SOLAR versus SERIOL revisited

European Journal of Cognitive Psychology

Volumn 22, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 695-724

  Davis, Colin J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Computational models; Letter position coding; SERIOL; SOLAR; Visual word recognition

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER MODEL; INFORMATION PROCESSING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; READING; REVIEW; VISUAL MEMORY; WORD RECOGNITION;

EID: 77955003583     PISSN: 09541446     EISSN: 14640635     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09541440903155682     Document Type: Review

References (103)

1. Abeles, M. (1982). Local cortical circuits: An electrophysiological study. Berlin: Springer.
2. Andrews, S. (1996). Lexical retrieval and selection processes: Effects of transposed-letter confusability. Journal of Memory and Language, 35, 775-800.
3. Andrews, S., Miller, B., & Rayner, K. (2004). Eye movements and morphological segmentation of compound words: There is a mouse in mousetrap. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 16, 285-311.
4. Averbach, E., & Coriell, A. S. (1961). Short-term memory in vision. Bell System Technical Journal, 40, 309-328.
5. Bouma, H. (1970). Interaction effects in parafoveal letter recognition. Nature, 226, 177-178.
6. Bowers, J. S., Davis, C. J., & Hanley, D. A. (2005a). Automatic semantic activation of embedded words: Is there a "hat" in "that"? Journal of Memory and Language, 52, 131-143.
7. Bowers, J. S., Davis, C. J., & Hanley, D. A. (2005b). Interfering neighbours: The impact of novel word learning on the identification of visually similar words. Cognition, 97, B45-B54.
8. Bradski, G., Carpenter, G. A., & Grossberg, S. (1992). Working memory networks for learning multiple groupings of temporal order with application to 3-D visual object recognition. Neural Computation, 4, 270-286.
9. Braitenberg, V. (1967). Is the cerebellar cortex a biological clock in the millisecond range? Progress in Brain Research, 25, 334-346.
10. Brunsdon, R., Coltheart, M., & Nickels, L. (2005). Treatment of irregular word spelling in developmental surface dysgraphia. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 22, 213-251.
11. Burani, A., & Caramazza, A. (1987). Representation and processing of derived words. Language and Cognitive Processes, 2, 217-227.
12. Butler, B. E., & Currie, A. (1986). On the nature of perceptual limits in vision-A new look at lateral masking. Psychological Research, 48, 201-209.
13. Carr, C. E., & Konishi, M. (1988). Axonal delay lines for time measurement in the owl's brainstem. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 85, 8311-8315.
14. Chambers, S. M. (1979). Letter and order information in lexical access. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18, 225-241.
15. Chung, S. T., Levi, D. M., & Legge, G. E. (2001). Spatial-frequency and contrast properties of crowding. Vision Research, 41, 1833-1850.
16. Davis, C. J. (1999). The self-organising lexical acquisition and recognition (SOLAR) model of visual word recognition. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of New South Wales, Australia.
17. Davis, C. J. (2001, December). A novel method of parallel matching in neural network models of recognition. Paper presented at the 10th Australasian Mathematical Psychology conference, Newcastle.
18. Davis, C. J. (2003). Factors underlying masked priming effects in competitive network models of visual word recognition. In S. Kinoshita & S. J. Lupker (Eds.), Masked priming: The state of the art (pp. 121-170). Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
19. Davis, C. J. (2004). Phase coding: A method for simultaneously encoding order and signal strength in a neural network model of recognition. In Proceedings of the eighth international conference on Cognitive and Neural Systems (p. 21). Boston, MA: Boston University Press.
20. Davis, C. J. (2006). Orthographic input coding: A review of behavioural data and current models. In S. Andrews (Ed.), From inkmarks to ideas: Current issues in lexical processing (pp. 180-206). Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
21. Davis, C. J. (in press). The spatial coding model of visual word identification. Psychological Review.
22. Davis, C. J., & Bowers, J. S. (2004). What do letter migration errors reveal about letter position coding in visual word recognition? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 30, 923-941.
23. Davis, C. J., & Bowers, J. S. (2005, 31 August). How is letter position coded? Further evidence for a spatial coding model. Paper presented at the 14th ESCOP conference, Leiden, The Netherlands.
24. Davis, C. J., & Bowers, J. S. (2006). Contrasting five different theories of letter position coding: Evidence from orthographic similarity effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32, 535-557.
