Toward the dynamic interactome: It's about time

Briefings in Bioinformatics

Volumn 11, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 15-29

  Przytycka, Teresa M ^a   Singh, Mona ^b,c   Slonim, Donna K ^d  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH   (United States)

^b Tufts University   (United States)

^c TUFTS UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^d Princeton University   (United States)

Author keywords

Interaction networks; Network analysis; Network dynamics; Systems biology

Indexed keywords

PROTEIN;

CHEMISTRY; REVIEW; SYSTEMS BIOLOGY;

PROTEINS; SYSTEMS BIOLOGY;

EID: 77950353931     PISSN: 14675463     EISSN: 14774054     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/bib/bbp057     Document Type: Article

References (181)

1. Ito T, Chiba T, Ozawa R, et al. A comprehensive two-hybrid analysis to explore the yeast protein interactome. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2001;98:4569-74.
2. Uetz P, Giot L, Cagney G, et al. A comprehensive analysis of protein-protein interactions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nature 2000;403:623-7.
3. Ho Y, Gruhler A, Heilbut A, et al. Systematic identification of protein complexes in Saccharomycescerevisiae by mass spectrometry. Nature 2002;415:180-3.
4. Gavin AC, Aloy P, Grandi P, et al. Proteome survey reveals modularity of the yeast cell machinery. Nature 2006;440: 631-6.
5. Krogan NJ, Cagney G, Yu H, et al. Global landscape of protein complexes in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nature 2006;440:637-43.
6. Giot L, Bader JS, Brouwer C, et al. A protein interaction map of Drosophila melanogaster. Science 2003;302:1727-36.
7. Li S, Armstrong CM, Bertin N, et al. A map of the interactome network of the metazoan C. elegans. Science 2004; 303:540-3.
8. Rual JF, Venkatesan K, Hao T, et al. Towards a proteome-scale map of the human protein-protein interaction network. Nature 2005;437:1173-8.
9. Rain JC, Selig L, De Reuse H, et al. The protein-protein interaction map of Helicobacter pylori. Nature 2001;409: 211-5.
10. Harbison CT, Gordon DB, Lee TI, et al. Transcriptional regulatory code of a eukaryotic genome. Nature 2004;431: 99-104.
11. Lee TI, Rinaldi NJ, Robert F, et al. Transcriptional regulatory networks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Science 2002;298: 799-804.
12. Ptacek J, Devgan G, Michaud G, et al. Global analysis of protein phosphorylation in yeast. Nature 2005;438:679-84.
13. Aittokallio T, Schwikowski B. Graph-based methods for analysing networks in cell biology. Brief Bioinform 2006;7: 243-55.
14. Zhu X, Gerstein M, Snyder M. Getting connected: analysis and principles of biological networks. Genes Dev 2007;21: 1010-24.
15. Kanehisa M, Goto S. KEGG: kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes. Nucleic Acids Res 2000;28:27-30.
16. Tyson JJ, Chen K, Novak B. Network dynamics and cell physiology. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2001;2:908-16.
17. Tyson JJ, Chen KC, Novak B. Sniffers, buzzers, toggles and blinkers: dynamics of regulatory and signaling pathways in the cell. Curr Opin Cell Biol 2003;15:221-31.
18. de Jong H. Modeling and simulation of genetic regulatory systems: a literature review. J Comput Biol 2002;9:67-103.
19. Ruths D, Muller M, Tseng JT, et al. The signaling petri net-based simulator: a non-parametric strategy for characterizing the dynamics of cell-specific signaling networks. PLoS Comput Biol 2008;4:e1000005.
20. Zielinski R, Przytycki PF, Zheng J, et al. The crosstalk between EGF, IGF, and Insulin cell signaling pathways-computational and experimental analysis. BMC Syst Biol 2009;3:88.
21. Rubinstein A, Gurevich V, Kasulin-Boneh Z, et al. Faithful modeling of transient expression and its application to elucidating negative feedback regulation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2007;104:6241-6.
22. Aldridge BB, Saez-Rodriguez J, Muhlich JL, et al. Fuzzy logic analysis of kinase pathway crosstalk in TNF/EGF/insulin-induced signaling. PLoS Comput Biol 2009;5: e1000340.
23. Thakar J, Pilione M, Kirimanjeswara G, et al. Modeling systems-level regulation of host immune responses. PLoS Comput Biol 2007;3:e109.
24. De Jong H, Gouze JL, Hernandez C, et al. Qualitative simulation of genetic regulatory networks using piece-wise-linear models. Bull Math Biol 2004;66:301-40.
25. Albert I, Thakar J, Li S, et al. Boolean network simulations for life scientists. Source Code Biol Med 2008;3:16.
26. Zhang R, Shah MV, Yang J, et al. Network model of survival signaling in large granular lymphocyte leukemia. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2008;105:16308-13.
27. Fields S, Song O. A novel genetic system to detect protein-protein interactions. Nature 1989;340:245-6.
28. Collins MO, Choudhary JS. Mapping multiprotein complexes by affinity purification and mass spectrometry. Curr Opin Biotechnol 2008;19:324-30.
29. Kim TH, Ren B. Genome-wide analysis of protein-DNA interactions. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet 2006;7:81-102.
30. Johnson DS, Mortazavi A, Myers RM, et al. Genome-wide mapping of in vivo protein-DNA interactions. Science 2007; 316:1497-1502.
31. Ni L, Bruce C, Hart C, et al. Dynamic and complex transcription factor binding during an inducible response in yeast. Genes Dev 2009;23:1351-63.
32. Jakobsen JS, Braun M, Astorga J, et al. Temporal ChIP-on-chip reveals Biniou as a universal regulator of the visceral muscle transcriptional network. Genes Dev 2007;21: 2448-60.
33. Steffen M, Petti A, Aach J, et al. Automated modelling of signal transduction networks. BMC Bioinform 2002;3:34.
34. Scott J, Ideker T, Karp RM, et al. Efficient algorithms for detecting signaling pathways in protein interaction networks. J Comput Biol 2006;13:133-44.
35. Supper J, Spangenberg L, Planatscher H, et al. BowTieBuilder: modeling signal transduction pathways. BMC Syst Biol 2009;3:67.
36. Csete M, Doyle J. Bow ties, metabolism and disease. Trends Biotechnol 2004;22:446-50.
37. Banks E, Nabieva E, Peterson R, et al. NetGrep: fast network schema searches in interactomes. Genome Biol 2008;9: R138.
38. Banks E, Nabieva E, Chazelle B, et al. Organization of physical interactomes as uncovered by network schemas. PLoS Comput Biol 2008;4:e1000203.
39. Zotenko E, Guimaraes KS, Jothi R, et al. Decomposition of overlapping protein complexes: a graph theoretical method for analyzing static and dynamic protein associations. Algorithms Mol Biol 2006;1:7.
40. Gavril F. The intersection graphs of subtrees in trees are exactly the chordal graphs. J Comb Theory: Ser B 1974;16: 47-56.
41. Monma CL, Wei VK. Intersection graphs of paths in a tree. J Comb Theory: Ser B 1986;41:141-81.
42. Kelley BP, Sharan R, Karp RM, et al. Conserved pathways within bacteria and yeast as revealed by global protein network alignment. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2003;100: 11394-9.
43. Koyuturk M, Kim Y, Topkara U, et al. Pairwise alignment of protein interaction networks. J Comput Biol 2006;13: 182-99.
44. Sharan R, Suthram S, Kelley RM, et al. Conserved patterns of protein interaction in multiple species. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2005;102:1974-9.
45. Flannick J, Novak A, Srinivasan BS, et al. Graemlin: general and robust alignment of multiple large interaction networks. Genome Res 2006;16:1169-81.
46. Singh R, Xu J, Berger B. Global alignment of multiple protein interaction networks with application to functional orthology detection. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2008;105: 12763-8.
47. Sharan R, Ideker T. Modeling cellular machinery through biological network comparison. Nat Biotechnol 2006;24: 427-33.
48. Ideker T, Ozier O, Schwikowski B, et al. Discovering regulatory and signalling circuits in molecular interaction networks. Bioinformatics 2002;18(Suppl 1):S233-40.
49. Cabusora L, Sutton E, Fulmer A, et al. Differential network expression during drug and stress response. Bioinformatics 2005;21:2898-2905.
50. Guo Z, Li Y, Gong X, et al. Edge-based scoring and searching method for identifying condition-responsive protein-protein interaction sub-network. Bioinformatics 2007;23: 2121-8.
