A survey of computational methods and error rate estimation procedures for peptide and protein identification in shotgun proteomics

Journal of Proteomics

Volumn 73, Issue 11, 2010, Pages 2092-2123

  Nesvizhskii, Alexey I ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

Author keywords

Bioinformatics; False discovery rates; Mass spectrometry; Peptide identification; Protein inference; Proteomics; Statistical models

Indexed keywords

PEPTIDE;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ANALYTICAL ERROR; COMPUTER ANALYSIS; MACHINE LEARNING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEOMICS; REVIEW; TANDEM MASS SPECTROMETRY;

COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; DATABASES, PROTEIN; FALSE POSITIVE REACTIONS; MASS SPECTROMETRY; PEPTIDES; PROTEINS; PROTEOMICS;

EID: 77957221582     PISSN: 18743919     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jprot.2010.08.009     Document Type: Review

References (289)

1. Aebersold R., Mann M. Mass spectrometry-based proteomics. Nature 2003, 422:198-207.
2. Chen R, Snyder M. Yeast Proteomics and Protein Microarrays. J Proteomics 73 (11): 2147-2157.
3. Witze E.S., Old W.M., Resing K.A., Ahn N.G. Mapping protein post-translational modifications with mass spectrometry. Nat Meth 2007, 4:798-806.
4. Gstaiger M., Aebersold R. Applying mass spectrometry-based proteomics to genetics, genomics and network biology. Nat Rev Genet 2009, 10:617-627.
5. de Godoy L.M.F., Olsen J.V., Cox J., Nielsen M.L., Hubner N.C., Frohlich F., et al. Comprehensive mass-spectrometry-based proteome quantification of haploid versus diploid yeast. Nature 2008, 455. 1251-U60.
6. Weston A.D., Hood L. Systems biology, proteomics, and the future of health care: toward predictive, preventative, and personalized medicine. J Proteome Res 2004, 3:179-196.
7. Riffle M., Eng J.K. Proteomics data repositories. Proteomics 2009, 9:4653-4663.
8. Nesvizhskii A.I., Aebersold R. Analysis, statistical validation and dissemination of large-scale proteomics datasets generated by tandem MS. Drug Discov Today 2004, 9:173-181.
9. Russell S.A., Old W., Resing K.A., Hunter L. Proteomic informatics. Int Rev Neurobiol 2004, 61:129-157.
10. Baldwin M.A. Protein identification by mass spectrometry - issues to be considered. Mol Cell Proteomics 2004, 3:1-9.
11. Xie H., Griffin T.J. Trade-off between high sensitivity and increased potential for false positive peptide sequence matches using a two-dimensional linear ion trap for tandem mass spectrometry-based proteomics. J Proteome Res 2006, 5:1093-1099.
12. States D.J., Omenn G.S., Blackwell T.W., Fermin D., Eng J., Speicher D.W., et al. Challenges in deriving high-confidence protein identifications from data gathered by a HUPO plasma proteome collaborative study. Nat Biotechnol 2006, 24:333-338.
13. Boguski M.S., McIntosh M.W. Biomedical informatics for proteomics. Nature 2003, 422:233-237.
14. Patterson S.D. Data analysis - the Achilles heel of proteomics. Nat Biotechnol 2003, 21:221-222.
15. Carr S., Aebersold R., Baldwin M., Burlingame A., Clauser K., Nesvizhskii A. The need for guidelines in publication of peptide and protein identification data: working group on publication guidelines for peptide and protein identification data. Mol Cell Proteomics 2004, 3:531-533.
16. Steen H., Mann M. The ABC's (and XYZ's) of peptide sequencing. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2004, 5:699-711.
17. Marcotte E.M. How do shotgun proteomics algorithms identify proteins?. Nat Biotechnol 2007, 25:755-757.
18. Yates J.R., Ruse C.I., Nakorchevsky A. Proteomics by mass spectrometry: approaches, advances, and applications. Annu Rev Biomed Eng 2009, 11:49-79.
19. Leitner A., Lindner W. Chemistry meets proteomics: the use of chemical tagging reactions for MS-based proteomics. Proteomics 2006, 6:5418-5434.
20. Bantscheff M., Schirle M., Sweetman G., Rick J., Kuster B. Quantitative mass spectrometry in proteomics: a critical review. Anal Bioanal Chem 2007, 389:1017-1031.
21. Nesvizhskii A.I. Protein identification by tandem mass spectrometry and sequence database searching. Meth Mol Biol 2007, 367:87-119.
22. Kapp E.A., Schutz F., Connolly L.M., Chakel J.A., Meza J.E., Miller C.A., et al. An evaluation, comparison, and accurate benchmarking of several publicly available MS/MS search algorithms: sensitivity and specificity analysis. Proteomics 2005, 5:3475-3490.
23. Elias J.E., Haas W., Faherty B.K., Gygi S.P. Comparative evaluation of mass spectrometry platforms used in large-scale proteomics investigations. Nat Meth 2005, 2:667-675.
24. Kandasamy K., Pandey A., Molina H. Evaluation of several MS/MS search algorithms for analysis of spectra derived from electron transfer dissociation experiments. Anal Chem 2009, 81:7170-7180.
25. Keller A., Nesvizhskii A.I., Kolker E., Aebersold R. Empirical statistical model to estimate the accuracy of peptide identifications made by MS/MS and database search. Anal Chem 2002, 74:5383-5392.
26. Lopez-Ferrer D., Martinez-Bartolome S., Villar M., Campillos M., Martin-Maroto F., Vazquez J. Statistical model for large-scale peptide identification in databases from tandem mass spectra using SEQUEST. Anal Chem 2004, 76:6853-6860.
27. Anderson D.C., Li W.Q., Payan D.G., Noble W.S. A new algorithm for the evaluation of shotgun peptide sequencing in proteomics: support vector machine classification of peptide MS/MS spectra and SEQUEST scores. J Proteome Res 2003, 2:137-146.
28. Kislinger T., Rahman K., Radulovic D., Cox B., Rossant J., Emili A. PRISM, a generic large scale proteomic investigation strategy for mammals. Mol Cell Proteomics 2003, 2:96-106.
29. Ulintz P.J., Zhu J., Qin Z.H.S., Andrews P.C. Improved classification of mass spectrometry database search results using newer machine learning approaches. Mol Cell Proteomics 2006, 5:497-509.
30. Sadygov R.G., Good D.M., Swaney D.L., Coon J.J. A new probabilistic database search algorithm for ETD spectra. J Proteome Res 2009, 8:3198-3205.
31. Payne S.H., Yau M., Smolka M.B., Tanner S., Zhou H.L., Bafna V. Phosphorylation-specific MS/MS scoring for rapid and accurate phosphoproteome analysis. J Proteome Res 2008, 7:3373-3381.
32. Baker PR, Medzihradszky KF, Chalkley RJ. Improving software performance for peptide ETD data analysis by implementation of charge-state and sequence-dependent scoring. Mol Cell Proteomics 2010;9:1795-803.
33. Elias J.E., Gibbons F.D., King O.D., Roth F.P., Gygi S.P. Intensity-based protein identification by machine learning from a library of tandem mass spectra. Nat Biotechnol 2004, 22:214-219.
34. Havilio M., Haddad Y., Smilansky Z. Intensity-based statistical scorer for tandem mass spectrometry. Anal Chem 2003, 75:435-444.
35. Zhou C., Bowler L.D., Feng J.F. A machine learning approach to explore the spectra intensity pattern of peptides using tandem mass spectrometry data. BMC Bioinform 2008, 9:325.
36. Frank A.M. A ranking-based scoring function for peptide-spectrum matches. J Proteome Res 2009, 8:2241-2252.
37. Frank A.M. Predicting intensity ranks of peptide fragment ions. J Proteome Res 2009, 8:2226-2240.
38. Klammer A.A., Reynolds S.M., Bilmes J.A., MacCoss M.J., Noble W.S. Modeling peptide fragmentation with dynamic Bayesian networks for peptide identification. Bioinformatics 2008, 24:I348-I356.