25. Davis, C. J., & Lupker, S. J. (2006). Masked inhibitory priming in English: Evidence for lexical inhibition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32, 668-687.
26. Davis, C. J., Perea, M., & Acha, J. (2009). Re(de)fining the orthographic neighbourhood: The role of addition and deletion neighbours in lexical decision and reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 35, 1550-1570.
27. Davis, C. J., & Taft, M. (2005). More words in the neighborhood: Interference in lexical decision due to deletion neighbors. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 12, 904-910.
28. Dehaene, S., Cohen, L., Sigman, M., & Vinckier, F. (2005). The neural code for written words: A proposal. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9, 335-341.
29. De Moor, W., & Brysbaert, M. (2000). Neighborhood-frequency effects when primes and targets are of different lengths. Psychological Research-Psychologische Forschung, 63, 159-162.
30. Estes, W K., Allmeyer, D. H., & Reder, S. M. (1976). Serial position functions for letter identification at brief and extended exposure durations. Perception and Psychophysics, 19, 1-15.
31. Fiala, J. C., Grossberg, S., & Bullock, D. (1996). Metabotropic glutamate receptor activation in cerebellar Purkinje cells as substrate for adaptive timing of the classically conditioned eye-blink response. Journal ofNeuroscience, 16, 3760-3774.
32. Forster, K. I., Davis, C., Schoknecht, C., & Carter, R. (1987). Masked priming with graphemically related forms: Repetition or partial activation? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 39A, 211-251.
33. Frankish, C., & Barnes, L. (2008). Lexical and sublexical processes in the perception of transposed- letter anagrams. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61, 381-391.
34. Goswami, U., & Ziegler, J. C. (2006). A developmental perspective on the neural code for written words. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10, 142-143.
35. Grainger, J. (Ed.). (2008). Cracking the orthographic code. Language and Cognitive Processes, 23(Whole No. 1).
36. Grainger, J., Cole, P., & Segui, J. (1991). Masked morphological priming in visual word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 30, 370-384.
37. Grainger, J., Granier, J.-P., Farioli, F., van Assche, E., & van Heuven, W J. B. (2006). Letter position information and printed word perception: The relative-position priming constraint. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32, 865-884.
38. Grainger, J., & van Heuven, W. (2003). Modeling letter position coding in printed word perception. In P. Bonin (Ed.), The mental lexicon. New York: Nova Science.
39. Grossberg, S. (1969). Some networks that can learn, remember, and reproduce any number of complicated space-time patterns, I. Journal of Mathematics and Mechanics, 19, 53-91.
40. Grossberg, S. (1978). A theory of human memory: Self-organization and performance of sensory- motor codes, maps, and plans. Progress in Theoretical Biology, 5, 233-374.
41. Guerrera, C., & Forster, K. (2008). Masked form priming with extreme transposition. Language and Cognitive Processes, 23, 117-142.
42. Haag, J., Denk, W, & Borst, A. (2004). Fly motion vision is based on Reichardt detectors regardless of the signal-to-noise ratio. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 101, 16333-16338.
43. Hammond, E. J., & Green, D. (1982). Detecting targets in letter and non-letter arrays. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 36, 67-82.
44. Harris, K. D., Henze, D. A., & Hirase, H., Leinekugel, X., Dragoi, G., Czurko, A., & Buzsaki, G., et al. (2002). Spike train dynamics predicts theta-related phase precession in hippocampal pyramidal cells. Nature, 417, 738-741.
45. Houghton, G. (1990). The problem of serial order: A neural network model of sequence learning and recall. In R. Dale, C. Mellish, & M. Zock (Eds.), Current research in natural language generation (pp. 287-319). London: Academic Press.
46. Humphreys, G. W, Evett, L. J., & Quinlan, P. T. (1990). Orthographic processing in visual word identification. Cognitive Psychology, 22, 517-560.
47. Hunter, Z. R., & Brysbaert, M. (2008). Theoretical analysis of interhemispheric transfer costs in visual word recognition. Language and Cognitive Processes, 23, 165-182.
48. Jeffress, L. A. (1948). A place theory of sound localization. Journal of Comparative Physiology and Psychology, 41, 35-39.
49. Johnson, R. L., Perea, M., & Rayner, K. (2007). Transposed-letter effects in reading: Evidence from eye movements and parafoveal preview. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33, 209-229.
50. Joris, P. X. (2006). A dogged pursuit of coincidence. Journal of Neurophysiology, 96, 969-972.
