The flexibility of letter coding: Nonadjacent letter transposition effects in the parafovea

Eye Movements

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 425-440

  Johnson, Rebecca L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84884889856     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1016/B978-008044980-7/50021-5     Document Type: Chapter

References (32)

1. Adams M.J. Models of word recognition. Cognitive Psychology 1979, 11(2):133-176.
2. Andrews S. Lexical retrieval and selection processes: Effects of transposed-letter confusability. Journal of Memory and Language 1996, 35:775-800.
3. Baayen R.H., Piepenbrock R., Gulikers L. The CELEX lexical database (CD-ROM) 1995, Linguistic Data Consortium, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
4. Berent I., Perfetti C.A. A rose is a REEZ: The two cycles model of phonology assembly in reading English. Psychological Review 1995, 102:146-184.
5. Caramazza A., Chialant D., Capasso D., Miceli G. Separable processing of consonants and vowels. Nature 2000, 403:428-430.
6. Chambers S.M. Letter and order information in lexical access. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 1979, 18:225-241.
7. Christianson K., Johnson R.L., Rayner K. Letter transpositions within and across morphemes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2005, 31:1327-1339.
8. Coltheart M., Rastle K., Perry C., Ziegler J., Langdon R. DRC: A Dual Route Cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. Psychological Review 2001, 108:204-256.
9. Davis C.J. The Self-Organising Lexical Acquisition and Recognition (SOLAR) model of visual word recognition 1999, Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of New South Wales, Australia.
10. Forster K.I., Davis C., Schoknecht C., Carter R. Masked priming with graphemically related forms: Repetition or partial activation?. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology 1987, 39A(2):211-251.
11. Francis W., Kučera H. Frequency analysis of English usage: Lexicon and grammar 1982, Houghton Mifflin, Boston.
12. Gómez P., Perea M., Ratcliff R. A model of the coding of letter positions: The overlap model. Poster presented at the 45th Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society 2003.
13. Grainger J., Jacobs A.M. Orthographic processing in visual word recognition: A multiple read-out model. Psychological Review 1996, 103:518-565.
14. Holmes V.M., Ng E. Word-specific knowledge, word-recognition strategies, and spelling ability. Journal of Memory and Language 1993, 32:230-257.
15. Johnson R.L., Perea M., Rayner K. Transposed-Letter Effects in Reading: Evidence from Eye Movements and Parafoveal Preview. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2007.
16. Lee H-W., Rayner K., Pollatsek A. The relative contribution of consonants and vowels to word identification during reading. Journal of Memory and Language 2001, 44:189-205.
17. Lee H-W., Rayner K., Pollatsek A. The processing of consonants and vowels in reading: Evidence from the fast priming paradigm. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2002, 9:766-772.
18. McClelland J.L., Rumelhart D.E. An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: Part I. An account of basic findings. Psychological Review 1981, 88:375-407.
19. O'Connor R.E., Forster K.I. Criterion bias and search sequence bias in word recognition. Memory & Cognition 1981, 9(1):78-92.
20. Paap K.R., Newsome S.L., McDonald J.E., Schvanereldt R.W. An activation-verification model for letter and word recognition: The word superiority effect. Psychological Review 1982, 89:573-594.
21. Perea M., Lupker S.J. Does judge activate COURT? Transposed-letter similarity effects in masked associative priming. Memory and Cognition 2003, 31:829-841.
22. Perea M., Lupker S.J. Transposed-letter confusability effects in masked form priming. Masked priming: The State of the art 2003, 97-120. Psychology Press, New York, NY. S. Kinoshita, S.J. Lupker (Eds.).
23. Perea M., Lupker S.J. Can CANISO activate CASINO? Transposed-letter similarity effects with nonadjacent letter positions. Journal of Memory and Language 2004, 51:231-246.
24. Perea M., Lupker S.J. The effect of transposed letter stimuli in visual word recognition. Poster presented at the 45th Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society 2004.
25. Perea M., Rosa E., Gómez C. The frequency effect for pseudowords in the lexical decision task. Perception and Psychophysics 2005, 67:301-314.
26. Rayner K. The perceptual span and peripheral cues in reading. Cognitive Psychology 1975, 7:65-81.
27. Rayner K. Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychological Bulletin 1998, 124(3):372-422.
28. Rayner K., McConkie G.W., Zola D. Integrating information across eye movements. Cognitive Psychology 1980, 12(2):206-226.
29. Rayner K., Pollatsek A. The psychology of reading 1989, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
30. Schoonbaert S., Grainger J. Letter position coding in printed word perception: Effects of repeated and transposed letters. Language and Cognitive Processes 2004, 19:333-367.
31. Taft M., van Graan F. Lack of phonological mediation in a semantic categorization task. Journal of Memory and Language 1998, 38:203-224.
32. Whitney C. How the brain encodes the order of letters in a printed word: The SERIOL model and selective literature review. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2001, 8(2).