Do transposed-letter similarity effects occur at a syllable level?

Experimental Psychology

Volumn 53, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 308-315

  Perea, Manuel ^a   Carreiras, Manuel ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VALENCIA   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSIDAD DE LA LAGUNA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Coding scheme; Letter encoding; Lexical decision; Syllables; Word recognition

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATTENTION; COMPREHENSION; DECISION MAKING; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; HUMAN; LINGUISTICS; PHONETICS; REACTION TIME; READING; SEMANTICS;

ATTENTION; COMPREHENSION; DECISION MAKING; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; HUMANS; PHONETICS; PSYCHOLINGUISTICS; REACTION TIME; READING; SEMANTICS;

EID: 34248525777     PISSN: 16183169     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1027/1618-3169.53.4.308     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Alameda, J. R., & Cuetos, F. (1995). Diccionario defrecuencia de las unidades lingüísticas del castellano [Word frequency dictionary in Spanish]. Oviedo: Universidad de Oviedo.
2. Álvarez, C. J., Carreiras, M., & Perea, M. (2004) Are syllables phonological units in visual word recognition? Language & Cognitive Processes, 19, 427-452.
3. Andrews, S. (1996). Lexical retrieval and selection processes: Effects of transposed-letter confusability. Journal of Memory & Language, 35, 775-800.
4. Caramazza, A., Chialant, D., Capasso, D., & Miceli, G. (2000). Separable processing of consonants and vowels. Nature, 403, 428-430.
5. Carreiras, M., Álvarez, C. J., & de Vega, M. (1993). Syllable frequency and visual word recognition in Spanish. Journal of Memory & Language, 32, 766-780.
6. Carreiras, M., Ferrand, L., Grainger, J., & Perea, M. (2005). Sequential effects of phonological priming in visual word recognition. Psychological Science, 16, 585-589.
7. Carreiras, M., & Perea, M. (2002). Masked priming effects with syllabic neighbors in the lexical decision task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 28, 1228-1242.
8. Carreiras, M., Vergara, M., & Perea, M. (2005, September). ERP correlates of transposed-letter similarity effects: Are consonants processed differently from vowels? Paper presented at the 9th International Conference on Cognitive Neuroscience, La Habana, Cuba.
9. Chambers, S. M. (1979). Letter and order information in lexical access. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 18, 225-241.
10. Chen, J-Y. (2000). Syllable errors from naturalistic slips of the tongue in Mandarin Chinese. Psychologia, 43, 15-26.
11. Christianson, K., Johnson, R. L., & Rayner, K. (2005). Transposed letter effects within and across morphemes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 31, 1327-1339.
12. Coltheart, M., Rastle, K., Perry, C., Ziegler, J., & Langdon, R. (2001). DRC: A dual-route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. Psychological Review, 108, 204-256.
13. Conrad, M., & Jacobs, A. M. (2004). Replicating syllable-frequency effects in Spanish in German: One more challenge to computational models of visual word recognition. Language & Cognitive Processes, 19, 369-390.
14. Davis, C. J. (1999). The Self-Organising Lexical Acquisition and Recognition (SOLAR) model of visual word recognition. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
15. Davis, C. J., & Andrews, S. (2001). Inhibitory effects of transposed-letter similarity for words and non-words of different lengths. Australian Journal of Psychology, 53, 50.
16. Forster, K. I., Davis, C., Schoknecht, C., & Carter, R. (1987). Masked priming with graphemically related forms: Repetition of partial activation? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 39, 211-251.
17. Forster, K. I., & Hector, J. (2002). Cascaded versus noncascaded models of lexical and semantic processing the turple effect. Memory & Cognition, 30, 1106-1116.
18. Górnez, P., Perea, M., & Ratcliff, R. (2003, November). The overlap of the encoding of letter positions. Poster presented at the 45th Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Vancouver, B.C., Canada.