51. Kinoshita, S., & Norris, D. (2009). Transposed-letter priming of prelexical orthographic representations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35, 1-18.
52. Klimesch, W., Doppelmayr, M., Wimmer, H., Gruber, W., Rohm, D., Schwaiger, J., & Hutzler, F. (2001). Theta band power changes in normal and dyslexic children. Clinical Neurophysiology, 112, 1174-1185. (Pubitemid 32539443)
53. Ktori, M., & Pitchford, N. J. (2008). Effect of orthographic transparency on letter position encoding: A comparison of Greek and English monoscriptal and biscriptal readers. Language and Cognitive Processes, 23, 258-281.
54. Levi, D. M. (2008). Crowding-An essential bottleneck for object recognition: A mini-review. Vision Research, 48, 635-654.
55. Lewandowsky, S. (1993). The rewards and hazards of computer simulations. Psychological Science, 4, 236-243.
56. Licklider, J. C. R. (1951). A duplex theory of pitch perception. Experientia, 7, 128-134.
57. Lindell, A. K., Nicholls, M. E. R., Kwantes, P. J., & Castles, A. (2005). Sequential processing in hemispheric word recognition: The impact of initial letter discriminability on the OUP naming effect. Brain and Language, 93, 160-172.
58. Lupker, S. J., & Davis, C. J. (2009). Sandwich priming: A method for overcoming the limitations of masked priming by reducing lexical competitor effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35, 618-639.
59. Lupker, S. J., Perea, M., & Davis, C. J. (2008). Transposed-letter effects: Consonants, vowels and letter frequency. Language and Cognitive Processes, 23, 93-116.
60. Mariol, M., Jacques, C., Schelstraete, M.-A., & Rossion, B. (2008). The speed of orthographic processing during lexical decision: Electrophysiological evidence for independent coding of letter identity and letter position in visual word recognition. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 20, 1283-1299.
61. Mason, M. (1982). Recognition time for letters and nonletters: Effects of serial position, array size, and processing order. Journal ofExperimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 8, 724-738.
62. McClelland, J. L., & Rumelhart, D. E. (1981). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: 1. An account of basic findings. Psychological Review, 88, 375-407.
63. McCormick, S. F., Rastle, K., & Davis, M. H. (2008). Is there a "fete" in "fetish"? Effects of orthographic opacity on morpho-orthographic segmentation in visual word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 58, 307-326.
64. Mehta, M. R., Lee, A. K., & Wilson, M. A. (2002). Role of experience and oscillations in transforming a rate code into a temporal code. Nature, 417, 741-746.
65. Mewhort, D. J., Campbell, A. J., Marchetti, F. M., & Campbell, J. I. (1981). Identification, localization, and "iconic memory": An evaluation of the bar-probe task. Memory and Cognition, 9, 50-67.
66. Mewhort, D. J. K., & Campbell, A. J. (1978). Processing spatial information and the selective- masking effect. Perception and Psychophysics, 24, 93-101.
67. New, B., Brysbaert, M., Segui, J., Ferrand, L., & Rastle, K. (2004). The processing of singular and plural nouns in French and English. Journal of Memory and Language, 51, 568-585.
68. Nikolic, D., Haeusler, S., Singer, W., & Maass, W. (2007). Temporal dynamics of information content carried by neurons in the primary visual cortex. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 19, 1041-1048.
69. Norris, D., & Kinoshita, S. (2008). Perception as evidence accumulation and Bayesian inference: Insights from masked priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 137, 434-455.
70. O'Connor, R. E., & Forster, K. I. (1981). Criterion bias and search sequence bias in word recognition. Memory and Cognition, 9, 78-92.
71. Olsen, J. F., & Suga, N. (1991). Combination-sensitive neurons in the medial geniculate body of the mustached bat: Encoding of relative velocity information. Journal of Neurophysiology, 65, 1254-1273.
72. Page, M., & Norris, D. (1998). The primacy model: A new model of immediate serial recall. Psychological Review, 105, 761-781.
73. Perea, M., & Carreiras, M. (2006). Do transposed-letter similarity effects occur at a prelexical phonological level? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59, 1600-1613. (Pubitemid 44180436)
74. Perea, M., & Fraga, I. (2006). Transposed-letter and laterality effects in lexical decision. Brain and Language, 97, 102-109.
75. Perea, M., & Lupker, S. J. (2003a). Does jugde activate COURT? Transposed-letter similarity effects in masked associative priming Memory and Cognition, 31, 829-841.
76. Perea, M., & Lupker, S. J. (2003b). Transposed-letter confusability effects in masked form priming. In S. Kinoshita & S. J. Lupker (Eds.), Masked priming: State of the art (pp. 97-120). Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