51. Ulitsky I, Shamir R. Identification of functional modules using network topology and high-throughput data. BMC Syst Biol 2007;1:8.
52. Yeang CH, Ideker T, Jaakkola T. Physical network models. J Comput Biol 2004;11:243-62.
53. Yeang CH, Mak HC, McCuine S, et al. Validation and refinement of gene-regulatory pathways on a network of physical interactions. Genome Biol 2005;6:R62.
54. Ourfali O, Shlomi T, Ideker T, et al. SPINE: a framework for signaling-regulatory pathway inference from cause-effect experiments. Bioinformatics 2007;23:i359-66.
55. Singh R, Berger B. Influence flow: integrating pathway-specific RNAi data and protein interaction data. PLoS track at ISMB/ECCB. Cambridge, UK: PLoS, 2007.
56. Tu Z, Argmann C, Wong KK, et al. Integrating siRNA and protein-protein interaction data to identify an expanded insulin signaling network. Genome Res 2009;19: 1057-67.
57. Jones TR, Carpenter AE, Lamprecht MR, et al. Scoring diverse cellular morphologies in image-based screens with iterative feedback and machine learning. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2009;106:1826-31.
58. Moffat J, Grueneberg DA, Yang X, et al. A lentiviral RNAi library for human and mouse genes applied to an arrayed viral high-content screen. Cell 2006;124: 1283-98.
59. Beyer A, Bandyopadhyay S, Ideker T. Integrating physical and genetic maps: from genomes to interaction networks. Nat Rev Genet 2007;8:699-710.
60. Bumgarner RE, Yeung KY. Methods for the inference of biological pathways and networks. Methods Mol Biol 2009; 541:225-45.
61. Friedman N. Inferring cellular networks using probabilistic graphical models. Science 2004;303:799-805.
62. D'Haeseleer P, Liang S, Somogyi R. Genetic network inference: from co-expression clustering to reverse engineering. Bioinformatics 2000;16:707-26.
63. Pe'er D, Regev A, Elidan G, et al. Inferring subnetworks from perturbed expression profiles. Bioinformatics 2001; 17(Suppl 1):S215-24.
64. Margolin AA, Nemenman I, Basso K, et al. ARACNE: an algorithm for the reconstruction of gene regulatory networks in a mammalian cellular context. BMC Bioinform 2006;7(Suppl 1):S7.
65. Margolin AA, Wang K, Lim WK, et al. Reverse engineering cellular networks. Nat Protoc 2006;1:662-71.
66. Friedman N, Linial M, Nachman I, et al. Using Bayesian networks to analyze expression data. J Comput Biol 2000;7: 601-20.
67. Hartemink AJ, Gifford DK, Jaakkola TS, et al. Using graphical models and genomic expression data to statistically validate models of genetic regulatory networks. Pac Symp Biocomput 2001;6:422-33.
68. Sachs K, Perez O, Pe'er D, et al. Causal protein-signaling networks derived from multiparameter single-cell data. Science 2005;308:523-9.
69. Baym M, Bakal C, Perrimon N, et al. High resolution modeling of cellular signaling networks. RECOMB 2008. Singapore:;257-71.
70. Friedman N, Murphy K, Russell S. Learning the structure of dynamic probabilistic networks. Proceedings of the 14th Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence. San Mateo: Morgan Kaufmann, 1998;139-47.
71. Murphy K, Mian S. Modeling Gene Expression Data using Bayesian Networks. Technical Report, Computer Science Division. Berkeley, CA: University of California.
72. Ong IM, Glasner JD, Page D. Modelling regulatory pathways in E. coli from time series expression profiles. Bioinformatics 2002;18(Suppl 1):S241-8.
73. Kim SY, Imoto S, Miyano S. Inferring gene networks from time series microarray data using dynamic Bayesian networks. Brief Bioinform 2003;4:228-35.
74. Butte AJ, Kohane IS. Mutual information relevance networks: functional genomic clustering using pairwise entropy measurements. Pac Symp Biocomput 2000;5:415-26.
75. Lee HK, Hsu AK, Sajdak J, et al. Coexpression analysis of human genes across many microarray data sets. Genome Res 2004;14:1085-94.
76. Stuart JM, Segal E, Koller D, et al. A gene-coexpression network for global discovery of conserved genetic modules. Science 2003;302:249-55.
