Sequence encoders enable large-scale lexical modeling: Reply to Bowers and Davis (2009)

Cognitive Science

Volumn 33, Issue 7, 2009, Pages 1187-1191

  Sibley, Daragh E ^a   Kello, Christopher T ^b   Plaut, David C ^c   Elman, Jeffrey L ^d  

^a GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Large scale modeling; Orthography; Phonology; Sequence encoder; Wordforms

Indexed keywords

EID: 74049113576     PISSN: 03640213     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1551-6709.2009.01064.x     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Ans, B., Carbonnel, S., & Valdois, S. (1998). A connectionist multiple-trace memory model for polysyllabic word Reading. Psychological Review, 105, 678-723.
2. Balota, D.A., Yap, M.J., Cortese, M.J., Hutchinson, K.I., Kessler, B., Loftis, B., Neely, J.H., Nelson, D.L., Simpson, G.B., & Treiman, R. (2007). The English lexicon project. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 445-459.
3. Binder, J.R., Medler, D.A., Westbury, C.F., Liebenthal, E., & Buchanan, L. (2006). Tuning of the human left fusiform gyrus to sublexical orthographic structure. NeuroImage, 33, 739-748.
4. Bowers, J., & Davis, C. (2009). Learning representations of wordforms with recurrent networks: Comment on Sibley, Kello, Plaut, & Elman. Cognitive Science, 33(7), 1183-1186.
5. Davis, C.J. (1999). The self-organizing lexical acquisition and recognition (SOLAR) model of visual word recognition. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Australia: University of New South Wales.
6. Dehaene, S., Cohen, L., Sigman, M., & Vinckier, F. (2005). The neural code for written words: A proposal. Trends in Cognitive Science, 9(7), 335-341.
7. Kello, C.T. (2006). Considering the junction model of lexical processing. In S. Andrews (Eds.), From Inkmarks to ideas: Current issues in lexical processing. New York: Psychology Press.
8. Plaut, D.C., McClelland, J.L., Seidenberg, M.S., & Patterson, K. (1996). Understanding normal and impaired word reading: Computational principles in quasi-regular domains. Psychological Review, 103, 56-115.
9. Rueckl, J.G., Fang, S., Begosh, K.T., Rimzhim, A., & Tobin, S.J. (2008). Learned internal representations and letter position information: A connectionist approach. Presented at Psychonomics, 2008. Chicago, Illinois.
10. Sibley, D.E. (2008). Large scale modeling of single word reading and recognition. Unpublished PhD thesis. Fairfax, VA: George Mason University.
11. Sibley, D.E., Kello, C.T., Plaut, D.C., & Elman, J.L. (2008). Large-scale modeling of wordform learning and representations. Cognitive Science, 32, 741-754.
12. Sibley, D.E., Kello, C.T., & Seidenberg, M.S. (In press). Learning orthographic and phonological representations in model of monosyllabic and bisyllabic naming. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology.