State of the Art in E-Gov Research: Surveying Conference Publications

International Journal of Electronic Government Research (IJEGR)

Volumn 1, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 1-25

  Gronlund, Åke ^a  

^a ÖREBRO UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

digital government; e government; governance; relevance; rigor

Indexed keywords

EID: 85001776491     PISSN: 15483886     EISSN: 15483894     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4018/jegr.2005100101     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Accenture. (2003). E-government leadership: Realizing the vision. Retrieved March 21, 2005, from http://www.edevlet.net/raporveyayinlar/egov_April2002.pdf
2. Accenture Consulting. (2003). E-government leadership: High performance, maximum value. In Proceedings of the Third European Conference on e-Government, Dublin, Ireland, July 3–4.
3. Andersen, K.V. & Henriksen, H.Z. (2005). The first leg of e-government research: Domains and application areas 1998–2003. Copenhagen, Denmark: Copenhagen Business School.
4. Benbasat, I., Goldstein, D.K., & Mead, M. (1987). The case research strategy in studies of information systems. MIS Quarterly, 11(3), 369–385.
5. Booz Allen Hamilton (2001). Balanced e-government: Connecting efficient administration and responsive democracy. Bertelsmann Foundation
6. CDT. (2002). The e-government handbook for developing countries. Center for Democracy Technology. Retrieved from http:// www.cdt.org/egov/handbook/
7. De, R. (2004). E-government systems in developing countries: Some research issues. In Paper presented at ICIS Workshop on E-Government, Washington, D.C., December. In Press.
8. Devadoss, P.R., Pan, S.L., & Huang, J.C. (2002). Structurational analysis of egovernment initiatives: A case study of SCO. Decision Support Systems, 34, 253–269.
9. Dubé, L. & Paré, G. (2003). Rigor in information systems positivist case research: Current practices, trends and recommendations. MIS Quarterly, 27(4), 597–635.
10. Eisenhart, K.M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 4(4), 532–550.
11. EU. (2004a). E-government research in Europe. European Commission. Retrieved March 21, 2005, from http://europa.eu.int/information_society/programmes/e-gov_rd/text_en.htm
12. EU. (2004b). IST e-government research in FP6 (2003–2006). European Commission. Retrieved November 15, 2004, from http://europa.eu.int/information_society/programmes/egov_rd/fp6/text_en.htm
13. Golden, W., Hughes, M., & Scott, M. (2003). The role of process evolution in achieving citizen-centered e-government. In Paper presented at the Ninth Americas Conference on Information Systems, Tampa, Florida.
14. Grönlund, Å. (2001). Managing electronic services: A public sector perspective. Springer.
15. Grönlund, Å. (2002). Electronic government: Design, applications, and management. Hershey, PA: Idea Group Publishing.
16. Hawaii. (2003). Proceedings of the 36th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences 2003.
17. IBM & EIU. (2002). The 2002 e-readiness rankings (white paper from the economist intelligence unit). Retrieved from http://www1.worldbank.org/publicsector/e-gov/2002eReadAss.pdf
18. Jensen, M. & Esterhuysen, A. (2001). The community telecentre cookbook for Africa: Recipies for selfsustainablility. How to establish a multi-purpose community telecentre in Africa. Paris: United Nations Educational Scientific and Cultural Organization.
19. Ke, W. & Wei, K.K. (2004). Successful e-government in Singapore. Communications of the ACM, 47(6), 95–99.
20. King, J.L. & Lyytinen, K. (2004, December). Reach and grasp. MISQ, 28(4).
21. Lee, A. (1989). A scientific methodology for MIS case studies. MIS Quarterly, 13(1), 33–52.
22. Molin, B., Månsson, L., & Strömberg, L. (1975). Offentlig förvaltning (public administration). Bonniers.
23. Norris, D., & Lloyd, B. (2004). The scholarly literature on e-government: Characterizing a nascent field. In Paper presented at the SIG E-Gov Workshop at ICIS, Washington, D.C., December 12.
24. OECD. (2003). The e-government imperative. OECD e-Government Studies.
25. Riley, T.B. (2004) E-governance vs. e-government. Information for Development (I4D). Retrieved on November 11, 2004, from http://www.i4donline.net/issue/nov03/e-governance.htm
26. Sachdeva, S.K. (2004). Quantifying and assessing e-governance. Information for Development (I4D). Retrieved on November 11, 2004, from http://www.i4donline.net/issue/nov03/quantifying.htm
27. Traunmüller, R. (2003). Electronic government. In Proceedings of the Second International Conference, EGOV 2003, Prague, Czech Republic, September. Springer Lecture Notes in Computer Science.
28. United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs (UNDESA). (2003). World public sector report 2003: E-government at the crossroads. Retrieved on March 21, 2005, from http://unpan1.un.org/intradoc/groups/public/documents/un/unpan012733.pdf
29. United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs (UNDESA). (2003a). UN global e-government survey 2003. Retrieved on March 21, 2005, from http://www.unpan.org/dpepa_worldpareport.asp
30. WB. (2004). World Bank E∗Government Web Site. Retrieved from http://www1.worldbank.org/publicsector/e-gov/
31. West, D.M. (2003). Global e-government, 2003. Retrieved on August 17, 2004, from http://www.insidepolitics.org/egovt03int.pdf
32. Yin, R.K. (1994). Case study research,design and methods. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
33. ZDNetIndiaNews. (2004). E-governance in India: Too many goals, very little reality. Retrieved from http://www.zdnetindia.com/news/features/stories/28670.html%20