39. Sun S.J., Meyer-Arendt K., Eichelberger B., Brown R., Yen C.Y., Old W.M., et al. Improved validation of peptide MS/MS assignments using spectral intensity prediction. Mol Cell Proteomics 2007, 6:1-17.
40. Zhang Z.Q. Prediction of electron-transfer/capture dissociation spectra of peptides. Anal Chem 2010, 82:1990-2005.
41. Li G.Z., Vissers J.P.C., Silva J.C., Golick D., Gorenstein M.V., Geromanos S.J. Database searching and accounting of multiplexed precursor and product ion spectra from the data independent analysis of simple and complex peptide mixtures. Proteomics 2009, 9:1696-1719.
42. Li Y., Chi H., Wang L.H., Wang H.P., Fu Y., Yuan Z.F., et al. Speeding up tandem mass spectrometry based database searching by peptide and spectrum indexing. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom 2010, 24:807-814.
43. Park C.Y., Klammer A.A., Kall L., MacCoss M.J., Noble W.S. Rapid and accurate peptide identification from tandem mass spectra. J Proteome Res 2008, 7:3022-3027.
44. Li D.Q., Gao W., Ling C.X., Wang X.B., Sun R.X., He S.M. IndexToolkit: an open source toolbox to index protein databases for high-throughput proteomics. Bioinformatics 2006, 22:2572-2573.
45. Ramakrishnan S.R., Mao R., Nakorchevskiy A.A., Prince J.T., Willard W.S., Xu W.J., et al. A fast coarse filtering method for peptide identification by mass spectrometry. Bioinformatics 2006, 22:1524-1531.
46. Roos F.F., Jacob R., Grossmann J., Fischer B., Buhmann J.M., Gruissem W., et al. PepSplice: cache-efficient search algorithms for comprehensive identification of tandem mass spectra. Bioinformatics 2007, 23:3016-3023.
47. Dutta D., Chen T. Speeding up tandem mass spectrometry database search: metric embeddings and fast near neighbor search. Bioinformatics 2007, 23:612-618.
48. Quandt A., Masselot A., Hernandez P., Hernandez C., Maffioletti S., Appel R.D., et al. SwissPIT: an workflow-based platform for analyzing tandem-MS spectra using the Grid. Proteomics 2009, 9:2648-2655.
49. Halligan B.D., Geiger J.F., Vallejos A.K., Greene A.S., Twigger S.N. Low cost, scalable proteomics data analysis using Amazon's cloud computing services and open source search algorithms. J Proteome Res 2009, 8:3148-3153.
50. Nesvizhskii A.I., Aebersold R. Interpretation of shotgun proteomic data - the protein inference problem. Mol Cell Proteomics 2005, 4:1419-1440.
51. Nesvizhskii A.I., Roos F.F., Grossmann J., Vogelzang M., Eddes J.S., Gruissem W., et al. Dynamic spectrum quality assessment and iterative computational analysis of shotgun proteomic data: toward more efficient identification of post-translational modifications, sequence polymorphisms, and novel peptides. Mol Cell Proteomics 2006, 5:652-670.
52. Choudhary J.S., Blackstock W.P., Creasy D.M., Cottrell J.S. Interrogating the human genome using uninterpreted mass spectrometry data. Proteomics 2001, 1:651-667.
53. Colinge J., Cusin I., Reffas S., Mahe E., Niknejad A., Rey P.-A., et al. Experiments in searching small proteins in unannotated large eukaryotic genomes. J Proteome Res 2005, 4:167-174.
54. Edwards N.J. Novel peptide identification from tandem mass spectra using ESTs and sequence database compression. Mol Syst Biol 2007, 3:102.
55. Desiere F., Deutsch E.W., Nesvizhskii A.I., Mallick P., King N.L., Eng J.K., et al. Integration with the human genome of peptide sequences obtained by high-throughput mass spectrometry. Genome Biol 2005, 6:R9.
56. Bitton D.A., Smith D.L., Connolly Y., Scutt P.J., Miller C.J. An integrated mass-spectrometry pipeline identifies novel protein coding-regions in the human genome. PLoS ONE 2010, 5:e8949.
57. Chang K.Y., Georgianna D.R., Heber S., Payne G.A., Muddiman D.C. Detection of alternative splice variants at the proteome level in Aspergillus flavus. J Proteome Res 2010, 9:1209-1217.
58. Findlay G.D., MacCoss M.J., Swanson W.J. Proteomic discovery of previously unannotated, rapidly evolving seminal fluid genes in Drosophila. Genome Res 2009, 19:886-896.
59. Loevenich S.N., Brunner E., King N.L., Deutsch E.W., Stein S.E., Aebersold R., et al. The Drosophila melanogaster PeptideAtlas facilitates the use of peptide data for improved fly proteomics and genome annotation. BMC Bioinform 2009, 10:59.
60. Merrihew G.E., Davis C., Ewing B., Williams G., Kall L., Frewen B.E., et al. Use of shotgun proteomics for the identification, confirmation, and correction of C. elegans gene annotations. Genome Res 2008, 18:1660-1669.
61. Tress M.L., Bodenmiller B., Aebersold R., Valencia A. Proteomics studies confirm the presence of alternative protein isoforms on a large scale. Genome Biol 2008, 9:R162.
62. Wright J.C., Sugden D., Francis-McIntyre S., Riba-Garcia I., Gaskell S.J., Grigoriev I.V., et al. Exploiting proteomic data for genome annotation and gene model validation in Aspergillus niger. BMC Genomics 2009, 10:61.
63. Fermin D., Allen B.B., Blackwell T.W., Menon R., Adamski M., Xu Y., et al. Novel gene and gene model detection using a whole genome open reading frame analysis in proteomics. Genome Biol 2006, 7:R35.
64. Kalume D., Peri S., Reddy R., Zhong J., Okulate M., Kumar N., et al. Genome annotation of Anopheles gambiae using mass spectrometry-derived data. BMC Genomics 2005, 6:128.
65. Tanner S., Shen Z.X., Ng J., Florea L., Guigo R., Briggs S.P., et al. Improving gene annotation using peptide mass spectrometry. Genome Res 2007, 17:231-239.
66. Gentzel M., Kocher T., Ponnusamy S., Wilm M. Preprocessing of tandem mass spectrometric data to support automatic protein identification. Proteomics 2003, 3:1597-1610.
67. Mujezinovic N., Raidl G., Hutchins J.R.A., Peters J.M., Mechtler K., Eisenhaber F. Cleaning of raw peptide MS/MS spectra: improved protein identification following deconvolution of multiply charged peaks, isotope clusters, and removal of background noise. Proteomics 2006, 6:5117-5131.
68. Good D.M., Wenger C.D., McAlister G.C., Bai D.L., Hunt D.F., Coon J.J. Post-acquisition ETD spectral processing for increased peptide identifications. J Am Soc Mass Spectrom 2009, 20:1435-1440.
69. Beer I., Barnea E., Ziv T., Admon A. Improving large-scale proteomics by clustering of mass spectrometry data. Proteomics 2004, 4:950-960.
70. Tabb D.L., Thompson M.R., Khalsa-Moyers G., VerBerkmoes N.C., McDonald W.H. MS2Grouper: group assessment and synthetic replacement of duplicate proteomic tandem mass spectra. J Am Soc Mass Spectrom 2005, 16:1250-1261.
71. Houel S, Abernathy R, Renganathan K, Meyer-Arendt K, Ahn N, Old WM. Quantifying the impact of chimera MS/MS spectra on peptide identification in large scale proteomics studies. J Proteome Res 2010;9:4152-60.
