Reflecting on e-government research: Toward a taxonomy of theories and theoretical constructs

International Journal of Electronic Government Research

Volumn 7, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 64-88

  Rana, Nripendra P ^a   Williams, Michael D ^a   Dwivedi, Yogesh K ^a   Williams, Janet ^b  

^a SWANSEA UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GLAMORGAN   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Applications; E Government; Taxonomy; Theoretical Constructs; Theories

Indexed keywords

EID: 84860588266     PISSN: 15483886     EISSN: 15483894     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4018/jegr.2011100105     Document Type: Article

References (137)

1. Al-Shafi, S., & Weerakkody, V. (2009). Implementing free Wi-Fi in public parks: An empirical study in Qatar. International Journal of Electronic Government Research, 5(3), 21-35. doi:10.4018/jegr.2009070102
2. Azad, B., & Faraj, S. (2009). E-Government institutionalizing practices of a land registration mapping system. Government Information Quarterly, 26(1), 5-14. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2008.08.005
3. Barnes, S. J., & Vidgen, R. (2004). Interactive e-government services: Modelling user perceptions with eQual. Electronic Government, an International Journal, 1(2), 213-228.
4. Belanger, F., & Carter, L. (2008). Trust and risk in e-government adoption. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 17(2), 165-176. doi:10.1016/j. jsis.2007.12.002
5. Belanger, F., & Carter, L. (2010). The digital divide and internet voting acceptance. In Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Digital Society (pp. 307-310).
6. Belanger, F., & Carter, L. D. (2005). U-Government: A framework for the evolution of e-government. Electronic Government, an International Journal, 2(4), 426-445.
7. Boyer-Wright, K. F., & Kottemann J. E. (2008). High-level factors affecting availability of online government services worldwide. Electronic Government, an International Journal, 5(4), 375-389.
8. Bussell, J. (2007). Electoral competition and digital development in India and South Africa. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Information and Communication Technologies and Development (pp. 1-9).
9. Carter, L. (2008). E-Government diffusion: A comparison of adoption constructs. Transforming Government: People, Process, and Policy, 2(3), 147-161. doi:10.1108/17506160810902167
10. Carter, L., & Belanger, F. (2005). The utilization of e-government services: Citizen trust, innovation and acceptance factors. Information Systems Journal, 15(1), 5-25. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2575.2005.00183.x (Pubitemid 40163171)
11. Carter, L., & Schaupp, L. C. (2009). Relating acceptance and optimism to e-file adoption. International Journal of Electronic Government Research, 5(3), 62-74. doi:10.4018/jegr.2009070105
12. Casalo, L. V., Cisneros, J., Guinaliu, M., & Orus, C. (2008). Effects of a virtual citizen community: The case of Expo Zaragoza. Electronic Government, an International Journal, 5(2), 131-145.
13. Chai, S., Herath, T. C., Park, I., & Rao, H. R. (2006). Repeated use of e-gov web sites: A satisfaction and confidentiality perspective. International Journal of Electronic Government Research, 2(3), 1-22. doi:10.4018/jegr.2006070101
14. Chen, Y., & Dimitrova, D. V. (2006). Electronic government and online engagement: Citizen interaction with government via web portals. International Journal of Electronic Government Research, 2(1), 54-76. doi:10.4018/jegr. 2006010104
15. Chhabra, S., & Jaiswal, M. (2008). E-government organizational performance framework: Case study of Haryana State in India - A log linear regression analysis. International Journal of Electronic Government Research, 4(3), 57-80. doi:10.4018/ jegr.2008070104
16. Chiang, L. (2009). Trust and security in the e-voting system. Electronic Government, an International Journal, 6(4), 343-360.
17. Choudrie, J., Brinkman, W., & Pathania, R. (2007). Using diffusion theory to determine the digital divide in e-services: Two UK local-area perspectives. Electronic Government, an International Journal, 4(3), 345-359.
18. Chu, P. Y., Hsiao, N., Lee, F. W., & Chen, C. W. (2004). Exploring success factors for Taiwan's government electronic tendering system: Behavioral perspectives from end users. Government Information Quarterly, 21(2), 219-234. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2004.01.005 (Pubitemid 38782154)
19. Chu, P. Y., Yeh, S., & Chuang, M. (2008). Reengineering municipality citizen electronic complaint system through citizen relationship management. Electronic Government, an International Journal, 5(3), 288-309.
20. Colesca, S. E. (2009). Understanding trust in e-government. The Engineering Economist, 3(3), 7-15.
21. Colesca, S. E., & Dobrica, L. (2008). Adoption and use of e-government services: The case of Romania. Journal of Applied Research and Technology, 6(3), 204-217.
22. Das, J., DiRienzo, C., & Burbridge, J. Jr. (2008). Global e-government and the role of trust: A cross country analysis. International Journal of Electronic Government Research, 5(1), 1-18. doi:10.4018/ jegr.2009010101
23. Davidrajuh, R. (2004). Planning e-government start-up: A case study on e-Sri Lanka. Electronic Government, an International Journal, 1(1), 92-106.
24. DeLone, W. H., & McLean, E. R. (1992). Information systems success: The quest for the dependent variable. Information Systems Research, 3(1), 60-95. doi:10.1287/isre.3.1.60
25. DeLone, W. H., & McLean, E. R. (2003). The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: A ten year update. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19(4), 9-30.
26. Dimitrova, D. V., & Chen, Y. C. (2006). Profiling the adopters of e-government information and services - The influence of psychological characteristics, civic mindedness, and information channels. Social Science Computer Review, 24(2), 172-188. doi:10.1177/0894439305281517 (Pubitemid 43536532)
27. Dwivedi, Y. K., Khan, N., & Papazafeiropoulou, A. (2007). Consumer adoption and usage of broadband in Bangladesh. Electronic Government, an International Journal, 4(3), 299-313.
28. Dwivedi, Y. K., Khoumbati, K., Williams, M. D., & Lal, B. (2007). Factors affecting consumers' behavioural intention to adopt broadband in Pakistan. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 1(3), 285-297.
29. Dwivedi, Y. K., & Weerakkody, V. (2007). Examining the factors affecting the adoption of broadband in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Electronic Government, an International Journal, 4(1), 43-58.
30. Dwivedi, Y. K., & Williams, M. D. (2008). Demographic Influence on UK citizens e-government adoption. Electronic Government, an International Journal, 5(3), 261-274.
31. Esterling, K., Lazer, D. M. J., & Neblo, M. A. (2005). Home (Page) style: Determinates of the quality of the house members' web sites. International Journal of Electronic Government Research, 1(2), 50-63. doi:10.4018/jegr.2005040103
32. Falivene, G. M., & Silva, G. M. (2008). Reflections and proposals on public officials training and promotion of e-government. International Journal of Electronic Government Research, 4(2), 43-58. doi:10.4018/jegr.2008040104
33. Floropoulos, J., Spathis, C., Halvatzis, D., & Tsipouridou, M. (2010). Measuring the success of the Greek Taxation Information System. International Journal of Information Management, 30(1), 47-56. doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2009.03.013
34. Fu, J. R., Chao, W. P., & Farn, C. K. (2004). Determinants of taxpayers' adoption of electronic filing methods in Taiwan: An exploratory study. Journal of Government Information, 30(5-6), 658-683. doi:10.1016/j.jgi. 2004.11.002 (Pubitemid 40045856)
35. Fu, J. R., Farn, C. K., & Chao, W. P. (2006). Acceptance of electronic tax filing: A study of taxpayer intentions. Information & Management, 43(1), 109-126. doi:10.1016/j.im.2005.04.001 (Pubitemid 41815210)
36. Fu-Lai, T. Y., & Yu, T. (2008). Uncertainty, human agency and e-government. Transforming Government: People, Process, and Policy, 2(4), 283-296. doi:10.1108/17506160810917963
37. Gotoh, R. (2009). Critical factors increasing user satisfaction with e-government services. Electronic Government, an International Journal, 6(3), 252-264.