77. Choi JK, Yu U, Yoo OJ, et al. Differential coexpression analysis using microarray data and its application to human cancer. Bioinformatics 2005;21:4348-55.
78. Kostka D, Spang R. Finding disease specific alterations in the co-expression of genes. Bioinformatics 2004;20(Suppl 1): i194-9.
79. Fang G, Kuang R, Pandey G, et al. Subspace differential coexpression analysis: problem definition and a general approach. Pac Sympos Biocomput 2010;15:145-56.
80. Ahmed A, Xing EP. Recovering time-varying networks of dependencies in social and biological studies. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2009;106:11878-83.
81. Song L, Kolar M, Xing EP. KELLER: estimating time-varying interactions between genes. Bioinformatics 2009;25: i128-36.
82. Cheng Y, Church GM. Biclustering of expression data. Proc Int Conf Intell Syst Mol Biol 2000;8:93-103.
83. Madeira SC, Oliveira AL. Biclustering algorithms for biological data analysis: a survey. IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform 2004;1:24-45.
84. Segal E, Shapira M, Regev A, et al. Module networks: identifying regulatory modules and their condition-specific regulators from gene expression data. Nat Genet 2003;34: 166-76.
85. Bonneau R, Reiss DJ, Shannon P, et al. The Inferelator: an algorithm for learning parsimonious regulatory networks from systems-biology data sets de novo. Genome Biol 2006;7:R36.
86. Lemmens K, De Bie T, Dhollander T, et al. DISTILLER: a data integration framework to reveal condition dependency of complex regulons in Escherichia coli. Genome Biol 2009;10: R27.
87. de Bivort B, Huang S, Bar-Yam Y. Empirical multiscale networks of cellular regulation. PLoS Comput Biol 2007;3: 1968-78.
88. Cooke EJ, Savage RS, Wild DL. Computational approaches to the integration of gene expression: ChIP-chip and sequence data in the inference of gene regulatory networks. Semin Cell Dev Biol 2009;20:863-8.
89. Bromberg KD, Ma'ayan A, Neves SR, et al. Design logic of a cannabinoid receptor signaling network that triggers neurite outgrowth. Science 2008;320:903-9.
90. Baugh LR, Hill AA, Claggett JM, et al. The homeodomain protein PAL-1 specifies a lineage-specific regulatory network in the C. elegans embryo. Development 2005;132: 1843-54.
91. Liao JC, Boscolo R, Yang YL, et al. Network component analysis: reconstruction of regulatory signals in biological systems. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2003;100:15522-7.
92. Seok J, Xiao W, Moldawer LL, et al. A dynamic network of transcription in LPS-treated human subjects. BMC Syst Biol 2009;3:78.
93. Ye C, Galbraith SJ, Liao JC, et al. Using network component analysis to dissect regulatory networks mediated by transcription factors in yeast. PLoS Comput Biol 2009;5: e1000311.
94. Ernst J, Vainas O, Harbison CT, et al. Reconstructing dynamic regulatory maps. Mol Syst Biol 2007;3:74.
95. Ucar D, Beyer A, Parthasarathy S, et al. Predicting functionality of protein-DNA interactions by integrating diverse evidence. Bioinformatics 2009;25:i137-44.
96. Luscombe NM, Babu MM, Yu H, et al. Genomic analysis of regulatory network dynamics reveals large topological changes. Nature 2004;431:308-12.
97. Chechik G, Oh E, Rando O, et al. Activity motifs reveal principles of timing in transcriptional control of the yeast metabolic network. Nat Biotechnol 2008;26:1251-9.
98. Shen-Orr SS, Milo R, Mangan S, et al. Network motifs in the transcriptional regulation network of Escherichia coli. Nat Genet 2002;31:64-8.
99. Milo R, Itzkovitz S, Kashtan N, et al. Superfamilies of evolved and designed networks. Science 2004;303: 1538-42.
100. Chechik G, Koller D. Timing of gene expression responses to environmental changes. J Comput Biol 2009;16: 279-90.
101. Alexander RP, Kim PM, Emonet T, et al. Understanding modularity in molecular networks requires dynamics. Sci Signal 2009;2:pe44.
102. Alon U. Network motifs: theory and experimental approaches. Nat Rev Genet 2007;8:450-61.
103. Ma'ayan A, Jenkins SL, Neves S, et al. Formation of Regulatory Patterns During Signal Propagation in a Mammalian Cellular Network. Science 2005;309:1078-83.
