Form-focused instruction: Isolated or integrated?

TESOL Quarterly

Volumn 42, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 181-207

  Spada, Nina ^a   Lightbown, Patsy M ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^b Gina Cody School of Engineering and Computer Science   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 47749083891     PISSN: 00398322     EISSN: 15457249     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/j.1545-7249.2008.tb00115.x     Document Type: Article

References (123)

1. Alanen, R. (1995). Input enhancement and rule presentation in second language acquisition. In R. Schmidt (Ed.), Attention and awareness in foreign language learning and teaching (pp. 259-302). Honolulu: University of Hawai'i Press.
2. Ammar, A., & Spada, N. (2006). One size fits all? Recasts, prompts, and L2 learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28, 543-574.
3. Anderson, J. (1982). Acquisition of cognitive skill. Psychological Review, 89, 369-406.
4. Barcroft, J. (2002). Semantic and structural elaboration in L2 lexical acquisition. Language Learning, 52, 323-363.
5. Barkhuizen, G. P. (1998). Discovering learners' perceptions of ESL classroom teaching/learning activities in a South African context. TESOL Quarterly, 32, 85-108.
6. Basden, B. H., Bonilla-Meeks, J. L., & Basden, D. R. (1994). Cross-language priming in word-fragment completion. Journal of Memory and Language, 33, 69-82.
7. Blaxton, T. A. (1989). Investigating dissociations among memory measures: Support for a transfer-appropriate processing framework. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15, 657-668.
8. Bley-Vroman, R. (1988). The fundamental character of foreign language learning. In W. Rutherford & M. Sharwood Smith (Eds.), Grammar and second language teaching (pp. 19-30). New York: Newbury House.
9. Borg, S. (1998). Talking about grammar in the foreign language classroom. Language Awareness, 7, 159-175.
10. Borg, S. (2001). Self-perception and practice in teaching grammar. ELT Journal, 55, 21-29.
11. Borg, S. (2003). Teacher cognition in language teaching: A review of research on what language teachers think, know, believe, and do. Language Teaching, 36, 81-109.
12. Brumfit, C. J. (1984). Communicative methodology in language teaching: The roles of fluency and accuracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
13. Brumfit, C., Mitchell, R., & Hooper, J. (1996). Grammar, language, and classroom practice. In M. Hughes (Ed.), Teaching and learning in changing times (pp. 70-87). Oxford: Blackwell.
14. Burgess, J., & Etherington, S. (2002). Explicit or implicit grammar? System, 30, 433-458.
15. Calvé, P. (1994). Comment faire de la grammaire sans trahir le discours: Le cas des exercices grammaticaux. Canadian Modern Language Review, 50, 636-645.
16. Cathcart, R., & Olsen, J. W. B. (1976). Teachers' and students' preferences for correction of classroom conversation errors. In J. Fanselow & R. Crymes (Eds.), On TESOL '76: Selections Based on Teaching Done at the 10th annual TESOL Convention (pp. 41-53). Washington, DC: TESOL.
17. Celce-Murcia, M. (1991). Discourse analysis and grammar instruction. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 11, 135-151.
18. Day, E., & Shapson, S. (1991). Integrating formal and functional approaches in language teaching in French immersion: An experimental study. Language Learning, 41, 25-58.
19. DeKeyser, R. (1995). Learning second language grammar rules: An experiment with a miniature linguistic system. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19, 249-297.
20. DeKeyser, R. (1998). Beyond focus on form: Cognitive perspectives on learning and practising second language grammar. In C. Doughty &J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 42-63). New York: Cambridge University Press.
21. DeKeyser, R. M. (2000). The robustness of critical period effects in second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 22, 493-533.
22. DeKeyser, R. (2003). Implicit and explicit learning. In C.J. Doughty & M. H. Long (Eds.), The handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 313-348). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
23. Doherty, R. W., Hilberg, R. S., Pinal, A., & Tharp, R. G. (2003). Five standards and student achievement. NABE Journal of Research and Practice, 1, 1-24.
24. Dörnyei, Z. (2005). The psychology of the language learner. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
25. Doughty, C. (1991). Second language instruction does make a difference: Evidence from an empirical study of ESL relativization. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 13, 431-469.
26. Doughty, C. (2003). Instructed SLA: Constraints, compensation, and enhancement. In C. J. Doughty & M. H. Long (Eds.). The handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 256-310). Maiden, MA: Blackwell.
27. Doughty, G., & Varela, E. (1998). Communicative focus on form. In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 114-138). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
28. Doughty, C., & Williams, J. (1998). Pedagogical choices in focus on form. In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 197-261). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
29. Durgunoglu, A. Y., & Roediger, H. L., III. (1987). Test differences in assessing bilingual memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 26, 377-391.