38. Gronlund, A. (2005). State of the art in e-gov research: Surveying conference publications. International Journal of Electronic Government Research, 1(4), 1-25. doi:10.4018/jegr.2005100101
39. Gumussoy, C. A., & Calisir, F. (2009). Understanding factors affecting e-reverse auction use: An integrative approach. Computers in Human Behavior, 25(4), 975-988. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2009.04.006
40. Hamner, M., & Al-Qahtani, F. (2009). Enhancing the case for electronic government in developing nations: A people-centric study focused in Saudi Arabia. Government Information Quarterly, 26(1), 137-143. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2007.08.008
41. Hinnant, C. C., & O'Looney, J. A. (2003). Examining pre-adoption interest in online innovations: An exploratory study of e-service personalization in the public sector. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 50(4), 436-447. doi:10.1109/ TEM.2003.820133
42. Horst, M., Kuttschreuter, M., & Gutteling, J. M. (2007). Perceived usefulness, personal experiences, risk perception and trust as determinants of adoption of e-government services in The Netherlands. Computers in Human Behavior, 23(4), 1838-1852. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2005.11.003 (Pubitemid 46176521)
43. Hsu, F. M., & Chen, T. Y. (2007). Understanding information systems usage behavior in e-government: The role of context and perceived value. In Proceedings of the Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems.
44. Hsu, L. (2005). The adoption and implementation of projects-ABCDE (MOEA) - Based on Grounded and TAM theory. Electronic Government, an International Journal, 2(2), 144-159.
45. Hung, S. Y., Chang, C. M., & Yu, T. J. (2006). Determinants of user acceptance of the e-Government services: The case of online tax filing and payment system. Government Information Quarterly, 23(1), 97-122. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2005.11.005 (Pubitemid 43820970)
46. Hung, S. Y., Tang, K. Z., Chang, C. M., & Ke, C. D. (2009). User acceptance of intergovernmental services: An example of electronic document management system. Government Information Quarterly, 26(2), 387-397. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2008.07.003
47. Hung, Y. H., Wang, Y. S., & Chou, S. C. T. (2007). User acceptance of e-government services. In Proceedings of the Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems.
48. Jaeger, P. T. (2003). The endless wire: E-government as global phenomenon. Government Information Quarterly, 20, 323-331. doi:10.1016/j. giq.2003.08.003 (Pubitemid 37527832)
49. Janssen, M., & Klievink, B. (2009). The role of intermediaries in multi-channel service delivery strategies. International Journal of Electronic Government Research, 5(3), 36-46. doi:10.4018/ jegr.2009070103
50. Janssen, M., & Kuk, G. (2007). E-Government business models for public service networks. International Journal of Electronic Government Research, 3(3), 54-71. doi:10.4018/jegr.2007070104
51. Joia, L. A. (2004). Bridging the digital divide: Some initiatives in Brazil. Electronic Government, an International Journal, 1(3), 300-315.
52. Kaliannan, M., & Awang, H. (2009). Adoption and use of e-government services: A case study on e-procurement in Malaysia . In Bulucea, C. A., Mladenov, V., Pop, E., Leba, M., & Mastorakis, N. (Eds.), Recent advances in e-activities, information security and privacy (pp. 88-93). Stevens Point, WI: WSEAS Press.
53. Kanat, I. E., & Ozkan, S. (2009). Exploring citizens' perception of government to citizen services: A model based on theory of planned behaviour (TPB). Transforming Government: People, Process, and Policy, 3(4), 406-419. doi:10.1108/17506160910997900
54. Khoumbati, K., Dwivedi, Y. K., Lal, B., & Chen H. (2007). Broadband adoption in Pakistan. Electronic Government, an International Journal, 4(4), 451-465.
55. Khoumbati, K., & Themistocleous, M. (2007). Application of fuzzy simulation for the evaluation of enterprise application integration in healthcare organisations. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 1(3), 230-241.
56. Kim, C., & Holzer, M. (2006). Public administrators' acceptance of the practice of digital democracy: A model explaining the utilization of online policy forums in South Korea. International Journal of Electronic Government Research, 2(2), 22-48. doi:10.4018/jegr.2006040102
57. Kim, S., & Lee, H. (2006). The impact of organizational context and information technology on employee knowledge-sharing capabilities. Public Administration Review, 66(3), 370-385. doi:10.1111/ j.1540-6210.2006.00595.x (Pubitemid 43937467)
58. Kolsaker, A. (2006). Reconceptualising e-government as a tool of governance: The UK case. Electronic Government, an International Journal, 3(4), 347-355. (Pubitemid 44541554)
59. Kolsaker, A., & Lee-Kelley, L. (2006). 'Mind the Gap': E-government and e-democracy. In M. A. Wimmer, H. J. Scholl, A. Gronlund, & K. V. Andersen (Eds.), Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Electronic Government (LNCS 4084, pp. 96-106).