104. Balazsi G, Barabasi AL, Oltvai ZN. Topological units of environmental signal processing in the transcriptional regulatory network of Escherichia coli. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2005;102:7841-6.
105. Ma HW, Buer J, Zeng AP. Hierarchical structure and modules in the Escherichia coli transcriptional regulatory network revealed by a new top-down approach. BMC Bioinform 2004;5:199.
106. Yu H, Gerstein M. Genomic analysis of the hierarchical structure of regulatory networks. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2006;103:14724-31.
107. Jothi R, Balaji S, Wuster A, et al. Genomic analysis reveals a tight link between transcription factor dynamics and regulatory network architecture. Mol Syst Biol 2009;5:294.
108. de Lichtenberg U, Jensen LJ, Brunak S, et al. Dynamic complex formation during the yeast cell cycle. Science 2005;307:724-27.
109. Komurov K, White M. Revealing static and dynamic modular architecture of the eukaryotic protein interaction network. Mol Syst Biol 2007;3:110.
110. Han JD, Bertin N, Hao T, et al. Evidence for dynamically organized modularity in the yeast protein-protein interaction network. Nature 2004;430:88-93.
111. Yu H, Braun P, Yildirim MA, et al. High-quality binary protein interaction map of the yeast interactome network. Science 2008;322:104-10.
112. Batada NN, Reguly T, Breitkreutz A, et al. Stratus not altocumulus: a new view of the yeast protein interaction network. PLoS Biol 2006;4:e317.
113. Batada NN, Reguly T, Breitkreutz A, et al. Still stratus not altocumulus: further evidence against the date/party hub distinction. PLoS Biol 2007;5:e154.
114. Schmid EM, McMahon HT. Integrating molecular and network biology to decode endocytosis. Nature 2007;448: 883-8.
115. Jeong H, Mason SP, Barabasi AL, et al. Lethality and centrality in protein networks. Nature 2001;411:41-2.
116. Missiuro PV, Liu K, Zou L, et al. Information flow analysis of interactome networks. PLoS Comput Biol 2009;5: e1000350.
117. Yu H, Greenbaum D, Xin Lu H, et al. Genomic analysis of essentiality within protein networks. Trends Genet 2004;20: 227-31.
118. Hahn MW, Kern AD. Comparative genomics of centrality and essentiality in three eukaryotic protein-interaction networks. MolBiolEvol2005;22:803-6.
119. Batada NN, Hurst LD, Tyers M. Evolutionary and physiological importance of hub proteins. PLoS Comput Biol 2006; 2:e88.
120. He X, Zhang J. Why do hubs tend to be essential in protein networks? PLoS Genet 2006;2:e88.
121. Yu H, Kim PM, Sprecher E, et al. The importance of bottlenecks in protein networks: correlation with gene essentiality and expression dynamics. PLoS Comput Biol 2007;3:e59.
122. Zotenko E, Mestre J, O'Leary DP, et al. Why do hubs in the yeast protein interaction network tend to be essential: reexamining the connection between the network topology and essentiality. PLoS Comput Biol 2008; 4:e1000140.
123. Fraser HB, Plotkin JB. Using protein complexes to predict phenotypic effects of gene mutation. Genome Biol 2007;8: R252.
124. Hart GT, Lee I, Marcotte ER. A high-accuracy consensus map of yeast protein complexes reveals modular nature of gene essentiality. BMC Bioinform 2007;8:236.
125. Bandyopadhyay S, Kelley R, Krogan NJ, et al. Functional maps of protein complexes from quantitative genetic interaction data. PLoS Comput Biol 2008;4:e1000065.
126. Pache RA, Babu MM, Aloy P. Exploiting gene deletion fitness effects in yeast to understand the modular architecture of protein complexes under different growth conditions. BMC Syst Biol 2009;3:74.
127. Wang H, Kakaradov B, Collins SR, et al. A complex-based reconstruction of the S. cerevisiae interactome. Mol Cell Proteomics 2009;8:1361-81.
128. Janga SC, Babu MM. Transcript stability in the protein interaction network of Escherichia coli. Mol Biosyst 2009;5: 154-62.
129. Ito T, Chiba T, Ozawa R, et al. A comprehensive two-hybrid analysis to explore the yeast protein interactome. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2001;98:4569-74.