72. Alves G., Ogurtsov A.Y., Kwok S., Wu W.W., Wang G.H., Shen R.F., et al. Detection of co-eluted peptides using database search methods. Biol Direct 2008, 3:1-16.
73. Bern M., Finney G., Hoopmann M.R., Merrihew G., Toth M.J., MacCoss M.J. Deconvolution of mixture spectra from ion-trap data-independent-acquisition tandem mass spectrometry. Anal Chem 2010, 82:833-841.
74. Zhang N., Li X.J., Ye M.L., Pan S., Schwikowski B., Aebersold R. ProblDtree: an automated software program capable of identifying multiple peptides from a single collision-induced dissociation spectrum collected by a tandem mass spectrometer. Proteomics 2005, 5:4096-4106.
75. Wang J, Perez-Santiago J, Katz JE, Mallick P, Bandeira N. Peptide identification from mixture tandem mass spectra. Mol Cell Proteomics 2010;9:1476-85.
76. Moore R.E., Young M.K., Lee T.D. Method for screening peptide fragment ion mass spectra prior to database searching. J Am Soc Mass Spectrom 2000, 11:422-426.
77. Wong J.W.H., Sullivan M.J., Cartwright H.M., Cagney G. msmsEval: tandem mass spectral quality assignment for high-throughput proteomics. BMC Bioinform 2007, 8.
78. Flikka K., Martens L., Vandekerckhoe J., Gevaert K., Eidhammer I. Improving the reliability and throughput of mass spectrometry-based proteomics by spectrum quality filtering. Proteomics 2006, 6:2086-2094.
79. Xu M., Geer L.Y., Bryant S.H., Roth J.S., Kowalak J.A., Maynard D.M., et al. Assessing data quality of peptide mass spectra obtained by quadrupole ion trap mass spectrometry. J Proteome Res 2005, 4:300-305.
80. Junqueira M., Spirin V., Balbuena T.S., Waridel P., Surendranath V., Kryukov G., et al. Separating the wheat from the chaff: unbiased filtering of background tandem mass spectra improves protein identification. J Proteome Res 2008, 7:3382-3395.
81. Koenig T., Menze B.H., Kirchner M., Monigatti F., Parker K.C., Patterson T., et al. Robust prediction of the MASCOT score for an improved quality assessment in mass spectrometric proteomics. J Proteome Res 2008, 7:3708-3717.
82. Na S., Paek E., Lee C. CIFTER: automated charge-state determination for peptide tandem mass spectra. Anal Chem 2008, 80:1520-1528.
83. Colinge J., Magnin J., Dessingy T., Giron M., Masselot A. Improved peptide charge state assignment. Proteomics 2003, 3:1434-1440.
84. Tabb D.L., Shah M.B., Strader M.B., Connelly H.M., Hettich R.L., Hurst G.B. Determination of peptide and protein ion charge states by Fourier transformation of isotope-resolved mass spectra. J Am Soc Mass Spectrom 2006, 17:903-915.
85. Sadygov R.G., Hao Z., Huhmer A.F.R. Charger: combination of signal processing and statistical learning algorithms for precursor charge-state determination from electron-transfer dissociation spectra. Anal Chem 2008, 80:376-386.
86. Luethy R., Kessner D.E., Katz J.E., McLean B., Grothe R., Kani K., et al. Precursor-ion mass re-estimation improves peptide identification on hybrid instruments. J Proteome Res 2008, 7:4031-4039.
87. Mayampurath A.M., Jaitly N., Purvine S.O., Monroe M.E., Auberry K.J., Adkins J.N., et al. DeconMSn: a software tool for accurate parent ion monoisotopic mass determination for tandem mass spectra. Bioinformatics 2008, 24:1021-1023.
88. Shinkawa T., Nagano K., Inomata N., Haramura M. A software program for more reliable precursor ion assignation from LC-MS analysis using LTQ ultra zoom scan. J Proteomics 2009, 73:357-360.
89. Yates J.R., Morgan S.F., Gatlin C.L., Griffin P.R., Eng J.K. Method to compare collision-induced dissociation spectra of peptides: potential for library searching and subtractive analysis. Anal Chem 1998, 70:3557-3565.
90. Craig R., Cortens J.C., Fenyo D., Beavis R.C. Using annotated peptide mass spectrum libraries for protein identification. J Proteome Res 2006, 5:1843-1849.
91. Frewen B.E., Merrihew G.E., Wu C.C., Noble W.S., MacCoss M.J. Analysis of peptide MS/MS spectra from large-scale proteomics experiments using spectrum libraries. Anal Chem 2006, 78:5678-5684.
92. Lam H., Deutsch E.W., Eddes J.S., Eng J.K., King N., Stein S.E., et al. Development and validation of a spectral library searching method for peptide identification from MS/MS. Proteomics 2007, 7:655-667.
93. Stein S.E., Scott D.R. Optimization and testing of mass-spectral library search algorithms for compound identification. J Am Soc Mass Spectrom 1994, 5:859-866.
94. Lam H., Deutsch E.W., Eddes J.S., Eng J.K., Stein S.E., Aebersold R. Building consensus spectral libraries for peptide identification in proteomics. Nat Meth 2008, 5:873-875.
95. Srikumar T., Jeram S.M., Lam H., Raught B. A ubiquitin and ubiquitin-like protein spectral library. Proteomics 2010, 10:337-342.
96. Bodenmiller B., Campbell D., Gerrits B., Lam H., Jovanovic M., Picotti P., et al. PhosphoPep - a database of protein phosphorylation sites in model organisms. Nat Biotechnol 2008, 26:1339-1340.
97. King N.L., Deutsch E.W., Ranish J.A., Nesvizhskii A.I., Eddes J.S., Mallick P., et al. Analysis of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae proteome with PeptideAtlas. Genome Biol 2006, 7:R106.
98. Brunner E, Ahrens CH, Mohanty S, Baetschmann H, Loevenich S, Potthast F, et al. A high-quality catalog of the Drosophila melanogaster proteome. Nat Biotechnol 2007;25:576-83.
99. Yen C.Y., Meyer-Arendt K., Eichelberger B., Sun S.J., Houel S., Old W.M., et al. A simulated MS/MS library for spectrum-to-spectrum searching in large scale identification of proteins. Mol Cell Proteomics 2009, 8:857-869.
100. Ye D., Fu Y., Sun R.X., Wang H.P., Yuan Z.F., Chi H., et al. Open MS/MS spectral library search to identify unanticipated post-translational modifications and increase spectral identification rate. Bioinformatics 2010, 26:i399-i406.
101. Vizcaíno JA, Foster JM, Martens L. Proteomics data repositories: Providing a safe haven for your data and acting as a springboard for further research. J Proteomics 77 (11) 2136-2146.
102. Deutsch E.W., Lam H., Aebersold R. PeptideAtlas: a resource for target selection for emerging targeted proteomics workflows. EMBO Rep 2008, 9:429-434.
103. Seidler J., Zinn N., Boehm M.E., Lehmann W.D. De novo sequencing of peptides by MS/MS. Proteomics 2010, 10:634-649.
104. Liska A.J., Shevchenko A. Expanding the organismal scope of proteomics: cross-species protein identification by mass spectrometry and its implications. Proteomics 2003, 3:19-28.
105. Grossmann J., Fischer B., Baerenfaller K., Owiti J., Buhmann J.M., Gruissem W., et al. A workflow to increase the detection rate of proteins from unsequenced organisms in high-throughput proteomics experiments. Proteomics 2007, 7:4245-4254.
106. Junqueira M., Spirin V., Balbuena T.S., Thomas H., Adzhubei I., Sunyaev S., et al. Protein identification pipeline for the homology-driven proteomics. J Proteomics 2008, 71:346-356.
107. Tessier D., Yclon P., Jacquemin I., Larre C., Rogniaux H. OVNIp: an open source application facilitating the interpretation, the validation and the edition of proteomics data generated by MS analyses and de novo sequencing. Proteomics 2010, 10:1794-1801.