77. Perea, M., & Lupker, S. J. (2004). Can CANISO activate CASINO? Transposed-letter similarity effects with nonadjacent letter positions. Journal of Memory and Language, 51, 231-246.
78. Peressotti, F., & Grainger, J. (1999). The role of letter identity and letter position in orthographic priming. Perception and Psychophysics, 61, 691-706.
79. Perry, J. R., Lupker, S. J., & Davis, C. J. (2008). The influence of partial-word primes in a masked prime lexical decision task: An evaluation of the Interactive-Activation model. Language and Cognitive Processes, 23, 36-68.
80. Pitchford, N. J., Ledgeway, T., & Masterson, J. (2008). Effect of orthographic processes in letter position encoding. Journal of Research in Reading, 31, 97-116.
81. Rastle, K., & Davis, M. H. (2008). Morphological decomposition based on the analysis of orthography. Language and Cognitive Processes, 23, 942-971.
82. Rayner, K., White, S., Johnson, R. L., & Liversedge, S. (2006). Raeding wrods with jubmled lettres: There is a cost. Psychological Science, 17, 192-193.
83. Reichardt, W. (1961). Autocorrelation, a principle for the evaluation of sensory information by the central nervous system. In W. A. Rosenblith (Ed.), Sensory communication (pp. 303-317). New York: MIT Press.
84. Schneider, G., Havenith, M. N., & Nikolic, D. (2006). Spatiotemporal structure in large neuronal networks detected from cross-correlation. Neural Computation, 18, 2387-2413.
85. Schoonbaert, S., & Grainger, J. (2004). Letter position coding in printed word perception: Effects of repeated and transposed letters. Language and Cognitive Processes, 19, 333-367.
86. Segui, J., & Grainger, J. (1990). Priming word recognition with orthographic neighbors: Effects of relative prime-target frequency. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16, 65-76.
87. Shackleton, T. M., Skottun, B. C., Arnott, R. H., & Palmer, A. R. (2003). Interaural time difference discrimination thresholds for single neurons in the inferior colliculus of guinea pigs. Journal of Neuroscience, 23, 716-724.
88. Shillcock, R., Ellison, T. M., & Monaghan, P. (2000). Eye-fixation behavior, lexical storage, and visual word recognition in a split processing model. Psychological Review, 107, 824-851.
89. Spironelli, C., Penolazzi, B., Vio, C., & Angrilli, A. (2006). Inverted EEG theta lateralization in dyslexic children during phonological processing. Neuropsychologia, 44, 2814-2821.
90. Stevens, M., & Grainger, J. (2003). Letter visibility and the viewing position effect in visual word recognition. Perception and Psychophysics, 65, 133-151.
91. Taft, M., & Forster, K. I. (1975). Lexical storage and retrieval of prefixed words. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 14, 638-647.
92. Taft, M., & van Graan, F. (1998). Lack of phonological mediation in a semantic categorization task. Journal of Memory and Language, 38, 203-224.
93. Townsend, J. T., Taylor, S. G., & Brown, D. R. (1971). Lateral masking for letters with unlimited viewing time. Perception and Psychophysics, 10, 375-378.
94. Tydgat, I., & Grainger, J. (2009). Serial position effects in the identification of letters, digits and symbols. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 35, 480-498.
95. Van Assche, E., & Grainger, J. (2006). A study of relative-position priming with superset primes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 32, 399-415.
96. Van der Haegen, L., Brysbaert, M., & Davis, C. J. (2009). How does interhemispheric communication work in visual word recognition? Deciding between early and late integration accounts of the split fovea theory. Brain and Language, 108, 112-121.
97. Van Heuven, W J. B., & Grainger, J. (2007). Letter position coding in visual word recognition: The overlap open-bigram model. Talk presented at the XVth meeting of the European Society for Cognitive Psychology, Marseille, France.
98. Van Santen, J. P. H., & Sperling, G. (1985). Elaborated Reichardt detectors. Journal of the Optical Society of America, 2A, 300-320.
99. Welvaert, M., Farioli, F., & Grainger, J. (2008). Graded effects of number of inserted letters in superset priming. Experimental Psychology, 55, 54-63.
100. Whitney, C. (2001). How the brain encodes the order of letters in a printed word: The SERIOL model and selective literature review. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 8, 221-243.
101. Whitney, C. (2004). Investigations into the neural basis of structured representations. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Maryland, College Park, MD.
102. Whitney, C. (2008). A comparison of the SERIOL and SOLAR theories of letter-position encoding. Brain and Language, 107, 170-178.
103. Yin, T. C. T., & Chan, J. C. K. (1990). Interaural time sensitivity in medial superior olive of cat. Journal of Neurophysiology, 64, 465-488.