Quality enhancing the continued use of e-government web sites: Evidence from e-citizens of Thailand

International Journal of Electronic Government Research

Volumn 5, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 19-35

  Wangpipatwong, Sivaporn ^a   Chutimaskul, Wichian ^b   Papasratorn, Borworn ^b  

^a BANGKOK UNIVERSITY   (Thailand)

^b KING MONGKUT'S UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY THONBURI   (Thailand)

Author keywords

Continued use; E government; E government web site; Information quality; IT diffusion; Service quality; System quality

Indexed keywords

GOVERNMENT DATA PROCESSING; INFORMATION ANALYSIS; QUALITY OF SERVICE; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; WEBSITES;

CONTINUED USE; E-GOVERNMENTS; INFORMATION QUALITY; IT DIFFUSION; SERVICE QUALITY; SYSTEM QUALITY;

WEB CRAWLER;

EID: 74549212771     PISSN: 15483886     EISSN: 15483894     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4018/jegr.2009092202     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Accenture (2004). e-government Leadership: High Performance, Maximum Value. Retrieved May 7, 2005 from: http://www.ac-centure.com/xdoc/en/industries/ government/gove-egov-value.pdf
2. Ateetanan, P. (2001). Country Report Thailand. Retrieved November 14, 2006 from: http:// unpan1.un.org/intradoc/groups/public/documents/APCITY/ UNPAN012806.pdf
3. Bailey, J.E., & Pearson, S.W. (1983). Developing a tool for measuring and analyzing computer user satisfaction. Management Science, 29(5), 530-545.
4. Baroudi, J.J., Olson, M.H., & Ives, B. (1986). An empirical study of the impact of user involvement on system usage and information satisfaction. Communications of the ACM, 29(3), 232-238.
5. Bevan, N. (1999). Quality in use: Meeting user needs for quality. Journal of Systems and Software, 49(1), 89-96.
6. Bhattacherjee, A. (2001). Understanding information systems continuance: An expectation-confirmation model. MIS Quarterly,25(3),351-370.
7. Bitner, M.J., Booms, B.H., & Mohr, L.A. (1994). Critical service encounters: The employee's viewpoint. Journal of Marketing, 58(4), 95-106.
8. Chamlertwat, K. (2001). Current status and issues of e-government in Thailand. 15th Asian Forum for the Standardization of Information Technology, Kathmandu, Nepal.
9. Cronin, J.J. Jr., & Taylor, S.A. (1992). Measuring service quality: A reexamination and extension. Journal of Marketing, 56(3), 55-68.
10. Cullen, R., & Hernon, P. (2004). Wired for Well-being Citizens 'Response to E-government. Retrieved March 15, 2005 from: http://www.e- government. govt.nz/docs/vuw-report-200406/
11. Davis, F.D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340.
12. DeLone,W.H.,&McLean,E.R.(1992).Information systems success: The quest for the dependent variable. Information System Research, 3(1), 60-95.
13. DeLone, W.H., & McLean, E.R. (2002). Information systems success revisited. Proceedings of the 35th Hawaii International Conference on System Science, 3(1), 2966-2976.
14. DeLone, W.H., & McLean, E.R. (2003). The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: A ten year update. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19, (4), 9-30.
15. DeLone, W.H., & McLean, E.R. (2004). Measuring eCommerce success: Applying the DeLone and McLean information system success model. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 9(1), 31-47.
16. Doll, W.J., & Torkzadeh, G. (1988). The measurement of end-user computing satisfaction. MIS Quarterly, 12(2), 259-274.
17. Fang, Z. (2002). E-government in digital era: Concept, practice, and development. International Journal of the Computer, The Internet and Management, 10(2), 1-22.
18. Green, S.B. (1991). How many subjects does it take to do aregression analysis?. MultivariateBehavioral Research, 26(3), 499-510.
19. Hair, J.F. Jr., Anderson, R.E., Tatham, R.L., & Black, W.C. (1998). Multivariate Data Analysis (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
20. Iivari, J. (2005). An empirical test of the DeLone-McLean model of information system success. The DATA BASE for Advances in Information Systems, 36(2), 8-27.
21. infoDev and CDT (Center for Democracy and Technology) (2002). The E-government Handbook for Developing Countries. Retrieved November 14,2006 from: http://www.cdt.org/egov/handbook/2002-11-14egovhandbook.pdf
22. Jeong,M.,& Lambert, C.U. (2001). Adaptation of an information quality framework to measure customers' behavioral intentions to use lodging web sites. Hospitality Management, 20(2), 129-146.