108. Thomas H., Shevchenko A. Simplified validation of borderline hits of database searches. Proteomics 2008, 8:4173-4177.
109. Frank A.M., Savitski M.M., Nielsen M.L., Zubarev R.A., Pevzner P.A. De novo peptide sequencing and identification with precision mass spectrometry. J Proteome Res 2007, 6:114-123.
110. Pan C., Park B.H., McDonald W.H., Carey P.A., Banfield J.F., VerBerkmoes N.C., et al. A high-throughput de novo sequencing approach for shotgun proteomics using high-resolution tandem mass spectrometry. BMC Bioinform 2010, 11:18.
111. Chi H., Sun R.X., Yang B., Song C.Q., Wang L.H., Liu C., et al. pNovo: de novo peptide sequencing and identification using HCD spectra. J Proteome Res 2010, 9:2713-2724.
112. van Breukelen B., Georgiou A., Drugan M.M., Taouatas N., Mohammed S., Heck A.J.R. LysNDeNovo: an algorithm enabling de novo sequencing of Lys-N generated peptides fragmented by electron transfer dissociation. Proteomics 2010, 10:1196-1201.
113. Datta R., Bern M. Spectrum fusion: using multiple mass spectra for de novo peptide sequencing. J Comput Biol 2009, 16:1169-1182.
114. Bertsch A., Leinenbach A., Pervukhin A., Lubeck M., Hartmer R., Baessmann C., et al. De novo peptide sequencing by tandem MS using complementary CID and electron transfer dissociation. Electrophoresis 2009, 30:3736-3747.
115. Mann M., Wilm M. Error tolerant identification of peptides in sequence databases by peptide sequence tags. Anal Chem 1994, 66:4390-4399.
116. Han Y., Ma B., Zhang K. SPIDER: software for protein identification from sequence tags with de novo sequencing error. J Bioinform Comput Biol 2005, 3:697-716.
117. Searle B.C., Dasari S., Wilmarth P.A., Turner M., Reddy A.P., David L.L., et al. Identification of protein modifications using MS/MS de novo sequencing and the OpenSea alignment algorithm. J Proteome Res 2005, 4:546-554.
118. Sunyaev S., Liska A.J., Golod A., Shevchenko A., Shevchenko A. MultiTag: multiple error-tolerant sequence tag search for the sequence-similarity identification of proteins by mass spectrometry. Anal Chem 2003, 75:1307-1315.
119. Tabb D.L., Saraf A., Yates J.R. GutenTag: high-throughput sequence tagging via an empirically derived fragmentation model. Anal Chem 2003, 75:6415-6421.
120. Tanner S., Shu H., Frank A., Wang L.C., Zandi E., Mumby M., et al. InsPecT: identification of posttranslationally modified peptides from tandem mass spectra. Anal Chem 2005, 77:4626-4639.
121. Savitski M.M., Nielsen M.L., Zubarev R.A. New data base-independent, sequence tag-based scoring of peptide MS/MS data validates Mowse scores, recovers below threshold data, singles out modified peptides, and assesses the quality of MS/MS techniques. Mol Cell Proteomics 2005, 4:1180-1188.
122. Shilov I.V., Seymour S.L., Patel A.A., Loboda A., Tang W.H., Keating S.P., et al. The paragon algorithm, a next generation search engine that uses sequence temperature values and feature probabilities to identify peptides from tandem mass spectra. Mol Cell Proteomics 2007, 6:1638-1655.
123. Dasari S., Chambers M.C., Slebos R.J., Zimmerman L.J., Ham A.J.L., Tabb D.L. TagRecon: high-throughput mutation identification through sequence tagging. J Proteome Res 2010, 9:1716-1726.
124. Frank A., Tanner S., Bafna V., Pevzner P. Peptide sequence tags for fast database search in mass-spectrometry. J Proteome Res 2005, 4:1287-1295.
125. Tabb D.L., Ma Z.Q., Martin D.B., Ham A.J.L., Chambers M.C. DirecTag: accurate sequence tags from peptide MS/MS through statistical scoring. J Proteome Res 2008, 7:3838-3846.
126. Cao X., Nesvizhskii A.I. Improved sequence tag generation method for peptide identification in tandem mass spectrometry. J Proteome Res 2008, 7:4422-4434.
127. Johnson R.S., Taylor J.A. Searching sequence databases via de novo peptide sequencing by tandem mass spectrometry. Mol Biotechnol 2002, 22:301-315.
128. Kim S., Gupta N., Bandeira N., Pevzner P.A. Spectral dictionaries: integrating de novo peptide sequencing with database search of tandem mass spectra. Mol Cell Proteomics 2009, 8:53-69.
129. Kim S., Bandeira N., Pevzner P.A. Spectral profiles, a novel representation of tandem mass spectra and their applications for de novo peptide sequencing and identification. Mol Cell Proteomics 2009, 8:1391-1400.
130. Shen Y.F., Tolic N., Hixson K.K., Purvine S.O., Anderson G.A., Smith R.D. De novo sequencing of unique sequence tags for discovery of post-translational modifications of proteins. Anal Chem 2008, 80:7742-7754.
131. Shen Y.F., Tolic N., Hixson K.K., Purvine S.O., Pasa-Tolic L., Qian W.J., et al. Proteome-wide identification of proteins and their modifications with decreased ambiguities and improved false discovery rates using unique sequence tags. Anal Chem 2008, 80:1871-1882.
132. Bern M., Cai Y.H., Goldberg D. Lookup peaks: a hybrid of de novo sequencing and database search for protein identification by tandem mass spectrometry. Anal Chem 2007, 79:1393-1400.
133. Nesvizhskii A.I., Roos F.F., Grossmann J., Vogelzang M., Eddes J.S., Gruissem W., et al. Dynamic spectrum quality assessment and iterative computational analysis of shotgun proteomic data: toward more efficient identification of post-translational modifications, sequence polymorphisms, and novel peptides. Mol Cell Proteomics 2006, 5:652-670.
134. Nesvizhskii A.I., Keller A., Kolker E., Aebersold R. A statistical model for identifying proteins by tandem mass spectrometry. Anal Chem 2003, 75:4646-4658.
135. Chalkley R.J., Baker P.R., Huang L., Hansen K.C., Allen N.P., Rexach M., et al. Comprehensive analysis of a multidimensional liquid chromatography mass spectrometry dataset acquired on a quadrupole selecting, quadrupole collision cell, time-of-flight mass spectrometer - II. New developments in protein prospector allow for reliable and comprehensive automatic analysis of large datasets. Mol Cell Proteomics 2005, 4:1194-1204.
136. Nielsen M.L., Savitski M.M., Zubarev R.A. Extent of modifications in human proteome samples and their effect on dynamic range of analysis in shotgun proteomics. Mol Cell Proteomics 2006, 5:2384-2391.
137. Na S., Jeong J., Park H., Lee K.J., Paek E. Unrestrictive identification of multiple post-translational modifications from tandem mass spectrometry using an error-tolerant algorithm based on an extended sequence tag approach. Mol Cell Proteomics 2008, 7:2452-2463.
138. Liu C., Yan B., Song Y., Xu Y., Cai L. Peptide sequence tag-based blind identification of post-translational modifications with point process model. Bioinformatics 2006, 22:E307-E313.
139. Chalkley R.J., Baker P.R., Medzihradszky K.F., Lynn A.J., Burlingame A.L. In-depth analysis of tandem mass spectrometry data from disparate instrument types. Mol Cell Proteomics 2008, 7:2386-2398.
140. Chen Y., Chen W., Cobb M.H., Zhao Y.M. PTMap - a sequence alignment software for unrestricted, accurate, and full-spectrum identification of post-translational modification sites. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2009, 106:761-766.
141. Tanner S., Payne S.H., Dasari S., Shen Z., Wilmarth P.A., David L.L., et al. Accurate annotation of peptide modifications through unrestrictive database search. J Proteome Res 2008, 7:170-181.
142. Tsur D., Tanner S., Zandi E., Bafna V., Pevzner P.A. Identification of post-translational modifications by blind search of mass spectra. Nat Biotechnol 2005, 23:1562-1567.
143. Ahrne E., Muller M., Lisacek F. Unrestricted identification of modified proteins using MS/MS. Proteomics 2010, 10:671-686.
144. Menschaert G., Vandekerckhove T.T.M., Landuyt B., Hayakawa E., Schoofs L., Luyten W., et al. Spectral clustering in peptidomics studies helps to unravel modification profile of biologically active peptides and enhances peptide identification rate. Proteomics 2009, 9:4381-4388.
145. Falkner J.A., Falkner J.W., Yocum A.K., Andrews P.C. A spectral clustering approach to MS/MS identification of post-translational modifications. J Proteome Res 2008, 7:4614-4622.
146. Liebler D.C., Hansen B.T., Davey S.W., Tiscareno L., Mason D.E. Peptide sequence motif analysis of tandem MS data with the SALSA algorithm. Anal Chem 2002, 74:203-210.
147. Erassov J.L.A., Halina P., Canete M., Vo N.D., Chung C., Cagney G., et al. Sequential interval motif search: unrestricted database surveys of global MS/MS data sets for detection of putative post-translational modifications. Anal Chem 2008, 80:7846-7854.
148. Baumgartner C., Rejtar T., Kullolli M., Akella L.M., Karger B.L. SeMoP: a new computational strategy for the unrestricted search for modified peptides using LC-MS/MS data. J Proteome Res 2008, 7:4199-4208.
149. Havilio M., Wool A. Large-scale unrestricted identification of post-translation modifications using tandem mass spectrometry. Anal Chem 2007, 79:1362-1368.
150. Craig R., Beavis R.C. TANDEM: matching proteins with tandem mass spectra. Bioinformatics 2004, 20:1466-1467.
151. Perkins D.N., Pappin D.J.C., Creasy D.M., Cottrell J.S. Probability-based protein identification by searching sequence databases using mass spectrometry data. Electrophoresis 1999, 20:3551-3567.
152. Tharakan R., Edwards N., Graham D.R.M. Data maximization by multipass analysis of protein mass spectra. Proteomics 2010, 10:1160-1171.
153. Searle B.C., Turner M., Nesvizhskii A.I. Improving sensitivity by probabilistically combining results from multiple MS/MS search methodologies. J Proteome Res 2008, 7:245-253.
154. Yu W., Taylor J.A., Davis M.T., Bonilla L.E., Lee K.A., Auger P.L., et al. Maximizing the sensitivity and reliability of peptide identification in large-scale proteomic experiments by harnessing multiple search engines. Proteomics 2010, 10:1172-1189.
155. Price T.S., Lucitt M.B., Wu W.C., Austin D.J., Pizarro A., Yocum A.K., et al. EBP, a program for protein identification using multiple tandem mass spectrometry datasets. Mol Cell Proteomics 2007, 6:527-536.
156. Ning K., Fermin D., Nesvizhskii A.I. Computational analysis of unassigned high quality MS/MS spectra in proteomic datasets. Proteomics 2010, 10:2712-2718.
157. Ahrne E., Masselot A., Binz P.A., Muller M., Lisacek F. A simple workflow to increase MS2 identification rate by subsequent spectral library search. Proteomics 2009, 9:1731-1736.
158. Addona T.A., Abbatiello S.E., Schilling B., Skates S.J., Mani D.R., Bunk D.M., et al. Multi-site assessment of the precision and reproducibility of multiple reaction monitoring-based measurements of proteins in plasma. Nat Biotech 2009, 27:633-641.
159. Chalkley R.J., Baker P.R., Hansen K.C., Medzihradszky K.F., Allen N.P., Rexach M., et al. Comprehensive analysis of a multidimensional liquid chromatography mass spectrometry dataset acquired on a quadrupole selecting, quadrupole collision cell, time-of-flight mass spectrometer - I. How much of the data is theoretically interpretable by search engines?. Mol Cell Proteomics 2005, 4:1189-1193.
160. Chen Y., Zhang J.M., Xing G., Zhao Y.M. Mascot-derived false positive peptide identifications revealed by manual analysis of tandem mass spectra. J Proteome Res 2009, 8:3141-3147.
161. Ding Y., Choi H., Nesvizhskii A.I. Adaptive discriminant function analysis and reranking of MS/MS database search results for improved peptide identification in shotgun proteomics. J Proteome Res 2008, 7:4878-4889.
162. Fenyo D., Beavis R.C. A method for assessing the statistical significance of mass spectrometry-based protein identifications using general scoring schemes. Anal Chem 2003, 75:768-774.
163. Geer L.Y., Markey S.P., Kowalak J.A., Wagner L., Xu M., Maynard D.M., et al. Open mass spectrometry search algorithm. J Proteome Res 2004, 3:958-964.
164. Sadygov R.G., Yates J.R. A hypergeometric probability model for protein identification and validation using tandem mass spectral data and protein sequence databases. Anal Chem 2003, 75:3792-3798.
165. Alves G., Ogurtsov A.Y., Wu W.W., Wang G., Shen R.F., Yu Y.K. Calibrating e-values for MS2 database search methods. Biol Direct 2007, 2:26.
166. Alves G., Ogurtsov A.Y., Yu Y.K. RAId_DbS: peptide identification using database searches with realistic statistics. Biol Direct 2007, 2:25.
167. Klammer A.A., Park C.Y., Noble W.S. Statistical calibration of the SEQUEST XCorr function. J Proteome Res 2009, 8:2106-2113.
168. Kim S., Gupta N., Pevzner P.A. Spectral probabilities and generating functions of tandem mass spectra: a strike against decoy databases. J Proteome Res 2008, 7:3354-3363.
169. Dudoit S., Yang Y.H., Callow M.J., Speed T.P. Statistical methods for identifying differentially expressed genes in replicated cDNA microarray experiments. Stat Sin 2002, 12:111-139.
170. Benjamini Y., Hochberg Y. Controlling the false discovery rate - a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J R Stat Soc B Methodol 1995, 57:289-300.
171. Tusher V.G., Tibshirani R., Chu G. Significance analysis of microarrays applied to the ionizing radiation response. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2001, 98:5116-5121.
172. Storey J.D., Tibshirani R. Statistical significance for genomewide studies. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2003, 100:9440-9445.
173. Efron B., Tibshirani R., Storey J.D., Tusher V. Empirical Bayes analysis of a microarray experiment. J Am Stat Assoc 2001, 96:1151-1160.
174. Elias J.E., Gygi S.P. Target-decoy search strategy for increased confidence in large-scale protein identifications by mass spectrometry. Nat Meth 2007, 4:207-214.
175. Lam H., Deutsch E.W., Aebersold R. Artificial decoy spectral libraries for false discovery rate estimation in spectral library searching in proteomics. J Proteome Res 2010, 9:605-610.
176. Choi H., Nesvizhskii A.I. False discovery rates and related statistical concepts in mass spectrometry-based proteomics. J Proteome Res 2008, 7:47-50.
177. Fitzgibbon M., Li Q.H., McIntosh M. Modes of inference for evaluating the confidence of peptide identifications. J Proteome Res 2008, 7:35-39.
178. Kall L., Storey J.D., MacCoss M.J., Noble W.S. Posterior error probabilities and false discovery rates: two sides of the same coin. J Proteome Res 2008, 7:40-44.
179. Kall L., Storey J.D., MacCoss M.J., Noble W.S. Assigning significance to peptides identified by tandem mass spectrometry using decoy databases. J Proteome Res 2008, 7:29-34.
