The Scholarly Literature on E-Government: Characterizing a Nascent Field

International Journal of Electronic Government Research (IJEGR)

Volumn 2, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 40-56

  Norris, Donald F ^a   Lloyd, Benjamin A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE COUNTY   (United States)

Author keywords

digital government; e government; electronic government

Indexed keywords

EID: 85001760427     PISSN: 15483886     EISSN: 15483894     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4018/jegr.2006100103     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. Anderson, K. V., & Henriksen, H. Z. (2005). The first leg of e-govemment research: Domains and application areas, 1998–2003. International Journal of Electronic Government Research, 1(4).
2. Gronlund, Å. (2004). State of the art in e-gov research - A survey. In R. Traunmuller, (Ed.), EGOV 2004, LNCS 3183 (pp. 178–185). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
3. Holden, S., Norris, D. F., & Fletcher, P. D. (2003). Electronic government at the local level. Public Performance & Management Review, 26(4), 325–344.
4. Korosec, R. L., & Norris, D. F. (in press). E-government among Florida municipalities: A comparison to national data and trends. Baltimore: Maryland Institute for Policy Analysis and Research, University of Maryland, Baltimore County.
5. Norris, D. F., & Moon, M. J. (2005). Advancing e-government at the grassroots: Tortoise or hare? Public Administration Review, 65(1), 64–73.
6. Titah, R., & Barki, H. (2006). E-government adoption and acceptance: A literature review. International Journal of Electronic Government Research, 2(3), 23–57.
7. Yin, R. K. (2004). Case study research design and method. Thousand Oaks. CA: Sage Publications.
8. Barnes, S., & Vidgen, R. (2004). Interactive e-government: Evaluating the Web site of the UK inland revenue. Journal of Electronic Commerce in Organizations, 2(1), 42–63.
9. Becker, S. (2004). E-government visual accessibility for older adult users. Social Science Computer Review, 22, 11–23.
10. Beynon-Davies, P., Williams, M. D., Owens, I., & Hill, R. (2004). The electronic procurement of ideas. International Journal of Electronic Business, 2(1), 3–19.
11. Cairns, G., Wright, G., Bardfield, R., van der Heijden, K., & Burt, G. (2002). Exploring e-government futures through the application of scenario planning. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 71, 217–238.
12. Cho, Y. H., & Choi, B. (2004). E-government to combat corruption: The case of Seoul metropolitan government. International Journal of Public Administration, 27, 719–735.
13. Cooper, C. (2002). E-mail in the state legislature: Evidence from three states. State and Local Government Review, 34(2), 127–132.
14. Cresswell, A., & Pardo, T. (2001). Implications of legal and organizational issues for urban digital government development. Government Information Quarterly, 18, 269–278.
15. Cullen, R., & Houghton, C. (2000). Democracy online: An assessment of New Zealand government Web sites. Government Information Quarterly, 17, 243–267.
16. Dawes, S., Pardo, T., & Cresswell, A. (2004). Designing electronic government information access programs: A holistic approach. Government Information Quarterly, 21, 3–23.
17. Deakins, E., & Dillon, S. M. (2002). E-government in New Zealand: The local authority perspective. The International Journal of Public Sector Management, 15(5), 375–398.
18. Doty, P., & Erdelez, S. (2002). Information micro-practices in Texas rural courts: Methods and issues for e-government. Government Information Quarterly, 19, 369–387.
19. Fagan, J. C., & Fagan, B. (2001). Citizens' access to on-line state legislative documents. Government Information Quarterly, 18, 105–121.
20. Fagan, J. C., & Fagan, B. (2004). An accessibility study of state legislative Web sites. Government Information Quarterly, 21, 65–85.
21. Ferber, P., Foltz, F., & Pugliese, R. (2003). The politics of state legislature Web sites: Making e-government more participatory. Bulletin of Science, Technology, and Society, 23(3), 157–167.
22. Gilbert, D., Balestrini, P., & Littleboy, D. (2004). Barriers and benefits in the adoption of e-government. The International Journal of Public Sector Management, 17(4), 286–301.
23. Golden, W., Hughes, M., & Scott, M. (2003). Implementing e-government in Ireland: A roadmap for success. Journal of Electronic Commerce in Organizations, 1(4), 17–33.
24. Gronlund, A. (2003). Emerging electronic infrastructures: Exploring democratic components. Social Science Computer Review, 21, 55–72.
25. Ho, A. T. (2002). Reinventing local governments and the e-government initiative. Public Administration Review, 62, 434–444.
26. Ho, A. T., & Ni, A. Y. (2004). Explaining the adoption of e-government features: A case study of Iowa County treasurers' offices. The American Review of Public Administration, 34(2), 164–180.
27. Holden, S., Norris, D., & Fletcher, P. (2003). Electronic government at the local level. Public Performance & Management Review, 26(4), 325–344.
28. Holliday, I. (2002). Building e-government in East and Southeast Asia: Regional rhetoric and national (in)action. Public Administration and Development, 22, 323–335.
29. Joia, L. A. (2003). A heuristic model to implement government-to-government projects. Journal of Electronic Commerce in Organizations, 1(4), 49–67.
30. Kaylor, C., Deshazo, R., & Van Eck, D. (2001). Gauging e-government: A report on implementing services among American cities. Government Information Quarterly, 18, 293–307.
31. Kim, S., & Kim, D. (2003). South Korean public officials' perceptions of values, failure, and consequences of failure in e-government leadership. Public Performance & Management Review, 26, 360–375.
