All about words: A lexicalist perspective on reading

From Inkmarks to Ideas: Current Issues in Lexical Processing

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 318-347

  Andrews, Sally ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84909398126     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203841211     Document Type: Chapter

References (88)

1. Andrews, S. (1982). Phonological recoding: Is the regularity effect consistent? Memory and Cognition, 10, 565-575.
2. Andrews, S. (1989). Frequency and neighbourhood effects on lexical access:Activation or search? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15, 802-814.
3. Andrews, S. (1997). The role of orthographic similarity in lexical retrieval: resolving neighborhood conflicts. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 4, 439-461.
4. Andrews, S. (2003). E-Z Reader's assumptions about lexical processing: Not so easy to define the two stage of lexical access? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 26, 477-478.
5. Andrews, S., & Borgwaldt, S. (2005). Repetition blindness in sentences: Turn a blind eye? Paper presented at the 15th Australian Language and Speech Conference, Macquarie University, Australia, December 2005.
6. Andrews, S., & Heathcote, A. (2001). Distinguishing common and task-specific processes in lexical retrieval: A matter of some moment? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27, 514-544.
7. Andrews, S., & Scarratt, D. (1998). Rule and analogy mechanisms in reading nonwords:Hough dou peapel rede gnew wirds? Journal of Experimental Psychology:Human Perception and Performance, 24, 1052-1086.
8. Andrews, S., Woollams, A., & Bond, R. (2005). Spelling-sound typicality only affects words with digraphs: Further qualifications to the generality of the regularity effect on word naming. Journal of Memory and Language, 53, 567-593.
9. Armstrong, I. T., & Mewhort, D. J. K. (1995). Repetition deficit in rapid-serial-visualpresentation displays: Encoding failure or retrieval failure? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 1044-1052.
10. Atkinson, R. C., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1968). Human memory: A proposed system and its control processes. In K. W. Spence & J. T. Spence (Eds.), The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory (Vol. 2, pp. 89-195). Oxford: Academic Press.
11. Baddeley, A. (1990). Human memory: Theory and practice. Hove, UK: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Ltd.
12. Balota, D. A. (1990). The role of meaning in word recognition. In D. A. Balota, G. B. Flores d'Arcais, & K. Rayner (Eds.), Comprehension processing in reading (pp. 9-32). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
13. Balota, D. A., & Chumbley, J. I. (1984). Are lexical decisions a good measure of lexical access? The role of word frequency in the neglected decision stage. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 10, 340-357.
14. Balota, D. A., & Spieler, D. H. (1998). The utility of item-level analyses in model evaluation: A reply to Seidenberg and Plaut. Psychological Science, 9, 38-40.
15. Bavelier, D. (1994). Repetition blindness between visually different items: The case of pictures and words. Cognition, 51, 199-236.
16. Bavelier, D. (1999). Role and nature of object representations in perceiving and acting. In V. Coltheart (Ed.), Fleeting memories: Cognition of brief visual stimuli (pp. 151-179). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
17. Bavelier, D., & Jordan, M. I. (1992). A dynamic model of word recognition. In C. L. Giles, S. J. Hanson, & J. D. Cowan (Eds.), Advances in neural information processing systems (Vol. 5, pp. 879-886). San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufman.
18. Bavelier, D., & Potter, M. C. (1992). Visual and phonological codes in repetition blindness. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 134-147.
19. Bavelier, D., Prasada, S., & Segui, J. (1994) Repetition blindness between words:nature of the orthographic and phonological representations involved. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 1437-1455.
20. Besner, D., & Smith, M. C. (1992). Models of visual word recognition: When obscuring the stimulus yields a clearer view. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 468-482.
21. Bond, R., & Andrews, S. (2005). Repetition blindness in context. Paper presented at Australian Language and Speech Conference, Macquarie University, Sydney.
22. Brown, S., & Heathcote, A. (2005). A ballistic model of choice response time. Psychological Review, 112, 117-128.
23. Byrne, B., & Fielding-Barnsley, R. (1990). Acquiring the alphabetic principle: A case for teaching recognition of phoneme identity. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 805-812.
24. Carr, T. H. (1999). Trying to understand dyslexia: Mental chronometry, individual differences, cognitive neuroscience and the impact of instruction as converging sources of evidence. In R. M. Klein & P. A. McMullen (Eds.), Converging methods for understanding reading and dyslexia. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
25. Carr, T. H., & Posner, M. I. (1995). The impact of learning to read on the functional anatomy of language processing. In B. de Gelder & J. Morais (Eds.), Speech and reading: A comparative approach. Hove, UK: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Ltd.