180. Higgs R.E., Knierman M.D., Freeman A.B., Gelbert L.M., Patil S.T., Hale J.E. Estimating the statistical significance of peptide identifications from shotgun proteomics experiments. J Proteome Res 2007, 6:1758-1767.
181. Olsen J.V., Mann M. Improved peptide identification in proteomics by two consecutive stages of mass spectrometric fragmentation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2004, 101:13417-13422.
182. Weatherly D.B., Atwood J.A., Minning T.A., Cavola C., Tarleton R.L., Orlando R. A heuristic method for assigning a false-discovery rate for protein identifications from mascot database search results. Mol Cell Proteomics 2005, 4:762-772.
183. Bianco L., Mead J.A., Bessant C. Comparison of novel decoy database designs for optimizing protein identification searches using ABRF sPRG2006 standard MS/MS data sets. J Proteome Res 2009, 8:1782-1791.
184. Navarro P., Vazquez J. A refined method to calculate false discovery rates for peptide identification using decoy databases. J Proteome Res 2009, 8:1792-1796.
185. Wang G., Wu W.W., Zhang Z., Masilamani S., Shen R.F. Decoy methods for assessing false positives and false discovery rates in shotgun proteomics. Anal Chem 2009, 81:146-159.
186. Feng J., Naiman D.Q., Cooper B. Probability-based pattern recognition and statistical framework for randomization: modeling tandem mass spectrum/peptide sequence false match frequencies. Bioinformatics 2007, 23:2210-2217.
187. Choi H., Nesvizhskii A.I. Semisupervised model-based validation of peptide identifications in mass spectrometry-based proteomics. J Proteome Res 2008, 7:254-265.
188. Choi H., Ghosh D., Nesvizhskii A.I. Statistical validation of peptide identifications in large-scale proteomics using the target-decoy database search strategy and flexible mixture modeling. J Proteome Res 2008, 7:286-292.
189. Deutsch EW, Mendoza L, Shteynberg D, Farrah T, Lam H, Tasman N, et al. A guided tour of the Trans-Proteomic Pipeline. Proteomics 2010;10:1150-9.
190. Kall L., Storey J.D., Noble W.S. Non-parametric estimation of posterior error probabilities associated with peptides identified by tandem mass spectrometry. Bioinformatics 2008, 24:I42-I48.
191. Tang W.H., Shilov I.V., Seymour S.L. Nonlinear fitting method for determining local false discovery rates from decoy database searches. J Proteome Res 2008, 7:3661-3667.
192. Zhang J.Y., Li J.Q., Liu X., Xie H.W., Zhu Y.P., He F.C. A nonparametric model for quality control of database search results in shotgun proteomics. BMC Bioinform 2008, 9:29.
193. Zhang J.Y., Ma J., Dou L., Wu S.F., Qian X.H., Xie H.W., et al. Bayesian nonparametric model for the validation of peptide identification in shotgun proteomics. Mol Cell Proteomics 2009, 8:547-557.
194. Renard B.Y., Timm W., Kirchner M., Steen J.A.J., Hamprecht F.A., Steen H. Estimating the confidence of peptide identifications without decoy databases. Anal Chem 2010, 82:4314-4318.
195. Martinez-Bartolome S., Navarro P., Martin-Maroto F., Lopez-Ferrer D., Ramos-Fernandez A., Villar M., et al. Properties of average score distributions of SEQUEST. Mol Cell Proteomics 2008, 7:1135-1145.
196. Ramos-Fernandez A., Paradela A., Navajas R., Albar J.P. Generalized method for probability-based peptide and protein identification from tandem mass spectrometry data and sequence database searching. Mol Cell Proteomics 2008, 7:1748-1754.
197. Razumovskaya J., Olman V., Xu D., Uberbacher E.C., VerBerkmoes N.C., Hettich R.L., et al. A computational method for assessing peptide-identification reliability in tandem mass spectrometry analysis with SEQUEST. Proteomics 2004, 4:961-969.
198. Resing K.A., Meyer-Arendt K., Mendoza A.M., Aveline-Wolf L.D., Jonscher K.R., Pierce K.G., et al. Improving reproducibility and sensitivity in identifying human proteins by shotgun proteomics. Anal Chem 2004, 76:3556-3568.
199. Strittmatter E.F., Kangas L.J., Petritis K., Mottaz H.M., Anderson G.A., Shen Y.F., et al. Application of peptide LC retention time information in a discriminant function for peptide identification by tandem mass spectrometry. J Proteome Res 2004, 3:760-769.
200. Qian W.J., Liu T., Monroe M.E., Strittmatter E.F., Jacobs J.M., Kangas L.J., et al. Probability-based evaluation of peptide and protein identifications from tandem mass spectrometry and SEQUEST analysis: the human proteome. J Proteome Res 2005, 4:53-62.
201. Baczek T., Kaliszan R. Predictions of peptides' retention times in reversed-phase liquid chromatography as a new supportive tool to improve protein identification in proteomics. Proteomics 2009, 9:835-847.
202. Malmstrom J., Lee H., Nesvizhskii A.I., Shteynberg D., Mohanty S., Brunner E., et al. Optimized peptide separation and identification for mass spectrometry based proteomics via free-flow electrophoresis. J Proteome Res 2006, 5:2241-2249.
203. Cargile B.J., Bundy J.L., Freeman T.W., Stephenson J.L. Gel based isoelectric focusing of peptides and the utility of isoelectric point in protein identification. J Proteome Res 2004, 3:112-119.
204. Zhang H., Yi E.C., Li X.J., Mallick P., Kelly-Spratt K.S., Masselon C.D., et al. High throughput quantitative analysis of serum proteins using glycopeptide capture and liquid chromatography mass spectrometry. Mol Cell Proteomics 2005, 4:144-155.
205. Heller M., Ye M.L., Michel P.E., Morier P., Stalder D., Junger M.A., et al. Added value for tandem mass spectrometry shotgun proteomics data validation through isoelectric focusing of peptides. J Proteome Res 2005, 4:2273-2282.
206. Olsen J.V., de Godoy L.M.F., Li G.Q., Macek B., Mortensen P., Pesch R., et al. Parts per million mass accuracy on an orbitrap mass spectrometer via lock mass injection into a C-trap. Mol Cell Proteomics 2005, 4:2010-2021.
207. Rudnick P.A., Wang Y.J., Evans E., Lee C.S., Balgley B.M. Large scale analysis of MASCOT results using a mass ccuracy-based THreshold (MATH) effectively improves data interpretation. J Proteome Res 2005, 4:1353-1360.
208. Joo J.W.J., Na S., Baek J.H., Lee C., Paek E. Target-decoy with mass binning: a simple and effective validation method for shotgun proteomics using high resolution mass spectrometry. J Proteome Res 2010, 9:1150-1156.
209. May D., Fitzgibbon M., Liu Y., Holzman T., Eng J., Kemp C.J., et al. A platform for accurate mass and time analyses of mass spectrometry data. J Proteome Res 2007, 6:2685-2694.
210. Petyuk V.A., Mayampurath A.M., Monroe M.E., Polpitiya A.D., Purvine S.O., Anderson G.A., et al. DtaRefinery, a software tool for elimination of systematic errors from parent ion mass measurements in tandem mass spectra data sets. Mol Cell Proteomics 2010, 9:486-496.
211. Scherl A., Tsai Y.S., Shaffer S.A., Goodlett D.R. Increasing information from shotgun proteomic data by accounting for misassigned precursor ion masses. Proteomics 2008, 8:2791-2797.
212. Shin B., Jung H.J., Hyung S.W., Kim H., Lee D., Lee C., et al. Postexperiment monoisotopic mass filtering and refinement (PE-MMR) of tandem mass spectrometric data increases accuracy of peptide identification in LC/MS/MS. Mol Cell Proteomics 2008, 7:1124-1134.
