Learning representations of wordforms with recurrent networks: Comment on Sibley, Kello, Plaut, & Elman (2008)

Cognitive Science

Volumn 33, Issue 7, 2009, Pages 1183-1186

  Bowers, Jeffrey S ^a   Davis, Colin J ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRISTOL   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Alignment problem; Connectionism; Position invariance; Slot coding; Symbols; Word identification

Indexed keywords

EID: 74049099300     PISSN: 03640213     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1551-6709.2009.01062.x     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Bowers, J.S., Davis, C.J., & Hanley, D.A. (2005). Automatic semantic activation of embedded words: Is there a 'hat' in 'that'? Journal of Memory and Language, 52, 131-143.
2. Davis, C.J. (1999). The Self-Organising Lexical Acquisition and Recognition (SOLAR) model of visual word recognition. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of New South Wales.
3. Davis, C.J. (2006). Orthographic input coding: A review of behavioural data and current models. In S. Andrews (Ed.), From inkmarks to ideas: Current issues in lexical processing p (pp. 180-206). New York: Psychology Press.
4. Davis, C.J., & Bowers, J.S. (2004). What do letter migration errors reveal about letter position coding in visual word recognition? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 30, 923-941.
5. Davis, C.J., & Bowers, J.S. (2006). Contrasting five theories of letter position coding. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 32, 535-557.
6. Grainger, J., Granier, J.P., Farioli, F., Van Assche, E., & van Heuven, W. (2006). Letter position information and printed word perception: The relative-position priming constraint. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32, 865-884.
7. Grainger, J., & Jacobs, A.M. (1996). Orthographic processing in visual word recognition: A multiple read-out model. Psychological Review, 103, 518-565.
8. Perea, M., & Lupker, S.J. (2003). Does jugde activate COURT? Transposed-letter similarity effects in masked associative priming. Memory & Cognition, 31, 829-841.
9. Perea, M., & Lupker, S.J. (2004). Can CANISO activate CASINO? Transposed-letter similarity effects with nonadjacent letter positions. Journal of Memory and Language, 51, 231-246.
10. Plaut, D.C., McClelland, J.L., Seidenberg, M.S., & Patterson, K. (1996). Understanding normal and impaired word reading: Computational principles in quasi-regular domains. Psychological Review, 103, 56-115.
11. Seidenberg, M.S., & McClelland, J. L (1989). A distributed, development model of word recognition and naming Psychological Review, 96, 563-568.
12. Sibley, D.E., Kello, C.T., Plaut, D., & Elman, J.L. (2008). Large-scale modeling of wordform learning and representation. Cognitive Science, 32, 741-754.
13. Whitney, C. (2001). How the brain encodes the order of letters in a printed word: The SERIOL model and selective literature review. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8, 221-243.