26. Chialant, D., & Caramazza, A. Q. (1997). Identity and similarity factors in repetition blindness: Implications for lexical processing. Cognition, 63, 79-119.
27. Chun, M. M. (1997). Types and tokens in visual processing: A double dissociation between the attentional blink and repetition blindness. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23, 738-755.
28. Collins dictionary of the English language: An extensive coverage of contemporary international and Australian English (1979). Sydney: Collins.
29. Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
30. Coltheart, M., Atkins, P., & Haller, M. (1993). Models of reading aloud: Dualroute and parallel-distributed-processing approaches. Psychological Review, 100, 589-608.
31. Coltheart, M., Rastle, K., Perry, C., Langdon, R., & Ziegler, J. C. (2001). DRC: A dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. Psychological Review, 108, 204-256.
32. Coltheart, V. Ed. (1999). Fleeting memories: Cognition of brief visual stimuli. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
33. Davis, C. J. (1999). The self-organising lexical acquisition and recognition (SOLAR) model of visual word recognition (doctoral dissertation, University of New South Wales, 1999). Dissertation Abstracts International, 62(1-B), 594 (www.maccs.mq.edu.au/~colin).
34. Dawson, M. W. (1998). Understanding cognitive science. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
35. Ehri, L. C. (1992). Reconceptualising the development of sight word reading and its relationship to decoding. In P. B. Gough, L. C. Ehri, & R. Treiman (Eds.), Reading acquisition (pp. 107-143). Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
36. Elman, J. L., Bates, E. A., Johnson, M. H., Karmiloff-Smith, A., & Plunkett, K. (1996). Rethinking innateness: A connectionist perspective on development. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
37. Fagot, C., & Pashler, H. (1995). Repetition blindness: Perception or memory failure? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 275-292.
38. Fodor, J. A. (1983). Modularity of mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
39. Forster, K. I. (1970). Visual perception of rapidly presented word sequences of varying complexity. Perception and Psychophysics, 8, 215-221.
40. Forster, K. I. (1989). Basic issues in lexical processing. In W. Marslen-Wilson (Ed.), Lexical representation and process (pp. 75-107). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
41. Gillund, G., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1984). A retrieval model for both recognition and recall. Psychological Review, 91, 1-67.
42. Goldinger, S. D. (1998). Echoes of echoes? An episodic theory of lexical access. Psychological Review, 105, 251-279.
43. Goodman, K. 1976. Reading: A psycholinguistic guessing game. In H. Singer & R. B. Ruddel (Eds.), Theoretical models and process of reading (2nd ed.). Newark, DE:International Reading Association.
44. Grainger, J., & Jacobs, A. M. (1996). Orthographic processing in visual word recognition: A multiple read-out model. Psychological Review, 103, 518-565.
45. Grossberg, S. (1980). How does a brain build a cognitive code? Psychological Review, 8, 1-51.
46. Harm, M. W., & Seidenberg, M. S. (2004). Computing the meanings of words in reading: Cooperative division of labor between visual and phonological processes. Psychological Review, 111, 662-720.
47. Harris, C. L., & Morris, A. L. (2000). Orthographic repetition blindness. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 53A, 1039-1060.
48. Harris, C. L., & Morris, A. L. (2001). Identity and similarity in repetition blindness:No cross-over interaction. Cognition, 81, 1-40.
49. Hinton, G. E., & Shallice, T. (1991). Lesioning an attractor network: Investigations of acquired dyslexia. Psychological Review, 98, 74-95.
50. Kanwisher, N. G. (1987). Repetition blindness: Type recognition without token individuation. Cognition, 27, 117-143.
51. Kanwisher, N. G., & Potter, M. C. (1990). Repetition blindness: Levels of processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16, 30-47.
52. Kello, C. T., Sibley, D. E., & Plaut, D. C. (2005). Dissociations in performance on novel versus irregular items: Single-route demonstrations with input gain in localist and distributed models. Cognitive Science, 29, 627-654.
53. Luo, C. R., & Caramazza, A. (1996). Temporal and spatial repetition blindness:Effects of presentation mode and repetition lag on the perception of repeated items. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 22, 95-113.
54. Marr, D. (1982). Vision. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.
55. Masson, M. E. J., & Bodner, G. E. (2003). A retrospective view of masked priming:Toward a unified account of masked and long-term repetition priming. In S. Kinoshita & S. J. Lupker (Eds.), Masked priming: The state of the art (pp. 57-94). New York: Psychology Press.
56. McClelland, J. L., & Rumelhart, D. E. (1981). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception. I. An account of basic findings. Psychological Review, 88, 375-407.
57. Miller, M. D., & MacKay, D. G. (1994). Repetition deafness: Repeated words in computer-compressed speech are difficult to encode and recall. Psychological Science, 5, 47-51.
58. Miller, M. D., & MacKay, D. G. (1996). Relations between language and memory:The case of repetition deafness. Psychological Science, 7, 347-351.