213. Pfeifer N., Leinenbach A., Huber C.G., Kohlbacher O. Improving peptide identification in proteome analysis by a two-dimensional retention time filtering approach. J Proteome Res 2009, 8:4109-4115.
214. Klammer A.A., Yi X.H., MacCoss M.J., Noble W.S. Improving tandem mass spectrum identification using peptide retention time prediction across diverse chromatography conditions. Anal Chem 2007, 79:6111-6118.
215. Kall L., Canterbury J.D., Weston J., Noble W.S., MacCoss M.J. Semi-supervised learning for peptide identification from shotgun proteomics datasets. Nat Meth 2007, 4:923-925.
216. Brosch M., Yu L., Hubbard T., Choudhary J. Accurate and sensitive peptide identification with mascot percolator. J Proteome Res 2009, 8:3176-3181.
217. Cerqueira F.R., Graber A., Schwikowski B., Baumgartner C. MUDE: a new approach for optimizing sensitivity in the target-decoy search strategy for large-scale peptide/protein identification. J Proteome Res 2010, 9:2265-2277.
218. Du X., Yang F., Manes N.P., Stenoien D.L., Monroe M.E., Adkins J.N., et al. Linear discriminant analysis-based estimation of the false discovery rate for phosphopeptide identifications. J Proteome Res 2008, 7:2195-2203.
219. Higgs R.E., Knierman M.D., BonnerFreeman A., Gelbert L.M., Patil S.T., Hale J.E. Estimating the statistical significance of peptide identifications from shotgun proteomics experiments. J Proteome Res 2007, 6:1758-1767.
220. Keller A, Eng J, Zhang N, Li X-J, Aebersold R. A uniform proteomics MS/MS analysis platform utilizing open XML file formats. Mol Syst Biol 2005;1:msb4100024-E1-msb-E8.
221. Alves G., Wu W.W., Wang G.H., Shen R.F., Yu Y.K. Enhancing peptide identification confidence by combining search methods. J Proteome Res 2008, 7:3102-3113.
222. Jones A.R., Siepen J.A., Hubbard S.J., Paton N.W. Improving sensitivity in proteome studies by analysis of false discovery rates for multiple search engines. Proteomics 2009, 9:1220-1229.
223. Li Y.F.G., Arnold R.J., Li Y.X., Radivojac P., Sheng Q.H., Tang H.X. A Bayesian approach to protein inference problem in shotgun proteomics. J Comput Biol 2009, 16:1183-1193.
224. Olsen J.V., Ong S.E., Mann M. Trypsin cleaves exclusively C-terminal to arginine and lysine residues. Mol Cell Proteomics 2004, 3:608-614.
225. Picotti P., Aebersold R., Domon B. The implications of proteolytic background for shotgun proteomics. Mol Cell Proteomics 2007, 6:1589-1598.
226. Choi H., Fermin D., Nesvizhskii A.I. Significance analysis of spectral count data in label-free shotgun proteomics. Mol Cell Proteomics 2008, 7:2373-2385.
227. Rappsilber J., Mann M. What does it mean to identify a protein in proteomics?. Trends Biochem Sci 2002, 27:74-78.
228. Sadygov R.G., Liu H.B., Yates J.R. Statistical models for protein validation using tandem mass spectral data and protein amino acid sequence databases. Anal Chem 2004, 76:1664-1671.
229. Gerster S., Qeli E., Ahrens C.H., Buhlmann P. Protein and gene model inference based on statistical modeling in k-partite graphs. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2010, 107:12101-12106.
230. Shen C.Y., Wang Z.P., Shankar G., Zhang X., Li L. A hierarchical statistical model to assess the confidence of peptides and proteins inferred from tandem mass spectrometry. Bioinformatics 2008, 24:202-208.
231. Li Q., MacCoss M.J., Stephens M. A nested mixture model for protein identification using mass spectrometry. Ann Appl Stat 2010, 4:962-987.
232. Feng J., Naiman D.Q., Cooper B. Probability model for assessing proteins assembled from peptide sequences inferred from tandem mass spectrometry data. Anal Chem 2007, 79:3901-3911.
233. Bern M., Goldberg D. Improved ranking functions for protein and modification-site identifications. J Comput Biol 2008, 15:705-719.
234. Gupta N., Pevzner P.A. False discovery rates of protein identifications: a strike against the two-peptide rule. J Proteome Res 2009, 8:4173-4181.
235. Mallick P., Schirle M., Chen S.S., Flory M.R., Lee H., Martin D., et al. eComputational prediction of proteotypic peptides for quantitative proteomics. Nat Biotechnol 2007, 25:125-131.
236. Li J., Zimmerman L.J., Park B.H., Tabb D.L., Liebler D.C., Zhang B. Network-assisted protein identification and data interpretation in shotgun proteomics. Mol Syst Biol 2009, 5:303.
237. Ramakrishnan S.R., Vogel C., Kwon T., Penalva L.O., Marcotte E.M., Miranker D.P. Mining gene functional networks to improve mass-spectrometry-based protein identification. Bioinformatics 2009, 25:2955-2961.
238. Ramakrishnan S.R., Vogel C., Prince J.T., Li Z.H., Penalva L.O., Myers M., et al. Integrating shotgun proteomics and mRNA expression data to improve protein identification. Bioinformatics 2009, 25:1397-1403.
239. Lange V., Picotti P., Domon B., Aebersold R. Selected reaction monitoring for quantitative proteomics: a tutorial. Mol Syst Biol 2008, 4:422.
240. Yang X.Y., Dondeti V., Dezube R., Maynard D.M., Geer L.Y., Epstein J., et al. DBParser: Web-based software for shotgun proteomic data analyses. J Proteome Res 2004, 3:1002-1008.
241. Cox J., Mann M. MaxQuant enables high peptide identification rates, individualized p.p.b.-range mass accuracies and proteome-wide protein quantification. Nat Biotechnol 2008, 26:1367-1372.
242. Ma Z.Q., Dasari S., Chambers M.C., Litton M.D., Sobecki S.M., Zimmerman L.J., et al. IDPicker 2.0: improved protein assembly with high discrimination peptide identification filtering. J Proteome Res 2009, 8:3872-3881.
243. Serang O, MacCoss MJ, Noble WS. Efficient marginalization to compute protein posterior probabilities from shotgun mass spectrometry data. J Proteome Res in press. [pmid: 20712337].
244. Bandeira N., Tsur D., Frank A., Pevzner P.A. Protein identification by spectral networks analysis. Pnas 2007, 104:6140-6145.
245. Padliya N.D., Garrett W.M., Campbell K.B., Tabb D.L., Cooper B. Tandem mass spectrometry for the detection of plant pathogenic fungi and the effects of database composition on protein inferences. Proteomics 2007, 7:3932-3942.
246. Grobei M.A., Qeli E., Brunner E., Rehrauer H., Zhang R.X., Roschitzki B., et al. Deterministic protein inference for shotgun proteomics data provides new insights into Arabidopsis pollen development and function. Genome Res 2009, 19:1786-1800.
247. Isserlin R., Emili A. Interpretation of large-scale quantitative shotgun proteomic profiles for biomarker discovery. Curr Opin Mol Ther 2008, 10:231-242.
248. Brunner E., Ahrens C.H., Mohanty S., Baetschmann H., Loevenich S., Potthast F., et al. A high-quality catalog of the Drosophila melanogaster proteome. Nat Biotechnol 2007, 25:576-583.
249. Baerenfaller K., Grossmann J., Grobei M.A., Hull R., Hirsch-Hoffmann M., Yalovsky S., et al. Genome-scale proteomics reveals C. elegans gene models and proteome dynamics. Science 2008, 320:938-941.
250. Reiter L., Claassen M., Schrimpf S.P., Jovanovic M., Schmidt A., Buhmann J.M., et al. Protein identification false discovery rates for very large proteomics data sets generated by tandem mass spectrometry. Mol Cell Proteomics 2009, 8:2405-2417.