130. Tong AH, Evangelista M, Parsons AB, et al. Systematic genetic analysis with ordered arrays of yeast deletion mutants. Science 2001;294:2364-8.
131. Kelley R, Ideker T. Systematic interpretation of genetic interactions using protein networks. Nat Biotechnol 2005; 23:561-6.
132. Collins SR, Miller KM, Maas NL, et al. Functional dissection of protein complexes involved in yeast chromosome biology using a genetic interaction map. Nature 2007;446:806-10.
133. Roguev A, Wiren M, Weissman JS, et al. High-throughput genetic interaction mapping in the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Nat Methods 2007;4:861-6.
134. Ulitsky I, Shamir R. Pathway redundancy and protein essentiality revealed in the Saccharomyces cerevisiae interaction networks. Mol Syst Biol 2007;3:104.
135. Ma X, Tarone AM, Li W. Mapping genetically compensatory pathways from synthetic lethal interactions in yeast. PLoS ONE 2008;3:e1922.
136. Ulitsky I, Shlomi T, Kupiec M, et al. From E-MAPs to module maps: dissecting quantitative genetic interactions using physical interactions. Mol Syst Biol 2008;4:209.
137. Brady A, Maxwell K, Daniels N, et al. Fault tolerance in protein interaction networks: stable bipartite subgraphs and redundant pathways. PLoS ONE 2009;4:e5364.
138. Hescott BJ, Leiserson MDM, Cowen LJ, et al. Evaluating between-pathway models with expression data. Res Comp Mol Biol Proc 2009;5541:372-85.
139. Jansen RC, Nap JP. Genetical genomics: the added value from segregation. Trends Genet 2001;17:388-91.
140. Yvert G, Brem RB, Whittle J, et al. Trans-acting regulatory variation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and the role of transcription factors. Nat Genet 2003;35:57-64.
141. Brem RB, Kruglyak L. The landscape of genetic complexity across 5,700 gene expression traits in yeast. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2005;102:1572-7.
142. Brem RB, Storey JD, Whittle J, et al. Genetic interactions between polymorphisms that affect gene expression in yeast. Nature 2005;436:701-3.
143. Klose J, Nock C, Herrmann M, et al. Genetic analysis of the mouse brain proteome. Nat Genet 2002;30:385-93.
144. Chesler EJ, Lu L, Shou S, et al. Complex trait analysis of gene expression uncovers polygenic and pleiotropic networks that modulate nervous system function. Nat Genet 2005;37:233-42.
145. Monks SA, Leonardson A, Zhu H, et al. Genetic inheritance of gene expression in human cell lines. Am J Hum Genet 2004;75:1094-105.
146. Cheung VG, Spielman RS, Ewens KG, et al. Mapping determinants of human gene expression by regional and genome-wide association. Nature 2005;437:1365-9.
147. Stranger BE, Forrest MS, Clark AG, et al. Genome-wide associations of gene expression variation in humans. PLoS Genet 2005;1:e78.
148. Kulp DC, Jagalur M. Causal inference of regulator-target pairs by gene mapping of expression phenotypes. BMC Genomics 2006;7:125.
149. Tu Z, Wang L, Arbeitman MN, et al. An integrative approach for causal gene identification and gene regulatory pathway inference. Bioinformatics 2006;22:e489-96.
150. Sun W, Yu T, Li KC. Detection of eQTL modules mediated by activity levels of transcription factors. Bioinformatics 2007;23:2290-7.
151. Suthram S, Beyer A, Karp RM, et al. eQED: an efficient method for interpreting eQTL associations using protein networks. Mol Syst Biol 2008;4:162.
152. Li H, Chen H, Bao L, et al. Integrative genetic analysis of transcription modules: towards filling the gap between genetic loci and inherited traits. Hum Mol Genet 2006;15: 481-92.
153. Sampson JN, Self SG. Identifying trait clusters by linkage profiles: application in genetical genomics. Bioinformatics 2008;24:958-64.
154. Zhu J, Zhang B, Smith EN, et al. Integrating large-scale functional genomic data to dissect the complexity of yeast regulatory networks. Nat Genet 2008;40:854-61.
155. Lee SI, Dudley AM, Drubin D, et al. Learning a priori on regulatory potential from eQTL data. PLoS Genet 2009;5: e1000358.
156. Litvin O, Causton HC, Chen BJ, et al. Modularity and interactions in the genetics of gene expression. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2009;106:6441-6.