19. Grainger, J., & Jacobs, A. M. (1996). Orthographic processing in visual word recognition: A multiple read-out model. Psychological Review, 103, 518-565.
20. Grainger, J., & van Heuven, W. J. B. (2003). Modeling letter position coding in printed word perception. In P. Bonin (Ed.), The mental lexicon (pp. 1-23). New York: Nova Science.
21. Grainger, J., & Whitney, C. (2004). Does the huamn mnid raed wrods as a wlohe? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 58-59.
22. Lane, D. M., & Ashby, B. (1987). PsychLib: A library of machine language routines for controlling psychology experiments on the Apple Macintosh computer. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 19, 246-248.
23. Lee, H.-W., Rayner, K., & Pollatsek, A. (2001). The relative contribution of consonants and vowels to word identification during reading. Journal of Memory & Language, 44, 189-205.
24. Mathey, S., & Zagar, D. (2002). Lexical similarity in visual word recotnition: The effect of syllabic neighborhood in French. Current Psychology Letters: Behavior. Brain & Cognition, 8, 107-121.
25. Nespor, M., Peña, M., & Mehler, J. (2003). On the different roles of vowels and consonants in speech processing and language acquisition. Lingue e Linguaggio, 2, 221-247.
26. O'Connor, R. E., & Forster, K. I. (1981). Criterion bias and search sequence bias in word recognition. Memory & Cognition, 9, 78-92.
27. Perea, M., & Carreiras, M. (1998). Effects of syllable frequency and syllable neighborhood frequency in visual word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 24, 134-144.
28. Perea, M., & Carreiras, M. (2006). Do transposed-letter similarity effects occur at a prelexical phonological level? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59, 1600-1613.
29. Perea, M., & Carreiras, M. (in press). Do transposed-letter effects occur across lexemes? Psychonomic Bulletin & Review.
30. Perea, M., & Fraga, I. (2006). Transposed-letter and laterality effects in lexical decision. Brain & Language, 97, 102-9.
31. Perea, M., & Lupker, S. J. (2003a). Does jugde activate COURT? Transposed-letter similarity effects in masked associative priming. Memory & Cognition, 31, 829-841.
32. Perea, M., & Lupker, S. J. (2003b). Transposed-letter confusability effects in masked form priming. In S. Konoshita & S. J. Lupker (Eds.), Masked priming: State of the art (pp. 97-120). Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
33. Perea, M., & Lupker, S. J. (2004). Can CANISO activate CASINO? Transposed-letter similarity effects with nonadjacent letter positions. Journal of Memory & Language, 51, 231-246.
34. Perea, M., Rosa, E., & Gómez, C. (2005). The frequency effect for pseudowords in the lexical decision task. Perception & Psychophysics, 67, 301-314.
35. Pérez, E., Palma, A., & Santiago, J. (2001). Una base de datos de errores del lenguaje en castellano [A database of speech errors in Spanish]. Poster presented at the V Simposio de Psicolingüística, Granada, Spain.
36. Pollatsek, A., & Well, A.D. (1995). On the use of counterbalanced designs in cognitive research: A suggestion for a better and more powerful analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 21, 785-794.
37. Rumelhart, D. E., & McClelland, J. L. (1982). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: Part 2. The contextual enhancement effect and some tests and extensions of the model. Psychological Review, 89, 60-94.
38. Schoonbaert, S., & Grainger, J. (2004). Letter position coding in printed word perception: Effects of repeated and transposed letters. Language & Cognitive Processes, 19, 333-367.
39. Sebastián-Gallés, N., Martí, M. A., Carreiras, M., & Cuetos, F. (2000). LEXESP: Léxico informatizado del español [LEXESP: A computerized word-pool in Spanish]. Barcelona: Edicions Universität de Barcelona.
40. Westall, R., Perkey, M. N., & Chute, D. L. (1986). Accurate millisecond timing on the Apple Macintosh using Drexler's Millitimer. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 18, 307-311.
41. Whitney, C. (2001). How the brain encodes the order of letters in a printed word: The SERIOL model and selective literature review. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8, 221-243.