23. Larsen, E., & Rainie, L. (2002). The Rise of the E-Citizen: How People Use Government Agencies'Web Site. Retrieved April 12,2006 from: Available: http://www.pewinternet.org/pdfs/PIP-Govt-Website-Rpt.pdf
24. Lee, Y., & Kozar, K.A. (2006). Investigating the effect of Web site quality on E-Business success: An analytic hierarchy process (AHP) approach. Decision Support Systems, 42(3), 1383-1401.
25. Limayem, M., Hirt, S.G., & Cheung, C.M.K. (2003). Habit in the context of IS continuance: Theory extension and scale development. Proceedings of the 11th European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS 2003). Retrieved April 12,2006 from: http://is2.lse.ac.uk/asp/aspecis/20030087.pdf
26. Molla, A., & Licker, P.S. (2001). E-Commerce systems success: An attempt to extend and respecify the Delone and Maclean model of IS success. Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, 2(4), 131-141.
27. NECTEC (National Electronics and Computer Technology Center) (2003). Thailand Information and Communications Technology (ICT) Master Plan (2002-2006). Retrieved November 6, 2006 from: http://www.nectec.or.th/pld/ masterplan/document/ICT-Masterplan-Eng.pdf
28. NECTEC (National Electronics and Computer Technology Center) (2005a). Thailand ICT Indicators 2005. Retrieved November 6, 2006 from: http://www.nectec.or.th/pub/book/ICTIndicators.pdf
29. NECTEC (National Electronics and Computer Technology Center) (2005b). Internet User Profile of Thailand 2005. Retrieved November 6, 2006 from: http://www.nectec.or.th/pld/intemetuser/Intemet%20User%20Profile%20 2005.pdf
30. Negash, S., Ryan, T., & Igbaria, M. (2003). Quality and effectiveness in web-based customer support systems. Information & Management, 40(8), 757-768.
31. nded.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
32. Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V.A., & Berry, L.L. (1985). A conceptual model of service quality and its implications for future research. Journal of Marketing, 49(4), 41-50.
33. Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V.A., & Berry, L.L. (1988). SERVQUAL: A multiple-item scale for measuring consumer perceptions of service quality. Journal of Retailing, 64(1), 12-40.
34. Pitt, L.F,Watson,R.T.,&Kavan,C.B.(1995). Service quality: Ameasure of information systems effectiveness. MIS Quarterly, 19(2), 173-185.
35. Seddon,P.B.,& Kiew,M.-Y.(1994).Apartial test and development of the DeLone and McLean's model of IS success. Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS 94), 99-110.
36. Solomon, M.R., Surprenant, C.F., Czepiel, J.A., & Gutman, E.G. (1985). A role theory perspective on dyadic interactions: the service encounter. Journal of Marketing, 49( 1), 99-111.
37. Spreng, R.A., MacKenzie, S.B., & Olshavsky, R.W. (1996). A reexamination of the determinants of consumer satisfaction. Journal of Marketing, 60(3), 15-32.
38. nd ed.). New York, NY: HarperCollins.
39. Szymanski, D.M., & Hise, R.T. (2000). E-Satisfac-tion: An initial examination. Journal of Retailing, 76(3), 309-322.
40. Truehits (2006). Truehits 2005 Awards. Retrieved November 16, 2006 from: http://truehits.net/awards2005
41. UnitedNations (2003). UN Global E-government Sur-vey2003. RetrievedNovember16,2006from:http://un-pan1.un.org/intradoc/groups/public/ documents/un/unpan019207.pdf
42. United Nations (2004). UN Global E-govern-ment Readiness Report 2004: Towards Access for Opportunity. Retrieved November 16, 2006 from: http://unpan1.un.org/intradoc/ groups/public/documents/un/unpan019207.pdf
43. United Nations (2005). Global E-government Readiness Report 2005: From E-gov-ernment to E-Inclusion. Retrieved November 16, 2006 from: http://unpan1.un.org/intradoc/ groups/public/documents/un/unpan021888.pdf
44. Wang, R.Y., & Strong, D.M. (1996). Beyond accuracy: What data quality means to data consumers. Journal of Management Information Systems, 12(4), 5-34.
45. Wangpipatwong, S., Chutimaskul, W., & Papas-ratorn, B. (2005). Factors influencing the use of eGovernment Web sites: Information quality and system quality approach. International Journal of the Computer, the Internet and Management, 13(SP3), 14.1-14.7.
46. Wilkin, C., & Castleman, T. (2003). Development of an instrument to evaluate the quality of delivered information systems. Proceedings of the 36th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Retrieved December 11, 2007 from: http://csdl2.computer.org/comp/proceedings/hicss/2003/1874/08/187480244b. pdf
47. rd ed.). New York, NY: Harper & Row.
48. Zeithaml, V.A., Berry, L.L., & Parasuraman, A. (1996). The behavioral consequences of service quality. Journal of Marketing, 60(2), 31-36.