Sachs, R. and Polio, C. (2007). Learners’ uses oftwo types of written feedback on an L2 writing revision task. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 29 67-100.
118. Saffran, J., Johnson, E., Aslin, R., and Newport, E. (1999). Statistical learning oftone sequences by human infants and adults. Cognition, 70 27-52.
119. Sagarra, N. (2007). From CALL to face-to-face interaction: The effect of computer delivered recasts and working memory on L2 development. In A. Mackey (Ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition (pp. 229-248). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
120. Sanz, C., Lin, H.-J., Lado, B., Bowden, H. W., and Stafford, C. A. (2009). Concurrent verbalizations, pedagogical implications and reactivity: Two CALL studies. Language Learning, 59 33-71.
121. Sanders, A. (1998). Elements of human performance. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
122. Schachter, D. (1987). Implicit memory: History and current status. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 13, 501-518.
123. Schachter, J. (1981). The hand signal system. TESOL Quarterly, 15 125-138.
124. Scheiter, K. and Van Gog, T. (2009). Using eye tracking in applied research to study and stimulate the processing of information from multi-representational sources. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 23 1209-1214.
125. Schmidt, R. (1990). The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 11 129-158.
126. Schmidt, R. (1995). Consciousness and foreign language learning: A tutorial on the role of attention and awareness in learning. In R. Schmidt (Ed.), Attention and awareness in foreign language learning and teaching(pp. 1-64). Honolulu, HI: University of Hawai’i Press.
127. Schmidt, R. and Frota, S. (1986). Developing basic conversational ability in a second language: A case study of an adult learner of Portuguese. In R. Day (Ed.), Talking to learn: Conversation in second language learning(pp. 237-322). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
128. Schuchert, S. (2004). The neurobiology of attention. In J. Schumann (Ed.), The neurobiology of learning: Perspectives from second language acquisition (pp. 143-174). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
129. Schumann, J. (Ed.) (2004). The neurobiology of learning: Perspectivesfrom second language acquisition. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
130. Shanks, D. and Johnstone, T. (1998). Implicit knowledge in sequential learning tasks. In M. Stadler and P. Frensch (Eds.), Handbook of implicit learning (pp. 533-572).Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
131. Shanks, D. R. and St.John, M. F. (1994). Characteristics of dissociable human systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 17 367-447.
132. Sharwood-Smith, M. (1981). Consciousness-raising and the second language learner. Applied Linguistics, 2, 159-168.
133. Sharwood-Smith, M. (1991). Speaking to many minds: On the relevance of different types of language information for the L2 learner. Second Language Research, 7 118-132.
134. Shiffrin, R. and Schneider, W. (1977). Controlled and automatic human information processing II: Perceptual learning, automatic attending and a general theory. Psychological Review, 84 127-190.
135. Simard, D. and Wong, W. (2001). Alertness, orientation and detection: The conceptualization of attentional functions in SLA. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 23, 103-124.
136. Skehan, P. (1996).A framework for the implementation oftask-based instruction. Applied Linguistics, 1738-62.
137. Skehan, P. (1998). A cognitive approach to language learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
138. Skehan, P. (2009). Modeling second language performance: Integrating complexity, accuracy, fluency and lexis. Applied Linguistics30 510-532.
139. Snow, R. E. (1994). Abilities in academic tasks. In R. Sternberg and R. Wagner (Eds.), Mind in context: Interactionist perspectives on human intelligence (pp. 3-37). New York: Cambridge University Press.
140. Sprouse, R. (1998). Some notes on the relationship between inflectional morphology and parameter setting in first and second language acquisition. In M. Beck (Ed.), Morphology and its interfaces in second language knowledge (pp. 41-67). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
141. Swain, M. (1995). Three functions of output in second language learning. In G. Cook and B. Seidlhoffer (Eds.), Principle and practice in applied linguistics: Studies in honor of H. G. Widdowson (pp. 125-144). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
142. Swain, M. and Lapkin, S. (1995). Problems in output and the cognitive processes they generate. Applied Linguistics 16,370-391.
143. Tomlin, R. and Villa, V. (1994). Attention in cognitive science and second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15 183-203.
144. Trofimovich, P., Ammar, A., and Gatbonton, E. (2007). How effective are recasts? The role of attention, memory and analytical ability. In A. Mackey (Ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition(pp. 171-196). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
145. Tunney, R., and Shanks, D. (1993). Subjective measures of awareness and implicit cognition. Memory & Cognition, 31 1060-1071.
146. Warden, M., Lapkin, S., Swain, M., and Hart, D. (1995). Adolescent language learners on a three month exchange: Evidence from their diaries. Foreign Language Annals, 28 537-549.
147. Weiskrantz, L. (1997). Consciousness lost and found: A neuropsychological exploation. New York: Oxford University Press.
148. Wickens, C. (1984). Processing resources and attention. In R. Parasuraman and D. Davies (Eds.), Varieties of attention (pp. 63-101). New York: Academic Press.
149. Wickens, C. (2007).Attention to the second language. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 45177-192.
150. Williams, J. (1999). Memory, attention and inductive learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21 1-48.
151. Williams, J. (2005). Learning without awareness. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 27, 269-304.
152. Williams, J. (2009). Implicit learning in second language learning. In W. Ritchie and T. J. Bhatia (Eds.), The new handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 319-353). Bingley, UK: Emerald Publishing.
153. Williams, J. (2010). Initial incidental learning of word order regularities: Is it just sequence learning?. Language Learning, 60 (Supplement 1), 221-244.