157. Zhu J, Lum PY, Lamb J, et al. An integrative genomics approach to the reconstruction of gene networks in segregating populations. Cytogenet Genome Res 2004;105: 363-74.
158. Bing N, Hoeschele I. Genetical genomics analysis of a yeast segregant population for transcription network inference. Genetics 2005;170:533-42.
159. Li H, Lu L, Manly KF, et al. Inferring gene transcriptional modulatory relations: a genetical genomics approach. Hum Mol Genet 2005;14:1119-25.
160. Liu B, de la Fuente A, Hoeschele I. Gene network inference via structural equation modeling in genetical genomics experiments. Genetics 2008;178:1763-76.
161. Huang Y, Zheng J, Przytycka T. Discovery of regulatory mechanisms by genome-wide from gene expression variation by eQTL analyisis. In: Lonardi S, Chen JY, (eds). Biological Data Mining. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 2009; 205-28.
162. Schadt EE. Exploiting naturally occurring DNA variation and molecular profiling data to dissect disease and drug response traits. Curr Opin Biotechnol 2005;16:647-54.
163. Storey JD, Tibshirani R. Statistical significance for genomewide studies. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2003;100: 9440-5.
164. Huang Y, Wuchty S, Ferdig MT, et al. Graph theoretical approach to study eQTL: a case study of Plasmodium falciparum. Bioinformatics 2009;25:i15-20.
165. Schadt EE, Lamb J, Yang X, et al. An integrative genomics approach to infer causal associations between gene expression and disease. Nat Genet 2005;37:710-7.
166. Cordell HJ. Genome-wide association studies: detecting gene-gene interactions that underlie human diseases. Nat Rev Genet 2009;10:392-404.
167. Hunter DJ. Gene-environment interactions in human diseases. Nat Rev Genet 2005;6:287-98.
168. Kouzine F, Levens D. Supercoil-driven DNA structures regulate genetic transactions. Front Biosci 2007;12:4409-23.
169. Kouzine F, Sanford S, Elisha-Feil Z, et al. The functional response of upstream DNA to dynamic supercoiling in vivo. Nat Struct Mol Biol 2008;15:146-54.
170. Cheung KJ, Badarinarayana V, Selinger DW, et al. A microarray-based antibiotic screen identifies a regulatory role for supercoiling in the osmotic stress response of Escherichia coli. Genome Res 2003;13:206-15.
171. Marr C, Geertz M, Hutt MT, et al. Dissecting the logical types of network control in gene expression profiles. BMC Syst Biol 2008;2:18.
172. Piston DW, Kremers GJ. Fluorescent protein FRET: the good, the bad and the ugly. Trends Biochem Sci 2007;32: 407-14.
173. Kentner D, Sourjik V. Dynamic map of protein interactions in the Escherichia coli chemotaxis pathway. Mol Syst Biol 2009;5:238.
174. Cristea IM, Carroll JW, Rout MP, et al. Tracking and elucidating alphavirus-host protein interactions. J Biol Chem 2006;281:30269-78.
175. Tarassov K, Messier V, Landry CR, et al. Anin vivo map of the yeast protein interactome. Science 2008;320:1465-70.
176. Kleinberg J. Small-world phenomena and the dynamics of information. Adv Neural Inform Process Syst (NIPS) 2001;14: 431-8.
177. Breiger RL, Carley KM, Pattison P. Dynamic Social Network Analysis: Workshop Summary and Papers. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2002.
178. Kempe D, Kleinberg J, Kumar A. Connectivity and inference problems for temporal networks. J Comput Syst Sci 2002;64:820-42.
179. Kempe D, Kleinberg J, Tardos E. Maximizing the spread of influence through a social network. Proceeding of the 9th ACM SIGKDD Intl. Conf. on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. New York, NY: ACM Press, 2003; 137-46.
180. Leskovec J, Kleinberg J, Faloutsos C. Graphs over time: densification laws, shrinking diameters and possible explanations. Proceedings of the 11th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery in Data Mining. IL USA: ACM, Chicago, 2005;177-87.
181. Tantipathananandh C, Berger-Wolf T, Kempe D. A frame-work for community identification in dynamic social networks. Proceedings of the 13th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. CA, USA: ACM, San Jose, 2007;717-26.