What makes learning second-language grammar difficult? A review of issues

Language Learning

Volumn 55, Issue SUPPL. 1, 2005, Pages 1-25

  DeKeyser, Robert M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 19944390658     PISSN: 00238333     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.0023-8333.2005.00294.x     Document Type: Review

References (101)

1. Andersen, R. W., & Shirai, Y. (1994). Discourse motivations for some cognitive acquisition principles. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 16, 133-156.
2. Andersen, R. W., & Shirai, Y. (1996). The primacy of aspect in first and second language acquisition: The pidgin-creole connection. In W. C. Ritchie & T. K. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 527-570). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
3. Ayoun, D. (2004). The effectiveness of written recasts in the second language acquisition of aspectual distinctions in French: A follow-up study. Modern Language Journal, 88, 31-55.
4. Bardovi-Harlig, K. (1987). Markedness and salience in second-language acquisition. Language Learning, 37, 385-407.
5. Bardovi-Harlig, K. (1998). Narrative structure and lexical aspect: Conspiring factors in second language acquisition of tense-aspect morphology. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 20, 471-508.
6. Bardovi-Harlig, K. (1999). From morpheme studies to temporal semantics: Tense-aspect research in SLA. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21, 341-382.
7. Bardovi-Harlig, K. (2000). Tense and aspect in second language acquisition: Form, meaning, and use. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
8. Bley-Vroman, R., & Joo, H.-R. (2001). The acquisition and interpretation of English locative constructions by native speakers of Korean. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 23, 207-219.
9. Birdsong, D. (1992). Ultimate attainment in second language acquisition. Language, 68, 706-755.
10. Butler, Y. G. (2002). Second language learners' theories on the use of English articles: An analysis of the metalinguistic knowledge used by Japanese students in acquiring the English article system. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24, 451-480.
11. Celce-Murcia, M., & Larsen-Freeman, D. (1999). The grammar book: An ESL/EFL teacher's course. Boston: Heinle & Heinle.
12. Collins, L. (2002). The roles of L1 influence and lexical aspect in the acquisition of temporal morphology. Language Learning, 52, 43-94.
13. DeKeyser, R. M. (2000). The robustness of critical period effects in second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 22, 499-533.
14. DeKeyser, R. M. (2003). Implicit and explicit learning. In C. Doughty & M. Long (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 313-348). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
15. DeKeyser, R. M. (2005). Monitoring processes in Spanish as a second language during a study abroad program. Manuscript in preparation.
16. DeKeyser, R. M., Alfi-Shabtay, I., Ravid, D., & Shi, M. (2005). The role of salience in the acquisition of Hebrew as a second language. Manuscript in preparation.
17. DeKeyser, R. M., Ravid, D., & Alfi-Shabtay, I. (2005). Cross-linguistic evidence for the nature of age effects in second language acquisition. Manuscript in preparation.
18. DeKeyser, R. M., Salaberry, R., Robinson, P., & Harrington, M. (2002). What gets processed in processing instruction? A commentary on Bill VanPatten's "Processing Instruction: An Update." Language Learning, 52, 805-823.
19. Dietrich, R., Klein, W., & Noyau, C. (1995). The acquisition of temporality in a second language. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
20. Eckman, F. R., Bell, L., & Nelson, D. (1988). On the generalization of relative clause instruction in the acquisition of English as a second language. Applied Linguistics, 9, 1-20.
21. Eckman, F. R., Moravcsik, E. A., & Wirth, J. R. (1989). Implicational universals and interrogative structures in the interlanguage of ESL learners. Language Learning, 39, 173-205.
22. Ellis, N. (2002). Frequency effects in language processing: A review with implications for theories of implicit and explicit language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24, 143-188.
23. Ellis, N. (2003). Constructions, chunking, and connectionism: The emergence of second language structure. In C. J. Doughty & M. H. Long (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 63-103). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
24. Ellis, R. (1990). Instructed second language acquisition. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
25. Flege, J. E., Yeni-Komshian, G. H., & Liu, S. (1999). Age constraints on second-language acquisition. Journal of Memory and Language, 41, 78-104.
26. Gass, S. M. (1979). Language transfer and universal grammatical relations. Language Learning, 29, 327-344.
27. Gass, S. M., & Selinker, L. (2001). Second language acquisition. An introductory course. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
28. Gómez, R. L. (1997). Transfer and complexity in artificial grammar learning. Cognitive Psychology, 33, 154-207.
29. Han, Z. (2000). Persistence of the implicit influence of NL: The case of the pseudo-passive. Applied Linguistics, 21(1), 55-82.
30. Hansen, L., & Chen, Y. L. (2001). What counts in the acquisition and attribution of numeral classifiers? JALT Journal, 23, 90-110.
31. Herschensohn, J. (2000). The second time around: Minimalism and L2 acquisition. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
32. Hertel, T. J. (2003). Lexical and discourse factors in the second language acquisition of Spanish word order. Second Language Research, 19, 273-304.
33. Huang, C.-T. (1982). Logical relations in Chinese and the theory of grammar. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.