30. Echevarria, J., Vogt, M., & Short, D.J. (2004). Making content comprehensible for English learners: The SIOP model. Boston: Pearson.
31. Ellis, N. C. (1997). Vocabulary acquisition, word structure, collocation, word-class, and meaning. In N. Schmitt & M. McCarthy (Eds.), Vocabulary: Description, acquisition and pedagogy (pp. 122-139). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
32. Ellis, N. C. (2005). At the interface: Dynamic interactions of explicit and implicit language knowledge. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27, 305-352.
33. Ellis, R. (1989). Are classroom and naturalistic language acquisition the same? A study of the classroom acquisition of German word order rules. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 11, 305-328.
34. Ellis, R. (1994). The study of second language acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
35. Ellis, R. (2001). Introduction: Investigating form-focused instruction. Language Learning, 51(Supplement 1), 1-46.
36. Ellis, R. (2002a). Does form-focused instruction affect the acquisition of implicit knowledge? A review of the research. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24, 223-236.
37. Ellis, R. (2002b). The place of grammar instruction in the second/foreign language curriculum. In E. Hinkel & S. Fotos (Eds.), New perspectives on grammar teaching in second language classrooms (pp. 17-34). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
38. Ellis, R., Basturkmen, H., & Loewen, S. (2001). Learner uptake in communicative ESL lessons. Language Learning, 51, 281-318.
39. Farrell, T. S. C. (1999). The reflective assignment: Unlocking pre-service teachers' beliefs on grammar teaching. RELC Journal, 30, 1-17.
40. Franks, J. J., Bilbrey, C. W., Lien, K. G., & McNamara, T. P. (2000). Transferappropriate processing (TAP) and repetition priming. Memory & Cognition, 28, 1140-1151.
41. Gass, S. (1997). Input, interaction, and the second language learner. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
42. Gass, S., & Selinker, L. (2001). Second language acquisition: An introductory course (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
43. Harley, B. (1989). Functional grammar in French immersion: A classroom experiment. Applied Linguistics, 10, 331-359.
44. Harley, B. (1993). Instructional strategies and SLA in early French immersion. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15, 245-259.
45. Harley, B. (1998). The role of focus-on-form tasks in promoting child L2 acquisition. In C. Doughty & J. Williams, (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 156-174). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
46. Harley, B., & Swain, M. (1984). The interlanguage of immersion students and its implications for second language teaching. In A. Davies, C. Criper, & A. Howatt (Eds.), Interlanguage (pp. 291-311). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
47. Higgs, T. V., & Clifford, R. (1982). The push toward communication. In T. V. Higgs (Ed.), Curriculum, competence, and the foreign language teacher (pp. 57-79). Skokie, IL: National Textbook Company.
48. Howatt, A. P. R. (1984). A history of English language teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
49. Hulstijn, J. (1995). Not all grammar rules are equal: Giving grammar instruction its proper place in foreign language teaching. In R Schmidt (Ed.), Attention and awareness in foreign language learning (pp. 359-386). Honolulu: University of Hawai'i.
50. Hulstijn, J. (2003). Incidental and intentional learning. In C. J. Doughty & M. H. Long (Eds.), The handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 349-382). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
51. Hulstijn, J., & DeGraaff, R. (1994). Under what conditions does explicit knowledge of a second language facilitate the acquisition of implicit knowledge? A research proposal. AILA Review, 11, 97-112.
52. Jean, G. (2005). Intégration de la grammaire dans l'enseignement des langues secondes: Le cas des exercices grammaticaux. Canadian Modern Language Review, 61, 519-542.
53. Johnson, K. (1982). Communicative syllabus design and methodology. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
54. Krashen, S. D. (1982). Principles and practice in second language acquisition. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
55. Krashen, S. D. (1994). The input hypothesis and its rivals. In N. Ellis (Ed.), Implicit and explicit learning of language (pp. 45-77). London: Academic Press.
56. Larsen-Freeman, D., & Long, M. H. (1991). An introduction to second language acquisition research. New York: Longman.
57. Lightbown, P. M. (1991). What have we here? Some observations on the role of instruction in second language acquisition. In R. Phillipson, E. Kellerman, L. Selinker, M. Sharwood Smith, & M. Swain (Eds.), Foreign/second language pedagogy research: A commemorative volume for Claus Faerch (pp. 197-212). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
58. Lightbown, P. M. (1998). The importance of timing in focus on form. In C Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 177-196). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
59. Lightbown, P. M., & Spada, N. (1990). Focus-on-form and corrective feedback in communicative language teaching: Effects on second language learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 12, 429-448.