251. Everett L.J., Bierl C., Master S.R. Unbiased statistical analysis for multi-stage proteomic search strategies. J Proteome Res 2010, 9:700-707.
252. Piggee C. Phosphoproteomics: miles to go before its routine. Anal Chem 2009, 81:2418-2420.
253. Mayya V., Han D.K. Phosphoproteomics by mass spectrometry: insights, implications, applications and limitations. Expert Rev Proteomics 2009, 6:605-618.
254. Bodenmiller B, Mueller LN, Mueller M, Domon B, Aebersold R. Reproducible isolation of distinct, overlapping segments of the phosphoproteome. Nat Methods 2007;4:231-7.
255. Steen H., Jebanathirajah J.A., Rush J., Morrice N., Kirschner M.W. Phosphorylation analysis by mass spectrometry: myths, facts, and the consequences for qualitative and quantitative measurements. Mol Cell Proteomics 2006, 5:172-181.
256. White F.M. Quantitative phosphoproteomic analysis of signaling network dynamics. Curr Opin Biotechnol 2008, 19:404-409.
257. Ulintz P.J., Bodenmiller B., Andrews P.C., Aebersold R., Nesvizhskii A.I. Investigating MS2/MS3 matching statistics: a model for coupling consecutive stage mass spectrometry data for increased peptide identification confidence. Mol Cell Proteomics 2008, 7:71-87.
258. Ulintz P.J., Yocum A.K., Bodenmiller B., Aebersold R., Andrews P.C., Nesvizhskii A.I. Comparison of MS2-Only, MSA, and MS2/MS3 methodologies for phosphopeptide identification. J Proteome Res 2009, 8:887-899.
259. Alcolea M.P., Kleiner O., Cutillas P.R. Increased confidence in large-scale phosphoproteomics data by complementary mass spectrometric techniques and matching of phosphopeptide data sets. J Proteome Res 2009, 8:3808-3815.
260. Grimsrud P.A., Swaney D.L., Wenger C.D., Beauchene N.A., Coon J.J. Phosphoproteomics for the Masses. ACS Chem Biol 2010, 5:105-119.
261. Bailey C.M., Sweet S.M.M., Cunningham D.L., Zeller M., Heath J.K., Cooper H.J. SLoMo: automated site localization of modifications from ETD/ECD mass spectra. J Proteome Res 2009, 8:1965-1971.
262. Beausoleil S.A., Villen J., Gerber S.A., Rush J., Gygi S.P. A probability-based approach for high-throughput protein phosphorylation analysis and site localization. Nat Biotechnol 2006, 24:1285-1292.
263. Ruttenberg B.E., Pisitkun T., Knepper M.A., Hoffert J.D. PhosphoScore: an open-source phosphorylation site assignment tool for MSn data. J Proteome Res 2008, 7:3054-3059.
264. Bradshaw R.A., Burlingame A.L., Carr S., Aebersold R. Reporting protein identification data - the next generation of guidelines. Mol Cell Proteomics 2006, 5:787-788.
265. Wu L., Han D.K. Overcoming the dynamic range problem in mass spectrometry-based shotgun proteomics. Expert Rev Proteomics 2006, 3:611-619.
266. Meng F.Y., Forbes A.J., Miller L.M., Kelleher N.L. Detection and localization of protein modifications by high resolution tandem mass spectrometry. Mass Spectrom Rev 2005, 24:126-134.
267. Krogan N.J., Cagney G., Yu H., Zhong G., Guo X., Ignatchenko A., et al. Global landscape of protein complexes in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nature 2006, 440:637-643.
268. Chait B.T. CHEMISTRY: mass spectrometry: bottom-up or top-down?. Science 2006, 314:65-66.
269. Garcia B.A. What Does the Future Hold for Top Down Mass Spectrometry?. J Am Soc Mass Spectrom 2010, 21:193-202.
270. Frank A., Pevzner P. PepNovo: de novo peptide sequencing via probabilistic network modeling. Anal Chem 2005, 77:964-973.
271. Ma B., Zhang K.Z., Hendrie C., Liang C.Z., Li M., Doherty-Kirby A., et al. PEAKS: powerful software for peptide de novo sequencing by tandem mass spectrometry. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom 2003, 17:2337-2342.
272. Eng J.K., McCormack A.L., Yates J.R. An approach to correlate tandem mass-spectral data of peptides with amino-acid-sequences in a protein database. J Am Soc Mass Spectrom 1994, 5:976-989.
273. Clauser K.R., Baker P., Burlingame A.L. Role of accurate mass measurement (+/-10ppm) in protein identification strategies employing MS or MS MS and database searching. Anal Chem 1999, 71:2871-2882.
274. Zhang N., Aebersold R., Schwilkowski B. ProbID: a probabilistic algorithm to identify peptides through sequence database searching using tandem mass spectral data. Proteomics 2002, 2:1406-1412.
275. Colinge J., Masselot A., Giron M., Dessingy T., Magnin J. OLAV: towards high-throughput tandem mass spectrometry data identification. Proteomics 2003, 3:1454-1463.
276. Matthiesen R., Trelle M.B., Hojrup P., Bunkenborg J., Jensen O.N. VEMS 3.0: algorithms and computational tools for tandem mass spectrometry based identification of post-translational modifications in proteins. J Proteome Res 2005, 4:2338-2347.
277. Tabb D.L., Fernando C.G., Chambers M.C. MyriMatch: highly accurate tandem mass spectral peptide identification by multivariate hypergeometric analysis. J Proteome Res 2007, 6:654-661.
278. Xu H., Freitas M.A. Monte Carlo simulation-based algorithms for analysis of shotgun proteomic data. J Proteome Res 2008, 7:2605-2615.
279. Tanner S., Shu H.J., Frank A., Wang L.C., Zandi E., Mumby M., et al. InsPecT: identification of posttransiationally modified peptides from tandem mass spectra. Anal Chem 2005, 77:4626-4639.
280. Hernandez P., Gras R., Frey J., Appel R.D. Popitam: towards new heuristic strategies to improve protein identification from tandem mass spectrometry data. Proteomics 2003, 3:870-878.
281. Craig R., Cortens J.P., Beavis R.C. The use of proteotypic peptide libraries for protein identification. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom 2005, 19:1844-1850.
282. Searle B.C. Scaffold: a bioinformatic tool for validating MS/MS-based proteomic studies. Proteomics 2010, 10:1265-1269.
283. Slotta D.J., McFarland M.A., Markey S.P. MassSieve: panning MS/MS peptide data for proteins. Proteomics 2010, 10:3035-3039.
284. Qeli E., Ahrens C.H. PeptideClassifier for protein inference and targeted quantitative proteomics. Nat Biotech 2010, 28:647-650.
285. Hakkinen J., Vincic G., Mansson O., Warell K., Levander F. The Proteios Software Environment: an extensible multiuser platform for management and analysis of proteomics data. J Proteome Res 2009, 8:3037-3043.
286. Rauch A., Bellew M., Eng J., Fitzgibbon M., Holzman T., Hussey P., et al. Computational Proteomics Analysis System (CPAS): an extensible, open-source analytic system for evaluating and publishing proteomic data and high throughput biological experiments. J Proteome Res 2006, 5:112-121.
287. Martens L., Hermjakob H., Jones P., Adamski M., Taylor C., States D., et al. PRIDE: the proteomics identifications database. Proteomics 2005, 5:3537-3545.
288. Slotta D.J., Barrett T., Edgar R. NCBI Peptidome: a new public repository for mass spectrometry peptide identifications. Nat Biotechnol 2009, 27:600-601.
289. Mohien C.U., Hartler J., Breitwieser F., Rix U., Rix L.R., Winter G.E., et al. MASPECTRAS 2: an integration and analysis platform for proteomic data. Proteomics 2010, 14:4.