34. Inagaki, S. (1997). Japanese and Chinese learners' acquisition of the narrow-range rules for the dative alternation in English. Language Learning, 47, 637-669.
35. Inagaki, S. (2001). Motion verbs with goal PPs in the L2 acquisition of English and Japanese. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 23, 153-170.
36. Ishida, M. (2004). Effects of recasts on the acquisition of the aspectual form -te i-(ru) by learners of Japanese as a foreign language. Language Learning, 54, 311-394.
37. Jarvis, S. (2002). Topic continuity in L2 English article use. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24, 387-418.
38. Jiang, N. (2004). Morphological insensitivity in second language processing. Applied Psycholinguistics, 25, 603-634.
39. Johnson, J. S., & Newport, E. L. (1989). Critical period effects in second language learning: The influence of maturational state on the acquisition of English as a second language. Cognitive Psychology, 20, 60-99.
40. Johnson, J. S., & Newport, E. L. (1991). Critical period effects on universal properties of language: The status of subjacency in the acquisition of a second language. Cognition, 39, 215-258.
41. Joo, H.-R. (2003). Second language learnability and the acquisition of English locative verbs by Korean speakers. Second Language Research, 19, 305-328.
42. Juffs, A. (1996). Semantics-syntax correspondences in second language acquisition. Second Language Research, 12, 177-221.
43. Juffs, A. (1998). The acquisition of semantics-syntax correspondences and verb frequencies in EL materials. Language Teaching Research, 2, 93-123.
44. Jung, E. H. (2004). Topic and subject prominence in interlanguage development. Language Learning, 54, 713-738.
45. Kempe, V., & MacWhinney, B. (1998). The acquisition of case marking by adult learners of Russian and German. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 20, 543-587.
46. Klein, W., & Dittmar, N. (1979). Developing grammars. Berlin: Springer.
47. Krashen, S. D. (1982). Principles and practice in second language acquisition. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
48. Krashen, S. D., & Pon, P. (1975). An error analysis of and advanced ESL learner. Working Papers in Bilingualism, 7, 125-129.
49. Lardiere, D. (1998). Case and tense in the "fossilized" steady-state. Second Language Research, 14, 1-26.
50. Lardiere, D. (2000). Mapping features to forms in second language acquisition. In J. Archibald (Ed.), Second language acquisition and linguistic theory (pp. 102-129). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
51. Larsen-Freeman, D. (2003). Teaching language: From grammar to grammaring. Boston: Heinle.
52. Larsen-Freeman, D., & Long, M. H. (1991). An introduction to second language acquisition research. New York: Longman.
53. Lee, E.-J. (2001). Intel-language development by two Korean speakers of English with a focus on temporality. Language Learning, 51, 591-633.
54. Leeman, J. (2003). Recasts and second language development: Beyond negative evidence. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 25, 37-63.
55. Liceras, J. M. (1989). On some properties of the "pro-drop" parameter: Looking for missing subjects in normative Spanish. In S. Gass & J. Schachter (Eds.), Linguistic perspectives on second language acquisition (pp. 109-133). New York: Cambridge University Press.
56. Liu, D., & Gleason, J. L. (2002). Acquisition of the article the by nonnative speakers of English: An analysis of four nongeneric uses. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24, 1-26.
57. Long, M. H. (1997). Fossilization: Rigor mortis in living linguistic systems? Plenary address to the EUROSLA 97 conference, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain.
58. Long, M. H. (2003). Stabilization and fossilization in interlanguage development. In C. J. Doughty & M. H. Long (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 487-535). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
59. Long, M. H., & Robinson, P. (1998). Focus on form: Theory, research, and practice. In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 15-41). New York: Cambridge University Press.
60. Long, M. H., & Sato, C. (1984). Methodological issues in interlanguage studies: An interactionist perspective. In A. Davies, C. Griper, & A. P. R. Howatt (Eds.), Interlanguage (pp. 253-279). Edinburgh, UK: Edinburgh University Press.
61. MacWhinney, B. (2001). The competition model: The input, the context, and the brain. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 69-90). New York: Cambridge University Press.
62. MacWhinney, B. (in press). A unified model of language acquisition. In J. F. Kroll & A. M. B. de Groot (Eds.), Handbook of bilingualism: Psycholinguistic approaches. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
63. Master, P. (1997). The English article system: Acquisition, function, and pedagogy. System, 25, 215-232.
64. McDonald, J. L. (1987). Sentence interpretation in bilingual speakers of English and Dutch. Applied Psycholinguistics, 8, 379-414.
65. McDonald, J. L. (2000). Grammaticality judgments in a second language: Influences of age of acquisition and native language. Applied Psycholinguistics, 21, 395-423.
66. Montrul, S. (2001). Agentive verbs of manner of motion in Spanish and English as second languages. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 23, 171-206.
67. Montrul, S., & Slabakova, R. (2003). Competence similarities between native and near-native speakers: An investigation of the preterite-imperfect contrast in Spanish. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 25, 351-398.
68. Papp, S. (2000). Stable and developmental optionality in native and non-native Hungarian grammars. Second Language Research, 16, 173-200.