60. Lightbown, P. M., & Spada, N. (2006). How languages are learned (3rd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
61. Long, M. H. (1991). Focus on form: A design feature in language teaching methodology. In K. de Bot, R. Ginsberg, & C. Kramsch (Eds.), Foreign language research in cross-cultural perspective (pp. 39-52). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
62. Long, M. H. (1996). The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In W. Ritchie & T. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 413-468). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
63. Long, M., & Robinson, P. (1998). Focus on form: Theory, research, and practice. In C Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 15-41). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
64. Lyster, R. (1987). Speaking immersion. Canadian Modern Language Review, 43, 701-717.
65. Lyster, R. (1994a). La negotiation de la forme: Stratégie analytique en classe d'immersion. Canadian Modern Language Review, 50, 446-465.
66. Lyster, R. (1994b). The effect of functional-analytic teaching on aspects of French immersion learners' sociolinguistic competence. Applied Linguistics, 15, 263-287.
67. Lyster, R. (1998). Negotiation of form, recasts, and explicit correction in relation to error types and learner repair in immersion classrooms. Language Learning, 48, 183-218.
68. Lyster, R. (2004). Differential effects of prompts and recasts in form-focused instruction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26, 399-432.
69. Lyster, R., & Mori, H. (2006). Interactional feedback and instructional counterbalance. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28, 269-300.
70. Lyster, R, & Ranta, L. (1997). Corrective feedback and learner uptake: Negotiation of form in communicative classrooms. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19, 37-66.
71. Mackey, A., Gass, S., & McDonough, K. (2000). How do learners perceive interactional feedback? Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 22, 471-497.
72. Mackey, A., & Philp, J. (1998). Conversational interaction and second language development: Recasts, responses, and red herrings. Modern Language Journal, 82, 338-356.
73. Mackey, A., Philp, J., Egi, T., Fujii, A., & Tomoaki, T. (2002). Individual differences in working memory, noticing of interactional feedback and L2 development. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Individual differences and instructed language learning (pp. 181-209). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
74. Mitchell, R., & Hooper, J. (1992). Teachers' views of language knowledge. In C. James & P. Garrett (Eds.), Language awareness in the classroom (pp. 40-50). London: Longman.
75. Mitchell, R., & Myles, F. (1998). Second language learning theories. London: Arnold.
76. Morgan-Short, K., & Wood Bowden, H. (2006). Processing instruction and meaningful output-based instruction: Effects on second language development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28, 31-66.
77. Morris, D. D., Bransford, J. D., & Franks, J. J. (1977). Levels of processing versus transfer appropriate processing. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 16, 519-533.
78. Norris, J. M., & Ortega, L. (2000). Effectiveness of L2 instruction: A research synthesis and quantitative meta-analysis. Language Learning, 50, 417-528.
79. Norris, J., & Ortega, L. (2003). Defining and measuring SLA. In C. J. Doughty & M. H. Long (Eds.). The handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 717-761). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
80. Ohta, A. (2000). Rethinking recasts: A learner-centered examination of corrective feedback in the Japanese classroom. In J. K. Hall & L. Verplaetse (Eds.), Second and foreign language learning through classroom interaction (pp. 47-71). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
81. Pica, T. (2002). Subject-matter content: How does it assist the interactional and linguistic needs of classroom language learners? The Modern Language Journal, 86, 1-19.
82. Pienemann, M. (1989). Is language teachable? Applied Linguistics, 10, 52-79.
83. Pienemann, M. (1998). Language processing and second language development: Processability theory. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
84. Raimes, A. (2002). Errors: Windows into the mind. In G. DeLuca, L. Fox, M.Johnson, & M. Kogen (Eds.). Dialogue on writing: Rethinking ESL, basic writing, and first-year composition (pp. 279-287). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
85. Ranta, L. (2002). The role of learners' language analytic ability in the communicative classroom. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Individual differences and instructed language learning (pp. 159-180). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
86. Robinson, P. (1996). Learning simple and complex second language rules under implicit, incidental, rule-search and instructed conditions. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19, 233-247.
87. Robinson, P. (2002). Effects of individual differences in intelligence, aptitude and working memory on adult incidental SLA: A replication and extension of Reber, Walkenfield and Hernstadt (1991). In P. Robinson (Ed.), Individual differences and instructed language learning (pp. 211-266). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
88. Samuda, V. (2001). Guiding relationships between form and meaning during task performance: The role of the teacher. In M. Bygate, P. Skehan, & M. Swain (Eds.), Researching pedagogic tasks: Second language learning, teaching and testing (pp. 119-140). London: Longman.
89. Schleppergrell, M. J., Achugar, M., & Oteíza, T. (2004). The grammar of history: Enhancing content-based instruction through a functional focus on language. TESOL Quarterly, 38, 67-93.
90. Schmidt, R. (1990). The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 11, 17-46.
91. Schulz, R. A. (1996). Focus on form in the foreign language classroom: Students' and teachers' views on error correction and the role of grammar. Foreign Language Annals, 29, 343-364.
92. Schulz, R. A. (2001). Cultural differences in student and teacher perceptions concerning the role of grammar teaching and corrective feedback: USA-Colombia. Modern Language Journal, 85, 244-258.
93. Schwartz, B. (1993). On explicit and negative data effecting and affecting competence and linguistic behavior. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15, 147-162.
94. Segalowitz, N., & Gatbonton, E. (1995). Automaticity and lexical skills in second language fluency: Implications for computer assisted language learning. Computer Assisted Language Learning 8, 129-149.
95. Segalowitz, N., & Lightbown, P. M. (1999). Psycholinguistic approaches to SLA. The Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 19, 23-43.
96. Sharwood Smith, M. (2004). In two minds about grammar: On the interaction of linguistic and metalinguistic knowledge in performance. Transactions of the Philological Society, 102, 255-280.
97. Sheen, R. (2005). Focus on formS as a means of improving accurate oral production. In A. Housen & M. Pierrard (Eds.), Investigations in instructed second language acquisition (pp. 271-310). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
98. Skehan, P. (1989). Individual differences in second language learning. London: Arnold.
99. Slimani, A. (1992). Evaluation of classroom interaction. In C. Alderson & A. Beretta (Eds.), Evaluation in second language education (pp. 197-220). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
100. Snow, M. A., Met, M., & Genesee, F. (1992). A conceptual framework for the integration of language and content instruction. In P. A. Richard-Amato & M. A. Snow (Eds.), The multicultural classroom: Readings for content-area teachers (pp. 27-38). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
101. Spada, N. (1987). Relationships between instructional differences and learning out-comes: A process-product study of communicative language teaching. Applied Linguistics, 8, 137-155.
102. Spada, N. (2006a). Communicative language teaching: Current status and future prospects. In J. Cummins & C. Davis (Eds.), The international handbook of English language teaching. Norwell, MA: Springer.
103. Spada, N. (2006b). Teacher and learner preferences for isolated and integrated instruction [Research report prepared for the Continuing Education English Language Program of the University of Toronto and the Toronto Catholic District School Board]. Toronto: OISE/University of Toronto.
104. Spada, N., & Lightbown, P. M. (1993). Instruction and the development of questions in L2 classrooms. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15, 205-224.
105. Spada, N., & Lightbown, P. M. (1999). Instruction, L1 influence and developmental readiness in second language acquisition. Modem Language Journal, 83, 1-22.
106. Spada, N., Lightbown, P. M., & White, J. L. (2005). The importance of form/meaning mappings in explicit form-focussed instruction. In A. Housen & M. Pierrard (Eds.), Current issues in instructed second language learning (pp. 199-234). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
107. Stern, H. H. (1992). Issues and options in language teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
108. Swain, M. (1988). Manipulating and complementing content teaching to maximize second language learning. TESL Canada Journal, 6, 68-83.
109. Swain, M., & Lapkin, S. (2002). Talking it through: Two French immersion learners' responses to reformulation. International Journal of Educational Research, 37, 285-304.
110. Trahey, M., & White, L. (1993). Positive evidence and preemption in the second language classroom. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15, 181-204.
111. Trofimovich, P. (2005). Spoken-word processing in a native and a second language: An investigation of auditory word priming. Applied Psycholinguistics, 26, 479-504.
112. Truscott, J. (1996). The case against grammar correction in L2 writing classes. Language Learning, 46, 327-369.
113. Truscott, J. (1999). What's wrong with oral grammar correction. Canadian Modern Language Review, 55, 437-456.
114. VanPatten, B. (1990). Attending to content and form in the input: An experiment in consciousness. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 12, 287-301.
115. VanPatten, B. (1996). Input processing and grammar instruction: Theory and research. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
116. VanPatten, B. (2004). Input processing in SLA. In B. VanPatten (Ed.), Processing instruction: Theory, research, and commentary (pp. 5-31). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
117. VanPatten, B., & Cadierno, T. (1993). Explicit instruction and input processing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15, 225-243.
118. Wesche, M. (1981). Language aptitude measures in streaming, matching students with methods, and diagnosis of learning problems. In K C Diller (Ed.), Individual differences and universais in language learning aptitude (pp. 119-154). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
119. White, J. (1998). Getting the learners' attention: A typographical input enhancement study. In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 85-113). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
120. White, L. (1991). Adverb placement in second language acquisition: Some effects of positive and negative evidence in the classroom. Second Language Research, 7, 133-161.
121. White, L., Spada, N., Lightbown, P. M., & Ranta, L. (1991). Input enhancement and L2 question formation. Applied Linguistics, 12, 416-432.
122. Williams, J., & Evans, J. (1998). What kind of focus and on which forms? In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 139-155). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
123. Yorio, C. (1986). Consumerism in second language learning and teaching. Canadian Modern Language Review, 42, 668-687.