60. Kraemer, K. L., & King, J. L. (2003). Information technology and administrative reform: Will the time after e-government be different? Retrieved from http://www.crito.uci.edu
61. Krell, K., & Matook, S. (2009). Competitive advantage from mandatory investments: An empirical study of Australian firms. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 18(1), 31-45. doi:10.1016/j. jsis.2008.12.001
62. Kunstelj, M., Jukic, T., & Vintar, M. (2007). Analysing the demand side of e-government: What can we learn from slovenian users? In M. A. Wimmer, J. Scholl, & A. Gronlund (Eds.), Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Electronic Government (LNCS 4656, pp. 305-317).
63. Lau, A. S. M. (2004). Strategies to encourage the adoption of G2C e-government services in Hong Kong. Electronic Government, an International Journal, 1(3), 273-292.
64. Lau, A. S. M., & Kwok, V. W. S. (2007). How e-government strategies influence e-commerce adoption by SMEs. Electronic Government, an International Journal, 4(1), 20-42.
65. Lean, O. K., Zailani, S., Ramayah, T., & Fernando, Y. (2009). Factors influencing intention to use e-government services among citizens in Malaysia. International Journal of Information Management, 29(6), 458-475. doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2009.03.012
66. Lee, J., & Rao, H. R. (2009). Task complexity and different decision criteria for online service acceptance: A comparison of two e-government compliance service domains. Decision Support Systems, 47(4), 424-435. doi:10.1016/j.dss.2009.04.009
67. Lee, K. C., Kirlidog, M., Lee, S., & Lim, G. G. (2008). User evaluations of tax filing web sites: A comparative study of South Korea and Turkey. Online Information Review, 32(6), 842-859. doi:10.1108/14684520810923962
68. Li, X., Hess, T. J., & Valacich, J. S. (2008). Why do we trust new technology? A study of initial trust formation with organizational information systems. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 17(1), 39-71. doi:10.1016/j.jsis.2008.01.001
69. Lim, J. H., & Tang, S. Y. (2008). Urban e-government initiatives and environmental decision performance in Korea. Journal of Public Administration: Research and Theory, 18(1), 109-138. doi:10.1093/jopart/ mum005
70. Loo, W. H., Yeow, P. H. P., & Chong, S. C. (2009). User acceptance of Malaysian government multipurpose smartcard applications. Government Information Quarterly, 26(2), 358-367. doi:10.1016/j. giq.2008.07.004
71. Lu, C. T., Huang, S. Y., & Lo, P. Y. (2010). An empirical study of on-line tax filing acceptance model: Integrating TAM and TPB. African Journal of Business Management, 4(5), 800-810.
72. Luk, S. C. Y. (2009). The impact of leadership and stakeholders on the success/failure of e-government service: Using the case study of e-stamping service in Hong Kong. Government Information Quarterly, 26(4), 594-604. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2009.02.009
73. Luna-Reyes, L. F., Gil-Garcia, J. R., & Estrada- Marroquin, M. (2008). The impact of institutions on interorganizational IT projects in the Mexican federal government. International Journal of Electronic Government Research, 4(2), 27-42. doi:10.4018/ jegr.2008040103
74. Marche, S., & McNiven, J. D. (2003). E-government and e-governance: The future isn't what it used to be. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 20(1), 74-86. doi:10.1111/j.1936-4490.2003.tb00306.x (Pubitemid 36618966)
75. Mbarika, V. W., & Byrd, T. A. (2009). An exploratory study of strategies to improve Africa's least developed economies' telecommunications infrastructure: The stakeholders speak. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 56(2), 312-328. doi:10.1109/ TEM.2009.2013826
76. McNeal, R. S., Schmeida, M., & Hale, K. (2007). E-disclosure laws and electronic campaign finance reform: Lessons from the diffusion of e-government policies in the States. Government Information Quarterly, 24(2), 312-325. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2006.06.006
77. McNeal, R. S., Tolbert, C. J., Mossberger, K., & Dotterweich, L. J. (2003). Innovating in digital government in the American states. Social Science Quarterly, 84(1), 52-70. doi:10.1111/1540-6237.00140 (Pubitemid 36593870)
78. Mirchandani, D. A., Johnson, J. H., & Joshi, K. (2008). Perspectives of citizens towards e-government in Thailand and Indonesia: A multigroup analysis. Information Systems Frontiers, 10(4), 483-497. doi:10.1007/s10796-008- 9102-7
79. Mitra, R. K., & Gupta, M. P. (2008). A contextual perspective of performance assessment in eGovernment: A study of Indian Police Administration. Government Information Quarterly, 25(2), 278-302. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2006.03.008
80. Moon, M. J., & Norris, D. F. (2005). Does managerial orientation matter? The adoption of reinventing government and e-government at the municipal level. Information Systems Journal, 15(1), 43-60. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2575.2005. 00185.x (Pubitemid 40163173)
81. Moynihan, D. P., & Silva, C. L. (2008). The administrators of democracy: A research note on local election officials. Public Administration Review, 68(5), 816-827. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2008.00923.x
82. Myers, B. L., Kappelman, L. A., & Prybutok, V. R. (1997). A comprehensive model for assessing quality and productivity of the information systems function: Toward a theory for information systems assessment. Information Resources Management Journal, 6-25.
83. Norris, F. D., & Lloyd, B. A. (2006). The scholarly literature on e-government: Characterizing a nascent field. International Journal of Electronic Government Research, 2(4), 40-56. doi:10.4018/jegr.2006100103
84. Norris, P. (2005). The impact of the internet on political activism: Evidence from Europe. International Journal of Electronic Government Research, 1(1), 20-39. doi:10.4018/jegr.2005010102
85. Norris, P., & Curtice, J. (2006). If you build a political web site, will they come? The Internet and political activism in Britain. International Journal of Electronic Government Research, 2(2), 1-21. doi:10.4018/jegr. 2006040101
86. Ojha, A., Sahu, G. P., & Gupta, M. P. (2009). Antecedents of paperless income tax filing by young professionals in India: An exploratory study. Transforming Government: People, Process, and Policy, 3(1), 65-90. doi:10.1108/17506160910940740
87. Ozkan, S., Koseler, R., & Baykal, N. (2009). Evaluating learning management systems: Adoption of hexagonal e-learning assessment model in higher education. Transforming Government: People, Process, and Policy, 3(2), 111-130. doi:10.1108/17506160910960522
88. Parent, M., Vandebeek, C. A., & Gemino, A. C. (2005). Building citizen trust through e-government. Government Information Quarterly, 22(4), 720-736. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2005.10.001 (Pubitemid 43422592)
89. Parvez, Z. (2006). Examining e-democracy through a double structuration loop. Electronic Government, an International Journal, 3(3), 329-346. (Pubitemid 43821625)
90. Parvez, Z. (2008). E-Democracy from the perspective of local elected members. International Journal of Electronic Government Research, 4(3), 20-35. doi:10.4018/jegr.2008070102
91. Phang, C. W., Sutanto, J., Kankanhalli, A., Li, Y., Tan, B. C. Y., & Teo, H. H. (2006). Senior citizens' acceptance of information systems: A study in the context of e-government services. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 53(4), 555-569. doi:10.1109/TEM.2006.883710 (Pubitemid 44680693)
92. Pieterson, W., & Teerling, M. (2009). Channel integration in governmental service delivery: The effects on citizen behavior and perceptions. In M. A. Wimmer, H. J. Scholl, M. Janssen, & R. Traunmuller (Eds.), Proceedings of the International Conference on Electronic Government (LNCS 5693, pp. 222-233).
93. Pieterson, W., Teerling, M., & Ebbers, W. (2008). Channel perceptions and usage: Beyond media richness factors. In M. A. Wimmer, H. J. Scholl, & E. Ferro (Eds.), Proceedings of the International Conference on Electronic Government (LNCS 5184, pp. 219-230).
94. Pina, V., Torres, L., & Royo, S. (2009). E-government evolution in EU local governments: A comparative perspective. Online Information Review, 33(6), 1137-1168. doi:10.1108/14684520911011052
95. Pinho, J. C., & Macedo, I. M. (2008). Examining the antecedents and consequences of online satisfaction within the public sector: The case of taxation services. Transforming Government: People Process and Policy, 2(3), 177-193.
