Robust prediction of the MASCOT score for an improved quality assessment in mass spectrometric proteomics

Journal of Proteome Research

Volumn 7, Issue 9, 2008, Pages 3708-3717

  Koenig, Thomas ^a,b   Menze, Bjoern H ^a   Kirchner, Marc ^a,b   Monigatti, Flavio ^b,c   Parker, Kenneth C ^d   Patterson, Thomas ^b   Steen, Judith Jebanathirajah ^b   Hamprecht, Fred A ^a   Steen, Hanno ^b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HEIDELBERG   (Germany)

^b BOSTON CHILDREN S HOSPITAL   (United States)

^c HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^d LABORATORY FOR MOLECULAR MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Classification; Peptide identification; Random forest; Regression; Supervised learning

Indexed keywords

CYSTEINE;

ARTICLE; LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY; MASS SPECTROMETRY; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEOMICS; QUALITY CONTROL; TANDEM MASS SPECTROMETRY; STANDARD; VALIDATION STUDY;

PROTEOMICS; TANDEM MASS SPECTROMETRY;

EID: 55249083770     PISSN: 15353893     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/pr700859x     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Choudhary,J. S.; Blackstock, W. P.; Creasy, D. M.; Cottrell, J. S. Interrogating the Human Genome Using Uninterpreted Mass Spectrometry Data. Proteomics 2001, 1, 651-667. Erratum in Proteomics 2001, 1, 796.
2. Mann, M.; Pandey, A. Use of Mass Spectrometry-Derived Data to Annotate Nucleotide and Protein Sequence Databases. Trends Biochem. Sci. 2001, 26, 54-61.
3. Matrix Science Home page, http://www.matrixscience.com, accessed 5/18/07.
4. SEQUEST Home Page, http://flelds.scripps.edu/sequest,accessed5/18/07.
5. Taylor, J. A.; Johnson, R. S. Implementation and Uses of Automated De Novo Peptide Sequencing by Tandem Mass Spectrometry. Anal. Chem. 2001, 73, 2594-2604.
6. Wisniewski, J. R.; Zougman, A.; Kruger, S.; Mann, M. Mass Spectrometric Mapping of Linker Histone HI Variants Reveals Multiple Acetylations, Methylations, and Phosphorylation as well as Differences between Cell Culture and Tissue. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2007, 6, 72-87.
7. Sun, W.; Li, F.; Wang, J.; Zheng, D.; Gao, Y. AMASS: Software for Automatically Validating the Quality of MS/MS Spectrum from SEQUEST Results. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2004, 3, 1194-1199.
8. Razumovskaya, J.; Olman, V.; Xu, D.; Uberbacher, E. C; VerBerkmoes, N. C; Hettich, R. L.; Xu, Y. A Computational Method for Assessing Peptide-Identification Reliability in Tandem Mass Spectrometry Analysis with SEQUEST. Proteomics 2004, 4, 961-969.
9. Anderson, D. C; Qeiqun, L.; Payan, D. G.; Noble, W. S. A New Algorithm for the Evaluation of Shotgun Peptide Sequencing in Proteomics: Support Vector Machine Classification of Peptide MS/ MS Spectra and SEQUEST Scores. J. Proteome Res. 2003, 2, 137- 146.
10. Keller, A.; Nesvizhskii, A. I.; Kolker, E.; Aebersold, R. Empirical Statistical Model to Estimate the Accuracy of Peptide Identifications Made by MS/MS and Database Search. Anal. Chem. 2002, 74, 5383-5392.
11. Moore, R.; Young, M. K.; Lee, T. D. Method for Screening Peptide Fragment Ion Mass Spectra Prior to Database Searching. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 2000, 11, 422-426.
12. Bern, M.; Goldberg, D.; McDonald, W. H.; Yates, J. R. Automatic Quality Assessment of Peptide Tandem Mass Spectra. Bioinformatics 2004, 20, i49-i54.
13. Xu, M.; Geer, L. Y.; Bryant, S. H.; Roth, J. S.; Kowalak, J. A.; Maynard, D. M.; Markey, S. P. Assessing Data Quality of Peptide Mass Spectra Obtained by Quadrupole Ion Trap Mass Spectrometry. J. Proteome Res. 2005, 4, 300-305.
14. Salmi, J.; Moulder, R.; Filén, J.-J.; Nevalainen, O. S.; Nyman, T. A.; Lahesmaa, R.; Aittokallio, T. Quality Classification of Tandem Mass Spectromtry Data. Bioinformatics 2006, 22, 400-406.
15. Flikka, K.; Martens, L.; Vandekerckhove, J.; Gevaert, K.; Eidhammer, I. Improving the Reliability and Throughput of Mass Spectrometry- Based Proteomics by Spectrum Quality Filtering. Proteomics 2006, 6, 2086-2094.
16. Hastie, T.; Tibshirani, R.; Friedman, J. H. The Elements of Statistical Learning; SpringertNew York, 2003.
17. Breiman, L. Random Forests. Mach. Learn. 2001, 45, 5-32.
18. Shevchenko, A.; Wilm, M.; Vorm, O.; Mann, M. Mass Spectrometric Sequencing of Proteins from Silver-Stained Polyacrylamide Gels. Anal. Chem. 1996, 68, 850-858.
19. Shilov, 1.; Seymour, S; Patel, A. A.; Loboda, A.; Tang, W. H.; Keating, S. P.; Hunter, C. L.; Nuwaysir, L. M.; Schaeffer, D. A. The Paragon Algorithm, a Next Generation Search Engine that Uses Sequence Temperature Values and Feature Probabilities to Identify Peptides from Tandem Mass Spectra. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2007, 6, 1638- 1655.
20. R Development Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, http://www.R-project.org, accessed 2/2/07.
21. Menze, B. H.; Kelm, B. M.; Weber, M.-A.; Bachert, P.; Hamprecht, F. A. Mimicking the Human Expert: Pattern Recognition for an Automated Assessment of Data Quality in Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopic Images. Magn. Resort. Med., in press.
22. Liaw, A.; Wiener, M. Classification and Regression by random Forest. R News 2002, 2, 18-22.
23. Moore, R.; Young, M. K.; Lee, T. D. Qscore: An Algorithm for Evaluating SEQUEST Database Search Results. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 2002, 13, 378-386.
24. Peng, J.; EUas, J. E.; Thoreen, C. C; Licklider, L. J.; Gygi, S. P. Evaluation of Multidimensional Chromatography Coupled with Tandem Mass Spectrometry (LC/LC-MS/MS) for Large-Scale Protein Analysis: The Yeast Proteome. J. Proteome Res. 2003, 2, 43-50.