59. Monsell, S., Doyle, M. C., & Haggard, P. N. (1989). Effects of frequency on visual word recognition tasks: Where are they? Journal of Experimental Psychology:General, 118, 43-71.
60. Morrison, R. E. (1984). Manipulation of stimulus onset delay in reading: Evidence for parallel programming of saccades. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 10, 667-682.
61. Page, M. (2000). Connectionist modelling in psychology: A localist manifesto. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23, 443-512.
62. Park, J. & Kanwisher, N. (1994). Determinants of repetition blindness. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 500-519.
63. Perfetti, C. A. (1992). The representation problem in reading acquisition. In P. B. Gough, L. C. Ehri, & R. Treiman (Eds.), Reading acquisition (pp. 145-174). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
64. Plaut, D. C. (1997). Structure and function in the lexical system: Insights from distributed models of word reading and lexical decision. Language and Cognitive Processes, 12, 767-808.
65. Plaut, D. C. (1999). Computational modeling of word reading, acquired dyslexia and remediation. In R. M. Klein & P. A. McMullen (Eds.), Converging methods for understanding reading and dyslexia. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
66. Plaut, D. C., McClelland, J. L., Seidenberg, M. S., & Patterson, K. E. (1996). Understanding normal and impaired word reading: Computational principles in quasi-regular domains. Psychological Review, 103, 56-115.
67. Plaut, D. C., & Shallice, T. (1993). Deep dyslexia: A case study of connectionist neuropsychology. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 10, 377-500.
68. Plunkett, K., & Marchman, V. (1991). U-shaped learning and frequency effects in a multi-layered perceptron: Implications for child language acquisition. Cognition, 38, 43-102.
69. Posner, M. I., & McCandliss, B. D. (1999). Brain circuitry during reading. In R. E. Klein & P. A. McMullen (Eds.), Converging methods for understanding reading and dyslexia. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
70. Potter, M. C. (1975). Meaning in visual search. Science, 187, 965-966.
71. Potter, M. C. (1999). Understanding sentences and scenes: The role of conceptual short-term memory. In V. Coltheart (Ed.), Fleeting memories: Cognition of brief visual stimuli (pp. 13-46). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
72. Potter, M. C., Chun, M. M., Banks, B. S., & Muckenhoupt, M. (1998a). Two attentional deficits in serial target search: The visual attentional blink and an amodal task-switch deficit. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24, 979-992.
73. Potter, M. C., Stiefbold, D., & Moryadas, A. (1998b). Word selection in reading sentences: Preceding versus following contexts. Journal of Experimental Psychology:Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24, 979-992.
74. Price, C., Wise, R., Watson, J. D. G., Patterson, K., Howard, D., & Frackowiak, R. (1994). Brain activity during reading: The effects of exposure duration and task. Brain, 117, 1255-1269.
75. Pugh, K. R., Mencl, W. E., Jenner, A. R., Katz, L., Frost, S. J., Lee, J. R. et al. (2001). Neurobiological studies of reading and reading disability. Journal of Communication Disorders, 34, 479-492.
76. Ratcliff, R., Gomez, P., & McKoon, G. (2004). A diffusion model account of the lexical decision task. Psychological Review, 111, 159-182.
77. Rayner, K., Foorman, B. R., Perfetti, C. A., Pesetsky, D., & Seidenberg, M. S. (2001). How psychological science informs the teaching of reading. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 2, 31-74.
78. Rayner, K., Foorman, B. R., Perfetti, C. A., Pesetsky, D., & Seidenberg, M. S. (2002). How should reading be taught? Scientific American, 286, 84-91.
79. Reichle, E. D., Pollatsek, A., Fisher, D. L., & Rayner, K. (1998). Toward a model of eye movement control in reading. Psychological Review, 105, 125-157.
80. Roberts, M., Rastle, K., Coltheart, M., & Besner, D. (2003). When parallel processing in visual word recognition is not enough: New evidence from naming. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 12, 405-414.
81. Seidenberg, M. S., & McClelland, J. L. (1989). A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming. Psychological Review, 96, 523-568.
82. Smith, F. (1973). Psycholinguistics and reading. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
83. Taft, M. (2001). Processing of orthographic structure by adults of different reading ability. Language and Speech, 44, 351-376.
84. Usher, M., & McClelland, J. L. (2001). The time course of perceptual choice: The leaky, competing accumulator model. Psychological Review, 108, 550-592.
85. Van Orden, G. C., & Goldinger, S. D. (1994). Interdependence of form and function in cognitive systems explains perception of printed words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 1269-1291.
86. Warrington, E. K., & Shallice, T. (1980). Word-form dyslexia. Brain, 103, 99-112.
87. Whittlesea, B. W. A., & Masson, M. E. J. (2005). Repetition blindness in rapid lists:Activation and inhibition versus construction and attribution. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31, 54-67.
88. Zorzi, M. (2000). Serial processes in reading aloud: No challenge for a parallel model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26, 847-856.