32. Kinder, T. (2002). Vote early, vote often? Tele-democracy in European cities. Public Administration, 80(3), 557–582.
33. Koh, C., & Prybutok, V. (2003). The three ring model and development of an instrument for measuring dimensions of e-government functions. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 43(3), 34–39.
34. Kuk, G. (2003). The digital divide and the quality of electronic government service delivery in local government in the United Kingdom. Government Information Quarterly, 20, 353–363.
35. LaPorte, T., Demchak, C., & de Jong, M. (2002). Democracy and bureaucracy in the age of the Web: Empirical findings and theoretical speculations. Administration & Society, 34, 411–446.
36. Lee-Kelley, L., & James, T. (2003). E-goverment and social exclusion: An empirical study. Journal of Electronic Commerce in Organizations, 1(4), 1–16.
37. Li, F. (2003). Implementing e-government strategy in Scotland: Current situation and emerging issues. Journal of Electronic Commerce in Organizations, 1(2), 44–65.
38. Macintosh, A., Robson, E., Smith, E., & Whyte, A. (2003). Electronic democracy and young people. Social Science Computer Review, 21, 43–54.
39. Martin, S., Chamberlin, B., & Dmitrieva, I. (2001). State laws requiring World Wide Web dissemination of information: A review of state government mandates for documents online. Information and Communications Technology Law, 10(2), 167–179.
40. McGregor, M., & Holman, J. (2004). Communication technology at the Federal Communications Commission: E-government in the public interest? Government Information Quarterly, 21, 268–283.
41. McNeal, R., Tolbert, C., & Mossberger, K. (2003). Innovating in digital government in the American states. Social Science Quarterly, 84(1), 52–70.
42. Melitski, J. (2003). Capacity and e-government performance: An analysis based on early adopters of Internet technologies in New Jersey. Public Performance and Management Review, 26, 376–390.
43. Moon, M. J. (2002). The evolution of e-government among municipalities: Rhetoric or reality?. Public Administration Review, 62, 424–433.
44. Musso, J., Weare, C., & Hale, M. (2000). Designing Web technologies for local governance reform: Good management of good democracy? Political Communication, 17, 1–19.
45. Potter, A. (2002). Accessibility of Alabama government Web sites. Journal of Government Information, 29, 303–317.
46. Reddick, C. (2004a). Public sector e-commerce and state financial management: Capacity versus wealth. Social Science Computer Review, 22, 293–306.
47. Reddick, C. (2004b). A two-stage model of e-government growth: Theories and empirical evidence for U.S. cities. Government Information Quarterly, 21, 51–64.
48. Shelley, M., Thrane, L., Shulman, S., Lang, E., Beisser, S., Larson, T., & Mutiti, J. (2004). Digital citizenship: Parameters of the digital divide. Social Science Computer Review, 22, 256–269.
49. Shi, W. (2002). The contribution of organizational factors in the success of electronic government commerce. International Journal of Public Administration, 25(5), 629–657.
50. Steyaert, J. (2000). Local governments online and the role of the resident: Government shop versus electronic community. Social Science Computer Review, 18, 3–16.
51. Steyaert, J. C. (2004). Measuring the performance of electronic government services. Information & Management, 41, 369–375.
52. Stowers, G. (1999). Becoming cyberactive: State and local governments on the World Wide Web. Government Information Quarterly, 16, 111–127.
53. Thomas, J. C., & Streib, G. (2003). The new face of government: Citizen-initiated contacts in the era of e-government. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 13(1), 83–102.
54. Thompson, C. (2002). Enlisting online residents: Expanding the boundaries of e-government in a Japanese rural township. Government Information Quarterly, 19, 173–187.
55. Timonen, V., & O'Donnell, O. (2003). Development of e-government in Ireland: Remaining issues and challenges. Administration, 51(3), 3–20.
56. Waddell, P., & Borning, A. (2004). A case study in digital government: Developing and applying urbansim, a system for simulating urban land use, transportation, & environmental impacts. Social Science Computer Review, 22, 37–51.
57. Wang, Y. (2003). The adoption of electronic tax filing systems: An empirical study. Government Information Quarterly, 20, 333–352.
58. Weare, C., Musso, J., & Hale, M. (1999). Electronic democracy and the diffusion of municipal Web pages in California. Administration and Society, 31(1), 3–27.
59. Welch, E., & Wong, W. (2001). Global information technology pressure and governmental accountability: The mediating effect of domestic context on Web site operations. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 11, 509–538.
60. West, D. (2004). E-government and the transformation of service delivery and citizen attitudes. Public Administration Review, 64(1), 15–27.
61. Whitson, T., & Davis, L. (2001). Best practices in electronic government: Comprehensive electronic information dissemination for science and technology. Government Information Quarterly, 18, 79–91.
62. Wong, W., & Welch, E. (2004). Does e-government promote accountability? A comparative analysis of Web site openness and government accountability. Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions, 17, 275–297.
63. Zhang, J. (2002). Will the government ‘serve the people’? The development of Chinese e-government. New Media & Society, 4(2), 163–184.
64. Zhou, X. (2004). E-government in China: A content analysis of national and provincial Web sites. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 9(4).