Do transposed-letter similarity effects occur at a prelexical phonological level?

Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology

Volumn 59, Issue 9, 2006, Pages 1600-1613

  Perea, Manuel ^a   Carreiras, Manuel ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VALENCIA   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSIDAD DE LA LAGUNA   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; DECISION MAKING; HUMAN; LANGUAGE; LINGUISTICS; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PERCEPTION; PHONETICS; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; REACTION TIME; READING; STUDENT;

ASSOCIATION; CUES; DECISION MAKING; HUMANS; LANGUAGE; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PERCEPTUAL MASKING; PHONETICS; REACTION TIME; READING; STUDENTS; VOCABULARY;

EID: 33746831710     PISSN: 17470218     EISSN: 17470226     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/17470210500298880     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Alameda, J. R., & Cuetos, F. (1995). Diccionario de frecuencia de las unidades lingüisticas del castellano. Oviedo, Spain: Universidad de Oviedo.
2. Alvarez, C., Carreiras, M., & Perea, M. (2004). Are syllables phonological units in visual word recognition? Language and Cognitive Processes, 19, 427-452.
3. Andrews, S. (1996). Lexical retrieval and selection processes: Effects of transposed-letter confusability. Journal of Memory and Language, 35, 775-800.
4. Berent, I., & Perfetti, C. A. (1995). A rose is a REEZ: The two cycles model of phonology assembly in reading English. Psychological Review, 102, 146-184.
5. Bruner, J. S., & O'Dowd, D. (1958). A note on the informativeness of parts of words. Language and Speech, 1, 98-101.
6. Caramazza, A., Chialant, D., Capasso, D., & Miceli, G. (2000). Separable processing of consonants and vowels. Nature, 403, 428-430.
7. Carreiras, M., Ferrand, L., Grainger, J., & Perea, M. (2005). Sequential effects of phonological priming in visual word recognition. Psychological Science, 16, 585-589.
8. Carreiras, M., & Perea, M. (2002). Masked priming effects with syllabic neighbors in the lexical decision task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28, 1228-1242.
9. Carreiras, M., & Perea, M. (2004). Naming pseudo-words in Spanish: Effects of syllable frequency. Brain and Language, 90, 393-400.
10. Chambers, S. M. (1979). Letter and order information in lexical access. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18, 225-241.
11. Coltheart, M., Davelaar, E., Jonasson J. F., & Besner, D. (1977). Access to the internal lexicon. In S. Dornic (Ed.), Attention and performance VI (pp. 535-555). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
12. Coltheart, M., Rastle, K., Perry, C., Ziegler, J., & Langdon, R. (2001). DRC: A dual-route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. Psychological Review, 108, 204-256.
13. Davis, C. J. (1999). The self-organising lexical acquisition and recognition (SOLAR) model of visual word recognition. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
14. Davis, C. J. (2005). The SOLAR (self-organising lexical acquisition & recognition) model of visual word identification, Part I: Orthographic input coding and lexical matching. Manuscript submitted for publication.
15. Davis, C. J., & Bowers, J. S. (2004). What do letter migration errors reveal about letter position coding in visual word recognition? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 30, 923-941.
16. Ferrand, L., & Grainger, J. (1994). Effects of orthography are independent of phonology in masked form priming. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47A, 365-382.
17. Forster, K. I., Davis, C., Schoknecht, C., & Carter, R. (1987). Masked priming with graphemically related forms: Repetition or partial activation? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 39, 211-251.
18. Forster, K. I., & Shen, D. (1996). No enemies in the neighborhood: Absence of inhibitory neighborhood effects in lexical decision and semantic categorization. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 696-713.
19. Frost, R. (1998). Towards a strong phonological theory of visual word recognition: True issues and false trails. Psychological Bulletin, 123, 71-99.
20. Frost, R., Ahissar, M., Gottesman, R., & Tayeb, S. (2003). Are phonological effects fragile? The effect of luminance and exposure duration on form priming and phonological priming. Journal of Memory and Language, 48, 346-378.
21. Gómez, P., Perea, M., & Ratcliff, R. (2003, November). The overlap model of the encoding of letter positions. Poster presented at the 45th Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
22. Grainger, J., & Jacobs, A. M. (1996). Orthographic processing in visual word recognition: A multiple read-out model Psychological Review, 103, 518-565.
23. Grainger, J., & van Heuven, W. J. B. (2003). Modeling letter position coding in printed word perception. In P. Bonin (Ed.), The mental lexicon (pp. 1-23). New York: Nova Science.
24. Grainger, J., & Whitney, C. (2004). Does the huamn mnid raed wrods as a wlohe? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 58-59.
25. Lee, H.-W., Rayner, K., & Pollatsek, A. (2001). The relative contribution of consonants and vowels to word identification during reading. Journal of Memory and Language, 44, 189-205.
26. Nespor, M., Peña, M., & Mehler, J. (2003). On the different roles of vowels and consonants in speech processing and language acquisition. Lingua e Linguaggo, 2, 203-229.
27. O'Connor, R. E., & Forster, K. I. (1981). Criterion bias and search sequence bias in word recognition. Memory and Cognition, 9, 78-92.
28. Perea, M., & Carreiras, M. (1998). Effects of syllable frequency and syllable neighborhood frequency in visual word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 134-144.
29. Perea, M., & Lupker, S. J. (2003a). Does jugde activate COURT? Transposed-letter similarity effects in masked associative priming. Memory and Cognition, 31, 829-841.
30. Perea, M., & Lupker, S. J. (2003b). Transposed-letter confusability effects in masked form priming. In S. Kinoshita & S. J. Lupker (Eds.), Masked priming: State of the art (pp. 97-120). Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
31. Perea, M., & Lupker, S. J. (2004). Can CANISO activate CASINO? Transposed-letter similarity effects with nonadjacent letter positions. Journal of Memory and Language, 51, 231-246.
32. Perea, M., & Rosa, E. (2000). Repetition and form priming interact with neighborhood density at a brief stimulus-onset asynchrony. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 7, 668-677.
33. Perea, M., Rosa, E., & Gómez, C. (2005). The frequency effect for pseudowords in the lexical decision task. Perception and Psychophysics, 67, 301-314.
34. Pérez, M. A. (2004). Influencia del orden de adquisition del léxico en el reconocimiento de palabras. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Universidad de Murcia, Murcia, Spain.
35. Pollatsek, A., Lesch, M., Morris, R. K., & Rayner, K. (1992). Phonological codes are used in integrating information across saccades in word identification and reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 148-162.
36. Pollatsek, A., Perea, M., & Carreiras, M. (2005). Does conal prime CANAL more than cinal? Masked phonological priming effects in Spanish with the lexical decision task. Memory and Cognition, 33, 557-565.
37. Rumelhart, D. E., & McClelland, J. L. (1982). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: Part 2. The contextual enhancement effect and some tests and extensions of the model. Psychological Review, 89, 60-94.
38. Schoonbaert, S., & Grainger, J. (2004). Letter position coding in printed word perception: Effects of repeated and transposed letters. Language and Cognitive Processes, 19, 333-367.
39. Sebastián-Gallés, N., Martí, M. A., Carreiras, M., & Cuetos, F. (2000). LEXESP: Léxico informatizado del español. Barcelona, Spain: Edicions Universitat de Barcelona.
40. Whitney, C. (2001). How the brain encodes the order of letters in a printed word: The SERIOL model and selective literature review. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 8, 221-243.
41. Ziegler, J. C., Jacobs, A. M., & Klüppel, D. (2001). Pseudohomophone effects in lexical decision: Still a challenge for current models of word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27, 547-559.