Input, interaction and output: An overview

AILA Review

Volumn 19, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 3-17

  Gass, Susan ^a   Mackey, Alison ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34548666961     PISSN: 14610213     EISSN: 15705595     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1075/aila.19.03gas     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (44)

1. Block, D. 2003. The Social Turn in Second Language Acquisition. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press
2. Bohannon, J. N., Padgett, M. and Nelson, K. 1996. Useful evidence on negative evidence. Developmental Psychology 32: 551-555
3. Egi, T. In press. Recasts, learners interpretations, and L2 development. In Conversational Interaction in Second Language Acquisition: A series of empirical studies, A. Mackey (ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press
4. Ellis, R. and He, X. 1999. The roles of modified input and output in the incidental acquisition of word meanings. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 21: 285-301
5. Ellis, N. 2002. Frequency effects in language processing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 24: 143-188
6. Ferguson, C. 1971. Absence of copula and the notion of simplicity: A study of normal speech, baby talk, foreigner talk and pidgins. In Pidginization and Creolization of Languages, D. Hymes (ed.), 141-150. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
7. Gass, S. 1988. Integrating research areas: A framework for second language studies. Applied Linguistics 9: 198-217
8. Gass, S. 1997. Input, Interaction, and the Second Language Learner. Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
9. Gass, S. 2003. Input and interaction. In Handbook of Second Language Acquisition, C. Doughty and M. Long (eds), 224-255. Oxford: Blackwell
10. Gass, S. and Lewis, K. In press. Perceptions of interactional feedback: Differences between heritage language learners and non-heritage language learners. In Conversational Interaction in Second Language Acquisition: A series of empirical studies, A. Mackey (ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press
11. Gass, S. and Mackey, A. 2000. Stimulated Recall Methodology in Second Language Research. Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
12. Gass, S. and Mackey, A. In press. In Theories in Second Language Acquisition, J. Williams and B. VanPatten (eds). Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
13. Gass, S. Mackey, A. and Ross-Feldman, L. 2005. Task-based interactions in classroom and laboratory settings. Language Learning 55: 575-611
14. Gass, S. and Selinker, L. 2001. Second Language Acquisition: An introductory course. Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
15. Gass, S. and Varonis, E. 1985. Variation in native speaker speech modification to non-native speakers. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 7: 37-57
16. Hatch, E. 1983. Psycholinguistics: A second language perspective. Rowley MA: Newbury House
17. Krashen, S. 1982. Principles and Practice in Second Language Acquisition. London: Pergamon
18. Krashen, S. 1985. The Input Hypothesis: Issues and implications. New York NY: Longman
19. Leeman, J. 2003. Recasts and second language development: Beyond negative evidence Studies in Second Language Acquisition 25: 37-63
20. Long, M. H. 1983. Linguistic and conversational adjustments to non-native speakers Studies in Second Language Acquisition 5: 177-193
21. Long, M. H. 1996. The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In Handbook of Language Acquisition, Vol. 2, W.C. Ritchie and T. K. Bhatia (eds), 413-468. New York NY: Academic Press
22. Long, M. H. and Robinson, P. 1998. Focus on form: Theory, research, and practice. In Focus on Form in Classroom Second Language Acquisition, C. Doughty and J. Williams (eds), 15-41. New York NY: Cambridge University Press
23. Lyster, R. 1998. Recasts, repetition, and ambiguity in L2 classroom discourse. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 20: 51-81
24. Lyster, R. and Ranta, L. 1997. Corrective feedback and learner uptake: Negotiation of form in communicative classrooms Studies in Second Language Acquisition 20: 37-66
25. Mackey, A, (ed.) In press. Conversational interaction and second language acquisition: A collection of emperical studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press
26. Mackey, A. and Oliver, R. 2002. Interactional feedback and children's L2 development. System 30: 460-477
27. Mackey, A., Gass, S. and McDonough, K. 2000. How do learners perceive interactional feedback? Studies in Second Language Acquisition 22: 471-497
28. McDonough, K. 2005. Identifying the impact of negative feedback and learners' responses on ESL question development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 27: 79-103
29. McDonough, K. and Mackey, A. In press. Responses to recasts: Repetitions, primed production and linguistic development. Language Learning
30. Muranoi, H. 2000. Focus on form through interactional enhancement: Integrating formal instruction with a communicative task in EFL classrooms. Language Learning 50: 617-673
31. Philp, J. 2003. Constraints on noticing the gap: Nonnative speakers' noticing of recasts in NSNNS interaction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 25: 99-126
32. Pica, T. 1994. Research on negotiation: What does it reveal about second-language learning conditions, processes, and outcomes? Language Learning 44: 493-527
33. Robinson, P. (ed.). 2002. Individual Differences and Instructed Language Learning. Amsterdam: John Benjamins
34. Saxton, M. 1997. The contrast theory of negative input. Journal of Child Language 24: 139-161
35. Saxton, M. 2005. Recast in a new light: Insights for practice from typical language studies. Child Language Teaching and Therapy 21: 23-38
36. Shehadeh, A. 2002. Comprehensible output, from occurrence to acquisition: An agenda for acquisitional research. Language Learning 52: 597-647
37. Swain, M. and Lapkin, S. 1995. Problems in output and the cognitive processes they generate: A step toward second language learning. Applied Linguistics 16: 371-391
38. Swain, M. and Lapkin, S. 1998. Interaction and second language learning: Two adolescent French immersion students working together. The Modern Language Journal 82: 320-337
39. Swain, M. 1985. Communicative competence: Some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development. In Input in Second Language Acquisition, S. Gass and C. Madden (eds), 235-253. Rowley MA: Newbury House
40. Swain, M. 1993. The output hypothesis: Just speaking and writing aren't enough. Canadian Modern Language Review 50: 158-164
41. Swain, M. 1995. Three functions of output in second language learning. In Principle and Practice in Applied Linguistics: Studies in honour of H. G. Widdowson, G. Cook and B. Seidlhofer (eds), 125-144. Oxford: Oxford University Press
42. Swain, M. 2005. The output hypothesis: Theory and research. In Handbook on Research in Second Language Learning and Teaching, E. Hinkel (ed.), 471-483. Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
43. Takashima, H. 1995. A study of focused feedback, or output enhancement, in promoting accuracy in communicative activities. Ed.D. dissertation, Temple University, Japan
44. VanPatten, B. and Williams, J. (eds). In press. Theories in Second Language Acquisition. Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates