Interaction research in second/foreign language classrooms

Multiple Perspectives on Interaction: Second Language Research in Honor of Susan M. Gass

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 157-175

  Spada, Nina ^a,b   Lightbown, Patsy M ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^b Dept of Electrical and Computer Engineering   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84919543436     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203880852     Document Type: Chapter

References (86)

1. Allen, P., Fröhlich, M., & Spada, N. (1984). The communicative orientation of second language teaching: An observation scheme. (pp. 231-252). In J. Handscombe, R. Orem and B. Taylor (Eds.) On TESOL '83, Washington, D.C.
2. Ammar, A. (2003). Corrective feedback and L2 learning: Elicitation and recasts. Unpublished doctoral thesis, McGill University, Montreal.
3. Ammar, A., & Spada, N. (2006). One size fits all? Recasts, prompts, and L2 learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28, 543-574.
4. Bitchener, J. (2004). The relationship between the negotiation of meaning and language learning: A longitudinal study. Language Awareness, 13, 81-95.
5. Carpenter, H., Seon Jeon, K., MacGregor, D., & Mackey, A. (2006). Learners' interpretations of recasts. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28, 209-236.
6. Chastain, K. (1969). The audiolingual habit theory versus cognitive codelearning theory: Some theoretical considerations. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 7, 97-106.
7. Chaudron, C. (1977). A descriptive model of discourse in the corrective treatment of learners' errors. Language Learning, 27, 29-46.
8. Chaudron, C. (1983). Simplification of input: Topic reinstatements and their effects on L2 learners' recognition and recall. TESOL Quarterly, 17, 437-458.
9. Chaudron, C. (1988). Second language classrooms: Research on teaching and learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
10. Day, E., & Shapson, S. (1991). Integrating formal and functional approaches in language teaching in French immersion: An experimental study. Language Learning, 41, 25-58.
11. Doughty, C. (1991). Second language instruction does make a difference: Evidence from an empirical study of SL relativization. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 13, 431-469.
12. Doughty, C., &Varela, E. (1998). Communicative focus on form. In C. Doughty and J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom SLA (pp. 114-138). Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
13. Duff, P. (1986). Taking task to task. In R. R. Day (Ed.), Talking to learn (pp. 147-181). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
14. Duff, P., & Polio, C. (1990). How much foreign language is there in the foreign language classroom? The Modern Language Journal, 74, 154-166.
15. Ellis, R., Basturkmen, H., & Loewen, S. (2001). Learner uptake in communicative ESL lessons. Language Learning, 51, 281-318.
16. Ellis, R., Loewen, S., & Erlam, R. (2006). Implicit and explicit corrective feedback and the acquisition of L2 grammar. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28, 339-368.
17. Fanselow, J. (1977). Beyond Rashomon-conceptualizing and describing the teaching act. TESOL Quarterly, 11, 17-39.
18. Flanders, N. (1960). Interaction analysis in the classroom: A manual for observers. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan.
19. Foster, P. (1998). A classroom perspective on the negotiation of meaning. Applied Linguistics, 19, 1-23.
20. Foster, P., & Ohta, A. (2005). Negotiation for meaning and peer assistance in second language classrooms. Applied Linguistics, 26, 402-430.
21. Fröhlich, M., Spada, N., & Allen, P. (1985). Differences in the communicative orientation of L2 classrooms. TESOL Quarterly, 19, 27-57.
22. Gass, S. M. (2003). Input and interaction. In C. J. Doughty & M. H. Long (Eds.), The handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 224-255). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
23. Gass, S. M., Mackey, A., & Ross-Feldman, L. (2005). Task-based interactions in classroom and laboratory settings. Language Learning, 55, 575-611.
24. Gass, S. M., & Varonis, E. (1985a). Task variation and nonnative/nonnative negotiation of meaning. In S. Gass & C. Madden (Eds.), Input in second language acquisition (pp. 149-161). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
25. Gass, S. M., & Varonis, E. (1985b). Variation in native speaker speech modification to non-native speakers. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 7, 37-58.
26. Gass, S. M., & Varonis, E. (1986). Sex differences in nonnative speaker-nonnative speaker interactions. In R. Day (Ed.), Talking to learn: Conversation in second language acquisition (pp. 327-351). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
27. Han, Z. (2002). A study of the impact of recasts on tense consistency in L2 output. TESOL Quarterly, 36, 543-572.
28. Harley, B. (1989). Functional grammar in French immersion. Applied Linguistics, 10, 331-359.
29. Hatch, E. (1978). Discourse analysis and second language acquisition. In E. Hatch (Ed.), Second language acquisition: A book of readings (pp. 401-435). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
30. Howatt, A. (1984). A history of English language teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
31. Ishida, S. (2002). The effect of recasts on the acquisition of aspect in JFL. Unpublished manuscript, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, HI.
32. Iwashita, N. (2003). Negative feedback and positive evidence in task-based interaction:Differential effects on L2 development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 25, 1-36.
33. Krashen, S. (1985). The input hypothesis: Issues and implications. New York:Longman.
34. Leeman, J. (2003). Recasts and second language development: Beyond negative evidence. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 25, 37-63.
35. Lightbown, P., & Spada, N. (1990). Focus-on-form and corrective feedback in communicative language teaching. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 12, 429-448.
36. Loewen, S. (2004). Uptake in incidental focus on form in meaning-focused ESL lessons. Language Learning, 54, 153-187.
37. Long, M. (1980). Inside the "black box": Methodological issues in classroom research on language learning. Language Learning, 80, 1-42. Reprinted in H. W. Seliger & M. H. Long (Eds.). (1983). Classroom oriented research in second language acquisition (pp. 3-35). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
38. Long, M. (1981). Input, interaction and second language acquisition. In H. Winitz (Ed.), Native language and foreign language acquisition. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 379, 259-278.
39. Long, M. (1983). Native speaker/non-native speaker conversation and the negotiation of comprehensible input. Applied Linguistics, 4, 126-141.
40. Long, M. (1985). Input and second language acquisition theory. In S. M. Gass & C. G. Madden (Eds.), Input in second language acquisition (pp. 377-393). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
41. Long, M. (1996). The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In W. Ritchie and T. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 413-468). New York: Academic Press.
42. Long, M. (2007). Problems in SLA. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
43. Long, M., Adams, L., McLean, M., & Castaños, F. (1976). Doing things with words-verbal interaction in lockstep and small group classroom situations. In J. F. Fanselow & R. H. Crymes (Eds.), On TESOL '76 (pp. 137-153). Washington, DC: TESOL.
44. Long, M., Inagaki, H., & Ortega, L. (1998). Models and recasts in Japanese and Spanish. The Modern Language Journal, 82, 357-371.
45. Long, M., & Porter, P. (1985). Group work, interlanguage talk, and second language acquisition. TESOL Quarterly, 19, 207-228.
46. Long, M., & Sato, C. (1983). Classroom foreigner talk discourse: Forms and functions of teachers' questions. In H. W. Seliger & M. H. Long (Eds.), Classroom oriented research in second language acquisition (pp 268-285). Rowley, MA:Newbury House.
47. Lyster, R. (1998). Recasts, repetition, and ambiguity in L2 classroom discourse. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 20, 51-81.
48. Lyster, R. (2004). Differential effects of prompts and recasts in form-focused instruction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26, 399-432.
49. Lyster, R. (2007). Learning and teaching languages through content: A counterbalanced approach. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
50. Lyster, R., & Mori, H. (2006). Interactional feedback and instructional counterbalance. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28, 269-300.
51. Lyster, R., & Ranta, L. (1997). Corrective feedback and learner uptake: Negotiation of form in communicative classrooms. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19, 37-66.
52. Mackey, A., & Goo, J. (2007). Interaction research in SLA: A meta-analysis and research synthesis. In A. Mackey (Ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition: A series of empirical studies (pp. 407-452). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
53. Mackey, A., & Philp, J. (1998). Conversational interaction and second language development: Recasts, responses, and red herrings? The Modern Language Journal, 82, 338-357.
54. Mackey, A., Polio, C., & McDonough, K. (2004). The relationship between experience, education, and teachers' use of incidental focus on form techniques. Language Teaching Research, 8, 301-327.
55. Mitchell, R., Parkinson, B., & Johnstone, R. (1981). The foreign language classroom:An observational study. Stirling Educational Monographs No., 9. Stirling:University of Stirling, Department of Education.
56. Mori, H. (2002). Error treatment at different grade levels in Japanese immersion classroom interaction. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles.
57. Moskowitz, G. (1967). The flint system: An observational tool for the foreign language class. In A. Simon & E. G. Boyer (Eds.), Mirrors for behavior: An anthology of classroom observation instruments (pp. 1-15). Philadelphia, PA: Center for the Study of Teaching, Temple University.
58. Musumeci, D. (1996). Teacher-learner negotiation in content-based instruction:Communication at cross-purposes? Applied Linguistics, 17, 286-235.
59. Nicholas, H., Lightbown, P. M., & Spada, N. (2001). Recasts as feedback to language learners. Language Learning, 51, 719-758.
60. Norris, J., & Ortega, L. (2000). Effectiveness of L2 instruction: A research synthesis and quantitative meta-analysis. Language Learning, 50, 417-528.
61. Nunan, D. (1991). Methods in second language classroom-oriented research:A critical review. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 12, 249-274.
62. Ohta, A. S. (2000). Rethinking interaction in SLA: Developmentally appropriate assistance in the zone of proximal development and the acquisition of L2 grammar. In J. P. Lantolf (Ed.) Sociocultural theory and second language learning (pp. 51-78). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
63. Oliver, R., & Mackey, A. (2003). Interactional context and feedback in child ESL classrooms. The Modern Language Journal, 87, 519-533.
64. Ortega, L. (2007). Meaningful L2 practice in foreign language classrooms:A cognitive-interactionist SLA perspective. In R. DeKeyser (Ed.), Practice in a second language: Perspectives from applied linguistics and cognitive psychology (pp. 180-207). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
65. Pica, T. (1994). Research on negotiation: What does it reveal about secondlanguage learning conditions, processes, and outcomes? Language Learning, 44, 493-527.
66. Pica, T. (2002). Subject-matter content: How does it assist the interactional and linguistic needs of classroom language learners? The Modern Language Journal, 86, 1-19.
67. Pica, T., Young, R., & Doughty, C. (1987). The impact of interaction on comprehension. TESOL Quarterly, 21, 737-758.
68. Polio, C., Gass, S. M., & Chapin, L. (2006). Using stimulated recall to investigate native speaker perceptions in native-nonnative speaker interaction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28, 237-267.
69. Polio, C., & Duff, P. (1994). Teachers' language use in university foreign language classrooms: A qualitative analysis of English and target language alternation. The Modern Language Journal, 78, 314-326.
70. Polio, C., & Gass, S. M. (1997). Replication and reporting: A commentary. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19, 499-508.
71. Polio, C., Gass, S. M., & Chapin, L. (2006). Using stimulated recall to investigate native speaker perceptions in native-nonnative speaker interaction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28, 237-267.
72. Porter, P. (1986). How learners talk to each other: Input and interaction in taskcentered discussions. In R. R. Day (Ed.), Talking to learn (pp. 200-222). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
73. Rulon, K. A., & McCreary, J. (1986). Negotiation of content: teacher-fronted and small-group interaction. In R. R. Day (Ed.), Talking to learn (pp. 182-199). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
74. Seliger, H. (1977). Does practice make perfect? A study of interaction patterns and L2 competence. Language Learning, 27, 263-278.
75. Sheen, Y. (2004). Corrective feedback and learner uptake in communicative classrooms across instructional settings. Language Teaching Research, 8, 263-300.
76. Sheen, Y. (2006). Exploring the relationship between characteristics of recasts and learner uptake. Language Teaching Research, 10, 361-392.
77. Shehadeh, A. (2002). Comprehensive output, from occurence to acquisition: An agenda for acquisitional research. Language Learning, 52, 597-647.
78. Smith, P. D., Jr. (1970). A comparison of the cognitive and audiolingual approaches to foreign language instruction. The Pennsylvania foreign language project. Philadelphia, PA: The Center for Curriculum Development.
79. Spada, N. (1987). Relationships between instructional differences and learning outcomes: A process-product study of communicative language teaching. Applied Linguistics, 8, 137-161.
80. Spada, N., & Fröhlich, M. (1995). Communicative orientation of language teaching:Observation scheme, coding conventions, and applications. Sydney: Macquarie University National Center for English Language Teaching and Research.
81. Storch, N. (2002). Patterns of interaction in ESL pair work. Language Learning, 52, 119-158.
82. Swain, M. (1985). Communicative competence: Some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development. In S. Gass & C. Madden (Eds.), Input in second language acquisition (pp. 235-253). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
83. Swain, M., & Lapkin, S. (2002). Talking it through: Two French immersion learners' response to reformulation. International Journal of Educational Research, 37, 285-304.
84. Ullman, R., & Geva, E. (1984) Approaches to observation in second language classes. In P. Allen and M. Swain (Eds.), Language issues and education policies. ELT Documents (119). Oxford: Pergamon Press.
85. White, J., & Lightbown, P. M. (1984). Asking and answering in ESL classes. Canadian Modern Language Review, 40, 228-244.
86. Yule, G., & Macdonald, D. (1990). Resolving referential conflicts in L2 interaction:The effect of proficiency and interactive role. Language Learning, 40, 539-556.