69. Perruchet, P., & Pacteau, C. (1990). Synthetic grammar learning: Implicit rule abstraction or explicit fragmentary knowledge? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 119, 264-275.
70. Perruchet, P., & Pacteau, C. (1991). Implicit acquisition of abstract knowledge about artificial grammar: Some methodological and conceptual issues. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 120, 112-116.
71. Pesetsky, D. (1987). Wh-in-situ: Movement and unselective binding. In E. Reuland & A. G. B. ter Meulen (Eds.), The representation of indefiniteness (pp. 98-129). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
72. Pienemann, M. (1984). Psychological constraints on the teachability of languages. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 6, 186-214.
73. Pienemann, M. (2003). Language processing capacity. In C. J. Doughty & M. H. Long (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 679-714). Oxford, UK Blackwell.
74. Pinker, S. (1989). Learnability and cognition: The acquisition of argument structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
75. Prévost, P., & White, L. (2000). Missing surface inflection or impairment in second language acquisition? Evidence from tense and agreement. Second Language Research, 16, 103-133.
76. Reed, J. M., & Johnson, P. J. (1998). Implicit learning: Methodological issues and evidence of unique characteristics. In M. A. Stadler & P. A. Frensch (Eds.), Handbook of implicit learning (pp. 261-294). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
77. Rizzi, L. (1982). Issues in Italian syntax. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Foris.
78. Robertson, D. (2000). Variability in the use of the English article system by Chinese learners of English. Second Language Research, 16, 135-172.
79. Robinson, P. (1996). Learning simple and complex second language rules under implicit, incidental, rule-search, and instructed conditions. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18, 27-67.
80. Robinson, P. (1997). Individual differences and the fundamental similarity of implicit and explicit adult second language learning. Language Learning, 47(1), 45-99.
81. Robinson, P. (2002). Effects of individual differences in intelligence, aptitude, and working memory on adult incidental SLA: A replication and extension of Reber, Walkenfield, and Hernstadt (1991). In P. Robinson (Ed.), Individual differences and instructed language learning (pp. 211-265). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins.
82. Salaberry, R. (2000). The development of past tense morphology in L2 Spanish. Philadelphia: Benjamins.
83. Sorace, A. (2000). Syntactic optionality in non-native grammars. Second Language Research, 16, 93-102.
84. Sorace, A. (2003). Near-nativeness. In C. J. Doughty & M. H. Long (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 130-151). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
85. Sorace, A., & Shomura, Y. (2001). Lexical constraints on the acquisition of split intransitivity: Evidence from L2 Japanese. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 23, 247-278.
86. Sprouse, R. (1998). Some notes on the relationship between inflectional morphology and parameter setting in first and second language acquisition. In M. Beck (Ed.), Morphology and its interfaces in second language knowledge (pp. 41-67). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
87. Stockwell, R. P., Bowen, J. D., & Martin, J. W. (1965). The grammatical structures of English and Spanish. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
88. Taraban, R. (2004). Drawing learners' attention to syntactic context aids gender-like category induction. Journal of Memory and Language, 51, 202-216.
89. Tarone, E. E. (1985). Variability in interlanguage use: A study of style-shifting in morphology and syntax. Language Learning, 35, 373-404.
90. Tarone, E. E., & Parrish, B. (1988). Task-related variation in interlanguage: The case of articles. Language Learning, 38, 21-44.
91. Thomas, M. (1989). The acquisition of English articles by first- and second-language learners. Applied Psycholinguistics, 10, 335-355.
92. Truscott, J., & Sharwood Smith, M. (2004). Acquisition by processing: A modular perspective on language development. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 7, 1-20.
93. VanPatten, B. (1990). Attending to form and content in the input: An experiment in consciousness. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 12, 287-301.
94. VanPatten, B. (2002a). Processing instruction: An update. Language Learning, 52, 755-803.
95. VanPatten, B. (2002b). Processing the content of input-processing and processing instruction research: A response to DeKeyser, Salaberry, Robinson, and Harrington. Language Learning, 52, 825-831.
96. VanPatten, B. (2004). Input processing in second language acquisition. In B. VanPatten (Ed.), Processing instruction: Theory, research, and commentary (pp. 5-31). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
97. Whong-Barr, M., & Schwartz, B. D. (2002). Morphological and syntactic transfer in child L2 acquisition of the English dative alternation. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24, 579-616.
98. Williams, J. N. (1999). Memory, attention, and inductive learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21, 1-48.
99. Wong, W. (2001). Modality and attention to meaning and form in the input. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 23, 345-368.
100. Yeni-Komshian, G., Robbins, M., & Flege, J. E. (2001). Effects of word class differences on L2 pronunciation accuracy. Applied Psycholinguistics, 22, 283-299.
101. Young, R. (1996). Form-function relationships in articles in English interlanguage. In R. Bayley & D. Preston (Eds.), Second language acquisition and linguistic variation (pp. 135-175). Amsterdam: Benjamins.