96. Plouffe, C., Hulland, J., & Vandenbosch, M. (2001). Research report: Richness versus parsimony in modeling technology adoption decisions - understanding merchant adoption of a smart card-based payment system. Information Systems Research, 12, 208-222. doi:10.1287/isre.12.2.208.9697
97. Prybutok, V. R., Zhang, X. N., & Ryan, S. D. (2008). Evaluating leadership, IT quality, and net benefits in an e-government environment. Information & Management, 45(3), 143-152. doi:10.1016/j. im.2007.12.004 (Pubitemid 351491529)
98. Reddick, C. G. (2005). Citizen-initiated contacts with Ontario local e-government: Administrators' responses to contacts. International Journal of Electronic Government Research, 1(4), 45-62. doi:10.4018/jegr.2005100103
99. Reddick, C. G. (2006). Information resource managers and e-government effectiveness: A survey of Texas state agencies. Government Information Quarterly, 23(2), 249-266. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2005.11.006 (Pubitemid 44172060)
100. Reddick, C. G. (2009). The adoption of centralized customer service systems: A survey of local governments. Government Information Quarterly, 26(1), 219-226. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2008.03.005
101. Sahu, G. P., & Gupta, M. P. (2007). Users' acceptance of e-government: A study of Indian central excise. International Journal of Electronic Government Research, 3(3), 1-21. doi:10.4018/jegr.2007070101
102. Sambasivan, M., Wemyss, G. P., & Rose, R. C. (2010). User acceptance of a G2B system: A case of electronic procurement system in Malaysia. Internet Research, 20(2), 169-187. doi:10.1108/10662241011032236
103. Sang, S., Lee, J. D., & Lee, J. (2009). E-government adoption in ASEAN: The case of Cambodia. Internet Research, 19(5), 517-534. doi:10.1108/10662240910998869
104. Sang, S., Lee, J. D., & Lee, J. (2010). E-government adoption in Cambodia: A partial least squares approach. Transforming Government: People, Process, and Policy, 4(2), 138-157. doi:10.1108/17506161011047370
105. Schaupp, L. C., & Carter, L. (2010). The impact of trust, risk and optimism bias on e-file adoption. Information Systems Frontiers, 12(3), 299-309. doi:10.1007/s10796-008-9138-8
106. Schaupp, L. C., Carter, L., & McBride, M. E. (2010). E-file adoption: A study of US taxpayers' intentions. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(4), 636-644. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2009.12.017
107. Seddon, P. B. (1997). A respecification and extension of the DeLone and McLean model of IS success. Information Systems Research, 8(3), 240-253. doi:10.1287/isre.8.3.240
108. Seeman, E. D., O'Hara, M. T., Holloway, J., & Forst, A. (2007). The impact of government intervention on technology adoption and diffusion: The example of wireless location technology, Electronic Government, an International Journal, 4(1), 1-19.
109. Segovia, R. H., Jennex, M. E., & Beatty, J. (2009). Paralingual web design and trust in e-government. International Journal of Electronic Government Research, 5(1), 36-49. doi:10.4018/jegr.2009091803
110. Senyucel, Z. (2007). Assessing the impact of e-government on providers and users of the IS function: A structuration perspective. Transforming Government: People, Process, and Policy, 1(2), 131-144. doi:10.1108/ 17506160710751968
111. Serrano-Cinca, C., Rueda-Tomas, M., & Poitillo- Tarragona, P. (2009). Determinants of e-government extension. Online Information Review, 33(3), 476-498. doi:10.1108/14684520910969916
112. Seyal, A. H., & Pijpers, G. G. M. (2004). Senior government executives' use of the internet: A Bruneian scenario. Behaviour & Information Technology, 23(3), 197-210. doi:10.1080/014492904100 01669978
113. Shareef, M. A., Kumar, U., Kumar, V., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2009). Identifying critical factors for adoption of e-government. Electronic Government, an International Journal, 6(1), 70-96.
114. Shelley, M. C. II, Thrane, L. E., & Shulman, S. W. (2006). Generational differences in information technology use and political involvement. International Journal of Electronic Government Research, 2(1), 36-53. doi:10.4018/jegr.2006010103
115. Srivastava, S. C., & Teo, T. S. H. (2006). Performance impacts of e-government: An international perspective. In Proceedings of the Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems.
116. Srivastava, S. C., & Teo, T. S. H. (2007a). E-government payoffs: Evidence from cross-country data. Journal of Global Information Management, 15(4), 20-40. doi:10.4018/jgim.2007100102
117. Srivastava, S. C., & Teo, T. S. H. (2007b). What facilitates e-government development? A cross-country analysis. Electronic Government, an International Journal, 4(4), 365-378.
