Non-parametric estimation of posterior error probabilities associated with peptides identified by tandem mass spectrometry

Bioinformatics

Volumn 24, Issue 16, 2008, Pages

  Käll, Lukas ^a   Storey, John D ^a,b   Noble, William Stafford ^a,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

^b PRINCETON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c University of Washington   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PEPTIDE;

ACCURACY; ALGORITHM; ANALYTICAL ERROR; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONFERENCE PAPER; CONTROLLED STUDY; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LOGISTIC REGRESSION ANALYSIS; MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD METHOD; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; PARAMETRIC TEST; PEPTIDE ANALYSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROBABILITY; SCORING SYSTEM; SEQUENCE DATABASE; TANDEM MASS SPECTROMETRY;

EID: 49549099563     PISSN: 13674803     EISSN: 13674811     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btn294     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (31)

1. Anderson,D. C. et al. (2003) A new algorithm for the evaluation of shotgun peptide sequencing in proteomics: Support vector machine classification of peptide MS/MS spectra and SEQUEST scores. J. Proteome Res., 2, 137-146.
2. Anderson,J.A. and B1air,V. (1982) Penalized maximum likelihood estimation in logistic regression and discrimination. Biometrika, 69, 123-136.
3. Benjamini,Y. and Hochberg,Y. (1995) Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J. R. Stat. Soc. B, 57, 289-300.
4. Bem,M. et al. (2007) Lookup peaks: A hybrid de novo sequencing and database search for protein identification by tandem mass spectrometry. Anal. Chem., 79, 1393-400.
5. Choi,H. and Nesvizhskii,A.I. (2008) Semisupervised model-based validation of peptide identifications in mass spectrometry-based proteomics. J. Proteome Res., 7, 254-265.
6. Choi,H. et al. (2008) Statistical validation of peptide identifications in large-scale proteomics using target-decoy database search strategy and flexible mixtute modeling. J. Proteome Res., 7, 286-292.
7. Colinge,J. et al. (2003) OLAV: Towards high-throughput tandem mass spectrometry data identification. Proteomics, 3, 1454-1463.
8. Craig,R. and Beavis,R.C. (2004) Tandem: Matching proteins with tandem mass spectra. Bioinformatics, 20, 1466-1467.
9. Efron,B. et al. (2001) Empirical bayes analysis of a microarray experiment. J. Am. Stat. Assoc., 96, 1151-1161.
10. Elias,J.E. et al. (2004) Intensity-based protein identification by machine learning from a library of tandem mass spectra. Nat. Biotechnol., 22, 214-219.
11. Eng,J.K. et al. (1994) An approach to correlate tandem mass spectral data of peptides with amino acid sequences in a protein database. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom., 5, 976-989.
12. Feng,J. et al. (2007) Probability-based pattern recognition and statistical framework for randomization: Modeling tandem mass spectrum/ peptide sequence false match frequencies. Bioinformatics, 23 2210-2217.
13. Green,P. and Silverman,B. (1994) Nonparametric Regression and Generalized Linear Models: A Roughness Penalty Approach. Chapman & Hall/CRC, London.
14. Gu,C. (1992) Cross-validating non-gaussian data. J. Comput. Graph. Stat., 1, 169-179.
15. Higgs,R.E. et al. (2007) Estimating the statistical sigrificance of peptide identifications from shotgun proteomics experiments. J. Proteome Res., 6, 1758-1767.
16. Käll,L. et al. (2007) A semi-supervised machine learning technique for peptide identification from shotgun proteomics datasets. Nat. Methods, 4, 923-925.
17. Käll,L. et al. (2008) Assigning significance to peptides identified by tandem mass spectrometry using decoy databases. J. Proteome Res., 7, 29-34.
18. Keller,A. et al. (2002) Empirical statistical model to estimate the accuracy of peptide identification made by MS/MS and database search. Anal. Chem., 74, 5383-5392.
19. Klammer,A.A. and MacCoss,M.J. (2006) Effects of modified digestion schemes on the identification of proteins from complex mixtures. J. Proteome Res., 5, 695-700.
20. Klammer,A.A. et al. (2005) Peptide charge state determination for low-resolution tandem mass spectra. In Proceedings of the IEEE Camputational Systems Bioinformatics Conference (CSB'05). IEEE Press. pp. 175-185.
21. Moore,R.E. et al. (2002) Qscore: An algorithm for evaluating SEQUEST database search results. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom., 13 378-386.
22. Nesvizhskii,A.I. et al. (2003) A statistical model for identifying proteins by tandem mass spectrometry. Anal. Chem., 75, 4646-4658.
23. Perkins,D.N. et al. (1999) Probability-based protein identification by searching sequence databases using mass spectrometry data. Electrophoresis, 20, 3551-3567.
24. Soric,B. (1989) Statistical discoveries and effect-size estimation. J. Am. Stat. Assoc., 84, 608-610.
25. Storey,J.D. (2002) A direct approach to false discovery rates. J. R. Stat. Soc., 64, 479-498.
26. Storey,J.D. and Tibshirani,R. (2003) Statistical significance for genome-wide studies. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 100, 9440-9445.
27. Storcy,J.D. et al. (2005) Multiple locus linkage analysis of genomewide expression in yeast. PLoS Biol., 3, 1380-1390.
28. Tanner,S. et al. (2005) InsPecT: Identification of posttranslationally modified peptides from tandem mass spectra. Anal. Chem., 77, 4626-4639.
29. Wahba,G. (1983) Bayesian "Confidence Intervals" for the cross-validated smoothing Spline. J. R. Stat. Soc. B (Methodological) 45, 133-150.
30. Washburn,M.P. et al. (2001) Large-scale analysis of the yeast proteome by multidimensional protein identification technology. Nat. Biotechnol., 19, 242-247.
31. Zhang,J. et al. (2008) A nonparametric model for quality control of database search results in shotgun proteomics. BMC Bioinformatics 9, 29.