118. Sun, S., Ju, T. L., & Chen, P. (2006). E-government impacts on effectiveness: A survey study of an e-official-document system. Electronic Government, an International Journal, 3(2), 174-189. (Pubitemid 43584876)
119. Tang, H., Chung, S. H., & Se, C. W. (2009). Examining the impact of possible antecedents on service usage: An empirical study on Macao e-government. Electronic Government, an International Journal, 6(1), 97-109.
120. Teerling, M. L., & Pieterson, W. (2010). Multichannel marketing: An experiment on guiding citizens to the electronic channels. Government Information Quarterly, 27(1), 98-107. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2009.08.003
121. Teo, T. S. H., Srivastava, S. C., & Jiang, L. (2008). Trust and electronic government success: An empirical study. Journal of Management Information Systems, 25(3), 99-131. doi:10.2753/MIS0742- 1222250303
122. Tolbert, C. J., Mossberger, K., & McNeal, R. (2008). Institutions, policy innovation, and e-government in the American states. Public Administration Review, 68(3), 549-563. doi:10.1111/j.1540- 6210.2008.00890.x
123. Tung, L. L., & Rieck, O. (2005). Adoption of electronic government services among business organizations in Singapore. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 14(4), 417-440. doi:10.1016/j. jsis.2005.06.001 (Pubitemid 41525800)
124. van Deursen, A. J. A. M., & van Dijk, J. A. G. M. (2009). Improving digital skills for the use of online public information and services. Government Information Quarterly, 26(2), 333-340. doi:10.1016/j. giq.2008.11.002
125. van Dijk, J. A. G. M., Peters, O., & Ebbers, W. (2008). Explaining the acceptance and use of government Internet services: A multivariate analysis of 2006 survey data in The Netherlands. Government Information Quarterly, 25, 379-399. doi:10.1016/j. giq.2007.09.006
126. van Veenstra, A. F., & Zuurmond, A. (2009). Opening the black box: Exploring the effect of transformation on online service delivery in local governments. In M. A. Wimmer, H. J. Scholl, M. Janssen, & R. Traunmuller (Eds.), Proceedings of the International Conference on Electronic Government (LNCS 5693, pp. 234-244).
127. Vathanophas, V., Krittayaphongphun, N., & Klomsiri, C. (2008). Technology acceptance toward e-government initiative in Royal Thai Navy. Transforming Government: People, Process, and Policy, 2(4), 256-282. doi:10.1108/17506160810917954
128. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 27(3), 425-478.
129. Verdegem, P., & Verleye, G. (2009). User-centered e-government in practice: A comprehensive model for measuring user satisfaction. Government Information Quarterly, 26(3), 487-497. doi:10.1016/j. giq.2009.03.005
130. Vonk, G., Geertman, S., & Schot, P. (2007). New technologies stuck in old hierarchies: The diffusion of geo-information technologies in Dutch public organizations. Public Administration Review, 67(4), 745-756. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2007.00757.x
131. Wang, Y. S. (2002). The adoption of electronic tax filing systems: An empirical study. Government Information Quarterly, 20(4), 333-352. doi:10.1016/j. giq.2003.08.005
132. Wang, Y. S., & Liao, Y. W. (2008). Assessing eGovernment systems success: A validation of the DeLone and McLean model of information systems success. Government Information Quarterly, 25(4), 717-733. doi:10.1016/j.giq. 2007.06.002
133. Wang, Y. S., & Shih, Y. W. (2009). Why do people use information kiosks? A validation of the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. Government Information Quarterly, 26(1), 158-165. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2008.07.001
134. Wangpipatwong, S., Chutimaskul, W., & Papasratorn, B. (2009). Quality enhancing the continued use of e-government web sites: Evidence from e-citizens of Thailand. International Journal of Electronic Government Research, 5(1), 19-35. doi:10.4018/ jegr.2009092202
135. Warkentin, M., Gefen, D., Pavlou, P. A., & Rose, G. M. (2002). Encouraging citizen adoption of e-government by building trust. Electronic Markets, 12(3), 157-162. doi:10.1080/101967802320245929
136. West, D. M. (2004). E-government and the transformation of service delivery and citizen attitudes. Public Administration Review, 64(1), 15-27. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2004.00343.x (Pubitemid 38059187)
137. Yeow, P. H. P., & Loo, W. H. (2009). Acceptability of ATM and transit applications embedded in multipurpose smart identity card: An exploratory study in Malaysia. International Journal of Electronic Government Research, 5(2), 37-56. doi:10.4018/ jegr.2009040103